Overcoming the Ugly Face of the Trinity

Overcoming the trinity lie first requires one to simply dig up its sandy foundation. Old habits die hard but when one sees the ugly face of the trinity doctrine as Elohim sees it then it should not be difficult to run form it. The trinity doctrine accuses the victim by saying that in denying the "trinity" one somehow makes the Son of Elohim (pw God) less than what he is, ie. not "divine" or less "divine" than the Father, and then sends you off to a place incorrectly called "hell". Yet, one can see right through the cloak and dagger (see chapel) tactics, since, once the victim is gripped by this first fear of so-called heresy against this pagan 'church institution', the false teachers, like wolves, then sink their teeth in deeper exposing their victim to the next level of lies, that "Jesus" is indeed the very "Divine" Father himself! The victim very easily jumps with fear from the teeth of a so-called heresy right into the mouth of a real blasphemy. 

When one realises the word "divine" is a pagan concept applied to pagan sky deities, and has no place in scripture in the first place, one immediately sees where the doctrine is coming from: Babylon! The pagan translators have inserted Babylonian words throughout the scriptures (pw bible) which have no place in the thoughts of a true believer. Secondly  when one attributes to the Son what has not been attributed to him in the scriptures, ie. a pagan concept -"divinity", then that person is the heretic! He, nor his Father, are "divine" or "deities" of any kind . These are pagan titles with pagan idolatrous concepts.The Father and Son are not sky deities- they exist in the highest heights - third shamayim (pw heaven). This is beyond any created sky itself. Yahuah the Father is the living Elohim, the creator and possessor of shamayim (pw heaven) and earth and he has begotten his first begotten Son Yehoshua, to whom he has appointed authority under his very own name. Thus Yah'uah gives his Son part of his name, Yehoshua, referring to the fact that Yahuah is the one who saves his people through His kinsman (Son) redeemer and our kinsman (who are believers). He has been given "power of attorney" as it were, he is our advocate. This does not give him power to be Elohim.  Denying the "trinity" does not strip the Son of Yahuah from his rightful position or title nor does it strip him of his appointed authority. Exalting Yehoshua the Son of Elohim in the correct way, on the other hand, will always reveal the Son's remaining subservience to his Father's will as an OBEDIENT SON, to the only Potentate, Elohim, his very teacher.

KJV adds "he" here. It is not there! So it should read  : "then shall you know that I exist (ego eimi) and do nothing of myself"

Thus his very existence is due to the Father since he is begotten (created) by Him and taught by Him. Anything that elevates the Son to a place above his teacher, ie. to a To'rahless Mashiach (pw Messiah), is an abomination and falsehood from Satan. This is the Marcion spirit which replaces Elohim as an apparently evil "god" with a benevolent, ecumenical, universal (Catholic), To'rahless J(Zeus) Jesus.  Pagan "deities" (really demons) have always been scripted this way. Such myths and legends are meant to teach the art and idea of revolting, usurping and competing for worship. Sound familiar? The real battle is with Satan, the leader of such demons. These real demons are merely represented by these fictional pagan images called "deities". Modern versions of these fictional "sky deities"are Superman, Batman etc all representing demons /Satan. Satan really does want you to join him and his demons in his attempted revolt against Yahuah's To'rah. Satan wants all the worship. The trinity is one of his strongest "divinely deified" demonic delusions that deceives the whole world and by which he can try to win over your worship to him, as that has been his goal since the garden of Eden.

The trinity doctrine and its liars have done much to create division and confusion in the minds of many lost souls. We trust that the word (scriptures) of Yahuah would truly revive and reform you as you study with us in exposing this damnable heresy.

Trinity 3 in one - More Perverse Than Even The Demons

19 OBVIOUS FACTS

1- The Scriptures Refute "Jesus is God" by Declaring Yehoshua (pw Jesus) as the "Son of Man"

According to Matthew 1:1, Yehoshua (pw Jesus) is the SON OF ELOHIM, the SON OF DAVID,  SON OF ABRAHAM. He is a man, but most importantly he is the SON OF MAN. Every time this term is mentioned referring to Yehoshua  we remember that Elohim (pw God) has already categorically stated that the Son of Man is  NOT Elohim according to Numbers 23:19 as above. 

In the (REC) Renewed Everlasting Covenant (pw New Testament) it is said 89 times!

2- Yahuah is Spirit, Yehoshua Came in the Flesh as the Son of Man - if you don't get that then there is no further help for you.

But Yehoshua is the Son OF man and the Son OF Elohim (pw God). Anything more than that is a lie, period!

2 John 1: 7 For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Mashiach (pw Christ) Yehoshua (pw Jesus) is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an opponent of Mashiach( pw antichrist /antiMessiah).

1 John 4:2 Hereby know ye the Spirit of Elohim (pw God): Every spirit that confesseth that Mashiach Yehoshua (Jesus Christ) is come in the flesh is of Elohim (pw God): 3 And every spirit that confesseth not that Mashiach Yehoshua (pw Jesus Christ) is come in the flesh is not of Elohim (pw God): and this is that spirit of an opponent of Mashiach (pw antichrist), whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world.

Is it not strange how the brainwashing by the Catholic church has been controlling people to confess the very opposite, that Mashiach (pw Messiah) is not flesh but Elohim (pw God) himself, and that to deny this is heresy and the unpardonable sin? This is the "success" of the trinity deception which deceives the world and puts them in fear of men rather than Elohim and fear of excommunication from men's "church" (pagan Catholic word from deity Circe / Kirkeh) system or persecution. Did not the Pharisees also fear what men said rather than what Mashiach and his Father said? 

3-The Very First and Greatest Command Says There is ONE Not Three, and NO Other!

The scribe confirms that there is none other than Elohim, there is no "god the son" and "god the spirit"! The scribe does not say yes and you are that one! No! He says there is none other but HE, Elohim, who is so to be worshipped. This is straight from the shema (to hear) the beginning and foundation of Yah'uah's commands ie to properly hear his commands you have to first and foremost understand He is ONE not three.

4- Elohim (pw God) Cannot Be Born.

Isaiah 43:10 "Ye are my witnesses, saith Yahuah (pw LORD), and my servant whom I have chosen: that ye may know and believe me, and understand that I am he: before me there was no Elohim (pw God) formed, neither shall there be after me."

5- Yehoshua (pw Jesus) Never Says, “I am Elohim (pw God)”.

On the contrary Yehoshua explicitly states that he is not "Elohim (pw God)" being totally reliant upon His Father's will and not his own.

John 5:19 Then answered Yehoshua and said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, The Son can do nothing of himself, but what he seeth the Father do: for what things soever he doeth, these also doeth the Son likewise.  30  I can of mine own self do nothing: as I hear, I judge: and my judgment is just; because I seek not mine own will, but the will of the Father which hath sent me."

6- Elohim (pw God) Cannot Be Seen.

John 1:18 No man hath seen Elohim (pw GOD) at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him.

Once again a clear and distinct difference. Mashiach (pw Messiah) has been his witness, his declaration, proclamation but never his doppelganger / imposter of Yahuah himself. He is the Son - period! ." Bosom" figuratively means a bay, this means he was figuratively hidden within the bay, as a ship would be, and then brought forth to be revealed / "declared" not as the Father but as the Son. The ship is revealed from the bay, the ship can never ever be the bay itself! 

Note how the abominable translations have tried to put their false Trinitarian , Jesus is God heresy into this verse. THEY HAVE LITERALLY ADDED WORDS TO THE SCRIPTURES.

PURE LIES:

7- Apostle Shaul (Paul) Never Taught a Three-headed "Godhead" 

(Figures Left and Right : Various pagan depictions of the Trinity invention seen in Catholic churches which match (figure below) the evil Masonic All seeing Eye.)
For a Trinity to exist, three "gods" have to exist Three sovereigns, but Yehoshua made it clear that Yah'uah his Father has already emphatically said there is only ONE Elohim (see point 2 above). Yehoshua the Son only teaches what his Father teaches not what the Catholic church (universal circus) teaches.

If the Trinity were such an important heresy to be made truth then Shaul (Paul) would have taught it. He does not mention any trinity, he does not refer to a three-headed Godhead. In fact, Godhead is only mentioned in the Renewed Everlasting Covenant (pw "New testament") scriptures three times and only by Apostle Shaul (Paul). When he does refer to it he does not use it to create or support a trinitarian doctrine. In fact, it, instead, weakens the idea of three-in-one. Not in any single description by Paul describing the so-called Godhead do we see the pagan formula included at the same time. There is no so-called "god the father, god the son and god the holy spirit" formula ever mentioned. Instead this difficult and curious word Godhead is mentioned referring to a separate entity, the Father, the potentate who is the origin of creation, men and Mashiach (pw Messiah).

1) Acts 17:29 Forasmuch then as we are the offspring of Elohim (pw God), we ought not to think that the Godhead is like unto gold, or silver, or stone, graven by art and man’s device.

Here we see that Paul (Shaul) refers to men as offspring of Elohim. Elohim the Father creates, it is not man who creates the Father. The man Yehoshua, the Son, therefore also cannot create or re-fashion the Father like some idol into his own liking. Yehoshua is equally an offspring of Elohim but differs by being the first begotten Son of Elohim born of flesh but fully annointed with the 7 spirits or attributes of Yahuah.  It means that the "Godhead" brings forth many offspring, Elohim the Father being their origin.  No "god the father, god the son, god the holy spirit" heresy is mentioned here by Shaul. Instead, Elohim the Father is said to be the supreme creator of men, and it follows that so is Yehoshua begotten as the first begotten Son of Yahuah in the flesh.  As our section on the history of the trinity will show, it was the pagan invention of a "baptism" formula that Irenaeus first used to begin crafting the trinity heresy. (for more on this see the Subversive Immersion Formula)

2) Romans 1:20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse

Again the "Godhead" here is made known to all men and they have no excuse.  The "Godhead" clearly excludes the Son.  Shaul is clearly showing that the "Godhead" is revealed by the things which the Godhead himself (Elohim Supreme) has created. If it were so obvious that the "Godhead" must include the Son then Shaul would not have excluded him in the equation. So the Godhead could be clearly known even without any knowledge of the Son then invisible. This is obviously how it was for most who obeyed the Father before getting knowledge of the Son or of His appearing. They did not need to acknowledge a "trinity" to be acceptable before Yahuah. No such command existed or should exist, except in the pagan Catholic church for its followers. But now that the "Godhead's" ultimate creation, his Son, who was hidden in the bay, has been revealed and has appeared, it is now only necessary to acknowledge the Son as just that, the Son of the living Elohim. There is no excuse, since his ultimate creation, that which he loves and is pleased with, his Son, has been shown to us. He has been shown to understand his own Creator whom he calls Father, POINTING to the Godhead as Father. There is no excuse! No trinity can destroy the ultimate creation of the Son of Yahuah worshiping his Creator by full obedience and love, even to the point of laying down his life.  3) continues with this idea.           

 3) Colossians 2:9 For in him (Mashiach (pw Messiah)) dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily.

Once again this demonstrates that although the Son had been created it was only until his life of obedience was manifested in the flesh that the full revelation of the "Godhead", Elohim the Father, could be fully understood by men on earth, since a Father can only be a Father if he has a Son who obeys him and shares his love with us. And thus, the Godhead, The Father, becomes our Father too through the acknowledgement of his Son and NOT through some vain idea that the Son is the Father himself. The Son bears all the fullness of His Father's spiritual character and traits, he is truly one of his SPIRITUAL kindred by his MORAL CHARACTER  inherited. 

We will ellaborate more later regarding this odd pagan translation  "Godhead" itself.

8- Elohim (pw God) Does Not Sleep, Eat, Drink, etc. Yehoshua (pw Jesus) Did. 

The son of man, Yehoshua did these things:
Even after resurrection:

9- Yehoshua is Not Omniscient (all knowing) Like His Father YHUH (also see point 14)

(1 John 3:20) and Mark 13:32  "But of that day and that hour knoweth no man, no, not the malakhim (pw angels) which are in shamayim (pw heaven), neither the Son, but the Father."  

Heb 5:8 Though he were a Son, yet learned he obedience by the things which he suffered;  

Only Yahuah is all knowing there is nothing for him to learn. This is not the case with Yehoshua. How does one learn obedience without being sinful? Simply by learning the commands of the Father and choosing to follow them from the outset. This is what Eve was supposed to continue to do after being created in perfection but did not. Where she failed the Son of Yahuah, Yehoshua did not. Once one knows all things one cannot afterwards be unaware of anything, unless one's mind has been affected. To say that Yehoshua lost his memory somehow would mean he were not of sound mind which is ridiculous. 

10- Elohim (pw God) Cannot Change.  He is Perfect.

Matt 5:48 "Be perfect, therefore, as your Father in shamayim (pw heaven) is perfect.

Malachi 3:6 "I am the the Master [refers to YHUH] (pw Lord) and change not"

This differs from Yehoshua who took all our sins onto himself and for a short while was "forsaken" by His Father.


Mashiach (pw Messiah) temporarlily lowered himself below the malakhim (pw angels) when on earth.

Thus he had to learn and understand obedience and submission to Elohim. Now, if he were Elohim there would be nothing to learn since Elohim is all-knowing (omniscient).

Mashiach (pw Messiah) had to

1. learn obedience, submission 
2. be perfected (made fully mature in character)
3. be purified by the Father's Word to remain free of Torah transgression (pw sin) in the world.

Yahuah is already perfect in every way, does not change, but rather is the source or Father of purification, perfection, and teaching. He is kodesh (morally set apart), He cannot even enter this sinful world - His mere presence would destroy this dark sinful world because of His pure light.

In 2) above KJV renders *"the author" rather than "causer" here due to trinitarian bias to make Mashiach (pw Messiah) appear to be the author or source of eternal life when he is, in fact, the Father's way or instrument of salvation (the way, instrument to the Father). The Greek here is 159 aitios ah'-ee-tee-os from the same as 154; causative, i.e. (concretely) a causer:--author.  Mashiach (pw Messiah) has already destroyed the notion that he is the source / author and rather the causer when he said "I do nothing of myself; but as my Father hath taught me, I speak these things." (John 8:28) This false use of author implies also that Mashiach (pw Messiah) would have authored a new law and done away with To'rah which he did not. Mashiach (pw Messiah) is not even a co-author of To'rah but a doer of it.

Note in 1) though he were a Son yet learned he obedience. We see that the obvious becomes clear, if Mashiach (pw Messiah) were Elohim (pw God) then here would have been the perfect time to say: though he were Elohim (pw God) yet learned he obedience ( an obvious oxymoron). This is after all the folly of the trinity "godspell" that the omniscient Elohim somehow became an amnesiac.  However Paul does not even hint at such absurdity. Paul is not a trinitarian. Instead he makes it clear that the Son of Yahuah was not excluded from learning to submit as he was truly a Son and his Father was truly a Father. I will now show you how the trinitarian bias again from the translators of the KJV twists the verse and you will see how the truth and proper logical sense of the sentence is revealed when the correct words are applied.


Let's look at the Greek shall we: "though" and "yet" are in the Greek the same word but since they have various meanings there is latitude in choosing which to use by context. If the context is trinitarian bias then obviously the translation would be in that direction. Let's look

*StrongsGreek
2539 kaiper kah'-ee-per from 2532 and 4007; and indeed, i.e. nevertheless or notwithstanding:--and yet, although. see GREEK for 2532 see GREEK for 4007

So let's use the first meaning listed "and indeed" and insert them


Now does this not make more sense. Obviously if he indeed were a Son then he would indeed obey his Father according to To'rah. According to To'rah a son is defined as a son by his very obedience to his Father, else he is no more.


Furthermore if Yahuah is no respector of persons then His own son should not receive special treatment either. However, this is the tone we get with the KJV, that even though he were a son he had to learn obedience. In other words, my gosh, how strange it is for them that the Son of Elohim himself should also have to learn obedience, how dare He have to go through such a thing, especially if you claim he is "Elohim (pw God)" himself, how strange indeed. This stupidity in translation would further lead to the imaginings of a son of royalty expecting to get red carpet treatment on earth only to be tricked by his Father to face the "evil Jews" and then this Jesus saying, oh dear, why are you forsaking me Father, what's happening? Of course this is all fiction. Yehoshua knew exactly (John 10:17) what was in store as a son and laid down His own life for all evil done by every sinner on earth, not only for the Jews. The ultimate obedience was that he must obey his Father to the end in taking the punishment for our sins whilst innocent, with the promise of resurrection. Such obedience and trust by a son to a Father is rare, thus it should read "AND INDEED he were a Son" to the fullest degree in obedience, submission and trust. If we use the translation "though he were a son" it implies that he was Elohim (pw God) and for a while he became a son, grinning and bearing obedience/submisison to himself or if not to himself then who or what? The Jews? The Romans? Of course not! There is no such charade! Digging deeper into the verse the only charade is the translation itself. Now, again, with the corrections (and indeed) let's look further:

*Strong's Greek
5607 on oan, including the feminine ousa oo'-sah; and the neuter on on present participle of 1510; being:--be, come, have. see GREEK for 1510

Thus the translation charade is further exposed and should be:


Now Shaul is making it clear that Yehoshua the Mashiach (pw Messiah) is emphatically STILL INDEED a SON, not past tense Son. He has not been elevated to "Elohim (pw God)" by some pretense of suffering. He is INDEED STILL OBEYING his FATHER. He is not THE FATHER. So now the false translation suggests the idea of a new god usurping Elohim and this idea would be further strengthened with the false use of the word, author, as explained in 2) above, where the "new god" has authored a new religion which they call Christianos (Christianity - all about a new syncretic god and nothing about pure To'rah). (For more see Do You Really Want To Be Called a Christian?"

However, the truth is that The Father INDEED will send His Son INDEED again to resurrect His righteous and destroy the wicked. If He were no longer an obedient Son what surety is there that justice will be done as prophesied? Perhaps the mind of the ecumencial translator can be heard here by these twisted translations. What if this son were that pagan (J)Zeus, the one that does away with To'rah? Perhaps he will resurrect all those sinning pagan Catholics and christians who love the sins of other idolaters, perhaps he is the benevolent one who will usurp his Father, throw out that dreaded righteous To'rah which condemns them, and feel sorry for those unrepentant wicked ones. No! Not so. The SON has been appointed as the righteous obedient judge of the Father, he is not a pagan (J)Zeus god born on 25 December like all the others from the pagan pantheon parade. No, he is the Son Yehoshua, Son of the Living righteous Elohim who will destroy the wicked according to his To'rah.

In today's society the erroneous translation "though he were a son, yet learned he obedience" would be quite acceptable to understand since the perverse fathers of today think sonship means spoiling / corrupting the son by encouraging materialism and worldly success (eg. a career which ignores the seventh day sabbath, dishonest dealings etc). Sonship for them is not defined by obedience to To'rah and bringing a son up in the ways of Yahuah. They would think it strange that a son should be punished, as correctly instructed in To'rah, so that he learns the ways of Yahuah and does not lose his soul.  At the same time, however, they might, if they are "Christian", accept the innocent Son Yehoshuah to stand in their place and be punished by the Father for their own sins, and yet they are content in despising the same Mashiach (pw Messiah) and his atonement by continuing to sin and raising sons who in turn sin (transgress the Father's To'rah). They will accept a (J)Zeus god who they think will universally (catholically) accept both goats (wicked) and sheep (righteous) into shamayim (pw heaven). They despise the Son of Elohim, they despise the Father Elohim most of all.


It does not mean Mashiach (pw Messiah) is of the same substance, ie, is sovereign, he is not above the To'rah (law) of his Father but is a submissive, obedient Son.

Yehoshua's wisdom had to develop and the source of that wisdom was from the already fully wise Yah'uah Elohim his Father who is perfect (complete in wisdom). He received the fulness of wisdom from the Father but that fullness could only be fully applied when it is fully understood and that is what Yehoshua was perfected in at an early age.

11-Yehoshua is Not Omnipresent.

Yah'uah Elohim is omnipresent


Yehoshua however now sits on the right-hand side of Elohim on the throne

1 Peter 3:22 "Who is gone into shamayim (pw heaven), and is on the right hand of Elohim ; malakhim (pw angels) and authorities and powers being made subject unto him."

He does not reside in every man but only through the spirit in the hearts of those who obey and acknowledge him as the Son of Yahuah. The Son has left us till he returns but is with true believers in spirit, in a way that is no different to Paul's own non-omnipresent description as a man on earth.

Col 2:5 For though I be absent in the flesh, yet am I with you in the spirit.

The spirit is the knowledge, acknowledgement, thoughts, prayers, mindset, will, wisdom of Yahuah- the spirit is NOT a person (although it is personified just as wisdom is elsewhere in scripture. Wisdom is personified as female while ruach hakodesh,  pure spirit of Yahuah, is personified as male) The spirit is also not a dove but was described in this way merely because of the manner in which it descended LIKE a dove. 

Yehoshua had to be fully present in the flesh to die on the torture stake (pw cross, crucifixion) - He had emunah (pw faith) that Elohim would raise him up. He did NOT raise himself as he was dead, D-E-A-D. Anyone who declares otherwise is denying that the Son came in the flesh ( ie. was mortal) - this is the anti Mashiach (pw Messiah) spirit that alludes to immortality of flesh. 

Yehoshua does not possess self-existence in the flesh since He was begotten.  How strange it would be if Elohim is both the Father and Son simultaneously, as at, for example, Yehoshua's immersion (pw baptism) and at the transfiguration. Is Elohim playing different roles as in a pantomime? If Yehoshua is Elohim he must then be a ventriloquist saying He is pleased with Himself? No, Yahuah is not an entertainer in the "church"/circus. Yahuah is not pretending or role playing like some child. This is not a Hollywood production. This is reality: Yahuah is the Almighty Father Elohim and he has a Son!!

Matthew 3:16 "And Yehoshua (pw Jesus), when he was immersed (pw baptized), went up straightway out of the water: and, lo, the shamayim (pw heavens) were opened unto him, and he saw the Spirit of Elohim (pw God) descending like a dove, and lighting upon him:  17 And lo a voice from shamayim (pw heaven), saying, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased."

Matthew 17: 4 "Then answered Peter, and said unto Yehoshua (pw Jesus), Master (pw -Lord) , it is good for us to be here: if thou wilt, let us make here three tabernacles; one for thee, and one for Moses, and one for Eliyahu (Elijah).  5 While he yet spake, behold, a bright cloud overshadowed them: and behold a voice out of the cloud, which said, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased; hear ye him." 

12- Yehoshua is Not Omnipotent (ALL powerful and ALL sovereign)

Firstly we see that the Son, the man in the flesh was weak in the flesh and had to be strengthened. That which is all powerful is never weak and that is Elohim (God) the Father alone who is not flesh or a man but spirit.

But now that Yehoshua has been given power it is finite as it will be handed over to His Father at the end.

1 Cor 15:24 "Then cometh the end, when he shall have delivered up the rule and reign (pw -kingdom) to Elohim (pw God), indeed (*even)the Father; when he shall have put down all rule and all authority and power.  25 For he must reign, till he hath put all enemies under his feet.  26 The last enemy that shall be destroyed is death.  27 For he hath put all things under his feet. But when he saith all things are put under him, it is manifest that he is excepted which did put all things under him.  28 And when all things shall be subdued unto him, then shall the Son also himself be subject unto him that put all things under him, that Elohim (pw God) may be all in all." 

(KJV has "even" the Father as though he is inclusive of others when it should be rendered "indeed" ie exlcusivley the very Father alone. This is confrimed by the use of "excepted" in verse 26 further conveying exclusivity of the Father from the Son)

13- The Father Cannot Be Sent. 

If the Father Elohim was sent who sent him? Mary his Mother???? No! This is a ridiculous Catholic lie and perversion.

(* glorify / glory is a pagan word used by Catholics in the Latin Vulgate and hence KJV after the godess Gloria- a cleaner word would be splendor, honor, exalt, etc. )

YHUH is the essence of the worship. He is the object of worship and receives the splendor even as Yehoshua's purpose in receiving splendor from His Father is to ultimately give splendor to the Father and, in fact, prove that he has been sent by the Father. Over and over again Yehoshua makes it clear that the true believers are to know that YHUH the Father has sent the Son and YHUH is to be worshipped as in the Master Mashiach's Prayer*.  Yehoshua's followers at that time (Apostles and Disciples) never ever believed that the Father IS the Son. Furthermore the term "I and the Father are one" is clearly explained as perfection / completeness, and is not at all limited to any trinity since the true believers are included in obtaining this same oneness which is purely a oneness or aggreement in mind and spirit with Yahuah's and Yehoshua's will.

(*pagan translation:  Lord's Prayer)

14-Yehoshua explicitly says that he worships and serves Yahuah his Elohim (pw God) alone.

Yehoshua obeys (continuous tense) the first commandment. He is not "Elohim (pw God)" . He does not worship himself!

Mat 4:8 Again, the devil taketh him up into an exceeding high mountain, and sheweth him all the kingdoms of the world, and the splendor of them; 9 And saith unto him, All these things will I give thee, if thou wilt fall down and worship me. 10 Then saith Yehoshua unto him, Get thee hence, Satan: for it is written, Thou shalt worship Yahuah thy Elohim (pagan translation the Lord thy God), and him only shalt thou serve.

Satan was tempting Yehoshua to worship him instead of Yahuah His Elohim. There is no point for Satan to tempt Yahuah that would be daft.

Jas 1:13 ...for Elohim (pw God) cannot be tempted with evil,

Yehoshua refused!! Notice, He did not say, Satan, you are to worship me your Elohim, and notice, Satan himself did not confuse Yehoshua (pw Jesus)  the Son with Elohim (pw God) either, now did he, else he would not have attempted to tempt him as the Son in breaking the first commandment! It is ironic that Satan himself knows who the Son is, one who worships the Father,

John 14:28 ...for my Father is greater than I.

Yet Satan still deceives men into thinking the Son is somebody else and creates a false "Jesus god" who does break the first commandment, making himself Elohim (pw God) and abolishing his To'rah ( including the first commandment and the fourth and so it goes). Same temptation all over again, only worse and on a bigger scale to the ignorant.

15-The Mind of Elohim (pw God) the Father is Clearly Not the Same as the Son.

1 Cor 2:15 For who hath known the mind of Yahuah (pw the Lord), that he may instruct him? But we have the mind of Mashiach (pw Christ).

The Father's mind instructs while the Son's mind chooses to follow and obey his instruction. Hence we can be like-minded as the Son but not all knowing as the Father. This ties in with point 7 above referring to omnscience.

This defines the meaning of the fullness of the nature of Elohim (pw Godhead) dwelling in Yehoshua (Col 2:9). It was and is not Elohim himself dwelling in a "Yehoshua disguise", else he would also be all knowing (omniscient) see point 7.

16-Elohim (pw God) Did Not Come Down to the Earth as a Man, Yehoshua (pw Jesus)

In fact, we see the very opposite - when Yehoshua teaches us how to separate men's identity from Elohim (pw God) the Father. He uses the evidence of Elohim (pw God) being in shamayim (pw heaven) even while he himself Yehoshua (the Son) was down on earth. This clear, distinct and distant seperation between Yehoshua and Yahuah could not be clearer by the added mention of shamayim ( the heights) - third shamayim (pw heaven) where Yahuah dwells outside of our realm.

Matthew 23:9 And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in shamayim (heaven).

Furthermore, Yehoshua's statement "your Father which IS in shamayim (pw heaven)" appears eight more times in the good message (pagan translation-gospel) as well as of course "OUR Father which IS in shamayim (pw heaven)". Yes, the Father's prayer which Yehoshua taught us while on earth as the Son of Elohim clearly reminds us again that the Father is His Father too by the use of "our" Father. The Son clearly separates himself from the notion that Elohim (pw God) came down from "shamayim (pw heaven)" as "Jesus". Instead he utilises the present tense case of what is going on on earth while he is presently here and where the Father is at the same time - ie. in shamayim (pw heaven) - period!

17-Elohim (pw God) Alone is Immortal, Unapproachable and Invisible

Yehoshua died and was given immortality by the only immortal Father who raised him. Thus "he shall shew in his times...the...only Potenate" was accomplished. Yehoshua points to the one and only immortal Elohim. Likewise, we, who are righteous, will be given the same immortality only by the power of the Father in the future at the one and only resurrection of the righteous. Even prophet Isaiah will only be raised later with the righteous at that resurrection.

Isa 26:19  Thy dead men shall live, together with my dead body shall they arise. Awake and sing, ye that dwell in dust: for thy dew is as the dew of herbs, and the earth shall cast out the dead.

There is no such thing as dying now and immediately entering shamayim (pw heaven), or gehenna (pw hell) - this is only in the vain imaginings of Catholic pagan immortality which bypasses death - this is another heresy!! And we have not even mentioned their abominable heresy concerning a Mary who is supposed to be in heaven who they blasphemously call the "Mother of God".

This will only take place at the resurrection when all the righteous dead are raised together at the last day before the millenium. After the 1000 years the wicked dead are raised to life but only to be destroyed along with death itself. Nobody currently possesses immortality (save Mashiach to whom it has been given by the Father)

Joh 3:13  And NO MAN  hath ascended up to shamayim (pw heaven), BUT he that came down from shamayim ( pw heaven), even the Son of man which is in shamayim (pw heaven).

  Thus repeated, unrepentant, wilful sin (eg. addicts, drunkards, eating unclean foods, sexually immoral: adulterers, fornicators(shacking up), multiple partners.................. etc, etc ) in the body will cause death and loss of salvation, even after justification by Mashiach. (For more on losing one's salvation see Take the OSAS Challenge). Neither is there purgatory where sins can be removed after death ( For more see Puragatory Heresy ).

18-Yehoshua The Son Made Like Us In Every Way, Not Elohim (pw God).

From the above it is clear that it was "essential" that Yehoshua be made like us as the Updated KJV puts it. He was of the seed of Abraham and He was made as we were in all things (Greek- pas) made in every way the same with free will to succumb to temptation or to resist it. He chose the latter. If He were Elohim (pw God) Satan would not have wasted his time trying to tempt Him, now would he? Yahuah Elohim cannot be tempted to sin. Yehoshua had to overcome Satan by not sinning. He chose to resist sin because He loves the Father. He thus became our perfect atonement. Some have taught that Mashiach was made righteous by nature rather than choice. This suggests He was an automaton who could not sin. This is utterly false and a lie since we have already been told here in Heb 2:16 that He was made with ournature, like us in every way with the same weaknesses, free will, etc. Mashiach was certainly born righteous (free of sin) just as Adam before he sinned. When Mashiach entered this sinful world He had to remain righteous by learning to remain obedient - Heb 5:8 as discussed in point 8 above. He had to purify himself (John 17:19) of this world's temptations by resisting them. Adam did not stay righteous, while Mashiach, on the other hand, obviously did. Mashiach did this both by choice and by nature since He chose to follow the nature of His Father just as we ought to.

19-Yehoshua Has One Father Elohim As Do His Followers, He is NOT That Elohim

20-Yehoshua Has the Fear of (From) Yahuah his Father As Prophesied

Isa 11:1  And there shall come forth a rod out of the stem of Jesse, and a Branch shall grow out of his roots: 

Isa 11:2  And the spirit of Yah'uah (pw the LORD) shall rest upon him, the spirit of wisdom and understanding, the spirit of counsel and might, the spirit of knowledge and of the fear of Yah'uah (pw the LORD);

Yehoshua has the full fear of Yahuah since Yehoshua fully and perfectly fulfils the whole duty of a man which is to obey his Elohim's commandments. He is not Elohim.

Ecc 12:13  Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter: Fear Elohim (pw God), and keep his commandments: for this is the whole duty of man.

21-Yehoshua Uses "I Am" To Confirm Sonship Not Sovereignty

Mar 14;61 ...Again the high priest asked him, and said unto him, Art thou the Mashiach (pw Christ), the Son of the Blessed?
Mar 14:62  And Yehoshua(pw Jesus) said, I am: and ye shall see the Son of man sitting on the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven. 

We see the priest going: oh blasphemy! This is just like the false teachers of the "Jesus is God heresy" who also  falsely accuse Yehoshua of saying he said he is Elohim / I AM when he is saying nothing of the sort! He is saying  I AM THE SON OF YAHUAH confirming the Sonship as was prophesied for the Mashiach (pw Messiah).  Yehoshua is seated on the right hand of Yahuah Eloheem so how can he be Eloheem himself?

22- Yehoshua Is One In Agreement With Elohim And Is Not Elohim Who Is One

Oneness is by unity of the Spirit and Word (Torah) which makes it possible for every believer to be one with Yahuah too.

23- Yahuah Alone is the Rock

Christians try to use a badly translated verse again to make out Yehoshua is the Rock when we have been told over and over again that Yahuah is the Spiritual Rock. They use


The translation should be "...and that Rock was anointed"

Yahuah is the Spiritual Rock who annointed the literal rock to miraculously provide water. The literal rock did not follow them but the provision from the Spiritual Rock followed them.Thus in a sense the supply of water folllowed them on their journey.


That literal anointed rock that Yahuah split became a foreshadow of another altar as hinted at by Apostle Shaul a few verses later


 Despising the miracles of the literal anointed rock provided became a Torah transgression. Breaking covenanan (oath) despises the altar and everything upon it.


Despising  Eloheem the Spiritual Rock becomes an example of warning for those who despise the Spiritual Lamb (spiritual  living Water) provided by Yahuah and wilfully  transgress the Torah of Eloheem as did Yasherel in the wilderness. They despised the altar , the literal anointed rock that Yahuah provided and which purified the water. Yahuah is the Spiritual Rock alone who provided his Son as an anointed offeringto purify us upon an altar (stauros/ stake/tree). The emphasis is thus on the provision of an anointed thing or person PROVIDED BY YAHUAH AND ANOINTED BY YAHUAH to do his miraculous work.

If we say that Eloheem (the Spiritual Rock) is a literal rock  then we blaspheme and commit idolatry. If we say the literal rock is Yehoshua then we blaspheme again.. Finally If we say the literal Son (Spiritual Lamb )anointed by Yahuhah is Eloheem(Spiritual Rock) we blaspheme.

*************

The following chapter: History of the Trinity,

contains some text from a printed tract of a "church" sect.

In some places we have left the pagan names and words as they are.

We do not uphold to the teachings of so-called

"church fathers","denominations" or the misleading term "Christianity" 

We merely use the historical references to show men's philosophy

through history and how it opposes the true scriptures. 

History of the Trinity

From 100 AD to 400 AD so-called church-fathers of Alexandria in Egypt Clement, Irenaeus, Alexander, Origen, Arius, Athanasius and Cyril were causing confusion over the so-called Divinity of the Mashiach (pw Messiah).
They wanted to know whether He was fully Divine, or was He human? 

Well, it is important to note that this word “divine” itself is a pagan idea in the first place.
Divine/Divinity, Deity, Theos are all related words. The Greek words "dios" and "Theos," and the Latin word "deus" all refer to pagan gods: Greek "Dieus/Zeus, Teutonic-Germanic "Ziu," Roman "Diovis/Jovis/ Jupiter/Zeus were all names for Sun-god deities that "shine, have brightness."

So denying the trinity is said to deny the Deity or Divinity of Mashiach (pw Messiah). Well, that would be a good start since Elohim (pw God) is not a pagan god. He is not  a Deity or Divinity either. 
 
It is well known from the writings on the walls of the pyramids that the Egyptians had many gods, and were familiar with worshipping various trinities.  A trinity is a group of three gods. For example, they worshipped Amun, Maut and Khonso, another was Osiris, Isis and Horus, and also Neph, Sate and Amouke, to name a few of the better known trinities.  Different trinities were being revered in different cities, while worshipers exercised a peaceful toleration toward those who revered any others.  This same tolerance or compromise was later shown with Constantine in Rome and his establishment of the false religion called Christianity. It is interesting to note, however, that in all these Egyptian trinities, the third god of the trio always emanated from the first two as though it were their offspring.

It was about AD 180 that Irenaeus proposed the first exposition of a “Christian Trinity”. This whole matter seems to have arisen from the baptism formula recorded in Matthew 28:19 "Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit".  Irenaeus also taught that those Christians who wished to be baptized must have a triple immersion in running water.  This was intended to conform to the three elements, the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit. Two leading clergymen, Alexander and Athanasius, quickly picked up on Irenaeus's  theory of a triune god. They both believed that Elohim (pw God) and Jesus were equal, and they started to teach the earliest concept of the Christian Trinity. They started to preach that Jesus was fully “divine” and the same substance with the Father.  They used the Greek words Homo Ousious (of the same substance) to describe the Father and the Son to make Irenaeus's idea more credible. So we assume that they had made their god a sun god like so many pagan triune gods since their obsession was with “divinity” and thus their Jesus was made of the same substance, ie. a sun-god too.

In the meanwhile Arius, a priest in Alexandria argued that Elohim (pw God) is spirit (John 4:24) a non-material personal being, and his Son “Jesus” flesh and blood. He used the term Heter Ousious (of a different substance).  He said if Elohim (pw God) had created the Son, the Son could not be eternal with the Father.  He argued that “Jesus” was created a superior Being to redeem the human race.  He reasoned that if the Father bore a Son, there must have been a time when the Son did not exist, so the Son could not be eternal with the Father. He therefore placed the Son in a position below that of the Father.  Arius also taught that the Father and Son were both superior to the “Holy” Spirit, which was Elohim's (pw God) power.  He was convinced that the Father must rank above the Son and the Son was above the “Holy” Spirit.  He said that Elohim (pw God) was the creator, and that the Son of Elohim (pw God) was an intermediate Being, above all the rest of creation.

As the contention raged on, Arius could not alter the views of his opponents, so he called upon some of his fellow clergymen at Constantinople and elsewhere for support, causing the dispute to spread.  The contention caused waves of strife to arise between bishops, the clergy and various “church” groups, causing Alexandria to become divided over this issue.  The arguments continued unabated well into the 4th century, and by the 5th century these conflicts disrupted all commercial and industrial activity in Alexandria.

In the meanwhile the Edict of Milan in AD 313 brought an end to all persecution of those who claimed to follow Jesus in the Roman Empire.  Constantine the Great then invented Christianity as the state religion, and concerned himself with the affairs of this early Christian Church which was nothing like the doctrine of the apostles, Mashiach (pw Messiah) or Yahuah. 

This was simply a political manoeuvre in order to unify its false doctrines and thereby ensure unity within the Empire. Constantine was greatly concerned over the quarrelling by the “church” leaders with regards to the nature of Jesus.  He then took the initiative in AD 325, by convoking a Church Council in Nicaea, in present day Turkey.  The Meeting was commissioned to resolve the disagreement over the nature of Jesus and several other disputes that were prevalent at that time.  The main dispute about the so-called “divinity” of Jesus was again based on some ambiguous Renewed Everlasting Covenant (pw New Testament) passages.  

The meeting was very tempestuous as they debated and finally adopted the heretic resolution that Yehoshua (pw Jesus)  was indeed fully divine and of the same substance as the Father.  The meeting then endorsed their decision by using the key words Homo Ousious (of one substance) to describe the relationship of Yehoshua (pw Jesus)  to Elohim (pw God) the Father.  From then onwards, Yehoshua (pw Jesus)  was to be known as "God the Son".  The Holy Spirit was then declared a God of equal standing with the Father and the Son.  The upshot of this meeting was that the Council had introduced a new doctrine into their Christian Church known as the Trinity.  This is the term used to express the belief that within the one God, there are three “divine” persons - the Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost (or Holy Spirit).  The Meeting then formulated the Nicene Creed, which was to be recited in all “churches” to demonstrate that Jesus was indeed "Very God".

At this time I cannot help but repeat what I had, as you may recall, stated at the begining in point 10:

1 Cor 15:24 "Then cometh the end, when he shall have delivered up the rule and reign (pw -kingdom) to Elohim (pw God), indeed (*even) the Father; when he shall have put down all rule and all authority and power.  25 For he (Yehoshua) must reign, till he hath put all enemies under his feet.  26 The last enemy that shall be destroyed is death.  27 For he (Yahuah) hath put all things under his feet. But when he (Yahuah) saith all things are put under him (Yehoshua), it is manifest that he (Yahuah) is excepted which did put all things under him (Yehoshua).  28 And when all things shall be subdued unto him (Yehoshua), then shall the Son also himself be subject unto him (Yahuah) that put all things under him, that Elohim [Yahuah](God) may be all in all." 

KJV has "even" the Father as though he is inclusive of others when it should be rendered "indeed", ie. exclusively the very Father alone. This is confirmed by the use of "excepted" in verse 26 further conveying the exclusivity of the Father from the Son. Yahuah is sovereign over all, including the son.

So, to put it another way, 1 Cor 15:24 is plainly exposing the lie of Yehoshua (pw Jesus)  indeed being “the very God” for it is saying that the fact that the Son is subject to the Father at the end of his appointed authority shows that he is NOT indeed the very God. It is the Father who is indeed the very all-in-all Elohim, in other words, Sovereign Potentate (pw Godhead), and NOT Yehoshua. Appointed power is never above its sovereign master (pw Godhead).

Mat 10:24 The disciple is not above his master, nor the servant above his master.

In 1 Cor 15:24 the Mashiach (pw Messiah) is neither above nor equal in position but under the sovereign Elohim. Scriptures refer to him being equal in other ways, eg. by kinship, etc. but not in sovereignty and certainly not of the same substance since Yahuah is not substance but Spirit. He creates substance!! He created the begotten Son whose substance (flesh) was filled with his Spirit [ie. ANOINTED = Mashiach (pw Messiah]. (Covered in more detail later).

Back to the history of the trinity : Arius still maintained that there was only one God and that Jesus was the Son of God.  He claimed that by exalting the Son to equality with the Father they were destroying the great truth of the unity of Elohim (pw God). He told the meeting that he rejected the Nicene Creed and everything that this meeting had endorsed. In reply, the meeting then rejected Arius, and declared his "One God" teaching as "Arian heresy" because he would not accept that Mashiach (pw Messiah) is of the same substance as Elohim (pw God).

After this, Arianism quickly disappeared from within the Roman Empire. However, his followers remained active outside the Empire, particularly through the preaching of Bishop Ulfilas who converted many Germanic tribes to “Christianity” in northern Europe. 

A second Council Meeting was held at Constantinople fifty years later, in AD 381 to ratify the doctrine of the Trinity.  It approved the wording Homo Ousious(of one substance), and then affirmed that the “Holy” Spirit was a person.  After a few amendments were made the Nicene Creed was adopted, all of which were first propounded at Nicaea in AD 325. Conservative churchmen, however, hesitated to use this non-Biblical term Homo Ousious.

The introduction of the Trinity created much discord within this “Church” which raged on for many years, causing another Council to be held at Ephesus in AD 431. This meeting was to resolve some unfinished business, and to make further amendments to the "Christian Trinity” which had been promulgated at the Nicaea and Constantinople Meetings. At this meeting the Bishop of Alexandria came forward and introduced the idea that the Virgin Mary should be called the "Mother of God".  He used the word Theotokos, "Birthgiver of God" to pacify the people concerning this new doctrine of the Trinity.  He also proposed that Mary should be worshipped as the "Mother of God".  Nestorius, the Bishop of Constantinople on the other hand, asserted that the so-called “Divine” nature did indeed dwell in Jesus but He was not fully Elohim (pw God), nor could he accept that the Virgin Mary is the Mother of Elohim (pw God).  The Meeting then condemned Nestorius as a heretic for not accepting the Trinity.

It is ironic that this meeting should have taken place in Ephesus where they were pursuing the old pagan ideas of Isis and Cybele, the great mother goddesses, and Diana, the virgin goddess of the Ephesians whom the Apostle Paul denounced while on his missionary journey when he arrived at Ephesus, as we read in Acts 19:26-29, 35.

It took over 200 years, and no less than five Councils to hammer out, refine, and finalise the doctrine of the Trinity.  Many proposals and counter proposals were put forward and debated at these meetings.  Every minutest detail and every possibility of Mashiach's (pw Messiah's) relationship to the Father were argued and debated over and over again.  Many of the clergymen at that time sincerely believed that within the one Elohim (pw God), there are three “Divine” Persons - the Father, the Son and the "Holy Ghost" or "Holy Spirit". Whilst one can be sincerely wrong, error can also be wilfully chosen by not taking the time to seek the truth in the scriptures and following the vain teachings of men.

The advent of the Trinity which evolved from these Council Meetings appears to be a concept drawn from the Mythologies of ancient Egypt and Babylon. It did not form part of the Apostles' original teachings as recorded in the Renewed Everlasting Covenant (pw New Testament), but was a product of many factors which were forming in this thing called “Church”, particularly in Egypt during the 3rd and 4th centuries.  By that time everyone had lost sight of the simple teachings of Yehoshua and the Apostles; and theology had taken its place. It is interesting to note that the word "theology" is not in scripture and is related to the invented Roman Vulgate word "theos" from which we get the pagan word Divine or god from Hinduism's sun gods / Divas, etc. It has nothing to do with Yahuah the Almighty in shamayim. He is not a sun-god or a sky god and neither is his Son.

The word "deity" derives from the Latin deus ("god"), which is related through a common Indo-European origin to Sanskrit deva ("god"), devi ("goddess"), divya ("transcendental", "spiritual"). The root is related to words for "sky", such as Latin dies ("day"), and the Sanskrit div, divus, diu ("sky", "day", "shine"). Also related are "divine" and "divinity," from the Latin "divinus," from "divus."

[Deity - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.htm]

Constantine however felt satisfied that for the first time his “Church” had a recognized set of "Christian" doctrines which are still adhered to today through the pagan Roman Catholic church and its Protestant “children” 

As the decisions of these Councils were intended for universal acceptance throughout the Roman Empire, those who would not subscribe to them were declared heretics. Ultimately a law was passed in AD 719 making the worship of the Trinity compulsory in all “churches”.

Shortly after this, however, it was discovered that the Western and Eastern sections of the Church were not unanimous in accepting the Trinity as it stood.  They disagreed on how the “Holy” Spirit is derived. The Greek Orthodox Church used the original text of the Nicene Creed which stated that the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father.  They base their belief on John 15:26

"But when the Comforter is come, whom I will send unto you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, which proceedeth from the Father, he shall testify of me."

The Church in Rome, in the meanwhile, inserted the filioque Clause (Latin for, and from the Son) into the Nicene Creed as they felt that the Holy Spirit proceeded from both the Father and the Son together, so as to conform to the Egyptian trinities.  This view was rejected by the Eastern Church as they believe that the Father alone produced both the Son and the "Holy Spirit". This dispute remains a serious obstacle to the reunification of the two pagan “Churches” to this day.  The Roman Catholic and the Greek Orthodox Churches each claim that their Trinity is the right one. These two "Christian Churches” have been divided over the Trinity for nearly a thousand years.

The Apostle Paul warned of an imminent departure by the congregations*, from the simple teachings of Yehoshua.

( *ekklesia , not "church"- a pagan Roman Vulgate word invention from the Circe / Kirkeh godess) 

Acts 20:28-31 Take heed brethren unto yourselves and to all the flock for I know this that after my departing shall grievous wolves enter in among you not sparing the flock.  Also of your own selves shall men arise speaking perverse things to draw away disciples after them.  Therefore watch and remember, that by the space of three years I ceased not to warn everyone night and day with tears .

Another stern warning

1 Cor 8:5-7 "For though there be that are called mighty ones, [elohim, which are not – in other words idols] (pw -gods), whether in shamayim or on Earth.  But to us there is but ONE Mighty One [Elohim], the Father, of whom are all things, and we in Him; AND one Yehoshua Mashiach, by whom are all things and we by him.  Howbeit there is not in every man this knowledge.

Shaul makes no mention of a "God the spirit" either here but in Hebrews says the Father Elohim is the source of the spirits.


These are the seven spirits Yehoshua was fully annointed with, as prophesied. Thus he was the Annointed One (pw Christ).

The Ruach (breath) of Yahuah was made to rest upon his Son, it came out of the Father, it is not a third pagan god to be prayed to as popularised by the Benny Hinn cult book "Good Morning Holy Spirit". It is not a person, it is only personified. Wisdom in Proverbs has been personified as a woman but nobody added "god the wisdom", so why "god the spirit"? The blood of Abel also cries out but it is not a god, it is merely personified as it bears direct witness of Cain and all the prophets murdered. The set apart Ruach is not a person!

The spirit of Yahuah consists of seven attributes:

These spirits / attributes / powers / thoughts are OF Elohim, ie. they belong to and proceed from Him, have been given to the Lamb (Yehoshua) who has sent them forth as the comforter into all the earth from the Father to all who believe. 
The spirit is merely the attributes of Yahuah's power and core character itself, and so, when it is despised it is as if one is directly despising or grieving Yahuah after receiving the revelation of his thoughts, wisdom, etc. (turning from the light). It is rejecting the fullness of the knowledge, power, might, understanding and fear of Yahuah revealed through his spirit, that one is then turning away from, and there can be no excuse for that. It is what Satan did.

At this point it is crucial now to note that blasphemy against the set apart spirit (pw holy spirit) is not forgiven, yet blasphemy against the Son of Man, Yehoshua, is forgiven. Why would this be if He is of the same substance and is the "very God"?

Benny Hinn Charismaniacal Trinity

A trinity idea of only three is somewhat lacking if one truly DEIFIES SPIRITS like a true pagan and loves to make a corrupted polytheism of the One TRUE ELOHIM Yahuah. That pagan should rather go all the way to gehenna (pw hell) in an express train and do his worst and invent a god the father, god the son, god the wisdom, god the fear, god the understanding, god the knowledge, god the counsel, god the spirit, etc. But perhaps that would have obviously been too pagan back then and they had to be more subtle. Perhaps this will be the next pantheon of pagan gods they will invent in the future as they paganise the scriptures further. In fact, the very pagan and Catholic pentecostal charismaniac Benny Hinn went so far as to invent a greater number within his trinity at some stage. "As Hinn's popularity increased due to his television program and the runaway sales of Good Morning, Holy Spirit, his teachings came under close scrutiny by several apologetics ministries. The Christian Research Institute became especially alarmed by Hinn's references to the Godhead that seemed at best unorthodox and at worst heretical. On both his television program and in his book Hinn asserted that all three persons of the so-called Triune Godhead have their own independent bodies, souls, and spirits, as well as wills (10/13/90, TBN)"

ref: www.rapidnet.com/~jbeard/bdm/exposes/hinn/general.htm

This is an example of what rubbish is shown on Trinity Broadcasting Network. Ironically this heretic broadcaster of the Trinity doctrine also boasts of its love for the pope as a man of God, as does Hinn.
Trinity Broadcasting Network also clearly admitted years ago that Mashiach (pw Christ/Messiah) himself does not say he is Elohim (pw God) anywhere, yet they continue with the lie of the Catholic church since they are her agents.


If the late Paul Crouch were corrected and if Kenneth Copeland was correcting him then why did they still continue serving the pope, and still do in the case of Copeland with his recent call to join with the Vatican?

The Catholic church has done its worst in any case, they created enough Saints to be prayed to every day of the year (365). In setting them up as sky deities to be prayed to they are indeed deified gods. Including Mary, of course. They thus pray to the dead and make themselves the masters of necromancy which is an abomination and punishable by death under Yah'uah's coming judgement. And let's not forget their god, "Saint" Nicholas, or Saint Nick, who encourages and rewards those who "nick" / steal stuff. He, the "saint" of thieves, who is worshipped by the world is none other than SANTA (SATAN). He certainly is the robbing demon, deceiving children with pagan worship and idolatry and turning them away from Yehoshua, robbing them of their reward of salvation. Martin Luther and the Protestants (daughters of the harlot church) merely offered soft porn, as it were, in the form of another idol for their pagan festival, Christmas. For Satan worshipers Yah'uah's sovereignty must be undermined at all costs.  For more see "Saving Christmas?"

Paul's prophecy of what would happen after his departure was a warning of the debacle that would divide the believers very early on after his departure. These early so-called "church fathers" (fathers of lies) in the 3rd and 4th centuries had already denounced much of the To'rah that Mashiach (pw Messiah) taught and that the disciples, apostles and believers had followed in the first century. Since they rejected the light it is no wonder that they wandered into the deeper darkness of trinity heresy and then into idolatry of a Mashiach (pw Messiah) who is a god, and then on to the abomination of Mary as the Mother of God. More darkness would follow as they began to create their own doctrines. One could be tempted to blame it on the scriptures themselves as if they are written in such a way that there may have been apparent contradictions, but there are no contradictions in the scriptures.  Elohim is not the author of confusion. They really simply wanted a replacement religion, one that would replace the To'rah. They chose darkness with the invention of To'rah-less Christianity and its trinity which blasphemes the sovereignty of Yahuah.

---- 00O00 ----

The Church's Greatest Lie Exposed - 1 Timothy 3:16

The Roman Catholic Church and its daughter the Protestant, Christian conglomerate had to create a supposed doctrinal support for their lying doctrines:

It seems their supposed success was achieved once again by their use of their own corrupted tranlsations that they had time to conjure up while they witheld them from the masses, the laity.They had plenty of time to tweak and corrupt the Hebrew and /or Greek into pagan Latin. Their "greatest" work would probably be 1 Timothy 3:16 as seen today in  the KJV still being used as doctrinal support across the trinitarian spectrum of deceivers.

 1 Tim 3:16 "...God was mainifest in the flesh..."

The half asleep and illiterate would not realise this to be a direct contradiction to Yah'uah (pw God) himself. 

 God is not a man, that he should lie;
neither the *son of man,
that he should repent...

 Numbers 23:19

The foolish, like so many of us at one time or another, accepted their lie. But now by the kindess of Yah'uah many of us who love the truth are being shown that very truth and the lies of Babylon are being exposed once and for all! The horrendous corruption of 1 Timothy 3:16 is still evident in most modern KJV versions. In the copy I have on hand, a Ninth Impression 1992 based on the 1962 edition of the American Bible Society I find the following

Very clearly the publication indicates an asterisk next to "God". This inidcates an "alternative reading and rendering" which is supplied at the back. The alternate reading provided or suggested woud then be:

1Tim 3:16 And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: He who was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory.

Already we see the papal walls of Rome crumbling, "Elohim" (pw God) is not even there in the alternate rendering. No such corrupted version of 1 Tim 3:16 existed in any manuscript, neither did any  reference to it exist until after the creation of the trinity doctrine as set out in the chapter" History of the Trinity". The conclusion is clear - corruption of the truth was necessary to support a corrupt religion.

At this point it becomes paramount to further take note of what the subject in the sentence is. The subject is "the mystery of godliness". The subject is not "God" himself here. "godliness" is the pagan translation's useless attempt at replacing the Greek "eusebeia" which means piety, ie. being morally set apart to Yah'uah (pw holiness). Thus, the subject is referring to an attitude, action, spirit or behaviour that is toward Elohim, and not referring to Elohim Himself. The mystery then is NOT about, how is it possible for Jesus to be God? That is never the question here since every true disciple knows Numbers 23:19 as above prohibits any such question, but rather, how is it possible for a man to behave totally set apart and pious in obedience to Yah'uah? This is what is being declared. It made no sense for the translator to have made any error here unless it was intentional.

The declaration that "he", someone, in the flesh was shown to us, justified in the spirit, seen of malakhim (pw angels), preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world and received up into splendor (pw glory), this is the answer to the mystery, and there is NO CONTROVERSY, NO CONTRADICTION. Did you hear that? He who was shown to us as being fully obedient and morally pure does not contradict Numbers 23:19, he is not Elohim. He is a man and remains a man, he remains the son of Elohim - it is Yehoshua. The mystery that a man sent from above could be perfect and morally pure unto Yahuah and re-enter into shamayim (pw heaven) is the mystery that is no longer a mystery or a question, it has been seen and declared without CONTROVERSY, without CONTRADICTION. So, we see that the heretical church tries to make the mystery here all about a mysterious trinity when it is not. They make out that their mysterious trinity is so mysterious that it cannot be explained to this day. How convenient. They cannot explain their own contradiction either. Apostle Paul says there is no contrdiction or controversy since he is not talking about God being manifest in the flesh but piety or righteousness being manifest by the man Yehoshua in the flesh.

The further stupidity of stating "God" was seen by malakhim (pw angels) as some new revelation would be even more laughable. That Yah'uah would need justifying by his own spirit is a double joke, and that He would be received up in splendor (pw glory) a triple great mystery since by whom would He be received by and given honor by? In this way the question rather than being answered by the scriptures is instead turned into some typical agnostic (secret knowledge) mystery by the Catholic Church.

Rome wants to contradict the true Elohim and thus they inserted "God" instead of "he who" "was manifest in the flesh". Forgery was the order of the day.



Note: O  C  which means "who"  (Greek O C changed to Θ‾C which means theos "God". Line above with darker ink supports evidence of a modern forgery (ie. after the invention of trinity doctrine and not before)


The same forgery was attempted in the Codex Sinaiticus (??)

I would call this a truly perfect example of what is today called the Mandela Effect, the name for the phenomenon where a fact is distorted by false information (in this case by forgery) which then seems to continue as a fact or truth regardless of the information having been corrected or changed. This type of phenomenon received its name when Nelson Mandela was reported to have died at an earlier time in his life and many continued to believe he was dead despite later reports of his activities. This has indeed happened to the world of Christianity who is living under the Mandela Effect of the Catholic Church.

The corruption of 1 Tim 3:16 has been exposed and corrected by numerous translations yet denominations around the world still declare Jesus is God manifest in the flesh and use 1 Tim 3:16 in its corrupted form. So what about you? Are you still under the Mandela Effect of Rome? Another example would be if I were to ask you to insert the missing word in the sentence - "We are saved / justified by ______ alone." Nine out of ten times the answer would undoubtedly be incorrect based upon another corrupted translation made around 500 years ago by Martin Luther! Although most translations do not render it this way at all the heretical slogan has stuck and continues to be used by the false church system just like the "God in the flesh" fable as if it were true scripture - another Mandela Effect. For the correct missing word see our aritcle Faith Alone?

Now, if we investigate 1 Tim 3:16 further, some texts even have "who" or" which" in place of "God". We agree most strongly with "which", since, as we stated previously, it is the mystery of set apartness (pw godliness), that is the subject, not "God" or a person that is being referred to, so "which" fits grammatically.

The following list is from http://www.TrinityTruth.org where 25 translations are shown with the more correct translations (we do not neccessarily endorse any of these 'bibles" in part or whole). They show how, despite the numerous correct translations, the lie or error continues to live on with gusto.

1Timothy 3:16

(ASV) “And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness; He who was manifested in the flesh, Justified in the spirit, Seen of angels, Preached among the nations, Believed on in the world, Received up in glory.”

(BBE) “And without argument, great is the secret of religion: He who was seen in the flesh, who was given God's approval in the spirit, was seen by the angels, of whom the good news was given among the nations, in whom the world had faith, who was taken up in glory.”

(CEV) “Here is the great mystery of our religion: Christ came as a human. The Spirit proved that he pleased God, and he was seen by angels. Christ was preached to the nations. People in this world put their faith in him, and he was taken up to glory.”

(CJB) “Great beyond all question is the formerly hidden truth underlying our faith: He was manifested physically and proved righteous spiritually, seen by angels and proclaimed among the nations, trusted throughout the world and raised up in glory to heaven.”

(CENT) “By common confession, great is the mystery of godliness: he was revealed in the flesh, was vindicated in the Spirit, seen by angels, preached among the nations, believed on in the world, taken up in glory.”

(ESV) “Great indeed, we confess, is the mystery of godliness: He was manifested in the flesh, vindicated by the Spirit, seen by angels, proclaimed among the nations, believed on in the world, taken up in glory.”

(GNB) “No one can deny how great is the secret of our religion: He appeared in human form, was shown to be right by the Spirit, and was seen by angels. He was preached among the nations, was believed in throughout the world, and was taken up to heaven.”

(HCSB) “And most certainly, the mystery of godliness is great: He was manifested in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen by angels, preached among the Gentiles, believed on in the world, taken up in glory.”

(LONT) “And, confessedly, great is the secret of godliness; -he who has manifested in the flesh, justified in the Spirit; seen of messengers, proclaimed to the Gentiles, believed on in the world, taken up in glory.”

(MSG) “This Christian life is a great mystery, far exceeding our understanding, but some things are clear enough: He appeared in a human body, was proved right by the invisible Spirit, was seen by angels. He was proclaimed among all kinds of peoples, believed in all over the world, taken up into heavenly glory.”

(MRC) “And as agreed by common consent great is the mystery of piety: He Who was manifested in the flesh, was justified in the Spirit, seen by angels, proclaimed among the nations, believed on in the world, taken up in glory.”

(NASB) “By common confession, great is the mystery of godliness: He who was revealed in the flesh, Was vindicated in the Spirit, Seen by angels, Proclaimed among the nations, Believed on in the world, Taken up in glory.”

(NCV) “Without doubt, the secret of our life of worship is great: He was shown to us in a human body, proved right in spirit, and seen by angels. He was preached to those who are not Jews, believed in by the world, and taken up in glory.”

(NET) “And we all agree, our religion contains amazing revelation: He was revealed in the flesh, vindicated by the Spirit, seen by angels, proclaimed among Gentiles, believed on in the world, taken up in glory.”

(NIRV) “There is no doubt that godliness is a great mystery. Jesus appeared in a body. The Holy Spirit proved that he was the Son of God. He was seen by angels. He was preached among the nations. People in the world believed in him. He was taken up to heaven in glory.”

(NIV) “Beyond all question, the mystery of godliness is great: He appeared in a body, was vindicated by the Spirit, was seen by angels, was preached among the nations, was believed on in the world, was taken up in glory.”

(NLT) “Without question, this is the great mystery of our faith: Christ appeared in the flesh and was shown to be righteous by the Spirit. He was seen by angels and was announced to the nations. He was believed on in the world and was taken up into heaven.”

(NLV) “It is important to know the secret of Godlike living, which is: Christ came to earth as a Man. He was pure in His Spirit. He was seen by angels. The nations heard about Him. Men everywhere put their trust in Him. He was taken up into heaven.”

(NRSV) “Without any doubt, the mystery of our religion is great: He was revealed in flesh, vindicated in spirit, seen by angels, proclaimed among Gentiles, believed in throughout the world, taken up in glory.”

(RSV) “Great indeed, we confess, is the mystery of our religion: He was manifested in the flesh, vindicated in the Spirit, seen by angels, preached among the nations, believed on in the world, taken up in glory.”

(RV) “And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness; He who was manifested in the flesh, justified in the spirit, seen of angels, preached among the nations, believed on in the world, received up in glory.”

(TCNT) “Yes, and confessedly wonderful are the deep truths of our religion; for-- 'He was revealed in our nature, pronounced righteous in spirit, seen by angels, proclaimed among the Gentiles, believed on in the world, taken up into glory.'”

(UPDV) “And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness; He who was manifested in the flesh, Justified in the spirit, Seen of angels, Preached among the nations, Believed on in the world, Received up in glory.”

(WmsNT) “Undoubtedly the mystery of our religion is a great wonder: "He was made visible in human form; He was vindicated by the Spirit; He was seen by angels; He was proclaimed among the heathen; He was trusted in throughout the world; He was taken up to glory.”

(WNT) “And, beyond controversy, great is the mystery of our religion - that Christ appeared in human form, and His claims justified by the Spirit, was seen by angels and proclaimed among Gentile nations, was believed on in the world, and received up again into glory.”

We also note the trinitarian Albert Barnes' explanation below and highlight the fact that he remained a trinitarian all the same. This would mean that Mr Barnes also did not believe Elohim (pw God) in Numbers 23:19, or simply ignored Him, rather hanging on to a Catholic fabrication - the Mandela Effect had developed into a lie that was now believed. If one tells a lie often enough it can be accepted as truth by the deceived and the teller of the lie will soon believe his own lie too. The To'rah is clear that there must be two or more witnesses to establish a truth and Yah'uah (through Num23;19 and many other places) is not a second witness to a false rendering of 1 Tim 3:16 but a witness who exposes its corruption by the Catholics of Constantine.

Albert Barnes' Notes on the Bible, (1798-1870)
“God - Probably there is no passage in the New Testament which has excited so much discussion among critics as this, and none in reference to which it is so difficult to determine the true reading. It is the only one, it is believed, in which the microscope has been employed to determine the lines of the letters used in a manuscript; and, after all that has been done to ascertain the exact truth in regard to it, still the question remains undecided. It is not the object of these notes to enter into the examination of questions of this nature. A full investigation may be found in Wetstein. The question which has excited so much controversy is, whether the original Greek word was Θεὸς Theos, “God,” or whether it was ὅςhos, “who,” or ὁho, “which.” The controversy has turned, to a considerable degree, on the reading in the “Codex Alexandrinus;” and a remark or two on the method in which the manuscripts in the New Testament were written, will show the true nature of the controversy.
Greek manuscripts were formerly written entirely in capital letters, and without breaks or intervals between the words, and without accents; see a full description of the methods of writing the New Testament, in an article by Prof. Stuart in Dr. Robinson's Biblotheca Sacra, No. 2, pp. 254ff The small, cursive Greek letters which are now used, were not commonly employed in transcribing the New Testament, if at all, until the ninth or tenth centuries. It was a common thing to abridge or contract words in the manuscript. Thus, πρ would be used for πατερpater, “father;” κς for κυριοςkurios, “Lord;” Θς for Θεος Theos, “God,” etc. The words thus contracted were designated by a faint line or dash over them. In this place, therefore, if the original uncials (capitals) were Θ¯C¯, standing for Θεὸς Theos, “God,” and the line in the Θ, and the faint line over it, were obliterated from any cause, it would easily be mistaken for OC - ὅςhos - “who.”
To ascertain which of these is the true reading, has been the great question; and it is with reference to this that the microscope has been resorted to in the examination of the Alexandrian manuscript. It is now generally admitted that the faint line “over” the word has been added by some later hand, though not improbably by one who found that the line was nearly obliterated, and who meant merely to restore it. Whether the letter O was originally written with a line within it, making the reading “God,” it is now said to be impossible to determine, in consequence of the manuscript at this place having become so much worn by frequent examination. The Vulgate and the Syriac read it: “who,” or “which.” The Vulgate is, “Great is the sacrament of piety which was manifested in the flesh.” The Syriac, “Great is the mystery of godliness, that he was manifested in the flesh.”

An easier understanding of how the "error" or rather corruption took place - watch this short video.

The Mindless Mystery of the Trinity

So, after creating their greater confusion and deeper mystery, instead of solving it, the Roman Catholics then have further excuse that the trinity is a mystery that cannot be understood by mere mortals and must therefore just be accepted by what they call faith. This, of course, is not the correct word - which in  Hebrew is emunah /moral fideltiy, conviction to obey the truth [not a lie]. Yahuah has not concealed any trinity but rather made it clear who He is (spirit) and who the Son came as (flesh)  throughout scripture, and the one is not the other as stated in Numbers 23:19 already! It is only false teachers who have concealed the truth with deception.

The so called Biblical doctrines are not to be accepted as such merely because they are labelled "Biblical" or "Christian". We do not accept doctrine by mindless so-called "faith", a pagan goddess inserted into the translation of the scriptures. We trust not in godesses which we simply carry around as amulets, but we have emunuh (pw faith), an active moral conviction which requires a conscious decision with reasoning and testing of every spirit.

1 John 4:1 Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of Elohim (pw God): because many false prophets are gone out into the world.

2 Hereby know ye the Spirit of Elohim (pw God): Every spirit that confesseth that Yehoshua (pw Jesus) Mashjak (pw Christ) is come in the flesh is of Elohim (pw God):
3 And every spirit that confesseth not that Yehoshua (pw Jesus) Mashiach (pw Christ) is come in the flesh is not of Elohim (pw God): and this is that spirit of anti-Mashiach (pw anti-Christ), whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world.
4 Ye are of Elohim (pw God), little children, and have overcome them: because greater is he that is in you, than he that is in the world.

Yah'uah does not create mindless mysteries or secrets for his true disciples

but reveals understandable truth which exposes bogus lies:

Amos 3:7 "Surely the Master Elohim will do nothing, but he revealeth his secret unto his servants the prophets." 

Prov. 25:2 "It is a splendor of Elohim to conceal a thing but the honor of kings is to search out a matter."

Isaiah 1:18  "Come now, and let us reason together, saith Yahuah ..."

Acts 17:11 "These were more noble than those in Thessalonica, in that they received the word with all readiness of mind, and searched the scriptures daily, whether those things were so"

Acts 18:4 "And he (Paul) reasoned* in the synagogue every sabbath, and persuaded the Yahudim (worshppers of Yah) (false modern word-Jews) and the Greeks.

* Strongs 1256 dialegomai dee-al-eg'-om-ahee middle voice from 1223 and 3004; to say thoroughly, i.e. discuss (in argument or exhortation):--dispute, preach (unto), reason (with), speak. see GREEK for 1223 see GREEK for 3004

Deut 13:3 "...for the Master your Elohim proveth (tests) you, to know whether ye love the Master your Elohim with all your heart and with all your soul* "

*Strongs 5315 nephesh neh'-fesh from 5314; properly, a breathing creature... accommodated or figurative sense (bodily or mental)..."

You must besides other things, apply all your mind to love Yahuah in order to make a morally convicted choice to serve and obey him correctly for who He is and what He commands. This is one of the reasons why a drunkard cannot enter shamayim ( pw heaven) He / she does not have or refuses to have their full mental faculties and reasoning to fully understand, serve and obey Yahuah.

It must not be forgotten that Sir Isaac Newton a man of almost obessesional study habits also studied the scriptures and believed in the Creator. Although he did not get all the scriptures right he did soon see through the lies of the Trinty doctrine by applying his mind and was one of the early people to question the corruption of 1 Tim 3:16 as discussed in the previous chapter.

The Egghead Godhead?

When one presses a trinitarian to explain the trinity they may make an attempt at using a physical example of the trinity and perhaps some of us settled for this explanation when we still followed the trinity heresy. (Been there done that).
They say :the egg is one egg, right, (Godhead), but it has three parts, the shell, the yolk and the white. That is the trinity they say - all different parts but the same egg. Wow, what a revelation! That sure cleared things up for us, after all, it was something to hold onto after being told that the Trinity is an unsolvable mystery and we are not to question "G-o-d". Sadly, when some of us found out the truth about the trinity lie all that was left was egg on our own faces, or we could hear the Humpty Dumpty nursery rhyme playing in the background. This is simply a way out for the "egghead", the thoughtless, mindless "faith-based" pagan trinity doctrine and not the emunah (moral conviction) based doctrine which includes a conscious seeking of the truth in the scriptures as they are written and not sermonized by Catholic philosophers.

Spurgeon made it clear but did not follow his own advice being a follower of the Church invention of "Jesus is God".

When these church philosphers cannot explain a trinity physically they then try to do away with the physical realm as in the following discussion.

1+1+1=1... Really!?

Mr Morrison, a defender of trinitarianism has this to say:
Mr Morrison has no choice then but to deny the material flesh of Mashiach (pw Christ) coming into the material world in order for his “spiritual trinity” heresy (1+1+1=1) to be able to work.

This is the anti Mashiach (pw antiChrist) spirit


The Creator Yah'uah remains one regardless of the physical or the spiritual realm whether before he created (begot) Yehoshua or after. Yah'uah is still Elohim alone. He created the ordinances (laws) of physics and maths themselves and rules over them, and to say that these laws prevent a trinity from making sense already shows from whence the trinity orignates, the minds of worldly men! Yah'uah has told us that he is ONE, if he meant three he would have said so. He is not mathematically challenged in the spiritual world, neither in the physical world.



 
 











The basis of this deception relies heavily on the misconstruing of the well known first chapter of John. We have added the correct meaning in brackets especially with reference to “Word” Greek “logos” and its matching Hebrew word  "*dabar".

“...was the Word ["dabar" reasoning ] , and the word was with Elohim, and the Word [dabar, logos, reasoning, motive, thoughts, work etc ] was Elohim.”

Naturally, therefore, the Word (logos) was present in the beginning as it was already there before the beginning of life or creation. It was self-existent since it was and is Elohim. The use of past tense “was” in no way excludes the continuous existence of the Word which IS Yahuah since it is eternal backwards and forwards. The later referral to the Word becoming flesh in no way causes this Word to cease to exist as the sovereign Word Yahuah but rather points to it and confirms it as such. The word of Yahuah is what created life.

*Strongs Hebrew
559 'amar aw-mar' a primitive root; to say (used with great latitude):--answer, appoint, avouch, bid, boast self, call, certify, challenge, charge, + (at the, give) command(-ment), commune, consider, declare, demand, X desire, determine, X expressly, X indeed, X intend, name, X plainly, promise, publish, report, require, say, speak (against, of), X still, X suppose, talk, tell, term, X that is, X think, use (speech), utter, X verily, X yet.

It becomes clear very soon that this word that was "said" or "amar" by Yahuah is related to commandment, appointing, promise (covenant), intention, desire and thought. This is why "amar" is Yahuah's thoughts and intentions - the core of His intent is to create life and prevent it from perishing eternally. It is His very character, inseperable from His being.  

Yahuah refers to Word (logos) as the very thing that surpasses soul, spirit, bone and marrow and gets to the all important core of what makes a man or woman good or evil - it is the thoughts and intents of the heart.

We thus see how the all powerful word - centre of Yahuah's heart - His intent and thoughts, examine or reveal the word / logos - thought and intents of the core of every man's heart. We see how that when our thoughts and intents do not match up with Yahuah's it is evil and we speak many things, but not what Yahuah has spoken.

We see that Yahuah's "word" goes beyond mere words of men since they may say one thing and do another. They may flatter when they should warn or correct. Yahuah's word, instead, is able to penetrate the heart of man to see if there is life or death in him. Yahuah's intent or word was to create the light so men could find their way out of the darkness they had foolishly chosen.  So, as we continue with John Chapter 1 ( square brackets my insertions)

John 1:2 The same (His word, dabar logos) was in the beginning with Elohim.  3 All things were made by him [Yahuah]; and without him [Yahuah] was not any thing made that was made.  4 In him [Yahuah] was life; and the life was the light of men. [as opposed to darkeness which is the death of men] 5 And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not.  6 There was a man sent from Yahuah, whose name was John.  7 The same came for a witness, to bear witness [report, dabar] of the Light [of Yahuah], that all men through him [Yahuah] might believe.  8 He [John] was not that Light [of Yahuah], but was sent to bear witness of that Light [of Yahuah].  9 That was the true Light [of Yahuah], which lighteth every man that cometh into the world. 10 He [Yahuah] was in the world, and the world was made by him [Yahuah], and the world knew him [Yahuah] not.  11 He [Yahuah] came unto his own, and his own received him [Yahuah] not.  12 But as many as received him [Yahuah], to them gave he [Yahuah] power to become the sons of Elohim, even to them that believe on his name [Yahuah]:  13 Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of Elohim. 

These three verses refer to Elohim Yahuah entirely. Many make the mistake of context here, thinking this is referring to the Messianic age, which it is not. They thus think the "he" who made the world and came into the world is the Mashiach (pw Christ), when it is not.  It refers to Yahuah Elohim when He Himself was in the world . His feet were seen upon the sapphire foundation at Sinai, He himself who passed over ("Yahuah's passover, who passed over the houses of the children of Israel Ex 12:27"). Thus when he was in the world with his own people the Hebrews with whom he made a covenant in Sinai. But they did not know him ( they did not learn his ways, his Word, logos, "dabar", commands his heart, his intent. He  had promised the power to be the sons of Elohim by his own Word (intent). He dwelt amongst them in the tabernacle but they still did not know him - they did not learn his ways but went after their own ways. He had given them at that time too the power to become the sons of Elohim (pw God), but they failed.  

Hosea 1:10 Yet the number of the children of Israel shall be as the sand of the sea, which cannot be measured nor numbered; and it shall come to pass, that in the place where it was said unto them, Ye are not my people, there it shall be said unto them, Ye are the sons of the living Elohim.

  Heb 3:9  When your fathers tempted me, proved me, and saw my works forty years.

  Heb 3:10  Wherefore I was grieved with that generation, and said, They do alway err in their heart; and they have not known my ways. 

After this the context in John 1:14 then only becomes Messianic. Yahuah has sent men to bear witness of the true light of Yahuah - He has used Yochanan (John) and then the first begotten Son of Elohim, Yehoshua in the flesh so that we can also become the Sons of Elohim. 

John 1:14 And the Word [of Yahuah] was made ¹ flesh ² [in Yehoshua], and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his [Yehoshua's] splendor, the splendor as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of favour ³, (pw grace) and truth."

1) 1096 ginomai ghin'-om-ahee a prolongation and middle voice form of a primary verb; to cause to be ("gen"-erate), i.e. (reflexively) to become (come into being), used with great latitude (literal, figurative, intensive, etc.):--arise, be assembled, be(-come, -fall, -have self), be brought (to pass), (be) come (to pass), continue, be divided, draw, be ended, fall, be finished, follow, be found, be fulfilled, + Elohim (pw God) forbid, grow, happen, have, be kept, be made, be married, be ordained to be, partake, pass, be performed, be published, require, seem, be showed, X soon as it was, sound, be taken, be turned, use, wax, will, would, be wrought.

2) 4561 sarx sarx probably from the base of 4563; flesh (as stripped of the skin), i.e. (strictly) the meat of an animal (as food), or (by extension) the body (as opposed to the soul (or spirit), or as the symbol of what is external, or as the means of kindred), or (by implication) human nature (with its frailties (physically or morally) and passions), or (specially), a human being (as such):--carnal(-ly, + -ly minded), flesh(-ly). see GREEK for 4563

Now, this is where the deception comes in - the scripture clearly says "the word was made flesh" it does notsay Elohim (God) was made flesh. It is Yahuah's word / logos, his thoughts and intents, work, commandments, oracles, as already established, it is this that has been fleshed out in the form of the witness, in Yehoshua who only speaks and does the thoughts and intents of his Father out of the abundance of his heart of flesh, upon which the word ( logos, commands) are written. So. the word of Yahuah was made flesh upon the heart of his Son and this word then dwelt among us. It was spoken by the fleshly tongue and lips of Yehoshua. Emmanuel - El (Elohim) is with us by thought and intent (logos) to give us eternal life. Yehoshua became the vessel of the word (logos) and spoke it and carried it out by the spirit of Yahuah. Even unto death so that Yah'uah could express the penalty of sin (without prejudice that it was His own son, for He is no respector of persons), upon Yehoshua who bore our sin. Thereafter Yahuah's splendor and word (promise) were expressed upon resurrection of His own innocent Son.

Now let's rewrite John 1:14 using the full and proper word meanings as in Strong's for "made flesh" (1,2) and "grace" (3) and you will see the truth come to light concerning Yehoshua's purpose.


Clearly Yahuah is the true light, not Yehoshua, Yehoshua is the reflection of it (image), and the true way TO the true light which gives life, and that is The All Mighty One, Elohim Yahuah.  Yehoshua, on His return, will show us the great light of Yahuah, the Only Potentate, which none of us have yet seen.


We are then told why the Son of Yahuah was manifested:

So, Yehoshua was manifested not to promote a Trinity doctrine that he is Elohim (pw God) but to show that he is the Son of Yahuah in the flesh, a greater witness of the light than John. Yehoshua is the forerunner of the Word (logos, promise, intent) of Yahuah, that we also might become the sons of Yahuah and fulfill that Word (logos) and destroy the works (especially words of temptation) of the devil. If Yehoshua is not the Son but rather Elohim himself then he is not our forerunner as sons of Elohim, and He then has not begun to destroy the works of the devil but put on a charade. That is not the case.

Next we have the clear revelation of what John was really saying in Chapter 1. Let's revise: 

John 1:1 In the beginning was the word, and the word was with Elohim, and the word was Elohim.  2 The same was in the beginning with Elohim.  3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.  4 In him was life; and the life was the light of men

 John now echoes this same thought and now describes the word with an additional expression -"word of life".

1 John 1:1-3 That which was from the beginning, which we have heard [dabar-Word], which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked upon, and our hands have handled, of the Word of life; 2 (For the life was manifested, and we have seen it, and bear witness, and shew unto you that eternal life, which was with the Father, and was manifested unto us;) 3 That which we have seen and heard declare we unto you, that ye also may have fellowship with us: and truly our fellowship is with the Father, and with his Son Mashiach (pw Christ) Yehoshua.

John now shows that from the beginning it is evident that Yahuah Elohim is the source of life which we can in part witness in this physical world around us that we can see and touch and that it was created by His word (logos, intent) from the beginning. It is an example of Yahuah's emunah (pw faith) in action through his word.

He is the source of life but that life at the beginning was eternal life since Yahuah is the Word of life eternal and is not Elohim of the dead. Adam and Eve did not comprehend the light, they did not appreciate the state of eternal life until they sinned and received death - separation from Yahuah and his llight. Man has been in that state ever since. Since death and darknesss came man then did not comprehend the light nor the possibility of eternal life either, even though creation, the very beginning of life bears witness of the Word of life - Yahuah. This physical world however is corrupted by sin and dying around us and thus does not fully reveal the promise of eternal life very well as a physical proof to the unbeliever who relies on what he sees alone.

1 John 1:4 And these things write we unto you, that your joy may be full. 5 This then is the message which we have heard of him, and declare unto you, that Elohim is light, and in him is no darkness at all. 6 If we say that we have fellowship with him [Elohim], and walk in darkness, we lie, and do not the truth: 7 But if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship one with another, and the blood of Mashiach (pw Christ) Yehoshua his Son cleanseth us from all sin.

This, however, was changed when the disciples and or apostles witnessed Yehoshua resurrected from the dead. They physcially felt where the nails were in his hands and ate and drank with him following his death. This was the eternal life of the Father manifested in the flesh of his Son, this was the good news passed to us. This is the Word of life made flesh, ie. Yehoshua's dead flesh risen to life by the word of life - Yahuah.

So, in the beginning was the word of life, the To'rah, the light that brings eternal life as it did for Mashiach (pw Christ), and we must walk in it now that Mashiach (pw Christ) has fulfilled the promise of eternal life in his flesh.

1 Tim 3:16 And without controversy great is the mystery of Yahuah-likeness (pagan word-godliness): Yahuah (the word of life) was manifestly declared (explicitly announced, asserted, proclaimed, avowed) in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of malakhim (pw angels) , preached unto the heathens (pagan word Gentiles), believed on in the world, received up into splendor.

So, eternal life - the word of life (logos, intent), promise of Yahuah was fully realised and witnessed in the raising of Mashiach's (pw Christ's) flesh from death. through his Son being YHUH-like and obeying the Word of Life. 

I John 5:20 And we know that the Son of Elohim is come, and hath given us an understanding (dabar To'rah), that we may know him that is true (YAHUAH), and we are in him that is true, even in his Son Yehoshua Mashiach. This is the true Elohim (YAHUAH), and eternal life (word of life, word, dabar, logos)

Yehoshua the son has manifestly declared, giving us an understanding of the true Elohim, Word of Life, who gives eternal life which we have witnessed in his Son, who, in the flesh (visibly) proclaimed his Father's word.

John 5:25 Verily, verily, I say unto you, The hour is coming, and now is, when the dead shall hear the voice of the Son of Elohim: and they that hear shall live. 26 For as the Father hath life in himself; so hath he given to the Son to have life in himself (given immortality after the Father raised him) 27 And hath given him authority to execute judgment also, because he is the Son of man.

1 John 1:7 But if we walk in the light (word of life), as he (Elohim) is in the light, we have fellowship one with another, and the blood of Yehoshua Mashiach his Son cleanseth us from all sin. 8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us. 9 If we confess our sins, he is trustworthy (pw faithful) and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness. 10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word (of life) is not in us. 1 My little children, these things write I unto you, that ye sin not (DO NOT TRANSGRESS THE TO'RAH-Word of Life). And if any man sin, we have an advocate with the Father, Mashiach Yehoshua the righteous:

John 5:2 And shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life (Word of Life) ; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation.

So, Yehoshua was with YHUH in the very beginning but at that stage He was not yet begotten, ie. born of Mary in the flesh in the form of the Son of Elohim (pw God). "Word" can be translated as "Logos" so you could say the idea / thought of Yehoshua the Son was with YHUH at the very beginning as a plan for our salvation. The Son was hidden in the bosom (bay) of Yahuah like a ship until Yahuah was ready to send him forth by his Ruach (wind, breath).

We see this clear distinction of origin and action in:

1Cor 8:5-7 "For though there be that are called gods* , whether in shamayim (pw heaven) or in Earth. But to us there is but ONE Elohim, (All Mighty ONE- pw God), the Father, of whom are all things (the source - Word of Life), and we in Him; AND one Yehoshua Mashiach (from the source of life - the Father), by whom are all things and we by him. Howbeit there is not in every man this knowledge."

*(eloheem - PLURAL OF "eloha" mighty ones 1) men appointed as judges by Yahuah eg. Yehoshua in shamayim (pw heaven) or men on earth (Psalm 82)  or 2) imagined mighty ones ie. idols, including trinity idols - god the father, god the son, god the Holi ghost, or idols / deities in general: eg. J-Zeus (hail Zeus/ Jesus) ,  Mary Mother of god, Hope, Grace (Charis), Faith (Fides), Mercy, Charity, Destiny, papa Pope , Easter, (Eostre), Santa (Satan), Church (Circe/ Kirkeh) etc.  For more see Sunday Worship Terms).

If Paul were a trinitarian he may have written utter nonsense similar to this: 

But to us there is but one Elohim (God), the Father AND One Elohim (pw God) Yehoshua who is Elohim (pw God).

But Paul does not. He says ONE Yehoshua Mashiach (pw Christ) and denounces the idea of plural mighty ones when referring to Elohim (God). There is not the slightest inclination to include earthly or "heavenly gods" within THE SOVEREIGNTY (pw GODHEAD) of ELOHIM THE ALMIGHTY, not even Yehoshua the  man appointed eloha (judge) who sits on his right hand.   

Here we also see "of whom" ascribed to Elohim (pw God) the Father and "by whom" ascribed to the Son.

"of whom" Greek "ek" denotes origin of all things that exist by Elohim and that includes the Son since that is why he is the Son OF Elohim begotten and created. Over and over again you will see heretics do the unthinkable and exchange the preposition "of" with "is" ie. the Son of Elohim (pw God) is changed to the Son is Elohim (pw God). One cannot do that without committing the damnable sin of adding to scripture. 

Paul places the "by whom" description on the shoulders of the Son since "by" (Greek dia) is the preposition denoting the channel of an act. As we saw before Mashiach (pw Christ) is the causer (not author).This is why Yehoshua is the WAY or channel by His action of offering (pw sacrifice), love and obedience to the Father. The Father is His, and our, origin to whom we wish to be restored to. Yehoshua was fully restored from death (under our sin) to the Father's eternal life.

John 20: 27 "Then saith he to Thomas, Reach hither thy finger, and behold my hands; and reach hither thy hand, and thrust it into my side: and be not without emunah (pw faithless), but believing.   28 And Thomas answered and said unto him, My Master (pw Lord) and my Elohim (pw God)." 

We should not have to go further than  "My Master AND my Elohim" but for those who are doubting like Thomas we shall have to.

Regarding John 20:28, the question is raised concerning Thomas’ double usage of the definite article, most literally translated: “the lord of me and the god [THEOS] of me.” Did Thomas use the definite article twice to speak of two persons, first the son to whom he was directly speaking as “the lord of me” and then did he turn his attention to the Father in shamayim (pw heaven) in saying “the God of me”? If Thomas meant his whole expression to refer to only one person, only one definite article would have been needed: “the Master (pw Lord) and God of me”.

But if Thomas was referring to Yehoshua when he said “the THEOS of me”, was he thinking that Yehoshua was YHUH, the only Most High of the universe, standing there before him? If Thomas did indeed refer to Yehoshua as “the THEOS of me”, we find no such custom all through the Renewed Everlasting Covenant (pw New Testament) of referring to Yehoshua as “my Elohim (pw God)”, nor “our Elohim (pw God)”. The scripture writers continuously distinguish the Father in shamayim (pw heaven) as “Elohim (pw God)”, and Yehoshua as the Son of Elohim (pw God), the one, made Master (pw Lord) and Mashiach (pw Christ), by Elohim (pw God). If such a claim or doctrine as "Jesus is God” ("Yehoshua is Yahuah") is so all-important and a truth as many today seem to assume, we should expect such to be clearly stated many times throughout the scriptures, but, actually, what we find is just the opposite. So, if Thomas refers to Yehoshua as his Elohim (pw God) in John 20:28, we have an exception to the general rule, and should seek to determine in what sense Thomas might have thought of Yehoshua as his Elohim (pw God), in harmony with the general distinction that is made throughout the rest of the Renewed Everlasting Covenant (pw New Testament). Thus, in harmony with the Hebraic tradition of applying the same words that are translated as “elohim (pw god)” to others as rulers, princes, mighty ones, etc. we could say Thomas was really applying one of these options for the word now translated by Roman Vulgate translators as THEOS in adressing Yehoshua . Theos or God could be rendered as mighty ruler or mighty prince. In fact, the word majesty,  is used to describe Yehoshua's spiritual reign  but YHUH is referred to as Majesty on High in contrast to Yehoshua. Yehoshua sits next to YHUH upon his throne as you could expect an appointed Prince would do beside His King in keeping with the order of authority.

Now, let's put the verse above into context:

John 20:28 And Thomas answered and said unto him, My Lord (Master) and my God (Elohim).  29 Yehoshua (pw Jesus)  saith unto him, Thomas, because thou hast seen me, thou hast believed: baruch'd (pw blessed) are they that have not seen, and yet have believed.   30 ¶And many other signs truly did Yehoshua (pw Jesus)  in the presence of his disciples, which are not written in this book:  31 But these are written, that ye might believe that Yehoshua (pw Jesus)  is the Mashiach (pw Christ), the Son of Elohim (pw God); and that believing ye might have life through his name.

This would have been the perfect opportunity for John to say he was Elohim (pw God), but he does not, instead he concludes that these things are written that "you might believe he is the Son of Elohim (pw God)." One would expect the apostle to say something like:

Yahuchanon (John, meaning Yah's chesed, favour) is a worshipper of Yahuah, a Yahudi (pw Jew) AND a worshipper of His son Yehoshua, he is not a trinitarian Catholic, so he does not write lies.

The use of "My Master and My Elohim" rather tie in with


Yahuah is ONE, The Almighty One, Elohim, who excludes plural gods. It is to this ONE Elohim that Thomas praises, after adressing his Master Yehoshua, separating them as two individuals with the use of "AND". Thomas separates Yehoshua from the sovereignty of Elohim, just as Paul described.

Our Saviour AND Our Saviour - But Only One Elohim.

Elohim is our saviour who appointed his Son as the means to our salvation. Simply because Elohim is called the Saviour does not mean we call the saviour Yehoshua (pw Jesus) Elohim (pw God). Yahuah is the ultimate self-existent Saviour and there is no saviour besides him.

Without Elohim there is no sent and appointed saviour, eg. Moses, and no saviour Son Yehoshua either. It has always been Elohim who sent saviours to his people and it is Elohim who saved the saviour Son from death to life. Thus Elohim is the Saviour to all who accept him, and in all things, even his own Son:

So, who do we expect and look for? Two saviours. "Elohim our saviour in all things" (vs 10) ANDour sent saviour Son Yehoshua (vs 12). Again "And" is Greek "kai" as used by Thomas. So it is not one and the same Saviour but two different saviours. One is Elohim and the other the Son of man, period! Note (vs 10) that the doctrine must be "put in the proper order" (kosmeo) where Elohim the great (megas) Saviour is given pre-eminence "of all things" including over his appointed Son, and not that the Son is a self-existent saviour who saves himself. This appointed saviour teaches us Yah-likeness by example, that is, To'rah obedience to Elohim his Father. So, the True Saviour, Yah'uah Elohim, results in true salvation, which is by righteous living in this world and is the result of the truly sent saviour Yehoshua honoring Elohim, who redeemed us from our past To'rah transgressions to make us acceptable to serve Him. A false saviour "Jesus" who is fabled to save on his own and becomes an Elohim (Saviour man-God) imposter, on the other hand, results in wholesale lawless (To'rahless) living unto destruction in this present age, as we see in the harlot "church" institution which deceives the whole world (2 John 1:7, Rev 12:9). It is the headquarters of the out of order saviour idol "J-esus" through this trinitarian heresy. This is the age of the false goddess "Grace" of Babylon and not the result of Yah'uah's "chesed", unmerited favour. It is devoid of a real working response by the followers, devoid of thanksgiving, there is no moral conviction to To'rah obedience. It is all vanity, an impotent "Jesus" saviour god idol who promotes freedom from To'rah and a hatred for Elohim's law, like so many false saviour idols before, eg. Horus, Serapis, etc., with no power to save men from their lusts.

2 Tim 3: 4 Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures (eg sabbath profaners...) more than lovers of ELOHIM; 5 Having an appearance of piety (false religion-Christianity, Catholicism etc), but denying the power (wonderful work of Yahuah to empower us to love and obey him) thereof : from such turn away.