HIS NAME

The Father's actual NAME is not LORD, G-o-d or Hashem. In fact these are pagan names or titles which replace

the true NAME of scripture as it originally appeared in the scriptures.

The Creator's Name Is Not Allah

Many Evangelical movers and shakers are now also trying to imply that Allah is the Creator mentioned in the bible in order to

bring more deception and false unity with paganism (aka Ecumenism) under direction of the chief deceiver the Pope.

First off Allah is not a name it is a generic title just the same as in other fake religions eg Catholicism where Yahuah has been

replaced with pagan titles Lord, LORD or God.

Allah is from the two Arabic words  AL + ILAH. "Al" means "the",   "Ilah" means "God". Thus we have the same generic big fat

zero nameless pagan title "the God" , thus when we ask who is this mighty one we get no answer from a Muslim as this

counterfeit imposter has no name. In Exodus when Pharoah asked Moshe (Moses) who this eloha (mighty one) was that

Moshe served Moses was able to give the specific name YAHUAH יהוה thus exclusively differentiating Him from the myriad

of pagan mighty ones in Egypt which are not mighty (gods) at all.

Even after this some will still say: so what's the big deal - surely we can call the Creator of shamayim (pw heaven) and Earth by any

name as long as we know and obey him? From a poll we took some years back it seemed this was the general consensus - that the

name was not important.

What about name calling on a personal level? I am sure you would not want to be called Adolf Hitler because of what that would

represent. Or if your spouse asked you to stop calling them a monkey, would you still call them that?

Would you insist that it does not make any difference? It was ironic that a lady jumped all over me, not so long  ago, on Youtube

commenting that I was teaching nonsense yet at the very same time she had told me she was annoyed that I had left out a T in her

name and it really irks her when people do that. Well there you go, correct names are important to people so why not to Yah'uah?

Even the secular world knows that the Name is required and a generic title "G-o-d" just wont do, period! Trevor Noah a secular

stand up comedian uses the example of the colonialists arriving in India and asking the so-called missionaries what they are doing

in their country. They reply we have come to tell you about G-o-d. They ask which G-o-d and begin to name some of their many false

deities : Shiva, Ganesh... etc.

To'rah keeping. In fact the producers of this Trevor Noah show removed my original Youtube clip under the guise of

copyright yet other clips they have not removed. It is most likely because we expose the truth about the name of Yah'uah and who He is.

Let's look at the problems with a false name or title when it comes to standing against false religion.

Only The True Name Can Rebuke False

Religion

If Christians want to reject the name YAH’UAH and insist on using the pagan titles found in the corrupted  translations

: “LORD” or “God” then they have no authority against Islam who claims that Mohammed is the last prophet that the

Quran claims would come in the name of “God” or the “LORD” which in Arabic is “Allah”.

Thus none of them have the authority of Moses’ prophesy. NONE of them are to be listened to!!!  So Christians using

that fake name cannot rebuke Islam and vice versa. Only those who accept the true name of Elohim can show who the true

prophet and Mashiach/ Anointed One ( pw Messiah) is.

The ONLY foretold Prophet that can be listened to as instructed by Moses is YAH’USHUA who

1)bears the NAME of his Father which is YAH’UAH, meaning YAH(UAH) saves, redeems, heals, avenges, delivers etc etc

2) comes in the NAME of YAH’UAH.

Deu 18:19 And it shall come to pass, that whosoever will not hearken unto my words which he (Yehoshua)

shall speak IN MY NAME I will require it of him.

When Moses appeared before Pharoah he spoke in the NAME OF YAH'UAH, NOT ALLAH, NOT LORD, NOT GOD.

Not only are GOD and LORD fake they are not names they are mere generic titles.

Shimon (Peter) re-iterated and confirmed, after Yehoshua’s death and resurrection that Yah’ushua was that very

one spoken of in Deuteronomy, not Mohammed.

Act 3:22 For Moses truly said unto the fathers, A prophet shall YHUH your Elohim raise up unto you of your

brethren, like unto me; him shall ye hear in all things whatsoever he shall say unto you.

Now some will still say "but does it matter what name or title we use, it's about our heart right and Yah'uah knows our heart."

Well exactly, he knows when your heart is rebellious! Remember that rebellion towards Yah'uah is regarded as witchcraft.

1Sa 15:23  For rebellion is as the sin of witchcraft, and stubbornness is as iniquity and idolatry. Because thou

hast rejected the word of YAHUAH יהוה , he hath also rejected thee from being king.

If Yah'uah commands you to do this and you do that, then your heart is rebellious.  Ignorance
concerning His name can be forgiven as long as one is not willingly ignorant and wilfully rebelling as you would be if you continue

ignoring His proper name after learning the truth.

Wilful Ignorance Is No Excuse

Yahuah says:

surely you know My name and My Son's name. (Proverbs 30:4)

It should not, and cannot be a secret if you wilfully seek the truth and have the scriptures at hand. 

You have no excuse as a believer after reading this.

Judaism And "The Name" - Is It Ineffable?

How can we just refer to Him as The Name (Hashem)? This is what evil Judaism has enforced by its own command from

rabbis and not according to the scriptures (To'rah). The father has not instructed any such command. 

They cannot utter his name YAH'UAH (as depicted here in ancient Hebrew letters) Why?

Perhaps those who cannot and will not utter his name are those evil ones found in this very revealing prophecy by Amos.

Read carefully :

You will notice that there is a connection to Samaria (v1)- which is where the false religion of Simon Magus

originates, the root of bitterness of gall which is a saying for idolatry. 

Today you will notice that secular Zion appears to be at a false ease due to the false Zionism which does not utter

Yahuah's name. We see that Amos foreshadows Yahuah's punishment manifested upon these who make vain the

commands of Yahuah; they do not utter his name Yahuah. So it becomes clear that those who are in idolatry will not

utter his name and thus bring his name to naught in this way.

But Yah'uah has said:

Exodus 20:7 Thou shalt not take the name of  יהוה thy Elohim in vain*; for יהוה will not hold him

guiltless that taketh his name in vain.

But how would we know whose name we should not take in vain in the first place if his name were ineffible here?

It would read

Exodus 20:7 Thou shalt not take the name of the Name thy Elohim in vain; for the Name will not hold

him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.

Whose name would it be?

The word "vain" here means bringing Yahuah's name to naught, in other words a meaningless, big fat zero! Is that not

what you are doing when you refuse to use his name  Yahuah altogether? You are making it meaningless, nameless,

vain, of no effect.

Have we not shown already that his name is in vain against false religion such as Islam when it is turned into a pagan

title LORD or God so that it can be used to represent any pagan mighty one? IS THAT NOT VAIN!?

Lev 24:16  Whoever blasphemes* the name of Yahuah יהוה shall surely be put to death. All the congregation

shall stone him. The sojourner as well as the native, when he blasphemes the Name, shall be put to death.

נָקַב*
nâqab
naw-kab'
A primitive root; to puncture, literally (to perforate, with more or less violence) or figuratively (to specify,

designate, libel): - appoint, blaspheme, bore, curse, express, with holes, name, pierce, strike through.

Note the definition "strike through". In English we have the strike through which would look like this:  Yahuah יהוה

We can thus conclude that blasphemy includes deleting Yahuah's name which the translators have done with the scriptures.

Not uttering “divine”* names is something that seems to have begun in Mitsrayim (pw Egypt) connected with their Osirian

religion (from which we get their story of Ra and Isis) Osiris’ name was said to be ineffable. We also see the same for the

Babylonian Marduk as recorded in an inscription. The name of Yah’uah was made ineffable shortly after Alexander. The

root of the idea is magic where if one utters a “god’s” name that god might be compelled. (Reference Legge, Forerunners

and Rivals of Christianity, p 37).

( *Yah'uah is not a "divinity" - a pagan idea referring to a "sky god". Yah'uah lives beyond the sky which he created Himself.)

Were they taking his name in vain then, were they transgressing Torah? No they were making sure they called on Yahuah and

Yahuah alone.

Would it make sense to say

or for David to say

        Psa 116:13  I will take the cup of salvation, and call upon the name of the Name

or

Psa 118:26  Blessed be he that cometh in the name of the Name: we have blessed you out of the house of the Name.

Whose house would it be then? The answer would only lie in the text as it was written ie with His very name in plain sight.

Psa 118:26  Blessed be he that cometh in the name of Yahuah: we have blessed you out of the house of Yahuah.

What about Yehoshua, the Son's Name?

The Catholic anti-Hebrew translators have done the same in our Bible translations to the name of the Son Yehoshua since

his name bears the name of the Father Yahuah and they wanted to obliterate it. Yehoshua bears the Yah part from the apocope

(shortened version) of Yah'uah his Father. (It is not a contraction of Yahuah as some claim).

Because the Greek, Latin and many other language influences upon the bible are languages corrupted by their pagan cultures

they are not pure languages. Hebrew /Aramaic are the pure and original language of the bible. Even the Renewed Covenant,

falsely called the New Testament had the Yahudath language (mistakenly called Hebrew) as already discovered by the use of

the many Semitisms / Hebraisms seen directly translated into the Greek. Yahudath (pw Hebrew) however was also influenced

when Israel was in captivity in Babylon for example and she began to take on her pagan ways. The scribes began to be corrupted.

However we are told that the pure language shall be restored. It is clear that the pure language is important to Yahuah in relation to

his people calling him by his correct name. 

So anyone who tries to say it does not matter what language or name we use is in direct opposition to Yahuah's prophecy,

command and will. They do not realise that their King James declares the names of gods and godesses simply in its use of English

namely Faith,Grace, Liberty, Charity, Easter (Eostre) etc.  Thus by using English we do not honour the Creator when it comes to

certain corrupt words. 

See Sunday Worship Terms 

No Iesous" Or "Jesus" in Oldest Complete

Greek New Testament!

The Catholic Church had 1400 years to hide the original scriptures from the lay people and 1400 years to fiddle with it. Thereafter

they have fiddled and corrupted further as we see with Yehoshua's name as recent as 400 years ago in this video.

FEEBLE EXCUSES

Female Name?

Many Names?

What About the Apostles And The True Name? 

Like so many mistakes and deliberate corruptions in modern translations of the scriptures over the years the Father's name

and his Son's name have been polluted by pagan influences whether intentionally or ignorantly and passed down through
the ages."

The Name Yehoshua Emphasises the Name

of the Father Yahuah

The name Yehoshua means Yahuah is our salvation, redeemer , deliverer. The salvation that Yehoshua brings to us that leads

us to the Father is only possible by the name which he bears, Yahuah, the name of His Father. It was his Father who raised

him from the dead. He did not raise himself from death. Thus no salvation would have been possible without Yahuah the

true bringer of this salvation. Yehoshua always points to the Father and magnifies Him. The name "Jesus" does not in any way.

Those who change the name to "Jesus" want to forget about Yahuah the Father. They want to replace the Father with a "Jesus"

who usurps the Father's Torah and does away with it. The next step is the abominable heresy that then declares this "Jesus"

to be "God" himself!(See: Why Jesus is Not God / Why Yehoshua is not Elohim )

Note right at the top of this image is יהוה.

King James Declares Yahuah's Name:

Any resistance to the Yahudath  (Hebrew language) and the name Yahuah from a so-called English standpoint
is clearly unjustified and pure ignorance since the the Tetragrammaton יהוה (YHUH) is seen just above the dove at the top
 of the page in the first edition of the Kings James Bible front page.

Let us revive and restore the truth of His PURE name and call Yahuah by

His pure name as commanded.

Lift Up His Name

The Father commands that his name is to be lifted up. This is the Creator, the all consuming fire,
we are talking about. Perhaps people have lost their fear or reverence for the All Mighty.
Now we do know that false teachers tell us that we do not need to keep the commandments
to remain justified so perhaps that is why they believe they can call the Creator whatever they like.

He however says otherwise:

Exo 23:13 And in all things that I have said unto you be circumspect: and make no mention of the name of

other mighty ones (gods), neither let it be heard out of thy mouth.

Jos 23:7 That ye come not among these nations, these that remain among you; neither make mention of

the name of their gods (mighty ones), nor cause to swear by them, neither serve them, nor bow yourselves

unto them

Deut 18:20 But the prophet, which shall presume to speak a word in my name, which I have not commanded

him to speak, or that shall speak in the name of other gods (mighty ones), even that prophet shall die.

 Lev 19:12 And all of you shall not swear by my name falsely, neither shall you profane the name of your

Elohim* : I am  ** יהוה(YHUH, Yahuah)

* not God  as your corrupted bible may have written

**  not L-O-R-D as your corrupted bible may have written

Even just before the time of Yahshua we see the name of the Father still being written as  יהו (YHUH - Yahuah) in Hebrew

as in this stele found in Israel and dated to around 1 BC. (this is a replica which has the text made clearer). The original stone

is at the Museum in Israel. It is NOT LORD or Adonai or Hashem but it is Yahuah יהוה and that is the name we declare.

Background to Corruption of Yehoshua's Name 

Let's get a background on the corrupted name of the Son from this article. It is from the book  Come out of Her My people by C.J. Koster, with minor editing by PierreRock Eksteen with further additions and editing by ourselves.

The Corruption of the Greek Name Iesous (Jesus)

Two factors contributed greatly to the substitution and distortion of Yehoshua's name. The first was the un-Scriptural superstitious teaching of the Jews that the Father's Name is not to be uttered, that it is ineffable, that others will profane it when they use it, and that the Name must be "disguised" outside of the temple of Jerusalem. Because of the Father's name being in His Son's Name, this same disastrous suppression of the Name resulted in them (The Greeks) giving a Hellenised, in fact a surrogate name for Yehoshua. He did warn us in Joh 5:43, "I have come in My Father's Name . . . if another comes in his own name, him you will receive." The second factor was a strong anti-Jewish “culture” that prevailed amongst the Gentiles, as we have already pointed out. The Gentiles wanted a saviour, but not a Jewish one. They loathed the Jews, they even loathed the The Mighty One of the Old Testament. Thus, a Hellenised Saviour was preferred. The Hellenised theological school at Alexandria, led by the syncretising, allegorising, philosophising, Gnostic-indoctrinated Clement and Origen, was the place where everything started to become distorted and adapted to suit the Gentiles. The Messianic Faith, and its Saviour, had to become Hellenised to be acceptable to the Gentiles.

Where did the Greek name “Iesous” and Latin name “Iesus” come from?

In Bux and Schone, Worterbuch der Antike, under "Jesus", we read, "JESUS: really named Jehoshua. Iesous (Greek), Iesus (Latin) is adapted from the Greek, possibly from the name of a Greek healing goddess Ieso (Iaso)." Like all authoritative sources, this dictionary admits to the real true name of Yehoshua. It then states, as most others, that the commonly known substitute, non-original, non-real name "Jesus" was adapted from the Greek. We must remember that Yehoshua was born from a Hebrew virgin, not from a Greek one. His stepfather, His half-brothers and half-sisters, in fact all His people, were all Hebrews. Furthermore, this dictionary then traces the substitute name back to the Latin Iesus, and the Greek Iesous. It then traces the origin of the name Iesous back as being possibly adapted from the Greek healing goddess Ieso (Iaso). To the uniformed I would like to point out that Iaso is the usual Greek form, while Ieso is from the Ionic dialect of the Greeks. This startling discovery, the connection between Ieso (Iaso) and Iesous, is also revealed to us by the large unabridged edition of Liddell and Scott, Greek-English Lexicon, p. 816, under "Iaso".

The third witness comes to us in a very scholarly article by Hans Lamer in Philologische Wochenschrift, No. 25, 21 June 1930, pp. 763- 765. In this article the author recalls the fact of Ieso being the Ionic Greek goddess of healing. Hans Lamer then postulates, because of all the evidence, that "they changed Ieso into a regular masculine Iesous. This was even more welcome to the Greeks who converted to Christianity." He then continues, "If the above is true, then the name of our “Lord” which we commonly use goes back to a long lost form of the name of a Greek goddess of healing. But to Greeks who venerated a healing goddess Ieso, a saviour Iesous must have been most acceptable. The Hellenisation was thus rather clever." This then is the evidence of three sourced who, like us, do not hide the fact of the Greek name Iesous being related to the Greek goddess of healing. The Hellenisation of Yehoshua's Name was indeed most cleverly done.

To repeat Yehoshua's words of warning in Joh 5:43, "I have come in My Father's Name and you do not receive Me; if another comes in his own name, him you will receive." There is no resemblance or identifiability between the Name, Yehoshua, and the Greek substitute for it, Iesous. The Father's Name, “Yahu-ah”, cannot be seen in the Greek Iesous or in the Latin Iesus, neither in the German Jesus, nor in the English Jesus. President Reagan's name remains the same in all languages. Hitler's name remains the same in all languages. Even satan has seen to it that all nations know him by his name: satan. satan has seen to it that his own name has been left unmolested!

However, let us further investigate the names Ieso (Iaso) and Iesous. According to ancient Greek religion, Apollo, their great Sun-deity, had a son by the name of Asclepius, the deity of healing, but also identified with the Sun. This Asclepius had daughters, and one of them was Iaso (Ieso), the Greek goddess of healing. Because of her father's and grandfather's identities as Sun-deities, she too is in the same family of Sun-deities. Therefore, the name Iesous, which is possibly derived from Ieso, can be traced back to Sun-worship. We find other related names, all of them variants of the same name, Iasus, Iasion, Iasius, in ancient Greek religion, as being sons of Zeus. Even in India we find a similar name Issa or Issi, as surnames for their deity Shiva. Quite a few scholars have remarked on the similarity between the names of the Indian Issa or Issi, the Egyptian Isis and the Greek Iaso. In our research on the deity Isis we made two startling discoveries. The one was that the son of Isis was called Isu by some. However, the second discovery yielded even further light: The learned scholar of Egyptian religion, Hans Bonnet, reveals to us in his Reallexikon der Agyptischen Religionsgeschichte, p. 326, that the name of Isis appears in the hieroglyphic inscriptions as ESU
or ES. No wonder it has been remarked, "Between Isis and Jesus as names confusion could arise." This Isis also had a child, which was called Isu by some. This Isu and Esu sound exactly like the "Jesu" that we find the Redeemer called in the translated Scriptures of many languages, e.g. many African languages. Rev. Alexander Hislop, The Two Babylons, p. 164, also remarked on the similarity of Jesus and Isis, "IHS - Iesus Hominum Salvator - But let a Roman worshipper of Isis (for in the age of the emperors there were innumerable worshippers of Isis in Rome) cast his eyes upon them, and how will he read them, or course, according to his own well-known system of idolatry: Isis, Horus, Seb." He then continues with a similar example of "skilful planning" by "the very same spirit that converted the festival of the Pagan Oannes is not the feast of the Christians Joannes." (The Hebrew name of the baptizer, and that of the apostle as well, was Yochanan or Yohanan).

Thus, by supplanting the Name of Yehoshua with that of the Hellenised Iesous (in capitals: IHSOUS), which became the Latinised Iesus, it was easy to make the pagans feel welcome - those pagans who worshipped the Greek Ieso (Iaso), of which he masculine counterpart is Iesous (in capitals: IHSOUS), as well as those who worshipped the Egyptian Esu (Isis). Further evidence of syncretism withe the Isis-system is found in A. Kircher, Oedipus Aegypticus, wherein the name of the son of Isis is revealed to us as "Iessus, which signifies Issa, whom they also called Christ in Greek."

Another pagan group of worshippers could also be made to feel at home with the introduction of this surrogate name Iesous (IHSOUS) or Iesus, namely the worshippers of Esus. Jan de Vries hold that Esus was a Gallic deity comparable to the Scandinavian Odin. Odin, of course, was the Scandinavian Sky-deity.

This Gallic or Celtic deity, Esus, has also been identified with Mars, and by others with Mercury, and was regarded to by the special deity of Paris. Just as Iaso, Ieso, Iesous are derived from the Greek word for healing, Iasis, we similarly find Isis (more correctly: Esu) and her son Horus (more correctly: Her), regarded as deities of healing as well as cosmic deities, or Sun deities, by others.

The most disturbing evidence is yet to follow. The abbreviated form of the name Iesous is: Ies or in capitals: IHS, or in Greek the capital for "e" id "H". This is to be found on many inscriptions made by the Church during the dark Middle Ages. This fact is also well documented and is generally admitted by scholarly sources and ordinary English dictionaries. These dictionaries bear witness to the fact if IHS (Ies) being an abbreviated form of IHSOUS (Iesous). Furthermore, the shocking fact has also been recorded for us that IHS was a mystery surname of Bacchus, and was afterwards taken as initials for Iesous, capitals: IHSOUS. We discovered this in a dictionary of mythology and in an encyclopaedia of religion. This revelation was confirmed by a third witness, Dr. E.W. Bullinger, The Apocalypse, footnote p. 396, "Whatever meanings of ... IHS may be given, the fact remains that it was part of the name of Bacchus ..." We then realised, most painfully, that our beloved Messiah was identified with the Greek deity Bacchus, by giving Yehoshua the surname or other name of Bacchus, namely: IHS or Ies! Bacchus was well known to be a Sun-deity. Bacchus was also a commonly known name for Tammuz among classical writers. Tammuz, as you will remember, was known to be the young returning Sun-deity, returning in spring. Bacchus, also known as Dionysus, was expressly identified with the Egyptian Osiris, the well-known Egyptian Sun-deity. Bacchus was also called Ichthus, the Fish. So, yet another group, the worshippers of Bacchus, the Sun-deity, alias Ies (IHS), were conciliated, were made welcome, with the foreign-to-the-Hebrew name of Iesous (IHSOUS) or Iesus. This most appalling revelation startled us, indeed. After being enlightened about the solar origin of the word IHS and its fuller form IHSOUS (Iesous), we are no longer surprised to find the ecclesiastical emblem, IHS, encircled by sunrays, commonly displayed on church windows.

No wonder that we read the testimony of the learned Christian advocate, M. Turretin, in describing the state of Christianity in the 4th century, saying "that it was not so much the (Roman) Empire that was brought over to the Faith, as the Faith that was brought over to the Empire; not the Pagans who were converted to Christianity, but Christianity that was converted to Paganism." A further witness to this paganisation of the Messianic Faith is that of emperor Hadrian, who, in a letter to the Consul Servianus, wrote, "There are there (in Egypt) Christians who worship Serapis; and devoted to Serapis are those who call themselves 'Bishops of Christ.'" Another testimony comes to us from the letter of Faustus, writing to Augustine, "You have substituted your love-feasts for the sacrifices of the Pagans; for their idols your martyrs, whom you serve with the very same honours. You appease the shades of the dead with wine and feasts; you celebrate the solemn festivals of the Gentiles, their calends, and their solstices; and as to their manners, those you have retained without any alteration. Nothing distinguishes you from the Pagans, except that you hold your assemblies apart from them."

Note this pagan Augustine is held in high regard by the modern pagan Christian Church today  as a Church Father.

Yehoshua, in His final message to us, the book of Revelation, has warned us of this in Rev 17, Rev 18, Rev 19, and also in Rev 13, Rev 14, and Rev 16 – Babylon, Mystery Babylon. The Great Harlot has made "the inhabitants of the earth drunk with the wine of her fornication," out of the "golden cup" in her hand, "full of abominations and the filthiness of her fornication," Rev 17:1-5. She is also described as "sitting on a scarlet beast, full of names of blasphemy," verse 3. Tammuz, alias Bacchus, had a surname: Ies or IHS. He was also known as the fish (Ichthus), and had the Tau, the cross, as his sign. These three pagan things have survived, and are still with us!

In Acts 4:12 we read, "Nor is there salvation in any other, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved." This verse clearly tells us that there is only one Name whereby we can be saved - there is none other. It cannot be Yehoshua as well as Jesus, Iesous, Iesus, or Ies (Bacchus). There is no resemblance between the names of Yehoshua and Jesus AT ALL. The one is correct and the other one a substitute. The one contains our Father's Name and the other one not. Yehoshua has said that He came in His Father's name, Joh 5:43.

In the newer translations of the Scriptures, we read in two places, Joh 17:11 and 12 that Yehoshua said that His Father's Name was given to Him. If we believe the Scriptures, if we believe our Messiah, if we believe what Peter said in Acts 4:12, we cannot be satisfied with any substitute name.

We must believe, accept, and be baptized into the only saving Name: Yehoshua. In the end-time, according to Joel 2:32, calling on the Name of Yahuah will be necessary for salvation and deliverance.

By believing on, calling on, and being baptized in the Name of Yehoshua, we do "call on the Name of Yahuah ", through His Son, "Who had His Father's Name given to Him, by His Father. "I have come in My Father's Name, and you do not receive Me; if another comes in his own name, him you will receive," Joh 5:43. The writer of Proverbs challenges us in

Prov 30:4, "What is His Name, and what is His Son's Name, if thou canst tell?" KJV.

A very interesting alternate rendering for Psalm 72:17 is given to us in the centre column of the Reference King James Version, speaking about the promised Messiah, "His Name shall be as a Son to continue His Father's Name for ever."

As I have stated, there is no resemblance between the Name Yehoshua and the name Jesus. Neither is there any resemblance between their meanings. Yehoshua means:

“Yahuah The Father saves (through The Son)” or "the Salvation of Yahu-ah".

"Jesus" is derived from Iesus, derived from Iesous (IHSOUS) derived, most probably, from the Greek goddess of healing, Ieso or Iaso. Her name was derived from Iasis ,which means "healing". Further, the short form, or original source of the name Iesous (IHSOUS) is Ies (IHS), the very surname of Bacchus, the Sun-deity. Therefore, the two names differ completely in their origin, and in their meaning. And more important: Yehoshua's name contains the Name of His Father, which the substitute name does not. Further proof of the Father's Name being in the Son's Name is found in Eph 3:14-15, "For this reason I bow my knees to the Father ... from Whom the whole family in heaven and earth is named." Surely, if His family received His Name; His only begotten Son will also have His Name.

Another proof is Rev 14:1, but this should be read in the newer translations, because the King James Version and the Revised Authorised Version have it both wrong. Rev 14:1-5, in the NASB reads, "And I looked, and behold, the Lamb was standing on Mount Zion, and with Him one hundred and forty-four thousand, having His Name and the Name of His Father written on their foreheads ... These are the ones who have not been defiled ... These are the ones who follow the Lamb where ever He goes. These have been purchased ... as first fruits ... And no lie was found in their mouth; they are blameless." The translators of the King James version must have realised the meaning of this passage in Rev 14:1, namely, the similarity between the Lamb's Name and His Father's Name. Therefore they took the freedom, even if wrongfully, to omit the words "His Name and". The King James Version therefore only speaks about the Father's Name, while the Greek Text reads, "having His Name and the Name of His Father written on their foreheads." Do we wish to be part of this first fruit company? Then we are to make quite certain that we have the Father's Name and the Lamb's Name on (or in) our Foreheads. The similarity between their Names is obvious. Whether it will be just one Name, Yah, or whether it will be both Yahuah and Yehoshua, is not clearly indicated, and is less important - as long as we have the essential part of the Name, Yah, which transmits its etymological concept of life, everlasting life. Verses 4-5 warn us against defilement, spiritual defilement - the lies that we have inherited, including the lies about the Names. "O Yahuah, ... the Gentile shall come to You from the ends of the earth and say, 'Surely our fathers have inherited lies ...' Therefore behold, I will this once cause them to know ... ; and they shall know My Name is Yahuah," Jer 16:19-21, a prophecy for the end-time.

"Therefore My people shall know My Name," Isa 52:6. "I will bring the one-third through the fire, will refine them as silver is refined, and test them as gold is tested. They will call on My Name, and I will answer them. I will say, 'This is My people'; and each one will say, 'Yahuah is my Mighty One,'" Zech 13:9. "For then will I restore to the peoples a pure language, that they all may call on the Name of Yahuah, to serve Him with one accord," Zeph 3:9. "And Yahuah shall be King over all the earth. In that day it shall be - 'Yahuah is one,' and His Name one," Zech 14:9. He will no longer be called by all those hundreds of names, by which He is known today. His Name will be "one". And His Son, in Whose Name the Father's Name is contained, will subject Himself to His Father in that day, 1 Cor 15:28."

The Name "Yahuah" Not Used by "Jesus"?

A teaching exists which says that Yehoshua (pw Jesus) did not use the name Yahuah in his day. These include the Church

of God founded by the late Herbert Armstrong who correctly taught to keep the sabbath but taught heresy such as "Jesus is

God" (see Why Jesus is Not God / Why Yehoshua is not Elohim). Armstrong used the argument that Yahuah's name was

ineffable when Yehoshua was on the scene and he would have been put to death for blasphemy right away.

We know Yehoshua was indeed eventually put to death for so-called "blasphemy" so this is no proof at all but rather proof

that he did proclaim the name and it was only a matter of time before they could arrest him without a revolt as he had a

large following in the beginning. This false teaching only serves to support the newly invented pagan titles of "Lord"and

"God" to corrupt and make void the name of Yahuah which is commanded to be proclaimed in the world.

So what does Yehoshua say himself: He says that he has declared and manifested the NAME of Elohim, not a pagan

TITLE "God" which falls short relating to "almighty" a generic title. It is very important that you get this into your head

before you continue. Yehoshua both declared (spoke out) and manifested, demonstrated the authority of the name

Yahuah with miracles. There is a huge difference between a title and a name. Remember that Pharoah needed a name,

asking who is this mighty one so he could identify him with the coming plagues that Moses warned of.  So the name proclaimed

would be attached to the manifiestation of that name.

Name Manifested by Mashiach:

Joh 17:6  I have manifested thy name unto the men which thou gavest me out of the world: thine they were, and thou gavest them me; and they have kept thy word.

Name Declared by Mashiach (pw Messiah):

Joh 17:26  And I have declared unto them thy name, and will declare it: that the love wherewith thou hast loved me may be in them, and I in them.

I love the way Yehoshua says he has declared the name of Yahuah in the past and will not stop declaring it even though he knows they will

put him to death (partly for declaring it) he will be raised to life again by His father Yahuah for obeying him in that very thing  - declaring His name Yahuah.

Heb 2:12  Saying, I will declare thy name unto my brethren, in the midst of the congregation will I sing praise unto thee  

Mat 22:34  But when the Pharisees had heard that he had put the Sadducees to silence,

they were gathered together.
Mat 22:35  Then one of them, which was a lawyer (Greek:nomikos -expert in Moses's law),

asked him a question, tempting him,

and saying,
Mat 22:36  Master, which is the great commandment in the law?
Mat 22:37  Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with

all thy soul, and with all

thy mind.
Mat 22:38  This is the first and great commandment.
Mat 22:39  And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.
Mat 22:40  On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.

Okay, so we did not see the name here. Let's move on then. Prior to this question the Saducees had asked Yehoshua about his doctrine concerning the resurrection. The Saducee sect did not believe in the resurrection  contrary to the Pharisees and tried to use a technicality involving marriage on earth to try and discredit the resurrection idea. This is the KJV with my corrections of the pagan words in brackets.

Mat 22:23  The same day came to him the Sadducees, which say that there is no resurrection,

and asked him,

Mat 22:24  Saying, Master (pw Lord), Moses said, If a man die, having no children, his brother

shall marry his wife,

and raise up seed unto his brother.
Mat 22:25  Now there were with us seven brethren: and the first, when he had married a wife,

deceased, and, having

no issue, left his wife unto his brother:
Mat 22:26  Likewise the second also, and the third, unto the seventh.
Mat 22:27  And last of all the woman died also.
Mat 22:28  Therefore in the resurrection whose wife shall she be of the seven? for they

all had her.
Mat 22:29  Yehoshua (pw Jesus) answered and said unto them, Ye do err, not knowing the

scriptures, nor the power

of Elohim (pw God).
Mat 22:30  For in the resurrection they neither marry, nor are given in marriage, but are as the

malakim (pw angels) of

Elohim (pw God) in shamayim (pw heaven).
Mat 22:31  But as touching the resurrection of the dead, have ye not read that which was spoken

unto you by Elohim

(pw God), saying,
Mat 22:32  I am the Elohim (pw God) of Abraham, and the Elohim (pw God) of Isaac, and the

Elohim (pw God) of Jacob?

Elohim (pw God) is not the Elohim (pw God) of the dead, but of the living.
Mat 22:33  And when the multitude heard this, they were astonished at his doctrine.

We notice that Yehoshua not only defends the resurrection but refers to Elohim (Almighty) of Isaac, Jacob and Abraham. This astonishes the multitude as they probably thought Yehoshua was starting a new religion under another mighty one (pw god) but they can associate with this Elohim who he says is a living Elohim of the patriarchs. This then makes the Pharisees question further. Notice how the expert in Moses's law tries to tempt Yehoshua (vs 35). But what exactly is the temptation here? Well, the temptation is surely to transgress the law, but what law? Is it the law of Moses or the law of the Pharisees? We believe it is the law of the Pharisees which they invented (takanot), the so-called blasphemy to utter the name of Yahuah? They know the text in Deuteronomy and they know Yahuah's name is there. Will Yehoshua submit to the law of Yahuah or to the law of the Pharisees? Will he utter the name as Yahuah has commanded or will he hide it. If he hides the name it could be said that his religion is referring to another generic mighty one, a pagan "god". If he says Yahuah it shows he does not submit to the authority of man and obeys Yahuah with all his heart... as the text itself commands. But now we get the answer as to what Yehoshua says distorted in the KJV. Let's go back to it:

Mat 22:37  Yehoshua (pw Jesus) said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind.
Mat 22:38  This is the first and great commandment.

The KJV completely distorts the response of Yehoshua and thus the explanation of the "temptation" spoken of in verse 35 falls flat. So what does Deuteronomy, from which Yehoshua quotes, actually say in the KJV:

Deu 6:5  And thou shalt love the LORD thy God with all thine heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy might. 

Notice here the KJV is consistent with the use of "LORD" in upper case being used for the tetragramaton יהוה which is correctly YAHUAH and not Lord (Master). It is highly suspicious as to why the KJV would corrupt the meaning specifically here. It is as though they are trying to make Yehoshua submit to the Pharisees and say:

"Thou shalt love the Lord / Master your Elohim"

as if he were afraid to utter the Father's name YAHUAH יהוה . Their diabolical plan is exposed since we know that Yehoshua is quoting from the text of Moses's law which explicitly refers to the name YAHUAH  (LORD יהוה) not a pagan title Lord (Master).

Recent Archeological evidence furhter proves the use of the name YAHUAH יהוה  in 2000 year old Greek fragments of the bible found in Israel's Cave of Horror. The Greek text is careful to use the Hebrew name YAHUAH יהוה unlike our corrupted King James bibles and other modern English bible translations.

Joh 12:20 -22 And there were certain Greeks among them that came up to worship at the feast: The same came therefore to Philip, which was of Bethsaida of Galilee, and desired him, saying, Sir, we would see Yehoshua ( pw Jesus). Philip cometh and telleth Andrew: and again Andrew and Philip tell Yehoshua (pw Jesus).

G2424

Ἰησοῦς

Iēsous

ee-ay-sooce'

Of Hebrew origin [H3091]; Jesus (that is, Jehoshua), the name of our Lord and two (three) other Israelites: - Jesus.

Total KJV occurrences: 975

G2424

Ἰησοῦς

Iēsous

ee-ay-sooce'

Of Hebrew origin [H3091]; Jesus (that is, Jehoshua), the name of our Lord and two (three) other Israelites: - Jesus.

Total KJV occurrences: 97

"we would see Yehoshua (G424)"

"Latin and Other Languages

In the Septuagint the name is transliterated as Ἰησοῦς (Iesous) the same way Jesus is spelled in Greek. However, in the Vulgate we see a distinction in how these names are spelled. What's the reason for this ?
Upvote

justastuma

•1y ago•Edited 1y ago

Jerome himself thought it important to preserve the “forest of Hebrew names”, as he wrote in his preface to the Book of Joshua:

Tandem finita Pentateucho Mosi, velut grandi fenore liberati, ad Iesum filium Nave manum mittimus, quem Hebraei Iosue Bennum id est Iosue filium Nun vocant, et ad Iudicum librum, quem Sopthim appellant, ad Ruth quoque et Hester, quos hisdem nominibus efferunt. Monemusque lectorem, ut silvam hebraicorum nominum et distinctiones per membra divisas diligens scriptura conservet, ne noster labor et illius studium pereat;

For his translation of the Old Testament he didn’t use only the Septuagint but also the Hebrew Bible (and often valued the Hebrew original higher than the Greek translation), which is also why he gives us two translations of the Psalms, one iuxta Septuaginta and one iuxta Hebraicum. I highly recommend reading an edition of the Vulgate that includes Jerome’s prefaces."

ref: www.reddit.com/r/latin/comments/182zigr/why_is_joshuas_name_rendered_as_josue_rather_than/?rdt=52248

1) zero
2) 6 519 (excl. New Testament)
 3) 49 (excl. New Testament)
4)Zero

More to follow, Yah willing

---