...from filthy rags to righteous fruit


Transubstantiation

TRANSUBSTANTIATION 


How low can you go?

Is the flesh of Yahushua of any use to us now?

Was it prophesied that Yahushua would offer literal blood drink offerings?

(first published 04-10-20    updated 29-05-21)   
("pw" in brackets refers to "pagan word")
   

The heresy of transubstantiation is defined by Catholics as:

"The change of substance by which bread and wine offered in the sacrifice of the sacrament of the Eucharist during the mass become, in reality, the body and blood of Jesus Christ"

The practice of transubstantiation is evil in every way. Directly inspired by Satan, this Catholic doctrine was only invented 1215 years after the death of our savior Yahushua. It is nowhere commanded in the scriptures but rather warned against in our scriptures.

Five years later the Catholic church would introduce further idolatry with the "adoration of the wafer host" in their "Eucharist" invention.


BREAD AND WINE - SYMBOL OR REAL FLESH AND BLOOD?

"The Council of Trent proclaimed that the belief in transubstantiation is essential to salvation and pronounced curses on any who would deny it. The Council ordered pastors to explain that not only did the elements of the Mass contain flesh, bones, and nerves as a part of Christ, "but also a WHOLE CHRIST." The Catholic Encyclopedia says, "The dogma of the totality of the Real Presence means that in each individual species the WHOLE CHRIST, flesh and blood, body and soul, Divinity and humanity, is really present."
ref The religion of the Mass "Sun Worship" www.granddesignexposed.com

Scripture makes it immediately clear that the Catholic dogma of Transubstantiation is a lie and heresy. In Corinthians Shaul (Paul ) says:

1Co 11:26  For as often as ye eat this bread, and drink this cup, ye do shew*  the Master's (pw Lord's) death till he come.

shew
Greek G2605
καταγγέλλω
kataggellō
kat-ang-gel'-lo
From G2596 and the base of G32; to proclaim, promulgate: - declare, preach, shew, speak of, teach.

The bread and wine are symbols of the good message (Hebrew-malkut) (pw gospel) they "kantanggello" / speak of the Master's death.  "kantanggello" always refers to preaching the good message not somehow reenacting the whole of the good message.
 If we teach, preach declare or proclaim the Master's death by eating the bread and wine it means we are  memorializing his death which took place over 2000 years ago. One thus acknowledges that he died for our Torah transgressions. A secular tradition with some is to lower a flag when an important person dies. So, it can be said that act of  flag lowering would  "kantangello" / speak or show that person's death. Does it mean that that person died again?

By eating bread and wine we do not reenact or repeat a real death of the Master in any way. If something speaks of an event that something is a symbol it is not the event itself
, period!

If this short answer does not convince you and cause you to repent if you are a Catholic then you are welcome to read on.

PERPETUAL SACRIFICE?

Catholics will tell me that Yahushua's offering (pw Jesus's sacrifice) is eternal ie ongoing because he was slain from the beginning of the world. Their doctrine is based on  a perverted interpretation of this verse:

1Pe 1:20  Who verily was FOREORDAINED before the foundation of the world, but was manifest in these last times for you.

They then go on to say "sacrifice in the cross happened even before the world was created"

But is this what the scriptures are saying? They obviously have a bad command of the language. What does "foreordained" mean here?

Strong's Concordance:

Greek proginōskō
prog-in-oce'-ko
From G4253 and G1097; to know beforehand, that is, foresee: - foreknow (ordain), know (before).

It is clear that the all-knowing (omniscient) Yahuah Elohim knew beforehand what he had planned. He would bring forth His first begotten Son and that Son would then willingly offer his life for us. He would redeem us and then raise His Son back to life as the last Adam. This was all known before, not done before. 1 Pe 1:20 says this preconceived idea or plan of Yahuah was only manifest in the last days. Manifest means revealed by the final act being accomplished. Yahushua then explained his Father's pre-planned manifestation to the disciples following His resurrection.

This teaching of a preplanned salvation is in harmony with Ephesians

Eph 1:5  Having predetermined (proorozo) us unto the adoption of children by Yahushua Ha Mashiak (pw Jesus Christ) to himself, according to the good pleasure of his will

proginosko (preplanned) and propprozo (predetermined) are tied together. These have nothing to do with something that was already happening.

Where does the false idea of eternal (ongoing) offering come into it? It is via word play.

His offering is only eternal in that Yahushua is raised to life eternal and it is eternal only in that it is the one and only offering needed. But it is not eternal in the sense that Yahushua is to be offered (pw sacrificed) eternally (ongoing) - he is NOT DEAD. The Catholic papa, the pope, would like to think He is. He thinks Yahushua will not return and send him into yam esh (lake of fire) for his filthy torahless acts. If he did believe it he would be repenting and obeying Torah that Yahushua preached. We know the Catholic church does not even believe in the 7 day creation in any case and preaches evolution. So this would mean that Yahushua was being "sacrificed" for millions and millions of years before some monkey allegedly turned into a "human" sinner. Wow - talk about over imaginative sadism. (Ten Ways Darwin Got it Wrong ).

TYPOLOGY:

This erroneous Catholic heresy is further broken asunder by typology which appears throughout the Bible and consists of many anti-types and types. The anti-type is always greater than the type eg  Melchezidek a type and Yahushua the anti-type, the real priestly ruler.

Psa 110:4  Yahuah hath sworn, and will not repent, Thou [Yahushua] art a priest for ever after the order of Melchizedek.

Another example is Isaac who was to be offered up by his Father Abraham. Isaac is the type and the greater is the anti-type - Yahushua who was REALLY offered up by his Father anti-type (father Abraham again being a type). If Yahshua's offering (pw  sacrifice) were eternal Isaac should have been offered up by Abraham but he was not since it was a symbol, a foreshadow (type). Similarly the eating of the BREAD AND WINE are FORESHADOWS (types) of the offering of Yahushua - he had not yet offered his body, NO OFFERING had taken place. So the very first example of the the bread and wine with Yahushua and his disciples was a symbol for what was to come. Yahushua would only die hours later.

HOW MANY 'THIRD' DAYS, HOW MANY RESURRECTIONS?

Luk 24:7  Saying, The Son of man must be delivered into the hands of torahless (pw sinful) men, and be impaled, and the third day rise again.

Now which day is this third day if Yahushua is meant to be dying every day eternally??? The words are "and be impaled". This is a future event which happened on a stake (stauros) / tree( no cross). Please take note this is not continuous tense. If this is a daily event then there can be no third day of resurrection either. We know that the Catholics contradict this very thing by claiming to remember a yearly resurrection, albeit a fake one, attached to pagan Ishtar (Easter) rather than Pesach (Passover). Now they cannot have it all their way, a real daily death and a real daily resurrection and a yearly resurrection. It simply does not happen.

"TOUTO MOU ESTIN TO SOMA"

1Co 11:24  And when he had given thanks, he brake it, and said, Take, eat: this is my body, which is broken for you: this do in remembrance of me.

Their next claim is that Yahushua is saying  here that "this is really my body and blood."

Wrong! it is not literal but figurative as defined by

STRONG"S GREEK :  soma =  the body (as a sound whole), used in a very wide application, literally or figuratively. 

Next they will tell us that John the Immerser was literally Elijah reincarnated or something stupid like that.

No Elijah was the type and John, being greater, was the Elijah anti-type. Reincarnation heresy is big with the Catholic cult which  syncretises with Babylonian mystery cults such as Hinduism especially since Vatican II.

Mat 11:11  Verily I say unto you, Among them that are born of women there hath not risen a greater than John the Baptist: notwithstanding he that is least in the rule and reign (pw kingdom) of shamayim (pw heaven) is greater than he.

FIGURATIVE CONFUSION, LITERALLY

The Catholic Church is famous for calling what is literal as metaphorical eg Noah (See: Noah's Ark Not Just a Myth  and  Why Disbelief in Noah's Ark is a Sin) and metaphorical they make literal eg eating flesh and drinking blood. This is because they serve Satan who is out to shipwreck any lost soul tossed about in the stormy sea of confusion. But Yahushua calmed the waters before he reached the place where the Torahless pig farmers were. This had opened the door to the demonic forces of evil to enter. Yahushua also killed those thousands of pigs. The pigs and storm were literal, the demonic activity spiritual and the events a foreshadow of future storms and plagues (COVID-19 etc) due to eating unclean animals eg pig.( see  Listeriosis - Pork To Eat Or Not To Eat )

Yahushua also says we the true assembly are the bride of Mashiak a pure virgin.

Rev 21:2  And I John saw the pure city, new Jerusalem, coming down from Elohim out of shamayim , prepared as a bride adorned for her husband.

Literal or figurative? Does that mean the city really is a woman because the word "are" is used or is it a metaphor referring to the covenant of loyalty as in marriage which is free of whoredom (spiritual idolatry)?

Literal Loaf

1Co 10:17  For we being many are one bread, and one body: for we are all partakers of that one bread.

I trust that you will not take this as literal bread.

Jer 15:16  Thy words were found, and I did eat them; and thy word was unto me the joy and rejoicing of mine heart: for I am called by thy name, O Yahuah Elohim of hosts. 

Literal or figurative?

Did Jeremiah really eat words or could it be the same symbolism that Yahushua gave that he is the Word made flesh represented  by bread and wine?

Of course it is a symbol but the Vatican is a religion of death and worships among the dead so it would turn the WORD of Yahuah upside down. It would literally like to swallow the pages and make it disappear perhaps. This would be the next best thing to chaining the Word to the Vatican walls so the lay people could not read the truth of the Word as was done by the Harlot Church. So intent were they to keep the scriptures unreadable and perverted that they had to strangle the English translator William Tyndale to death and burn him at the stake. A double murder by intent.

FAKE CONNECTION

In order to make Eucharist fit Catholics will try to invent a connection of bread and wine to a synchronous lamb offering. They claim:


In this Jewish Messianic prophecy feast the "lamb" sacrifice had to occur at the same time the "bread and wine" was consecrated. Just as the Jews believed they were "participating in" the original and timeless first PASSOVER when celebrating their old covenant "forever" GOD commanded Passover (Exodus 12:14), so do Catholics believe we are "participating in" the ONE SACRIFICE of Jesus Christ during the consecration of the bread and wine (1 Corinthians 10:16-17) in the NEW COVENANT PASSOVER.

Exo 12:14  And this day shall be unto you for a memorial*; and ye shall keep it a feast to Yahuah throughout your generations; ye shall keep it a feast by an ordinance for ever.

MEMORIAL H2146
זִכְרוֹן
zikrôn

From H2142; a memento (or memorable thing, day or writing): - memorial, record.

Yes, Yahuah certainly ordained the feast as a MEMORIAL as noted, but not as an actual reincarnation or reinvoking of the event all over again as Eucharist tries to do.

The Levitical Priesthood were on the contrary told not to offer the blood of any animal slaugher (pw sacrfice) on the alter with leaven on Passover

Exo 34:25  “You shall not offer the blood of my sacrifice with anything leavened, or let the sacrifice of the Feast of the Passover remain until the morning.

Yahushua celebrated with his disciples the night before, not in sync with the death of a Passover lamb which was the next afternoon.  Passover  would have been the night that the Israelites left Egypt and hastily ate the passover lamb. In fact they had no time to make chametz (sourdough yeast) for risen bread even. In fact it is for this very reason that Yahuah instead commands the feast of unleavened bread which is to be kept for seven days to remember this very hasty Exodus.

Now when Yahushua had the meal with his disciples what bread did Yahushua share? 

Mar 14:22  And as they did eat, Yahushua took bread* , and baruch'd (pw blessed), and brake it, and gave to them, and said, Take, eat: this is my body.

It is very easy to see it is "artos"

* G740
ἄρτος
artos
ar'-tos
From G142; bread (as raised) or a loaf: - (shew-) bread, loaf.

As opposed to unleavened bread

G106
ἄζυμος
azumos
ad'-zoo-mos
From G1 (as a negative particle) and G2219; unleavened, that is, (figuratively) uncorrupted; (in the neuter plural) specifically (by implication) the Passover week: - unleavened (bread).
(eg Luk 22:1)

Now if Yahushua ate "artos" - leavened bread to remember the Passover, as claimed, then he would have been breaking Torah and not keeping the feast of UNLEAVENED BREAD as COMMANDED

Exo 12:15  Seven days shall ye eat unleavened bread; even the first day ye shall put away leaven out of your houses: for whosoever eateth leavened bread from the first day until the seventh day, that soul shall be cut off from Israel.

Yahushua and his disciples would have been cut off from Israel had they followed this Catholic lie.

Now Catholics make a big deal about an unleavened wafer that has to be given by a so-called priest while Yahushua simply shared leavened bread and even dipped it into gravy - a very different scene compared to Catholic inventions.


Yahushua never commanded Catholic priests to pop unleavened wafers into our mouths neither to make the sign of T for Tammuz while doing so. He never called it "The Eucharist" or "Holy Communion" neither did any of his disciples.










The so called "sacred flaming heart" below the SFS  in the photo is indicative of Tammuz worship.

So why did Yahushua offer leavened bread?

Well, because the passover had not even started yet. It was the next day.

So there was no synchronous passover lamb being slaughtered with bread and wine as the Catholics would like you to think.

sunburst

Catholics make a big deal about the wafer, a SUNdisc which is held up and often put into a monstrance a SUN deity symbol with rays of sun.

This is connected to their word "Halo " which comes from the Greek / Roman Sun-god "Helios." Romans applied the word "gloria" to be a sunburst or ring of light around the head of "Helios." As seen in Catholic idolatry (artwork).

The Roman Catholic Church even admits
 the Monstrance to be a sunburst:

"During the baroque period, it took on a rayed form of a sun-monstrance with a circular window
 surrounded by a silver or gold frame with rays."


Source:  The Dictionary of the Liturgy by Rev. Jovian P. Lang, OFM., published and copyrighted © 1989 by Catholic Book Publishing Co., New York,

 ISBN 0-89942-273-X, page 436

The Catholics then invented Easter from the ancient Ishtar cult and slipped it into the KJV
translation exchanging it for Pesach / Passover and blaspheme Yahuah by then eating raisin
cakes which are LEAVENED.  These "hot crossed buns" traditionally bear the T of Tammuz.

These pagan LEAVENED hot cross buns are eaten in defiance to Yahuah when he says leavened bread is not to be eaten for seven days DURING PASSOVER MEMORIAL.
(The Catholic calendar does not even align with the Feast of Passover every year since they
invented their own pagan calendar as well - (See:  Whose Calendar Do You Follow?)

So who gets cut off? The answer is easy:

Exo 12:15  ...whosoever eateth leavened bread from the first day until the seventh day, that soul shall be cut off from Israel.

Yes, those in the  Catholic cult get cut off - there is no salvation within the Catholic Church and for those Protestants and the like who do the same who follow her ways rather than the Torah of Yahuah. We are either joined to the Israel of Yahuah or we are CUT OFF.

ENTER THE EUCHARIST IDOL

In order for the Catholic "Eucharist" invention to be accepted the Catholic will try to elevate this verse into something it is not:

1Co 11:23  For I have received of the Master (pw Lord) that which also I delivered unto you, That Master (pw Lord) Yahushua (pw Jesus) the same night in which he was betrayed took bread:

The Catholic will claim:

"Paul does not explain what he has actually received directly from Christ, except in the case when he teaches about the Eucharist" 

Not true. Firstly Shaul says nothing about a "Eucharist" but talks about Yahushua's supper of remembrance and secondly discusses a whole lot of things he has received directly from him  prior to mentioning the supper. He starts way back in verse 1 Co 11:2 when he begins discussing Head Coverings as the KJV even titles it.

1 Co 11:2"Now I commend you because you remember me in everything and maintain the ORDINANCES even as I delivered them to you."

Of course all Shaul ( Paul ) is doing here  is stating that the supper
of bread and wine that took place the first night with Yahushua is the same ordinance that was delivered to him in his revelation with Yahushua on the road to Damascus. This was the meal of remembrance that must be kept with the congregation and that they should not partake of it unworthily as it symbolizes Yahushua's body and therefore  his death offering which took place once and for all. It is not about filling one's stomach.

1Co 11:29  For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh damnation to himself, not discerning Yahushua's body.

He is simply saying that this is not an everyday meal which can just be had at home, it is a meal to remember the body of Yahushua.

1Co 11:34  And if any man hunger, let him eat at home; that ye come not together unto condemnation...


Now it is clear that if this were some kind of "Eucharist" where a super thin wafer disc were popped into one's mouth would people who are hungry and who come to this meal be a problem? What sustenance would the hungry man expect to receive knowing it to be a single wafer as in the Catholic Church . How would he be eating greedily, would he be grabbing more wafers from the priest as he passed by?

No of course not because the meal Yahushua had was a proper meal with leavened bread and even gravy as I said.

This would also make it clear that it would be easy to forget the supper is to remember Yahushua as it involves everyday things - bread and wine not a pagan Eucharist with chalice and Monstrance and abominable incense etc etc etc in some fancy shamancy cathedral. .

So Shaul is speaking about conduct  in the assembly - ordinances given by Yahushua and that is embodied in the fact that we are one body as an assembly of brothers so what we do to others in the body is as if we do it to Yahushua. This very symbolism is conveyed as the bread and wine that we are one body (NOT SACRIFICING JZEUS). The metaphor is further extended to us when he says "not discerning Yahushua's body" since we are described as the "body of Yahushua" . If we offend other believers we offend that body.

Mat 25:45 ... Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye did it not to one of the least of these, ye did it not to me.

Hurting the body of a brother is as doing it to Yahushua as we are one body symbolized by the bread and wine.
Firstly it is explicitly implied that the bread and wine are symbols not a literal body as we stated at the beginning of this article.
Secondly, does this not sound familiar to you as the one body under Mashiak which is under Yahuah (verse 1Co 11:3)

1Co 11:3  But I want you to understand that the head of every man is Mashiak (pw Christ), the head of a wife is her husband, and the head of Mashiak (pw Christ) is Elohim (pw God).

It is interesting that Catholics will try to use smoke and mirrors, some "Eucharist" to distract the reader from what Shaul is really talking about, that is the order of authority which the Catholic church tries to turn upside down in direct CONTRADICTION to Shaul who says:

1 Co 11:2...maintain the ORDINANCES even as I delivered them to you.

Not turning the order (ordinance) upside down with the Catholic pagan invention: a Mother God idol at the top something that only became doctrine  one thousand five hundred and eight years after the death of Yahushua.

SYMBOLIC TRAMPLING

This is exactly what a Catholic Youtuber said to me:

"We cannot murder a symbol."

It almost sounds as if the Catholics are disappointed when we tell them they cannot "murder" Yahushua again. I am not surprised that they would mention repeated murder considering all the repeated murders that their popes have committed in the name of their pagan "god". Nevertheless let us argue against their sick obsession. When a person burns a flag he is put to death in many countries for treason why is that? Similarly when one worships an idol a symbol of demon worship and rebellion to Yahuah does the idol have any power to put you to death or is it Yahuah who does that for disobeying him by worshiping a symbol to Satan?

Is it any surprise then that if one were to trample on a secular flag it becomes a personal insult to the person / people which represent that flag? So no dear Catholic you cannot murder Yahushua, neither can you murder his symbol but you will be punished very sorely for having that intention and for willfully insulting Him. Furthermore your popes have murdered Yahuah's children in the past and thus they indirectly do it to Yahushua by intent as he said (Mat 25:45).

Heb 10:29  Of how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of Elohim, and hath counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith he was purified (pw sanctified), a profane  thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of CHESED / KINDNESS?

Is it any surprise then that Shaul would use the same symbolic truth of trampling but directly relating to Yahushua himself?

Are we then to believe that Shaul is condoning the murdering of Yahushua by trampling upon him and doing it over and over again? Yah forbid - he is WARNING AGAINST IT. Is he not creating this picture in our minds to create the very opposite, to make us sick in the stomach, to make us never think of despising his one and only blood offering. We are never to think his one and only offering is incomplete, insufficient or profane. 

But let's pretend that you can physically murder /"sacrifice" Yahushua over and over again then how would you receive his body worthily if you are a torah transgressor (pw sinner) since you are "sacrificing" / murdering him repeatedly?

Exo 20:13  Thou shalt not kill.

What awaits the murderer?

Num 35:16  And if he smite him with an instrument of iron, so that he die, he is a murderer: the murderer shall surely be put to death.
Num 35:17  And if he smite him with throwing a stone, wherewith he may die, and he die, he is a murderer: the murderer shall surely be put to death.
Num 35:18  Or if he smite him with an hand weapon of wood, wherewith he may die, and he die, he is a murderer: the murderer shall surely be put to death.
Num 35:19  The revenger of blood himself shall slay the murderer: when he meeteth him, he shall slay him.

And what awaits the intentional repeat "murderer" of Yahushua?

Heb 10:29  ...sorer punishment

Does the Catholic believe he cannot be charged for the the same murder more than once - some kind of double jeopardy?
Well, Yahuah's Torah is not subject to "double jeopardy" since murder in the heart ie the intention can be repeated against the savior Yahushua who now has received immortality.

And if the Catholic believes "sacrificing" Yahushua is somehow not murdering him then at least why are they not afraid of profaning the shabbat for example or eating pig then? How do they eat and drink worthily knowing they do these things which are forbidden by Yahuah? As Torah transgressors they have no part in the body of Yahushua and are not one with him at all.

They will say "profane" means to literally murder Yahushua and that you cannot murder a symbol of his death. Then if that is the case how do we profane or "murder" the symbol of Yahuah's purification - the shabbat?

Isa 56:6  “And the foreigners who join themselves to YAHUAH, to minister to him, to love the name of YAHUAH, and to be his servants, everyone who keeps the Sabbath and does not PROFANE it, and holds fast my covenant

To prove the shabbat is indeed a sign or symbol:

Exo 31:13  “You are to speak to the people of Israel and say, ‘Above all you shall keep my Sabbaths, for this is a SIGN between me and you throughout your generations, that you may know that I, YAHUAH, purify you.

Likewise you shall keep Yahushua's annual supper for it is a sign of his death which has purified you and you shall not profane it. One last time:

Heb 10:29  Of how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of Elohim, and hath counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith he WAS (WAS WAS WAS WAS - NOT IS)  PURIFIED, a PROFANE thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of CHESED / KINDNESS?

What is this sorer punishment?

Heb 10:28  He that despised Moses' law DIED without kindness under two or three witnesses

So what is sorer punishment than death, death of the body and soul ie no eternal life.

Mat 10:28  And do not fear those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul. Rather fear him who can destroy both soul and body in gehinnom (pw hell).

Catholics claim that in Luke 22:19 and 1 Cor 11:24-25  Yahushua (pw Jesus) commands the apostles to offer the "Eucharistic sacrifice" in remembrance of Him.

Luk 22:19  And he took bread, and gave thanks, and brake it, and gave unto them, saying, This is my body which is given for you: this do in remembrance of me.

1Co 11:24  And when he had given thanks, he brake it, and said, Take, eat: this is my body, which is broken for you: this do in remembrance of me.

1Co 11:25  After the same manner also he took the cup, when he had supped, saying, This cup is the new testament in my blood: this do ye, as oft as ye drink it, in remembrance of me.

Where are the words "offer the Eucharist sacrifice" in these three verses? I do not see them, I see the words "in remembrance of me" three times ( a perfect witness according to Torah) This is a covenant reminder (zikron)of the price he paid for our torah transgression. We do not despise that offering by willfully transgressing Torah  which is exactly what Catholics do.

Heb 10:26  For if we TRANSGRESS TORAH WILFULLY after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth NO MORE offering (pagan word -sacrifice) for TORAH TRANSGRESSION.

Now did you hear that? How many more offerings can Yahushua offer?

NONE, NO MORE, NADA, ZERO.

You cannot go through the sick cycle of Rominism - sinning, sacrificing Jzeus, receiving pardon/ life, sinning, sacrificing JZeus, receiving pardon / life......... This is not what a talmidim (disciple) of Yahushua does this is what a pagan cult does. Those who cannot cease from Torah transgression are cursed - PERIOD! They are not his disciples.

2Pe 2:14  Having eyes full of adultery, and that CANNOT CEASE FROM TORAH TRANSGRESSION; beguiling unstable souls: an heart they have exercised with covetous practices; cursed children:

The Eucharist idol is indeed a system which allows the unstable heart to excercise covetous practices since the sinner thinks he has a way to life and pardon following his repeated willful sin. This sinner can look forward to an endless cycle of sin or so he thinks. He does not know that he is cursed. Satan has thus used a dumb idol to ensnare this sinner.

The whole world knows the sick cycle of Roman Catholicism how much more Yahuah?

  There is NO MORE offering for TORAH transgression. NO MORE did you get that? WHY? Because:

Rom 6:9  Knowing that Mashiak being raised from the dead DIETH NO MORE ; death hath no more dominion over him.

Rom 6:10  For in that he died, he died unto torah transgression (pw sin) ONCE : but in that he liveth, he liveth unto Elohim

Quick Quiz

1) How many times did Yahushua die?
A) once
B) the same number of times I sin
C) eternally
D) once at the foundation of the world and once 2000 years ago

https://youtu.be/_4upHPYKtqE

2) Can you physically Murder Yahushua?

A) A sinner or person has no dominion over Yahushua to murder him.
B) Yes, as a Catholic I like to sin so I can murder Yahushua repeatedly and receive absolution from the priest for doing so

3) Does Yahushua die anymore for your sins?
A)Yes
B)No

But now who is supposed to die daily?

1Co 15:30  Why are we in danger every hour?
1Co 15:31  I protest, brothers, by my pride in you, which I have in Mashiak Yahushua our Master, I die every day!

Shaul- he metaphorically dies to self and lives for Elohim as we who are believers are supposed to.

And who is offering their literal physical body as a continuous living offering (pw sacrifice)?

Rom 12:1  I appeal to you therefore, BROTHERS, by the kindnesses of Elohim, to present YOUR BODIES as a LIVING OFFERING, morally ordained and acceptable to Elohim, which is your spiritual worship (service)

Note:    Brothers - --->   all true talmidim ( disciples), the true Yahudim ( worshipers of Ya(huah)) erroneously misnomered as "Jews" 

SEE : (But I am not Jewish)

Gal 2:17  But if, while we seek to be justified by Mashiak, we ourselves also are found TORAH TRANSGRESSORS (pw sinners), is therefore Mashiak the minister of TORAH TRANSGRESSION? Elohim forbid.
Gal 2:18  For if I build again the things which I destroyed, I make myself a transgressor.
Gal 2:19  For I through the law am dead to the law [of torah transgression and death], that I might live unto Elohim.
Gal 2:20  I am impaled with Mashiak: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Mashiak LIVETH (continuous tense) in me: and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the moral conviction of the Son of Elohim, who loved me, and gave (past tense, not "gives"- continuous tense)  himself for me.

"If they then deviate from the faith ... it is impossible to bring them back to repentance ... as long as they nail up on the cross the Son of God afresh ... and are holding Him up to contempt and shame and public disgrace." [Hebrews 6:6, Parallel Bible, KJV/Amplified Bible 

So the Eucharist cult turns the whole thing upside-down. The scriptures tell us Yahushua died once so that we repent and die daily to ourselves so that we do not sin and  make Yahushua's death  useless which will lead to their destruction. Catholics however say that they can sin over and over again causing "Jesus" to die over and over again and in this way they will receive life in the "Eucharist". This is satanic idolatry.
DOWNWARD SPIRAL OF TORAHLESSNESS

It is easy for a Catholic to believe in cannibalism (transubstantiation) since it is only the next step away from eating unclean foods such as pig, lobster, crab, rabbit etc etc  which Yahuah forbids in Torah (see  Listeriosis - Pork To Eat Or Not To Eat). It is also ridiculous since the bread and wine were eaten before Yahushua's death and WITH HIM so it would be advocating not only cannibalism but that of a live person who then was still able to go and die on the stake thereafter- wow. Abominable stupidity.

Besides this, eating other people is a sign of a curse not a baruch (blessing) and we have already shown that the sick cycle of repeated non-stop torah transgression is a sign of a cursed child not a saved one:

2Pe 2:14  Having eyes full of adultery, and that CANNOT CEASE FROM TORAH TRANSGRESSION; beguiling unstable souls: an heart they have exercised with covetous practices; cursed children:

that is what happened to the Hebrews as punishment for rebelling against Torah and becoming besieged. They ended up eating their own young as prophesied would happen. Is it any wonder then that Catholics that cannot cease from Torah transgression and who reject Torah would next be led into such a curse, the vile idea of eating human flesh over and over again, and not just any flesh but the savior who came to die once and for all.

FAKE MANIFESTATIONS

The presence of Yahushua is present not through a pagan eating of JZeus (Jupiter) or looking at an idol hanging on an altar. It is clear that every Catholic has an obsession with looking at an image of a dead Mashiak on a cross.  This is in direct contravention of Yahuah's law which is to not make an image and bow to it. Yahuah even warns against staring at things he has made in case one is tempted to worship them,

Deu 4:19  And beware lest you raise your eyes to shamayim (pw heaven), and when you see the sun and the moon and the stars, all the host of shamayim (pw heaven), you be drawn away and bow down to them and serve them, things that YAHUAH your Elohim (pw God) has allotted to all the peoples under the whole shamayim (pw heaven).

Are Catholics going out of their way to create a system of regularly staring at an image so as to worship it? This is what a Catholic clearly confirms:

Every Catholic during the..."Mass" enters the aisle and approaches the "Bridegroom" Jesus Christ the "Lamb of God" who hangs above every single altar. We get to see the "Bridegroom" who emptied Himself out on the cross...".

So either it is an idol or they are  trying to convince themselves that Yahushua is still dead so they can carry on with their torah transgressions. Either way this is the work of Satan.

Let us read the words of Yahushua and stop listening to the words of a Vatican agent. Yahushua is not present or manifest through a so-called Eucharist he is manifest as Yahuchanon (John) said:

Joh 14:21  He that hath MY COMMANDMENTS AND KEEPTEH THEM he it is that loveth me: and he that loveth me shall be loved of my Father, and I will love him, and will MANIFEST myself to him."

So Yahushua is not manifested to anyone who is a pagan man eater,  an  "eucharistian" . Yahushua is manifest to those who have and do the Commands (Torah) of Yahuah. The Catholic church does not have the commands (Torah) of Yahuah and instead profanes them and has persecuted those who have kept them. So it is anathema to the Eucharist and to the unrepentant Jesuit cult of Rome.

EUCHARIST ETYMOLOGY

A Catholic statement:

The Greek "Eucharistia" or English meaning "Thanksgiving" being the One Holy "Eucharist" is the source, summit, and ultimate high point of worship in the NEW COVENANT.

Here we see how the Catholic elevates their own re-invention of the pagan goddess hidden within the Eucharist.

Eucharistia bears the word "charis" which is supposed to mean thanksgiving but like many vulgar (pagan) words in Greek and Latin which corrupt the Hebrew we soon find why this "Charis" is lifted to such a high and ultimate point by the Catholic. They worship their invented idol the "Queen of Heaven Mary Mother full of Grace".

"Charis" was a Greek deity, the wife of Vulcan. From the goddess "Charis" comes the Greek "Charities," three female deities, daughters of "Helios," the Greek/Roman high Sun-god. Likewise the "charis"matic movement has SUN worship as its centre through SUNday worship. Grace Comes from the Greek word "charis," and the Latin word "gratia."

    * Kindness or favor are better words both in English, and can be used without reference to paganism. 

Hebrew often uses more specific words for various occasions.  Piety towards Yah'uah= Chesed (kheh-sed) gratitude -favor from us who are inferior to Yah who is superior. This form of favor or kindness to Yah'uah is the one that is most often not taught or ignored and replaced with this fake Charis goddess.

Chanan (pronounced khaw-nan) Yah'uah's favor (gift) reaching down to us who are inferior eg unmerited favor or kindness ( this type is taught as the only one and falsely named "grace" by false "church" teachers eg Joseph Prince (makes Catholic allusions to "our Mother is Grace" or Jesus is Grace- no such doctrine in scripture). It is falsely taught as being received without limit and without any mention of what kindness we are to return to Yah'uah and his Son-No wonder the Catholic believes he can keep transgressing Torah and trampling upon the Son and "sacrificing" him and eating him over and over again .
We are to have gratitude in the form of love and OBEDIENCE  -see 2 Peter 3:18 "Chanan" (pw Grace in KJV) here is defined in Strong's Greek as


5485 charis khar'-ece from 5463; graciousness (as gratifying), of manner or act (abstract or concrete; literal, figurative or spiritual; especially the divine influence upon the heart, and its reflection in the life; including gratitude):--acceptable, benefit, favor, gift, grace(- ious), joy, liberality, pleasure, thank(-s, -worthy). see GREEK for 5463
Favour (gift /kindness )from Yah'uah is meant to result in reciprocal gratitude towards Yah'uah by way of righteous living not by repeatedly sinning and intending to put Yahushua to death repeatedly.

Is 26:10   Let favor (chanan) be shewed to the wicked, yet will he not learn righteousness.

Sending his own Son to die and suffer is the ultimate kindness / favor of Yah'uah yet false "grace" / "charis" results in the sinful false religion of "christianity" which hates Yah's To'rah and causes the error of lawlessness /Torahlessness (see  Error of Lawlessness.)  "Christianity is not the religion of Yahuah or his Son Yahushua ( see Do You Really Want to be Called a Christian? ).

The Eucharist is nothing more than SUN worship with emphasis on a SUNday,  a day installed by the pope to try and profane the shabbat. It is nowhere commanded in Torah. Apostle Shaul was not a SUN worshiper neither was he a SUNday observer but a sabbath keeper. (see AntiSabbath Doctrines). The pagan Catholic religio-political institution killed and persecuted people for keeping the shabbat of Yahuah and for not taking Mass. Yahushua commanded us to remember his death and this occurred on Pesach not Ishtar (Easter) a pagan invention only possible by the invention of a pagan Gregorian calendar. There was no Roman Catholic calendar in 70 AD and Pesach, Passover (not Easter) memorial (zikron) is done once a year according to the moedim (feasts) of Yahuah.

HOLY COMMUNION WHOLY PAGAN

Holi / holy communion is a pagan intercourse (sexual or otherwise)  of man-god religions such as in Roman Catholicism.

This is best portrayed by the idolatrous image painted by Michael Angelo. Besides the fact that images of a pagan deity are forbidden in the ten commandments, this "sky god" is depicted as a man while a naked Adam appears to be making a frivolous and effortless "communion" with this pagan "G-o-d". The pagan sky god is the one who is having to make the extra effort in stretching out to an apathetic (apostate)  Adam. With this sky deity is a naked female deity under his arm - the Queen of Heaven no doubt, the whore of Babylon. (There are no female malakim ( pw angels ) according  to scripture).

1) Yahuah Elohim is not a sky god neither is he a man.

Num 23:19 Elohim is not a man, that he should lie; neither the *son of man, that he should repent...

2) His Son is not a man-god he is the SON of ELOHIM however Catholic heresy teaches Jesus (JZeus)  is God and Mary is the Mother of God, pure Greco-Roman paganism. (see  Why Jesus is Not God / Why Yah'ushua is not Elohim). 

A Catholic claimed the following:

Catholics receive His "divinity" in the Holy Eucharist...As a result, we become a part of GOD'S NEW CREATION (2 Corinthians 5:17)...

So what does 2 Co 5:17 really say :

2 Co 5:17  Therefore, if anyone is in Mashiak, he is a new creation. The old has passed away; behold, the new has come. 

The new has come, it does not come and then go and need to return over and over again through a "Eucharist". The new is not coming, it has come, period. We are either a new creation or not. Of course there is no mention of any "Eucharist", only in the mind of the heretical Catholic. Shaul refers to being one with Mashiak and that means by walking in the light of his Father's truth (Torah).

1 Jn 1:6  If we say that we have fellowship with him, and walk in darkness, we lie, and do not the truth:

If we read only a few verses  back  from the Catholic's 2 Co 5:17 quote used to try and support a fleshly "Eucharist" we once again see the very opposite is preached by Shaul (Paul). He is preaching against turning to the flesh of Mashiak.

2 Co 5:15  and he died for all, that those who live might no longer live for themselves but for him who for their sake died and was raised (past tense).
2 Co 5:16  From now on, therefore, we regard no one according to the flesh. Even though we once regarded Mashiak ( pw Christ) according to the flesh, we regard him thus no longer.

WAS YAHUSHUA A CATHOLIC PREACHING TRANSUBSTANTIATION?

Joh 6:58  This is the bread that came down from shamayim (pw heaven), not like the bread the fathers ate, and died. Whoever feeds on this bread will live forever.”
Joh 6:59  Yahushua said these things in the kahal / assembly (pw synagogue), as he taught at Capernaum.

The Words of Eternal Life
Joh 6:60  When many of his disciples heard it, they said, “This is a hard saying; who can listen to it?”
Joh 6:61  But Yahushua, knowing in himself that his disciples were grumbling about this, said to them, “Do you take offense at this?
Joh 6:62  Then what if you were to see the Son of Man ascending to where he was before?
Joh 6:63  It is the Spirit who gives life; the flesh is no help at all. The words that I have spoken to you are spirit
and life.

Quick Questions:

1) According to 2 Co 5:15-16 are we to literally feast on the literal flesh of Mashiak?

A) No

B) Yes

2) According to Yahushua himself (Jn 6:58-63) is his flesh of any use?

A) Yes

B) No 

3)Is Yahushua's flesh to be literally consumed?

A)Yes

B) No

4)Are Yahushua's words on eating bread (his body)spiritual or literal (physical)?

A) Spiritual

B) Literal physical

5) Which does Yahushua say gives life

A) his future spiritual body which ascended to shamayim (heaven)

B) his previous fleshly body?

LYING SIGNS AND WONDERS

Pete Burak in his Video :

"The act of consecration is in and of itself  a miracle that takes place at every Catholic Mass... today we want to focus on Eucharistic Miracles that go beyond transubstantiation"

So the Catholic church is probably the greatest liar when it comes to claiming miracles since we know how many Catholic masses have taken place over history and they are claiming each and every one of these abominations to be a miracle, not to mention their other claims that "go beyond transubstantiation".

Did Apostle Shaul ( Paul ) not warn us of such a false religion?

A description of a pope-like character:

2Th 2:4  Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called Elohim (pw God), or that is worshipped; so that he as Elohim sitteth in the hakal (pw temple) of Elohim (pw God), shewing himself that he is Elohim ( pwGod).

A description of  Catholic-like Torahlessness - opposing Yahuah's commands with their own satanic dogma:

2Th 2:5  Remember ye not, that, when I was yet with you, I told you these things?
2Th 2:6  And now ye know what withholdeth that he might be revealed in his time.
2Th 2:7  For the mystery of iniquity [TORAHLESSNESS ] doth already work: only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way. 

A description of its future destruction:

2Th 2:8  And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom YAHUAH shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming:

A description of Catholic-like lying signs and miracles:

2Th 2:9  Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders,
2Th 2:10  And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth [TORAH and TORAH MADE FLESH (YAHSUHUA)], that they might be saved. 

A description of the resultant very big delusion and lie (damnable heresy) :

2Th 2:11  And for this cause Elohim shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:
2Th 2:12  That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.

This is clearly the transubstantiation and Eucharist lie which is said to give salvation by way of drinking blood and not OBEYING THE TRUTH ie TORAH as preached by the TORAH MADE FLESH YAHUSHUA HIMSELF The EL DABARIM - WORD OF ELOHIM. No instead they want to eat His flesh and throw away the truth of Torah and break His Father's commands over and over again to their damnation.

Out of the six so-called 'miracles' that Catholic Pete Burak covers in the following video, the fifth is of particular interest. A lonely wafer was said to be found in the back of a Catholic church in Beunos Aires . The priest dissolves it in water and then has it tested because it has apparently turned into blood, wow some real hocus pocus delusion.



According to the lab the sample given was of human tissue from the heart of a living peson who was under great stress at the time the sample was taken. But wait I thought that the sample was originally a wafer?? Oh so it was human flesh that was taken from somebody in the first place???...very disturbing!!)  Of course now this miracles is meant to encourage us all to go out to the local Catholic church intending to literally eat bits of heart or whatever else of our Saviour while he is supposed to be still living and being tortured over and over again.

One could of course rather focus on real 'miracles' such as the survival of Paolo Sarpi  who coincidentally was stabbed three times by the Pope's assassins on the 5th of October (the same date as the labeled sample).

Sarpi happened to be a critic of the Catholic church. He is considered an early advocate of the Freedom of the Press and "crypto Protestant" (whatever that is). The lesson we learn is that the Pope obviously does not obey "thou shalt not kill" since he sits on his thrown which he must protect at all costs as though he is Elohim himself:

2Th 2:4  Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called Elohim (pw God), or that is worshipped; so that he as Elohim sitteth in the hakal (pw temple) of Elohim (pw God), shewing himself that he is Elohim ( pw God).

So when we are told there is 'human' heart tissue floating around in Catholic churches we begin to wonder who the real victim might be. If they could throw babies into the fire then what else are they capable of?
Buenos Aires where this "bloody host miracle" is supposed to have happened, now happens to be harder hit by the plague of COVID-19 where priests struggle as they cannot have public Mass according to a report (27 August 2020)

"Although public liturgies are allowed in many other parts of Argentina, the nation’s capital is harder hit by the pandemic"

 (https://cruxnow.com/church-in-the-americas/2020/08/buenos-aires-priests-struggle-to-fill-spiritual-void-with-no-public-mass/.
Is Yahuah saying something? If the Eucharist is such a "miracle" in and of itself why is Yahuah preventing it from happening?
Why is the Eucharist host "in and of itself" not rendering every virus infected wafer into a healthy morsel?
Why is heart tissue so important to the Catholics?  Well remember they follow the sick cult of the Sacred Flaming Heart which is connected to sun worship of course and is linked to Tammuz.

"The "Sacred Heart" means the "Sacred Bel", Bell: Nimrod.Sacred Bel
Hislop (pg. 155):
[...] How came it that the "Heart" became the recognised symbol of the Child of the great Mother? The
answer is, "The Heart" in Chaldee is "BEL"; [...] almost all the most important elements of the Chaldean
system were introduced under a veil [...] [and] shrouded from the gaze of the uninitiated [or common
people], [....]
Now, the worship of the "Sacred Heart" was just, under a symbol, the worship of the "Sacred Bel," that
mighty one of Babylon [Nimrod], who had died a martyr for idolatry; for Harpocrates, or Horus, the infant
god, was regarded as Bel, born again.
That this was in very deed the case, the following extract from Taylor, in one of his notes to his translation
of the Orphic Hymns, will show. "While Bacchus," says he, was "beholding himself" with admiration "in a
mirror, he was miserably torn to pieces by the Titans, [...] but while they were tasting his esh [...], Jupiter,
[...], committed his members to Apollo, the brother of Bacchus, [....] And this being performed, Dionysius
[i.e., Bacchus], (whose HEART, during his laceration, was snatched away by Minerva and preserved) by a
new REGENERATION, again emerged, [....]"
(The "Sacred Heart" is shown on re, symbolic of the sun-god, Baal (Tammuz, Apollo, Surya, etc.).  Sun-disks or halos (nimbus) can
be found on Buddha, and Surya (Indian sun-god), and Apollo, and on the "Queen of Heaven".) "

(ref:  19justinbrown88.yolasite.com/Eucharist Transsubstantiation/Origins of the Rosary and the Sacred Heart)


Also "Marys", dates and idolizing "saints" are always significant to Catholics so let's ask what so-called saint has been given a pagan feast day on October 5. 

Answer:
Saint Maria Faustyna Kowalska of the Blessed Sacrament - well of course a Eucharist Mary.

bloody host Pete Burak

A small side note : the sample is  labeled with two Roman years : 1996 and 1999. The last 6 in 1996 is the inverse to 9 in 1999 and 999 inverted is of course 666.

"Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six." REVELATION 13:18

The pope "and the number of his name" = 666

It is no secret that the pope has the title "Representative of the Son of God", which is "VICARIUS FILII DEI" in Latin, the official language of the Roman Catholic church. We also know that different Latin letters count as numbers. For example, M=1000, D=500, C=100, L=50, V or U=5, I=1. If we discount the letters with no value, it follows that:

"Representative of the Son of God"

V I C A R I U S   F I L I I   D E I

5+1+100 + 1 + 5 + 1+50+1+1 + 500 + 1 = 666

Another title which expresses the office and the dignity of the pope is: "LATINUS REX SACERDOS", which means "Latin priest-king". It produces the same result:

"Latin priest-king"

L A T I N U S R E X S A C E R D O S

50 + 1 + 5 + 10 + 100 + 500 = 666

The Vatican consists of 11,100 furnished, luxury rooms, carpeted with 85,000 metres of scarlet and purple coloured carpet (see REVELATION 17:3-5).

"Woe to the people who break the tablets of Sinai .... no bishop and no pope can dispense with the duty of belief, the duty of truthfulness and the other commandments .... whosoever breaks one of the commandments of God, is the same as someone who takes away one of the pillars from a ten-pillar bridge, thereby weakening the whole bridge."

Archbishop M. Faulhaber

(Hirtenbrief, 1924)

Translated from the German: "Irrlehre der katholischen Kirche (666)"

Source unknown.                      (ref https://www.cai.org/bible-studies/false-teaching-catholic-church-666)


Note how Mr Burak presents these heretical lies to children. We see how children are featured in the abominable modern image to Baphomet.

Mar 9:42  And whosoever shall offend one of these little ones that believe in me [Yahushua, not J-Zeus], it is better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and he were cast into the sea.Baphomet

 



EUCHARIST - SATANIC ALCHEMY

Transubstantiation and the Eucharist  are directly linked to Baphomet an image/ idol used to  give worship to Satan. Now that we have established the great delusion of the man of iniquity 666 of the Catholic system and his connection - it is no surprise then that Archbishop Vigano would use occultic Latin words solve et coagula  (dissolve and coagulate) in a so-called warning to the Jesuit President Donald Trump.


The Catholic 'father' in Beunos Aires  was obviously well versed in this satanic ritual of dissolving and coagulating. He dissolved a lost wafer host (god) in water - WHY? to allow it to coagulate into blood and tissue. We see that Pete Burak is so excited by this practice he wants to spread the news to the children as though he were gathering them around the very feet of Baphomet (Satan).

Dr. Marshall a Catholic himself explains what “Solve et Coagula” means and why occultists and magicians use the term. He tries to explain that it’s a profound yet subtle warning by a Catholic Archbishop (Vigano) to the US President about these evils penetrating the "Church" however we are not fooled. This is nothing new ! The Catholic Church has always been practicing and promoting this cult magic with the very invention of 
Eucharist / transubstantiation in 1215 AD.

Catholicism also claims to be able to exorcise demons as if it had any authority only to be bringing legions of demons with them since they are Satan's agent and bring further curses teaching lawlessness, idolatry, sexual immorality and pagan witchcraft to name a few. The Catholic Rasputin is a prime example of this, also known as Russia's own "Antichrist" (antiMashiak), a totally Torahless servant of Satan.


Then we have Dr Marshall again  himself highlighting a so called  cleansing of idolatry by the Catholic church in the White House. It clearly is a sham and blasphemy since the end result is the keeping of the Mother and Child idol (Baal /Nimrod) and the sign of Tammuz, the cross, in the White House. So much for cleaning out the White House. And what use is it if the people in the White House themselves are all Torah transgressors who reject Yahuah and His Son Yahushua? It seems the Catholic church is not worried about the hundreds of satanic idols in the Vatican itself. Black Peter in the Vatican for one (aka Jupiter aka Satan , aka Zeus aka J-Zeus / Jesus) who they kiss regularly. Metaphorically idols are "dissolved" and "coagulated" into many different forms with different names but they all point to satanic worship from ancient Babylon.

"...The sign made with Baphomet's left hand is sometimes seen in the context of Roman Catholicism being interpreted as a sign of blessing. As the sign of Horus, the sun god, what could be more fitting for the sun cult that worships Isis in the guise of Mary? Baphomet's arms are perhaps tattooed with Latin words that express the Alchemical motto, “Solve et Coagula.” This interprets to “solution and coagulation.” What I understand about the alchemy pertains to how component elements are dissolved or merged into solution and transmuted or synthesized into a new substance. Alchemy is not about turning lead into gold to become rich in worldly goods. Its about exploiting the secrets of heaven, where the heavenly thereby manifests in the earthly. What this means can be interpreted by exploiting our “Rosetta Stone,” comparing the postcard modeled on the Baphomet. If you have grasped the meaning of the hand signs you may understand how Horus is the key to understanding the Alchemist's “Solve et Coagula” because he is the result or Coagula. The origin Osiris and recipient Isis are Solve as expressed by the union of the fingers 3 and 4. The mystery of the Egyptian sex magick is the mystery of the Alchemists and Rosicrucians and Freemasons and priests of the various sun cults and illuminated Pagans. In a word, Horus. Osiris, Zeus, Jupiter, Odin, Satan, the Devil, the dragon, the serpent or Lucifer manifest. The Alchemist's “Solve et Coagula” equates to the philosopher's stone* and squaring of the circle, to John Dee's Monas, the mystical universal essential substance. In practice, this typically involves ritual sodomy, a kundalini activation of the third eye. The man in the

 postcard with no eyelids..."    [ref  -The Open Scroll Blog_ Part 2 - Signs of Horus Worship - _Oh, Rapture! I've got a Brain!_        ( including images on right and image of Baphomet Alchemy)]

* Philsopher's Stone - the "high priestess" in magic and alchemy promotion, JK Rowling, author of Harry Potter, recently got a tattoo  in her own hand-writing with  the very same phrase - solve et coagula. (Image ref - The Sun). While she insists it has nothing to do with Harry Potter we know she probably means Harry Potter is fiction unlike the real Luciferian magic she promotes in it. The Philospher's Stone is of course one of Rowling's Harry Potter  titles after all. ouroboros

 Ouroboros is an ancient symbol depicting a serpent or dragon eating its own tail... and was adopted as a symbol in Gnosticism and Hermeticism and most notably in alchemy...is often interpreted as a symbol for eternal cyclic renewal or a cycle of life, death, and rebirth...the snake biting its own tail is a fertility symbol. The tail...is a phallic symbol, the mouth is a yonic or womb-like symbol (Wikipedia).



The chrysopoeia ouroboros of Cleopatra the Alchemist is one of the oldest images of the ouroboros to be linked with the legendary opus of the alchemists, the philosopher's stone.

Ouroboros has also been used to describe the Kundalini hence we have a connection to Baphomet which also contains the Kundalini.

The Catholics also celebrated their invention of the pagan calendar and reform of it in 1582 on a coin. Pope Gregory who introduced this calendar also had Huguenots murdered.

Gregory ouroboros








The coin is complete with Baphomet (Goat of Mendes)* the ouroboros shows they are the serpent that deceives the world by trying to change the times (calendar/ feasts)  and laws of Yahuah as prophesied by prophet Daniel ( see Whose Calendar Do You Follow?) and they worship the horned goat God Satan who opposes Yahuah's Torah and his obedient children.

(*Baphomet = Goat of Mendes, Pan, horned goat God  (made famous by Knights Templars) as explained by 33rd Degree Freemason, Albert Pike in Morals and Dogma. )Harry Horned God

Monstrance horn

Horned GodRight: Harry's Horned God (Satan)

Babylonian crescentHorned God (Satan) Symbol
(Crescent = Moon =

Female(Monstrance).
Disc =Sun= Male  (Wafer God) .


Baal/Shamash: All Roman Catholic monstrances have a crescent (horn) to hold the wafer-god of Babylon within it, thereby depicting an exact duplicate of Babylonian worship of the sun-god BAAL . 


Baal/Shamash Pagan carving of the solar deity Baal-Hadad depicted as a disk in a crescent

http://www.remnantofgod.org/images/IGC/pagan-rcc.htm http://whale.to/c/moon.html

Queen of Heaven


"A derived meaning of this [ouroboros] is the perpetual cyclic renewal of life and infinity, the concept of eternity and the cyclic return or reincarnation." (Ref theosophy.wiki/en/Ouroboros)

It is thus clear that Transubstantiation's is nothing more than the alchemy of reincarnation for Catholics. This is Satan's lie that you shall not die if you continue to reject and transgress Torah willfully after receiving redemption through Yahushua's offering once and for all. This lie is again surfacing by offering another way, transubstantiation sorcery in a cycle of sinning and receiving rebirth over and over again. Hence we clearly see the Queen of Heaven - The Harlot of Babylon (aka Mary) , the goddess they worship holding the ouroboros in an image in the Vatican with the Illuminati symbol above.

EUCHARIST - TREE OF LIFE?

Catholic Claim:

"" In God's beautiful salvation plan He takes a "do not partake" disobedience and removal of the "TREE OF LIFE" (Genesis 3:23) from sinful Adam and Eve and transforms it to telling us "to partake" of the "TREE OF LIFE" (John 6:54-58, Revelation 22:2, 14) through the NEW ADAM OF OBEDIENCE (Romans 5:12-21) Jesus Christ the "Lamb of God". ""


Really? Does a Eucharist give us access to the tree of life - immortality on earth?????

Let's read properly:

Rev 2:7  He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the congregations (pw churches); To him that overcometh will I give to eat of the tree of life, which is in the midst of the paradise of Elohim.


The Spirit of Yahuah says that we first must overcome the temptations of this world. After redemption through the Son's one and only offering we must be obedient to Yahuah to enter into the city

where the tree of life is.

When does this happen? This happens at the resurrection of the righteous (first resurrection) when the last shofar is blown. There is no immortality where people who die go to a place called heaven and are up there now. This is pagan heresy. (see   Getting Caught Up With Rapture Heresy.)

Death is yet to be destroyed at the resurrection.

1Co 15:26  The last enemy that shall be destroyed is death.

Immortality is given at the resurrection of all the righteous living and dead when Yahushua returns to raise us up.

Rev 22:2  In the midst of the street of it, and on either side of the river, was there the tree of life, which bare twelve manner of fruits, and yielded her fruit every month: and the leaves of the tree were for the healing of the nations.

The tree of life is a future event in the eternal city above not here on earth but Catholics will create their own idolatrous and blasphemous counterfeit here on earth :

"The 'TREE OF LIFE' hangs above every Catholic Church altar."

No that is the counterfeit - trees mentioned by prophet Jeremiah ( See Saving Christmas).

2Ki 17:10  And they set them up images and groves in every high hill, and under every green tree:

STRANGE FIRE

The Catholic church does the same as the two sons of Aaron who offered up strange fire in the hakal (pw temple) to Yahuah that was not commanded. They were killed by Yahuah for their transgression of presumption, offering up strange things. The pagan thing they call the "host" by its very root definition is "stranger" or "enemy".  Indeed this host is a stranger to Yahuah and they make themselves the enemy of Yahuah by offering up such abominable things.

|Definition of pagan "host"

host (n.3)"body of Christ, consecrated bread," c. 1300, from Latin hostia "sacrifice," also "the animal sacrificed, victim,"
 probably ultimately related to host (n.1) in its root sense of "stranger, enemy." Applied in Church Latin to Christ, in Medieval
 Latin to the consecrated bread.  (ref https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=host)


THE BLIND, NON-JEALOUS "GODS" (IDOLS) OF THE HARLOT OF ROME (BABYLON).


She holds up a cup in her right hand, in which you see the pagan sunburst wafer god
fides
 Reverse side of the  100 Lire coins issued by the Vatican for nearly 10 years

A perfect image of what Yahushua warned us about:

Rev 17:4 And the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet colour, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication:

Rev 18:3 For all nations have drunk of the wine of the wrath of her fornication, and the kings of the earth have committed fornication with her, and the merchants of the earth are waxed rich through the abundance of her delicacies.

The cup of wine of the apostate woman (church) represents spiritual and doctrinal fornication, a mixing of truth and error, Christianity and paganism, which she has taught to the world (made the nations drink).

Rev 17:5 And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH.

There is only one self-proclaimed "Mother" church, The Universal (Catholic) Church.

Rev 18:4 And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her torah transgression (pw sins), and that ye receive not of her plagues.

Rev 18:5 For her TORAH TRANSGRESSIONS have reached unto shamayim (pw heaven), and Elohim (pw God) hath remembered her iniquities (torah transgressions).

 ref http://www.aloha.net/~mikesch/monstr.htm

Now if things have become new as the Catholic claims for himself from 2 Co 5:15 in a so-called Eucharist then why does the Catholic keep on transgressing Torah willfully, trampling upon the blood of Yahushua and thus not discerning his body and thus partaking of it unworthily. The answer is simple, the Catholic is serving an old religion of the old creation, all that has become new are the new dogmas and new paint covering the old pagan religion of Babylon.

They will claim that we must obey what they call the" Magisterium of Jesus" where Peter is supposed to be the church of Rome upon which this Jesus built his church and thus everything they say and do is Jesus ordained.

Well is it any surprise that they call Yahushua J-Zeus since Zeus was originally Jupiter and the statue idol they worship in Rome by kissing its feet is Black Peter who is really Jupiter. Of course Yahuah interrupted this for a while with COVID 19. Now while the Catholic church tries to claim that Catholicism is the religion of Yahushua passed down through Kipha (Peter) one has to ask why was transubstantiation only invented  one thousand two hundred and fifteen  years after Yahushua's execution? What were all the Catholics doing before, how were they being made new without a Eucharist invention? In the same year was the invention of more idolatry : the adoration of a wafer/ host )wafer god)  ie worshiping an idol contrary to the commands of Yahuah. Yahushua said he has NOT come to abolish the commands of Yahuah specifically this one:


Exo 20:3  “You shall have no other mighty ones (pw gods) before me.
Exo 20:4  “You shall not make for yourself a carved image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above,
or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth.

Exo 20:5  You shall not bow down to them or serve them, for I YAHUAH (יהוה ) your Elohim am a jealous Elohim
 
visiting the iniquity (TORAHLESSNESS) of the fathers on the children to the third and the fourth generation of those
who hate me,

Exo 20:6  but showing steadfast love to thousands of those who love me and keep my commandments.

Yahuah unlike a pagan idol (as admitted on John Beckett's idol website)  is jealous He has eyes and ears and He does care for His people as a true husband jealously wants to protect his loyal wife (His congregation of believers) against adulterers (spiritual harlots).

So if the early believers, disciples and apostles were not doing what the Catholic church now demands will give you life, ie eating the very flesh of JZeus,  then does this mean that they were all damned heretics including Kipha (Peter) and if so how could he then be the man upon which they claim their doctrine/ church was allegedly built? Short answer it was not.

Why was that dogma of transubstantiation not present in the Catholic church from the start?

 The answer is simple the early believers including Kipha (Peter) would be  'heretics' in the dim the eyes of the Catholics because these believers followed Torah and they obeyed Yahuah and his Son. The Catholic Church hates heretics - anyone who does not obey THEM, they are labeled heretics and killed or persecuted.

The Catholic Church is the Mystery church of Babylon and that includes everyone who takes part in her evil dogmas (torah transgressions).

PAGAN MASS OR TORAH OBEDIENCE?

Who do we obey the Catholic Church or Yahuah? What does Yahuah require from us, pagan offerings or obedience to Torah?

Psa 40:6  Animal slaugher (pw sacrifice) and offering thou didst not desire; mine ears hast thou opened: burnt offering and Torah transgression (pw sin) offering hast thou not required.
Psa 40:7  Then said I, Lo, I come: in the volume of the book it is written of me,
Psa 40:8  I delight to do thy will, O my Elohim: yea, thy law is within my heart.
Psa 40:9  I have preached righteousness in the great congregation: lo, I have not refrained my lips, O YAHUAH, thou knowest.
Psa 40:10  I have not hid thy righteousness within my heart; I have declared thy trustworthiness and thy salvation: I have not concealed thy lovingkindness and thy truth from the great congregation.

First and foremost Yahuah wants our obedience especially now that Yahushua has offered his body once and for all  for our Torah transgressions. We should realize the cost of Torah transgression when we remember his death so that we do not take that gift he offered for granted. We do not despise the blood of Yahushua by transgressing Torah (pw sinning). His law (Torah) is within our hearts (Psa 40:8) and the more so now that he has given us new heart. We do not need some heart tissue satanic Eucharist "magic" in a test tube.


Joh 6:35  And Yahushua (pw Jesus) said unto them, I am the bread of life: he that cometh to me shall never hunger; and he that believeth on me shall never thirst.

Mat 13:21  Yet hath he not root in himself, but dureth for a while: for when tribulation or persecution ariseth because of the word, by and by he is offended.

APOSTLE SHAUL (PAUL) WAS NOT BOUND BY A EUCHARIST INVENTION

1Co 8:13  Wherefore, if meat make my brother to offend, I will eat no flesh while the world standeth, lest I make my brother to offend.

Now while this verse is in the context of some brothers who may refuse to eat food because of a suspicion that it had been offered to idols for example by the seller in the market place. Shaul says he is even prepared to stop eating such meat if it offends such a brother. Now if we KNOW that the wafer host is an idol itself (as proven earlier)in the Catholic Church given in the presence of idols (Mary, Saints, Crosses, Sun, Moon etc etc ) then would Shaul eat such flesh (bread/wafer/host/idol)? If Shaul said he was even willing to stop eating flesh entirely then that would mean he could not be a Eucharist follower in transubstantiation. If Shaul had opted to stop eating flesh he, under the heretical dogma of Catholicism, would have no way to salvation since he says he is able to avoid flesh altogether if he wants. Shaul was thus not bound by any Eucharist/ transubstantiation dogma but he indeed was remembering the death of Yahushua by taking part in the spiritual "zikron" ( memorial) of bread and wine as Yahushua commanded us.

YAHUAH'S PROPHETS DO NOT LIE

Dan 9:27  And he [Yahushua] shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week [three and a half years of his ministry]he shall cause the animal slaughter (pw sacrifice) and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.

Yahushua did indeed bring an end to the animal slaughter for atonement. He is the lamb that WAS, WAS WAS slain and there is no more animal slaughter (pw sacrifice) even up to the consummation -the Wedding Feast as stated in the verse when we shall drink with him the new fruit of the vine.

Mat 26:29  But I say unto you, I will not drink henceforth of this fruit of the vine, until that day when I drink it new with you in my Father's rule and reign (pw kingdom)

Transubstantiation does the very thing that Yahushua warned against  - it  declares the so-called real physical presence of an anointed one on earth in diverse places in secret chambers, in the desert, appearing in a wafer, in heart tissue, in the "Eucharist".......etc etc etc.....and they will use lying signs and wonders to promote such lies.

Mat 24:23  Then if any man shall say unto you, Lo, here is Mashiak (pw Christ), or there; believe it not.
Mat 24:24  For there shall arise false Mashiaks (pw Christs), and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect. 

Yahushua said we will not see Him again:

Joh 16:10  Of righteousness, because I go to my Father, and ye see me no more.

We will see him only one way in the future and that is as follows at the one and only resurrection for the righteous when he returns to take his children.

Mat 24:25  Behold, I have told you before.
Mat 24:26  Wherefore if they shall say unto you, Behold, he is in the desert; go not forth: behold, he is in the secret chambers; believe it not.
Mat 24:27  For as the lightning cometh out of the east, and shineth even unto the west; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.

Any claims of seeing JZeus / Jesus are pure evidence of the antiMashiak which the Catholic church promotes by the further evidence of their spirit of antiMashiak:

1Jn 4:3  And every spirit that confesseth not that Yahushua HaMashiak is come in the flesh is not of Elohim: and this is that spirit of antiMashiak (pw antichrist), whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world.

If they  really confess Yahushua to have come in the flesh then they would not believe he could die many deaths over and over again as they do. That is not the spirit of Mashiak in the flesh but  an antiMashiak, false Mashiak.

WAS IT PROPHESIED THAT YAHUSHUA WOULD OFFER LITERAL BLOOD TO DRINK?

The prophecy of Yahushua in Psalms clearly answers that question.
Prophecy of Yahushua (falsely called Jesus):

Psa 16:1  A Secret Treasure of David. Watch over me, O Elohim; for in You do I put my trust.
Psa 16:2  Oh my soul, you have said to Yahuah (pw  the LORD), You are my Master; I have no goodness apart from You.
Psa 16:3  As to the saints in the earth, they are the excellent, in whom is all my delight.
Psa 16:4  Their sorrows shall be multiplied who run after another Elohim. I (Yahushua) will not pour out their drink offerings of blood; and I will not take their names on my lips.
Psa 16:5  Yahuah (pw the LORD) is the portion of my inheritance, and of my cup; You shall uphold my lot.
Psa 16:6  The lines have fallen to me in pleasant places; yea, I have a beautiful inheritance.
Psa 16:7  I will baruch (pw bless) Yahuah (pw the LORD), who has given me wisdom; my heart also instructs me in the nights.
Psa 16:8  I have set Yahuah (pw the LORD) always before Me; because He is at My right hand, I shall not be moved.
Psa 16:9  Therefore My heart is glad, and My splendour rejoices; My flesh also shall rest in hope;
Psa 16:10  For You will not leave My soul in the grave ( pw hell); You will not allow Your morally ordained One to see corruption.
Psa 16:11  You will make Me know the way of life; in Your presence is fullness of joys. At Your right hand are pleasures forevermore.

It is indeed this literal blood drink offering that would set the real Yahushua apart from the pagan imposter "Jesus" of Rome who is supposed to offer literal bloodlike the pagans and the one, note, who has a pagan name eg Jesus (J-Zeus) who will not be on the lips of Yahushua.

v 4)  ...and I will not take their names on my lips.

Thus we have the two main signs linked to the False Mashiak ( antiChrist) of Roman Catholicism and all that serve her :

1)  a pagan literal blood drink offerings 

2)  a pagan name J-Zeus.

(for more see His Name)

ONE DEATH

How many deaths does a man go through before judgment?

Heb 9:27  And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment:

ONE death. Now Yahushua THE MAN (in the flesh) died once too. He is not a "god" and he is not into reincarnation like the Babylonian sun worshiping Catholics, Muslims or Hindus.

Heb 9:28  So Mashiak ( pw Christ)  was once* offered to bear the Torah transgressions (pw sins) of many; and unto them that look for him shall he appear the second time without torah  transgression (pw sin) unto salvation.

(*hapax = one / a SINGLE TIME)

So how many times does Mashiak die?

ONCE

 How many? 

ONCE

Sorry, how many times?

ONCE

Okay but....

No! No more debate

1Pe 3:18  For Mashiak (pwChrist) also hath once* suffered for sins...being put to death in the flesh, but quickened by the Spirit:

(*hapax = one / a SINGLE TIME)

 -he died and suffered

ONCE!

THERE CAN BE NO TRANSUBSTANTIATION

Yahushua was judged righteous by His Father after dying once, a single time

and will appear the second time righteous without transgression

 at resurrection and

 THAT IS WHAT SAVES US

 END OF STORY

(or perhaps not. We will probably add more later Yah-willing)


Additional verses for consideration

Rom 8:9  But ye are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit, if so be that the Spirit of Elohim dwell in you. Now if any man have not the Spirit of Mashiak (pw Christ), he is none of his. 

Rom 8:13  For if ye live after the flesh, ye shall die: but if ye through the Spirit do mortify the deeds of the body, ye shall live.

2Co 4:11  For we which live are alway delivered unto death for Yahushua's (pwJesus')  sake, that the life also of Yahushua might be made manifest in our mortal flesh.




Gal 1:16  To reveal his Son in me, that I might preach him among the heathen; immediately I conferred not with flesh and blood: 

Gal 3:3  Are ye so foolish? having begun in the Spirit, are ye now made perfect by the flesh? 

Eph 2:18  For through him we both (circumcised and uncircumcised) have access by one Spirit unto the Father. 

Eph 5:30  For we are members of his body(SPIRITUAL), of his flesh, and of his bones.
Eph 5:31  For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and shall be joined unto his wife, and they two shall be one flesh (SPIRITUAL).

Col 1:24  Who now rejoice in my sufferings for you, and fill up that which is behind of the afflictions of Mashiak (pw Christ) in my flesh for his body's sake , which is (SPIRITUALLY) the assembly (pw church): 


Make a free website with Yola