[pw = pagan translation ]
(see Sunday Worship Terms to understand what we mean by "pagan translation")
THIS IS THE CREATOR'S NAME IN ANCIENT HEBREW
AS IT WAS PRESENTED IN SCRIPTURE,
THE PICTOGRAPHIC TEXT OF THE FOUR LETTERS
(IN ENGLISH - YHUH)
This page is dedicated to the restoration of that true name which is YAHUAH (YHUH) and his Son's name Yah'ushua in accordance with YHUH's prophecy, commands and words concerning His very name. One of these being:
Pro 30:4 Who has gone up to shamayim ( pw heaven) and has come down? Who has gathered the wind in His fists? Who has bound the waters in His garments? Who has established all the ends of the earth?
What is His name, and what is His Son's name? Surely you know
The Father's actual NAME is not LORD, G-o-d or Hashem. In fact these are pagan names or titles which replace the true NAME of scripture as it originally appeared in the scriptures.
Brian Houston of Hillsong "Church" Australia is one such example. "Allah" does not teach To'rah* neither does Brian Houston's "G-o-d" teach Tor'ah but rather the doing away of it. False names with false doctrines.
So what's the big deal - surely we can call the Creator of shamayim ( pw heaven) and Earth by any name as long as we know and obey him? From the above poll it seems this is the general consensus. Let's look at the problems with a false name or title when it comes to standing against false religion.
Only The True Name Can Rebuke False ReligionIf Christians want to reject the name YAH’UAH and insist on using the pagan titles found in the corrupted translations: “LORD” or “God” then they have no authority against Islam who claims that Mohammed is the last prophet that the Quran claims would come in the name of “God” or the “LORD” which in Arabic is “Allah”.
However “Allah”, the “LORD” and “God” all do not refer to the NAME of the creator Yah’uah. Thus none of them have the authority of Moses’ prophesy. NONE of them are to be listened to!!! So Christians using that fake name cannot rebuke Islam and vice versa. Only those who accept the true name of Elohim can show who the true prophet / Mashiak ( pw Messiah) is.
The ONLY foretold Prophet that can be listened to as instructed by Moses is YAH’USHUA who
1) bears the NAME of his Father which is YAH’UAH, meaning YAH(UAH) saves, redeems, heals, avenges, delivers etc etc
2) comes in the NAME of YAH’UAH.
Deu 18:19 And it
shall come to pass, that whosoever will not hearken unto my words which
he shall speak IN MY NAME I will require it of him.
When Moses appeared before Pharoah he spoke in the NAME OF YAH'UAH, NOT ALLAH, NOT LORD, NOT GOD!
Shimon (Peter) re-iterated and confirmed, after Yahushua’s death and resurrection that Yah’ushua was that very one spoken of in Deuteronomy, not Mohammed.
3:22 For Moses truly said unto the fathers, A prophet shall YHUH your
Elohim raise up unto you of your brethren, like unto me; him shall ye
hear in all things whatsoever he shall say unto you.
Now some will still say "but does it matter what name or title
we use, it's about our heart right. and Yah'uah knows our heart.
Well exactly, he
knows when your heart is rebellious! Remember that rebellion towards
Yah'uah is regarded as witchcraft.
For rebellion is as the sin of witchcraft, and stubbornness is as
iniquity and idolatry. Because thou hast rejected the word of the LORD,
he hath also rejected thee from being king.
If Yah'uah commands you to do this
and you do that, then your
heart is rebellious. Ignorance concerning his name can be
long as one is not willingly ignorant and wilfully rebelling as you
would be after learning of this.
Wilful ignorance is no excuse.
so many mistakes and deliberate corruptions in modern
translations of the scriptures over the years the Father's name
and his Son's name have been polluted by pagan influences
whether intentionally or ignorantly and passed down through
Let us revive and restore the truth of His PURE name and
call Him by His pure name as commanded.
What about name calling on a personal level? I am sure you
would not want to be called Adolf Hitler because of what that
would represent. Or if your spouse asked you to stop calling
them a monkey, would you still call them that? Would you
insist that it does not make any difference?
It was ironic that a lady jumped all over me, not so long
ago, on Youtube commenting that I was teaching nonsense
yet at the very same time she had told me she was annoyed
that I had left out a T in her name and it really irks her when
people do that. Well there you go, correct names are
important to people so why not to Yah'uah?
Even the secular world knows that the Name is required and
a generic title "G-o-d" just wont do, period! Trevor Noah a
secular stand up comedian uses the example of the
colonialists arriving in India and asking the so-called
missionaries what they are doing in their country. They reply
we have come to tell you about G-o-d. They ask which G-o-d
and begin to name some of theirs : Shiva, Ganesh... etc.
So Yah'uah has to be named by His as He is the Almighty
alone and does not share His throne with pagan titles or
names. People are afraid of His true name since Yah'uah
does not compromise the truth and commands To'rah
keeping. In fact the producers of this Trevor Noah show
removed my Youtube clip of Trevor Noah's joke under the
guise of copyright yet other clips they have not removed.
It is mostl likely because we expose the truth about the
name of Yah'uah and who He is.
Lift up His Name
The Father commands that his name is to be lifted up? This is the Creator, the all consuming fire, we are talking about. Perhaps people have lost their fear or reverence for the All Mighty. Now we do know that false teachers tell us that we do not need to keep the commandments to remain justified so perhaps that is why they believe they can call the Creator whatever they like. He however says otherwise:
Background to Corruption of Yah'ushua's Name
Let's get a background of the corrupted name of the Son from this article. It is from the book Come out of Her My people by C.J. Koster, with minor editing by PierreRock Eksteen with further additions and editing by ourselves.
The Corruption of the Greek Name Iesous (Jesus)
Many Hebrew names of the Old Testament prophets have been "Hellenised" when these names were rewritten in the Greek New Testament. Thus, Isaiah became Isaias, Elisha became Elissaios or Elisseus (Eliseus),and Elijah became Helias in the Greek New Testament. The King James Version has retained some of these Hellenised names. Since the King James Version was published, the newer English versions have ignored these Hellenised names of the Greek New Testament, and have preferred, quite correctly, to render them as they are found in the Hebrew Old Testament. Incidentally, the similarity between the Hellenised Helias (instead of Elijah) and the Greek Sun-deity Helios, gave rise to the well-known assimilation of these two by the Church. Dr. A.B. Cook, in his book, Zeus - A Study in Ancient Religion, vol. I p. 178 - 179, elaborates on this, quoting the comments of a 5th century Christian poet and others, on this. Imagine it, Elijah identified with Helios, the Greek Sun-deity! Returning to our discussion on the reluctance of the translators to persist with all of the Hellenised names in the Greek of the New Testament, one could very well ask: But why did they persist with the Hellenised Iesous of Messiah’s Name, and its further Latinised form Iesus? It is accepted by many that His Hebrew name was Yah'ushua (meaning Yahuh-ah, The Father, sha (saves) through The Son [Mat 1:21]). So why did the translators of the scriptures not restore it, as they did with the names of the Hebrew prophets? It is generally agreed that our successor to Moses, was Joshua. The Greeks substituted the Old Testament "Yehoshua" with Iesous, the same word they used for Yah'ushua (true name of Messiah) in the New Testament. Subsequently the Latin’s came and substituted it with Josue (Iosue) in the Old Testament (which became Josua in German and Joshua in English), but used Iesus in the New Testament.
Two factors contributed greatly to the substitution and distortion of Yah'ushua's name. The first was the un-Scriptural superstitious teaching of the Jews that the Father's Name is not to be uttered, that it is ineffable, that others will profane it when they use it, and that the Name must be "disguised" outside of the temple of Jerusalem. Because of the Father's name being in His Son's Name, this same disastrous suppression of the Name resulted in them (The Greeks) giving a Hellenised, in fact a surrogate name for Yah'ushua. He did warn us in Joh 5:43, "I have come in My Father's Name . . . if another comes in his own name, him you will receive." The second factor was a strong anti-Jewish “culture” that prevailed amongst the Gentiles, as we have already pointed out. The Gentiles wanted a saviour, but not a Jewish one. They loathed the Jews, they even loathed the The Mighty One of the Old Testament. Thus, a Hellenised Saviour was preferred. The Hellenised theological school at Alexandria, led by the syncretising, allegorising, philosophising, Gnostic-indoctrinated Clement and Origen, was the place where everything started to become distorted and adapted to suit the Gentiles. The Messianic Faith, and its Saviour, had to become Hellenised to be acceptable to the Gentiles.
Where did the Greek name “Iesous” and Latin name “Iesus” come from?
In Bux and Schone, Worterbuch der Antike, under "Jesus", we read, "JESUS: really named Jehoshua. Iesous (Greek), Iesus (Latin) is adapted from the Greek, possibly from the name of a Greek healing goddess Ieso (Iaso)." Like all authoritative sources, this dictionary admits to the real true name of Yah'ushua. It then states, as most others, that the commonly known substitute, non-original, non-real name "Jesus" was adapted from the Greek. We must remember that Yah'ushua was born from a Hebrew virgin, not from a Greek one. His stepfather, His half-brothers and half-sisters, in fact all His people, were all Hebrews. Furthermore, this dictionary then traces the substitute name back to the Latin Iesus, and the Greek Iesous. It then traces the origin of the name Iesous back as being possibly adapted from the Greek healing goddess Ieso (Iaso). To the uniformed I would like to point out that Iaso is the usual Greek form, while Ieso is from the Ionic dialect of the Greeks. This startling discovery, the connection between Ieso (Iaso) and Iesous, is also revealed to us by the large unabridged edition of Liddell and Scott, Greek-English Lexicon, p. 816, under "Iaso".
The third witness comes to us in a very scholarly article by Hans Lamer in Philologische Wochenschrift, No. 25, 21 June 1930, pp. 763- 765. In this article the author recalls the fact of Ieso being the Ionic Greek goddess of healing. Hans Lamer then postulates, because of all the evidence, that "they changed Ieso into a regular masculine Iesous. This was even more welcome to the Greeks who converted to Christianity." He then continues, "If the above is true, then the name of our “Lord” which we commonly use goes back to a long lost form of the name of a Greek goddess of healing. But to Greeks who venerated a healing goddess Ieso, a saviour Iesous must have been most acceptable. The Hellenisation was thus rather clever." This then is the evidence of three sourced who, like us, do not hide the fact of the Greek name Iesous being related to the Greek goddess of healing. The Hellenisation of Yah'ushua's Name was indeed most cleverly done.
To repeat Yah'ushua's words of warning in Joh 5:43, "I have come in My Father's Name and you do not receive Me; if another comes in his own name, him you will receive." There is no resemblance or identifiability between the Name, Yah'ushua, and the Greek substitute for it, Iesous. The Father's Name, “Yahu-ah”, cannot be seen in the Greek Iesous or in the Latin Iesus, neither in the German Jesus, nor in the English Jesus. President Reagan's name remains the same in all languages. Hitler's name remains the same in all languages. Even satan has seen to it that all nations know him by his name: satan. satan has seen to it that his own name has been left unmolested!
However, let us
further investigate the names Ieso (Iaso) and Iesous. According to
ancient Greek religion, Apollo, their great Sun-deity,
had a son by the name of Asclepius, the deity
of healing, but also identified with the
Sun. This Asclepius had daughters, and
one of them was Iaso (Ieso), the Greek
goddess of healing. Because of her father's and
grandfather's identities as Sun-deities, she too is in the same family
of Sun-deities. Therefore, the name Iesous, which is possibly
derived from Ieso, can be traced
back to Sun-worship. We find other related names, all
of them variants of the same name, Iasus,
Iasion, Iasius, in ancient Greek religion,
as being sons of Zeus.
Even in India we find a similar name Issa or Issi, as
surnames for their deity Shiva. Quite a few scholars
have remarked on the similarity between the names of the
Indian Issa or Issi, the Egyptian Isis and the Greek Iaso. In
our research on the deity Isis we made two startling discoveries. The
one was that the son of Isis was called Isu
by some. However, the second discovery yielded
even further light: The learned scholar of Egyptian religion, Hans
Bonnet, reveals to us in his Reallexikon der Agyptischen
Religionsgeschichte, p. 326, that the name
of Isis appears in the hieroglyphic inscriptions as ESU
Thus, by supplanting the Name of Yah'ushua with that of the Hellenised Iesous (in capitals: IHSOUS), which became the Latinised Iesus, it was easy to make the pagans feel welcome - those pagans who worshipped the Greek Ieso (Iaso), of which he masculine counterpart is Iesous (in capitals: IHSOUS), as well as those who worshipped the Egyptian Esu (Isis). Further evidence of syncretism withe the Isis-system is found in A. Kircher, Oedipus Aegypticus, wherein the name of the son of Isis is revealed to us as "Iessus, which signifies Issa, whom they also called Christ in Greek."
Another pagan group of worshippers could also be made to feel at home with the introduction of this surrogate name Iesous (IHSOUS) or Iesus, namely the worshippers of Esus. Jan de Vries hold that Esus was a Gallic deity comparable to the Scandinavian Odin. Odin, of course, was the Scandinavian Sky-deity.
This Gallic or Celtic deity, Esus, has also been identified with Mars, and by others with Mercury, and was regarded to by the special deity of Paris. Just as Iaso, Ieso, Iesous are derived from the Greek word for healing, Iasis, we similarly find Isis (more correctly: Esu) and her son Horus (more correctly: Her), regarded as deities of healing as well as cosmic deities, or Sun deities, by others.
The most disturbing evidence is yet to follow. The abbreviated form of the name Iesous is: Ies or in capitals: IHS, or in Greek the capital for "e" id "H". This is to be found on many inscriptions made by the Church during the dark Middle Ages. This fact is also well documented and is generally admitted by scholarly sources and ordinary English dictionaries. These dictionaries bear witness to the fact if IHS (Ies) being an abbreviated form of IHSOUS (Iesous). Furthermore, the shocking fact has also been recorded for us that IHS was a mystery surname of Bacchus, and was afterwards taken as initials for Iesous, capitals: IHSOUS. We discovered this in a dictionary of mythology and in an encyclopaedia of religion. This revelation was confirmed by a third witness, Dr. E.W. Bullinger, The Apocalypse, footnote p. 396, "Whatever meanings of ... IHS may be given, the fact remains that it was part of the name of Bacchus ..." We then realised, most painfully, that our beloved Messiah was identified with the Greek deity Bacchus, by giving Yah'ushua the surname or other name of Bacchus, namely: IHS or Ies! Bacchus was well known to be a Sun-deity. Bacchus was also a commonly known name for Tammuz among classical writers. Tammuz, as you will remember, was known to be the young returning Sun-deity, returning in spring. Bacchus, also known as Dionysus, was expressly identified with the Egyptian Osiris, the well-known Egyptian Sun-deity. Bacchus was also called Ichthus, the Fish. So, yet another group, the worshippers of Bacchus, the Sun-deity, alias Ies (IHS), were conciliated, were made welcome, with the foreign-to-the-Hebrew name of Iesous (IHSOUS) or Iesus. This most appalling revelation startled us, indeed. After being enlightened about the solar origin of the word IHS and its fuller form IHSOUS (Iesous), we are no longer surprised to find the ecclesiastical emblem, IHS, encircled by sunrays, commonly displayed on church windows.
No wonder that we read the testimony of the learned Christian advocate, M. Turretin, in describing the state of Christianity in the 4th century, saying "that it was not so much the (Roman) Empire that was brought over to the Faith, as the Faith that was brought over to the Empire; not the Pagans who were converted to Christianity, but Christianity that was converted to Paganism." A further witness to this paganisation of the Messianic Faith is that of emperor Hadrian, who, in a letter to the Consul Servianus, wrote, "There are there (in Egypt) Christians who worship Serapis; and devoted to Serapis are those who call themselves 'Bishops of Christ.'" Another testimony comes to us from the letter of Faustus, writing to Augustine, "You have substituted your love-feasts for the sacrifices of the Pagans; for their idols your martyrs, whom you serve with the very same honours. You appease the shades of the dead with wine and feasts; you celebrate the solemn festivals of the Gentiles, their calends, and their solstices; and as to their manners, those you have retained without any alteration. Nothing distinguishes you from the Pagans, except that you hold your assemblies apart from them."
Note this pagan Augustine is held in high regard by the modern pagan Christian Church today as a Church Father.
Yah'ushua, in His final message to us, the book of Revelation, has warned us of this in Rev 17, Rev 18, Rev 19, and also in Rev 13, Rev 14, and Rev 16 – Babylon, Mystery Babylon. The Great Harlot has made "the inhabitants of the earth drunk with the wine of her fornication," out of the "golden cup" in her hand, "full of abominations and the filthiness of her fornication," Rev 17:1-5. She is also described as "sitting on a scarlet beast, full of names of blasphemy," verse 3. Tammuz, alias Bacchus, had a surname: Ies or IHS. He was also known as the fish (Ichthus), and had the Tau, the cross, as his sign. These three pagan things have survived, and are still with us!
In Acts 4:12 we read, "Nor is there salvation in any other, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved." This verse clearly tells us that there is only one Name whereby we can be saved - there is none other. It cannot be Yah'ushua as well as Jesus, Iesous, Iesus, or Ies (Bacchus). There is no resemblance between the names of Yah'ushua and Jesus AT ALL. The one is correct and the other one a substitute. The one contains our Father's Name and the other one not. Yah'ushua has said that He came in His Father's name, Joh 5:43.
In the newer translations of the Scriptures, we read in two places, Joh 17:11 and 12 that Yah'ushua said that His Father's Name was given to Him. If we believe the Scriptures, if we believe our Messiah, if we believe what Peter said in Acts 4:12, we cannot be satisfied with any substitute name.
We must believe, accept, and be baptized into the only saving Name: Yah'ushua. In the end-time, according to Joel 2:32, calling on the Name of Yahuah will be necessary for salvation and deliverance.
believing on, calling on, and being baptized in the Name of Yah'ushua, we
do "call on the Name of Yahuah ", through His Son, "Who had His
Father's Name given to Him, by His Father. "I
have come in My Father's Name,
and you do not receive Me; if another comes in his own name, him you
will receive," Joh 5:43. The writer
of Proverbs challenges us in
Prov 30:4, "What is His Name, and what is His Son's Name, if thou canst tell?" KJV.
A very interesting alternate rendering for Psalm 72:17 is given to us in the centre column of the Reference King James Version, speaking about he promised Messiah, "His Name shall be as a Son to continue His Father's Name for ever."
As I have stated, there is no resemblance between the Name Yah'ushua and the name Jesus. Neither is there any resemblance between their meanings. Yah'ushua means:
“Yahuah The Father saves (through The Son)” or "the Salvation of Yahu-ah".
"Jesus" is derived from Iesus, derived from Iesous (IHSOUS) derived, most probably, from the Greek goddess of healing, Ieso or Iaso. Her name was derived from Iasis ,which means "healing". Further, the short form, or original source of the name Iesous (IHSOUS) is Ies (IHS), the very surname of Bacchus, the Sun-deity. Therefore, the two names differ completely in their origin, and in their meaning. And more important: Yah'ushua's name contains the Name of His Father, which the substitute name does not. Further proof of the Father's Name being in the Son's Name is found in Eph 3:14-15, "For this reason I bow my knees to the Father ... from Whom the whole family in heaven and earth is named." Surely, if His family received His Name; His only begotten Son will also have His Name.
Another proof is Rev 14:1, but this should be read in the newer translations, because the King James Version and the Revised Authorised Version have it both wrong. Rev 14:1-5, in the NASB reads, "And I looked, and behold, the Lamb was standing on Mount Zion, and with Him one hundred and forty-four thousand, having His Name and the Name of His Father written on their foreheads ... These are the ones who have not been defiled ... These are the ones who follow the Lamb where ever He goes. These have been purchased ... as first fruits ... And no lie was found in their mouth; they are blameless." The translators of the King James version must have realised the meaning of this passage in Rev 14:1, namely, the similarity between the Lamb's Name and His Father's Name. Therefore they took the freedom, even if wrongfully, to omit the words "His Name and". The King James Version therefore only speaks about the Father's Name, while the Greek Text reads, "having His Name and the Name of His Father written on their foreheads." Do we wish to be part of this first fruit company? Then we are to make quite certain that we have the Father's Name and the Lamb's Name on (or in) our Foreheads. The similarity between their Names is obvious. Whether it will be just one Name, Yah, or whether it will be both Yahuah and Yah'ushua, is not clearly indicated, and is less important - as long as we have the essential part of the Name, Yah, which transmits its etymological concept of life, everlasting life. Verses 4-5 warn us against defilement, spiritual defilement - the lies that we have inherited, including the lies about the Names. "O Yahuah, ... the Gentile shall come to You from the ends of the earth and say, 'Surely our fathers have inherited lies ...' Therefore behold, I will this once cause them to know ... ; and they shall know My Name is Yahuah," Jer 16:19-21, a prophecy for the end-time.
"Therefore My people shall know My Name," Isa 52:6. "I will bring the one-third through the fire, will refine them as silver is refined, and test them as gold is tested. They will call on My Name, and I will answer them. I will say, 'This is My people'; and each one will say, 'Yahuah is my Mighty One,'" Zech 13:9. "For then will I restore to the peoples a pure language, that they all may call on the Name of Yahuah, to serve Him with one accord," Zeph 3:9. "And Yahuah shall be King over all the earth. In that day it shall be - 'Yahuah is one,' and His Name one," Zech 14:9. He will no longer be called by all those hundreds of names, by which He is known today. His Name will be "one". And His Son, in Whose Name the Father's Name is contained, will subject Himself to His Father in that day, 1 Cor 15:28."
Heb 2:12 Saying, I will declare thy name unto my brethren, in the midst of the congregation will I sing praise unto thee.
More to follow, Yah willing