Overcoming the Ugly Face of the Trinity

Overcoming the Trinity lie first requires one to simply dig up its sandy foundation. Old habits die hard but when one sees the ugly face of the Trinity doctrine as Eloheem sees it then it should not be difficult to run form it. The Trinity doctrine accuses the victim by saying that in denying the "Trinity" one somehow makes the Son of Eloheem (pw God) less than what he is, ie. not "divine" or less "divine" than the Father, and then sends you off to a place incorrectly called "hell". Yet, one can see right through the cloak and dagger (see chapel) tactics, since, once the victim is gripped by this first fear of so-called heresy against this pagan 'church institution', the false teachers, like wolves, then sink their teeth in deeper exposing their victim to the next level of lies, that "Jesus" is indeed the very "Divine" Father himself! The victim very easily jumps with fear from the teeth of a so-called heresy right into the mouth of a real blasphemy. 

When one realises the word "divine" is a pagan concept applied to pagan sky deities, and has no place in scripture in the first place, one immediately sees where the doctrine is coming from: Babylon! The pagan translators have inserted Babylonian words throughout the scriptures (pw bible) which have no place in the thoughts of a true believer. Secondly  when one attributes to the Son what has not been attributed to him in the scriptures, ie. a pagan concept -"divinity", then that person is the heretic! He, nor his Father, are "divine" or "deities" of any kind . These are pagan titles with pagan idolatrous concepts.The Father and Son are not sky deities- they exist in the highest heights - third shamayim (pw heaven). This is beyond any created sky itself. Yahuah the Father is the living Eloheem, the creator and possessor of shamayim (pw heaven) and earth and he has begotten his first begotten Son Yehoshua, to whom he has appointed authority under his very own name. Thus Yahuah gives his Son part of his name, Yehoshua, referring to the fact that Yahuah is the one who saves his people through His kinsman (Son) redeemer and our kinsman (who are believers). He has been given "power of attorney" as it were, he is our advocate. This does not give him power to be Eloheem.  Denying the "Trinity" does not strip the Son of Yahuah from his rightful position or title nor does it strip him of his appointed authority. Exalting Yehoshua the Son of Eloheem in the correct way, on the other hand, will always reveal the Son's remaining subservience to his Father's will as an OBEDIENT SON, to the only Potentate, Eloheem, his very teacher.

KJV adds "he" here. It is not there! So it should read  : "then shall you know that I exist (ego eimi) and do nothing of myself"

Thus his very existence is due to the Father since he is begotten (created) by Him and taught by Him. Anything that elevates the Son to a place above his teacher, ie. to a Torahless Mashiach (pw Messiah), is an abomination and falsehood from Satan. This is the Marcion spirit which replaces Eloheem as an apparently evil "god" with a benevolent, ecumenical, universal (Catholic), Torahless J(Zeus) Jesus.  Pagan "deities" (really demons) have always been scripted this way. Such myths and legends are meant to teach the art and idea of revolting, usurping and competing for worship. Sound familiar? The real battle is with Satan, the leader of such demons. These real demons are merely represented by these fictional pagan images called "deities". Modern versions of these fictional "sky deities"are Superman, Batman etc all representing demons /Satan. Satan really does want you to join him and his demons in his attempted revolt against Yahuah's Torah. Satan wants all the worship. The Trinity is one of his strongest "divinely deified" demonic delusions that deceives the whole world and by which he can try to win over your worship to him, as that has been his goal since the garden of Eden.

A Doctrine More Perverse Than Even The Demons

Even the demons know Eloheem is not three so how perverse is the Trinity doctrine ???

A Doctrine of Confusion And Chaos

The Trinity doctrine and its liars have done much to create division and confusion in the minds of many lost souls. Dr. Cyril Richardson, a Trinitarian himself and professor in Church history, admitted to the confusion emanating from the Trinity doctrine.

We trust that the Word (scriptures) of Yahuah would truly remove the confusion of the enemy and revive you as you study scripture with us in exposing this damnable heresy.

Chapter 3

27 Biblical Facts

1- The Scriptures Refute "Jesus is God" by Declaring Yehoshua (pw Jesus) as the "Son of Man"

According to Matthew 1:1, Yehoshua (pw Jesus) is the SON OF Eloheem, the SON OF DAVID,  SON OF ABRAHAM. He is a man, but most importantly he is the SON OF MAN. Every time this term is mentioned referring to Yehoshua  we remember that Eloheem (pw God) has already categorically stated that the Son of Man is  NOT Eloheem according to Numbers 23:19 as described in Chapter 2. 

In the (REC) Renewed Everlasting Covenant (pw New Testament) it is said 89 times!

2- Yahuah is Spirit But Yehoshua Came in the Flesh as the Son of Man

But Yehoshua is the Son OF man and the Son OF Eloheem (pw God). Anything more than that is a lie, period!

2 Jn 1: 7 For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Mashiach (pw Christ) Yehoshua (pw Jesus) is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an opponent of Mashiach( pw antichrist /antiMessiah).

1 Jn 4:2 Hereby know ye the Spirit of Eloheem (pw God): Every spirit that confesseth that Mashiach Yehoshua (Jesus Christ) is come in the flesh is of Eloheem (pw God): 3 And every spirit that confesseth not that Mashiach Yehoshua (pw Jesus Christ) is come in the flesh is not of Eloheem (pw God): and this is that spirit of an opponent of Mashiach (pw antichrist), whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world.

Is it not strange how the brainwashing by the Catholic church has been controlling people to confess the very opposite, that Mashiach (pw Messiah) is not flesh but Eloheem (pw God) himself, and that to deny this is heresy and the unpardonable sin? This is the "success" of the Trinity deception which deceives the world and puts them in fear of men rather than Eloheem and fear of excommunication from men's "church"*  system or persecution. Did not the Pharisees also fear what men said rather than what Mashiach and his Father said?

*(pagan Catholic word from the Greco-Roman deity Circe / Kirkeh)

The question by some is :

But to deny Yehoshua came in the flesh is the very spirit of the Anti-Anointed One (pw Anti-Christ).

When Adam and Eve were created in the flesh they were not sinful but perfect and good in the eyes of Yahuah. Gnosticism teaches that all flesh is evil and that only spirit is good. In fact, this leads to the antinomian heresy that sin in the flesh / body does not lead to spiritual death, as if one has attained a spiritual separation from one's Torah transgressions by a fake Jesus god and can continue transgressing Torah without consequences. Yehoshua, the Son of man, indeed, came in the flesh and gave up his spirit to Yahuah. He was dead flesh lying in the tomb for three days and devoid of spirit.

This is evidence enough. But the pure spirit of Yahuah, his Father, raised him from the dead since his Son's body own body was guiltless of sin and innocent. His flesh was not evil as he always obeys Torah which is righteousness.  If you deny that flesh and thus blood cannot purify then you must deny all the blood offering of the flesh of all the animals offered for sin in the past. Was Yahuah a liar then? Did these offerings not cleanse the people of their Torah transgressions so that they did not die there and then? Yehoshua's offering still being flesh was however the ultimate as it was for wilful Torah transgression which no animal offering could redeem and thus provides redemption for eternal life.

Yehoshua was born again of the spirit when he was immersed , being anointed of the Father. It seems that those who think flesh cannot be purified by Yahuah are those who continue to transgress Torah and reject the power of Eloheem's spirit even demonstrated in the flesh of Yehoshua. These are thus Trinitarians aka anti-anointed ones. The annointing of Yahuah is rejected.

They only follow some Torah, cherry pick from it and continue breaking the rest of it. They choose only what they think is convenient because of their own lusts. Thus they have to change the very doctrine by their own fleshly minds which have not been renewed by the Spirit. They thus have to invent a doctrine which says "flesh is sinful, only God can keep the Torah and therefore we demand that Jesus be God". They do not heed the warning that the flesh can be purified by the same  Spirit of Yahuah that was upon Yehoshua to do righteousness unto perfection.

3-The Very First and Greatest Command Says There is ONE Not Three, and NO Other!

The scribe confirms that there is none other than Eloheem, there is no "god the son" and "god the spirit"! The scribe does not say yes and you are that one! No! He says there is none other but HE, Eloheem, who is so to be worshipped. This is straight from the shema (to hear) the beginning and foundation of Yahuah's commands ie to properly hear his commands you have to first and foremost understand He is ONE not three.

4- Eloheem (pw God) Cannot Be Born

Isaiah 43:10 "Ye are my witnesses, saith Yahuah (pw LORD), and my servant whom I have chosen: that ye may know and believe me, and understand that I am he: before me there was no Eloheem (pw God) formed, neither shall there be after me."

5- Yehoshua (pw Jesus) Never Says, “I am Eloheem (pw God)”

On the contrary Yehoshua explicitly states that he is not "Eloheem (pw God)" being totally reliant upon His Father's will and not his own.

Jn 5:19 Then answered Yehoshua and said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, The Son can do nothing of himself, but what he seeth the Father do: for what things soever he doeth, these also doeth the Son likewise.  30  I can of mine own self do nothing: as I hear, I judge: and my judgment is just; because I seek not mine own will, but the will of the Father which hath sent me."

6- Eloheem (pw God) Cannot Be Seen

Jn 1:18 No man hath seen Eloheem (pw GOD) at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him.

Once again a clear and distinct difference. Mashiach (pw Messiah) has been his witness, his declaration, proclamation but never his doppelganger / imposter of Yahuah himself. He is the Son - period! ." Bosom" figuratively means a bay, this means he was figuratively hidden within the bay, as a ship would be, and then brought forth to be revealed / "declared" not as the Father but as the Son. The ship is revealed from the bay, the ship can never ever be the bay itself! 

Note how the abominable translations have tried to put their false Trinitarian , Jesus-is-God heresy into this verse. THEY HAVE LITERALLY ADDED WORDS TO THE SCRIPTURES.

PURE LIES:

7- Apostle Shaul (Paul) Never Taught a Three-headed "Godhead" 

(Figures Left and Right : Various pagan depictions of the Trinity invention seen in Catholic churches which match (figure below) the evil Masonic All seeing Eye.)

For a Trinity to exist, three "gods" have to exist Three sovereigns, but Yehoshua made it clear that Yahuah his Father has already emphatically said there is only ONE Eloheem (see point 2 above). Yehoshua the Son only teaches what his Father teaches not what the Catholic church (universal circus) teaches.

If the Trinity were such an important heresy to be made truth then Shaul (Paul) would have taught it. He does not mention any Trinity, he does not refer to a three-headed Godhead. In fact, Godhead is only mentioned in the Renewed Everlasting Covenant (pw "New testament") scriptures three times and only by Apostle Shaul (Paul). When he does refer to it he does not use it to create or support a trinitarian doctrine. In fact, it, instead, weakens the idea of three-in-one. Not in any single description by Paul describing the so-called Godhead do we see the pagan formula included at the same time. There is no so-called "god the father, god the son and god the holy spirit" formula ever mentioned. Instead this difficult and curious word Godhead is mentioned referring to a separate entity, the Father, the potentate who is the origin of creation, men and Mashiach (pw Messiah).

1) Acts 17:29 Forasmuch then as we are the offspring of Eloheem (pw God), we ought not to think that the Godhead is like unto gold, or silver, or stone, graven by art and man’s device.

Here we see that Paul (Shaul) refers to men as offspring of Eloheem. Eloheem the Father creates, it is not man who creates the Father. The man Yehoshua, the Son, therefore also cannot create or re-fashion the Father like some idol into his own liking. Yehoshua is equally an offspring of Eloheem but differs by being the first begotten Son of Eloheem born of flesh but fully annointed with the 7 spirits or attributes of Yahuah.  It means that the "Godhead" brings forth many offspring, Eloheem the Father being their origin.  No "god the father, god the son, god the holy spirit" heresy is mentioned here by Shaul. Instead, Eloheem the Father is said to be the supreme creator of men, and it follows that so is Yehoshua begotten as the first begotten Son of Yahuah in the flesh.  As our section on the history of the Trinity will show, it was the pagan invention of a "baptism" formula that Irenaeus first used to begin crafting the Trinity heresy. (for more on this see the Subversive Immersion Formula)

2) Romans 1:20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse

Again the "Godhead" here is made known to all men and they have no excuse.  The "Godhead" clearly excludes the Son.  Shaul is clearly showing that the "Godhead" is revealed by the things which the Godhead himself (Eloheem Supreme) has created. If it were so obvious that the "Godhead" must include the Son then Shaul would not have excluded him in the equation. So the Godhead could be clearly known even without any knowledge of the Son then invisible. This is obviously how it was for most who obeyed the Father before getting knowledge of the Son or of His appearing. They did not need to acknowledge a "Trinity" to be acceptable before Yahuah. No such command existed or should exist, except in the pagan Catholic church for its followers. But now that the "Godhead's" ultimate creation, his Son, who was hidden in the bay, has been revealed and has appeared, it is now only necessary to acknowledge the Son as just that, the Son of the living Eloheem. There is no excuse, since his ultimate creation, that which he loves and is pleased with, his Son, has been shown to us. He has been shown to understand his own Creator whom he calls Father, POINTING to the Godhead as Father. There is no excuse! No Trinity can destroy the ultimate creation of the Son of Yahuah worshiping his Creator by full obedience and love, even to the point of laying down his life.  3) continues with this idea.           

 3) Colossians 2:9 For in him (Mashiach (pw Messiah)) dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily.

Once again this demonstrates that although the Son had been created it was only until his life of obedience was manifested in the flesh that the full revelation of the "Godhead", Eloheem the Father, could be fully understood by men on earth, since a Father can only be a Father if he has a Son who obeys him and shares his love with us. And thus, the Godhead, The Father, becomes our Father too through the acknowledgement of his Son and NOT through some vain idea that the Son is the Father himself. The Son bears all the fullness of His Father's spiritual character and traits, he is truly one of his SPIRITUAL kindred by his MORAL CHARACTER  inherited. 

We will ellaborate more later regarding this odd pagan translation  "Godhead" itself.

8- Eloheem (pw God) Does Not Sleep, Eat, Drink, etc. Yehoshua (pw Jesus) Did

The son of man, Yehoshua did these things:
Even after resurrection:

9- Yehoshua is Not Omniscient (all knowing) Like His Father Yahuah (also see point 14)

(1 Jn 3:20) and Mark 13:32  "But of that day and that hour knoweth no man, no, not the malakhim (pw angels) which are in shamayim (pw heaven), neither the Son, but the Father."  

Heb 5:8 Though he were a Son, yet learned he obedience by the things which he suffered;  

Only Yahuah is all knowing there is nothing for him to learn. This is not the case with Yehoshua. How does one learn obedience without being sinful? Simply by learning the commands of the Father and choosing to follow them from the outset. This is what Eve was supposed to continue to do after being created in perfection but did not. Where she failed the Son of Yahuah, Yehoshua did not. Once one knows all things one cannot afterwards be unaware of anything, unless one's mind has been affected. To say that Yehoshua lost his memory somehow would mean he were not of sound mind which is ridiculous.

If Yehoshua were omniscient would have known Lazarus was going to die and would likely not have been so late to raise him to life.

10- Eloheem (pw God) Cannot Change. He is Eternally Perfect And Pure

Matt 5:48 "Be perfect, therefore, as your Father in shamayim (pw heaven) is perfect.

Malachi 3:6 "I am the the Master [refers to Yahuah] (pw Lord) and change not"

This differs from Yehoshua who took all our sins onto himself and for a short while was "forsaken" by His Father.

Mashiach (pw Messiah) temporarlily lowered himself below the malakhim (pw angels) when on earth.

Thus he had to learn and understand obedience and submission to Eloheem. Now, if he were Eloheem there would be nothing to learn since Eloheem is all-knowing (Omniscient).

Mashiach (pw Messiah) had to

1. learn obedience, submission 

2. be perfected (made fully mature in character)

3. be purified by the Father's Word to remain free of Torah transgression (pw sin) in the world.

Yahuah is already perfect in every way, does not change, but rather is the source or Father of purification, perfection, and teaching. He is kodesh (morally set apart), He cannot even enter this sinful world - His mere presence would destroy this dark sinful world because of His pure light.

In 2) above KJV renders *"the author" rather than "causer" here due to trinitarian bias to make Mashiach (pw Messiah) appear to be the author or source of eternal life when he is, in fact, the Father's way or instrument of salvation (the way, instrument to the Father). The Greek here is 159 aitios ah'-ee-tee-os from the same as 154; causative, i.e. (concretely) a causer:--author.  Mashiach (pw Messiah) has already destroyed the notion that he is the source / author and rather the causer when he said "I do nothing of myself; but as my Father hath taught me, I speak these things." (Jn 8:28) This false use of author implies also that Mashiach (pw Messiah) would have authored a new law and done away with Torah which he did not. Mashiach (pw Messiah) is not even a co-author of Torah but a doer of it.

Note in 1) though he were a Son yet learned he obedience. We see that the obvious becomes clear, if Mashiach (pw Messiah) were Eloheem (pw God) then here would have been the perfect time to say: though he were Eloheem (pw God) yet learned he obedience ( an obvious oxymoron). This is after all the folly of the Trinity "godspell" that the omniscient Eloheem somehow became an amnesiac.  However Paul does not even hint at such absurdity. Paul is not a trinitarian. Instead he makes it clear that the Son of Yahuah was not excluded from learning to submit as he was truly a Son and his Father was truly a Father. I will now show you how the trinitarian bias again from the translators of the KJV twists the verse and you will see how the truth and proper logical sense of the sentence is revealed when the correct words are applied.

Let's look at the Greek shall we: "though" and "yet" are in the Greek the same word but since they have various meanings there is latitude in choosing which to use by context. If the context is trinitarian bias then obviously the translation would be in that direction. Let's look

*StrongsGreek

2539 kaiper kah'-ee-per from 2532 and 4007; and indeed, i.e. nevertheless or notwithstanding:--and yet, although. see GREEK for 2532 see GREEK for 4007

So let's use the first meaning listed "and indeed" and insert them

Now does this not make more sense. Obviously if he indeed were a Son then he would indeed obey his Father according to Torah. According to Torah a son is defined as a son by his very obedience to his Father, else he is no more.

Furthermore if Yahuah is no respector of persons then His own son should not receive special treatment either. However, this is the tone we get with the KJV, that even though he were a son he had to learn obedience. In other words, my gosh, how strange it is for them that the Son of Eloheem himself should also have to learn obedience, how dare He have to go through such a thing, especially if you claim he is "Eloheem (pw God)" himself, how strange indeed. This stupidity in translation would further lead to the imaginings of a son of royalty expecting to get red carpet treatment on earth only to be tricked by his Father to face the "evil Jews" and then this Jesus saying, oh dear, why are you forsaking me Father, what's happening? Of course this is all fiction. Yehoshua knew exactly (Jn 10:17) what was in store as a son and laid down His own life for all evil done by every sinner on earth, not only for the Jews. The ultimate obedience was that he must obey his Father to the end in taking the punishment for our sins whilst innocent, with the promise of resurrection. Such obedience and trust by a son to a Father is rare, thus it should read "AND INDEED he were a Son" to the fullest degree in obedience, submission and trust. If we use the translation "though he were a son" it implies that he was Eloheem (pw God) and for a while he became a son, grinning and bearing obedience/submisison to himself or if not to himself then who or what? The Jews? The Romans? Of course not! There is no such charade! Digging deeper into the verse the only charade is the translation itself. Now, again, with the corrections (and indeed) let's look further:

*Strong's Greek

5607 on oan, including the feminine ousa oo'-sah; and the neuter on on present participle of 1510; being:--be, come, have. see GREEK for 1510

Thus the translation charade is further exposed and should be:

Now Shaul is making it clear that Yehoshua the Mashiach (pw Messiah) is emphatically STILL INDEED a SON, not past tense Son. He has not been elevated to "Eloheem (pw God)" by some pretense of suffering. He is INDEED STILL OBEYING his FATHER. He is not THE FATHER. So now the false translation suggests the idea of a new god usurping Eloheem and this idea would be further strengthened with the false use of the word, author, as explained in 2) above, where the "new god" has authored a new religion which they call Christianos (Christianity - all about a new syncretic god and nothing about pure Torah). (For more see Do You Really Want To Be Called a Christian?"

However, the truth is that The Father INDEED will send His Son INDEED again to resurrect His righteous and destroy the wicked. If He were no longer an obedient Son what surety is there that justice will be done as prophesied? Perhaps the mind of the ecumencial translator can be heard here by these twisted translations. What if this son were that pagan (J)Zeus, the one that does away with Torah? Perhaps he will resurrect all those sinning pagan Catholics and christians who love the sins of other idolaters, perhaps he is the benevolent one who will usurp his Father, throw out that dreaded righteous Torah which condemns them, and feel sorry for those unrepentant wicked ones. No! Not so. The SON has been appointed as the righteous obedient judge of the Father, he is not a pagan (J)Zeus god born on 25 December like all the others from the pagan pantheon parade. No, he is the Son Yehoshua, Son of the Living righteous Eloheem who will destroy the wicked according to his Torah.

In today's society the erroneous translation "though he were a son, yet learned he obedience" would be quite acceptable to understand since the perverse fathers of today think sonship means spoiling / corrupting the son by encouraging materialism and worldly success (eg. a career which ignores the seventh day sabbath, dishonest dealings etc). Sonship for them is not defined by obedience to Torah and bringing a son up in the ways of Yahuah. They would think it strange that a son should be punished, as correctly instructed in Torah, so that he learns the ways of Yahuah and does not lose his soul.  At the same time, however, they might, if they are "Christian", accept the innocent Son Yehoshuah to stand in their place and be punished by the Father for their own sins, and yet they are content in despising the same Mashiach (pw Messiah) and his atonement by continuing to sin and raising sons who in turn sin (transgress the Father's Torah). They will accept a (J)Zeus god who they think will universally (catholically) accept both goats (wicked) and sheep (righteous) into shamayim (pw heaven). They despise the Son of Eloheem, they despise the Father Eloheem most of all.

It does not mean Mashiach (pw Messiah) is of the same substance, ie, is sovereign, he is not above the Torah (law) of his Father but is a submissive, obedient Son.

Yehoshua's wisdom had to develop and the source of that wisdom was from the already fully wise Yahuah Eloheem his Father who is perfect (complete in wisdom). He received the fulness of wisdom from the Father but that fullness could only be fully applied when it is fully understood and that is what Yehoshua was perfected in at an early age.

11-Yehoshua is Not Omnipresent

Yahuah Eloheem is omnipresent

Yehoshua however now sits on the right-hand side of Eloheem on the throne

1 Peter 3:22 "Who is gone into shamayim (pw heaven), and is on the right hand of Eloheem ; malakhim (pw angels) and authorities and powers being made subject unto him."

He does not reside in every man but only through the spirit in the hearts of those who obey and acknowledge him as the Son of Yahuah. The Son has left us till he returns but is with true believers in spirit, in a way that is no different to Paul's own non-omnipresent description as a man on earth.

Col 2:5 For though I be absent in the flesh, yet am I with you in the spirit.

The spirit is the knowledge, acknowledgement, thoughts, prayers, mindset, will, wisdom of Yahuah- the spirit is NOT a person (although it is personified just as wisdom is elsewhere in scripture. Wisdom is personified as female while ruach hakodesh,  pure spirit of Yahuah, is personified as male) The spirit is also not a dove but was described in this way merely because of the manner in which it descended LIKE a dove. 

Yehoshua had to be fully present in the flesh to die on the torture stake (pw cross, crucifixion) - He had emunah (pw faith) that Eloheem would raise him up. He did NOT raise himself as he was dead, D-E-A-D. Anyone who declares otherwise is denying that the Son came in the flesh ( ie. was mortal) - this is the anti Mashiach (pw Messiah) spirit that alludes to immortality of flesh. 

Yehoshua does not possess self-existence in the flesh since He was begotten.  How strange it would be if Eloheem is both the Father and Son simultaneously, as at, for example, Yehoshua's immersion (pw baptism) and at the transfiguration. Is Eloheem playing different roles as in a pantomime? If Yehoshua is Eloheem he must then be a ventriloquist saying He is pleased with Himself? No, Yahuah is not an entertainer in the "church"/circus. Yahuah is not pretending or role playing like some child. This is not a Hollywood production. This is reality: Yahuah is the Almighty Father Eloheem and he has a Son!!

Matthew 3:16 "And Yehoshua (pw Jesus), when he was immersed (pw baptized), went up straightway out of the water: and, lo, the shamayim (pw heavens) were opened unto him, and he saw the Spirit of Eloheem (pw God) descending like a dove, and lighting upon him:  17 And lo a voice from shamayim (pw heaven), saying, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased."

Matthew 17: 4 "Then answered Peter, and said unto Yehoshua (pw Jesus), Master (pw -Lord) , it is good for us to be here: if thou wilt, let us make here three tabernacles; one for thee, and one for Moses, and one for Eliyahu (Elijah).  5 While he yet spake, behold, a bright cloud overshadowed them: and behold a voice out of the cloud, which said, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased; hear ye him."

If Yehoshua were omnipresent he would have been able to present in at least two places at the same time and not arrived so late to raise Lazarus.

12- Yehoshua is Not Omnipotent (ALL powerful and ALL sovereign)

Firstly we see that the Son, the man in the flesh was weak in the flesh and had to be strengthened. That which is all powerful is never weak and that is Eloheem (God) the Father alone who is not flesh or a man but spirit.

But now that Yehoshua has been given power it is finite as it will be handed over to His Father at the end.

1 Cor 15:24 "Then cometh the end, when he shall have delivered up the rule and reign (pw -kingdom) to Eloheem (pw God), indeed (*even)the Father; when he shall have put down all rule and all authority and power.  25 For he must reign, till he hath put all enemies under his feet.  26 The last enemy that shall be destroyed is death.  27 For he hath put all things under his feet. But when he saith all things are put under him, it is manifest that he is excepted which did put all things under him.  28 And when all things shall be subdued unto him, then shall the Son also himself be subject unto him that put all things under him, that Eloheem (pw God) may be all in all." 

(KJV has "even" the Father as though he is inclusive of others when it should be rendered "indeed" ie exlcusivley the very Father alone. This is confrimed by the use of "excepted" in verse 26 further conveying exclusivity of the Father from the Son)

13- The Father Cannot Be Sent

If the Father Eloheem was sent who sent him? Mary his Mother???? No! This is a ridiculous Catholic lie and perversion.

(* glorify / glory is a pagan word used by Catholics in the Latin Vulgate and hence KJV after the godess Gloria- a  purer word would be: splendor, honor, exalt, etc. )

Yahuah is the essence of the worship. He is the object of worship and receives the splendor even as Yehoshua's purpose in receiving splendor from His Father is to ultimately give splendor to the Father and, in fact, prove that he has been sent by the Father. Over and over again Yehoshua makes it clear that the true believers are to know that Yahuah the Father has sent the Son and Yahuah is to be worshipped as in the Master Mashiach's Prayer* to the Father.  Yehoshua's followers at that time (Apostles and Disciples) never ever believed such a ridiculous heresy that the Father IS the Son. Furthermore the term "I and the Father are one" is clearly explained as perfection / completeness, and is not at all limited to any Trinity since the true believers are included in obtaining this same oneness which is purely a oneness or aggreement in mind and spirit with Yahuah and Yehoshua's will.

(*pagan translation:  Lord's Prayer)

14-Yehoshua Explicitly Says That He Worships And Serves Yahuah His Eloheem (pw God) Alone

Yehoshua obeys (continuous tense) the first commandment. He is not "Eloheem (pw God)" . He does not worship himself!

Mat 4:8 Again, the devil taketh him up into an exceeding high mountain, and sheweth him all the kingdoms of the world, and the splendor of them; 9 And saith unto him, All these things will I give thee, if thou wilt fall down and worship me. 10 Then saith Yehoshua unto him, Get thee hence, Satan: for it is written, Thou shalt worship Yahuah thy Eloheem (pagan translation the Lord thy God), and him only shalt thou serve.

Satan was tempting Yehoshua to worship him instead of Yahuah His Eloheem. There is no point for Satan to tempt Yahuah that would be daft.

Jas 1:13 ...for Eloheem (pw God) cannot be tempted with evil,

Yehoshua refused!! Notice, He did not say, Satan, you are to worship me your Eloheem, and notice, Satan himself did not confuse Yehoshua (pw Jesus)  the Son with Eloheem (pw God) either, now did he, else he would not have attempted to tempt him as the Son in breaking the first commandment! It is ironic that Satan himself knows who the Son is, one who worships the Father,

Jn 14:28 ...for my Father is greater than I.

Yet Satan still deceives men into thinking the Son is somebody else and creates a false "Jesus god" who does break the first commandment, making himself Eloheem (pw God) and abolishing his Torah ( including the first commandment and the fourth and so it goes). Same temptation all over again, only worse and on a bigger scale to the ignorant.

15-The Mind of Eloheem (pw God) the Father is Clearly Not the Same as the Son

1 Cor 2:15 For who hath known the mind of Yahuah (pw the Lord), that he may instruct him? But we have the mind of Mashiach (pw Christ).

The Father's mind instructs while the Son's mind chooses to follow and obey his instruction. Hence we can be like-minded as the Son but not all knowing as the Father. This ties in with point 7 above referring to omnscience. This is what separates the Mind of the Creator of all things from the mind of the created, including the creation : Yehoshua.

This defines the meaning of the fullness of the nature of Eloheem (pw Godhead) dwelling in Yehoshua (Col 2:9). It was and is not Eloheem himself dwelling in a "Yehoshua disguise", else he would also be all knowing (omniscient) see point 7.

16-Eloheem (pw God) Did Not Come Down to the Earth as a Man, Yehoshua (pw Jesus)

In fact, we see the very opposite - when Yehoshua teaches us how to separate men's identity from Eloheem (pw God) the Father, he uses the evidence of Eloheem (pw God) being in shamayim (pw heaven) even while he himself Yehoshua (the Son) was down on earth. This clear, distinct and distant seperation between Yehoshua and Yahuah could not be clearer by the added mention of shamayim ( the heights) - third shamayim (pw heaven) where Yahuah dwells outside of our realm.

Matthew 23:9 And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in shamayim (heaven).

Furthermore, Yehoshua's statement "your Father which IS in shamayim (pw heaven)" appears eight more times in the good message (pagan translation-gospel) as well as of course "OUR Father which IS in shamayim (pw heaven)". Yes, the Father's prayer which Yehoshua taught us while on earth as the Son of Eloheem clearly reminds us again that the Father is His Father too by the use of "our" Father. The Son clearly separates himself from the notion that Eloheem (pw God) came down from "shamayim (pw heaven)" as "Jesus". Instead he utilises the present tense case of what is going on on earth while he is presently here and where the Father is at the same time - ie. in shamayim (pw heaven) - period!

17-Eloheem (pw God) Alone is Immortal, Unapproachable and Invisible

Yehoshua died and was given immortality by the only immortal Father who raised him. Thus "he shall shew in his times...the...only Potenate" was accomplished. Yehoshua points to the one and only immortal Eloheem. Likewise, we, who are righteous, will be given the same immortality only by the power of the Father in the future at the one and only resurrection of the righteous. Even prophet Isaiah will only be raised later with the righteous at that resurrection.

Isa 26:19  Thy dead men shall live, together with my dead body shall they arise. Awake and sing, ye that dwell in dust: for thy dew is as the dew of herbs, and the earth shall cast out the dead.

There is no such thing as dying now and immediately entering shamayim (pw heaven), or gehenna (pw hell) - this is only in the vain imaginings of Catholic pagan immortality which bypasses death - this is another heresy!! And we have not even mentioned their abominable heresy concerning a Mary who is supposed to be in heaven who they blasphemously call the "Mother of God".

This will only take place at the resurrection when all the righteous dead are raised together at the last day before the millenium. After the 1000 years the wicked dead are raised to life but only to be destroyed along with death itself. Nobody currently possesses immortality (save Mashiach to whom it has been given by the Father)

Jn 3:13  And NO MAN  hath ascended up to shamayim (pw heaven), BUT he that came down from shamayim ( pw heaven), even the Son of man which is in shamayim (pw heaven).

  Thus repeated, unrepentant, wilful sin (eg. addicts, drunkards, eating unclean foods, sexually immoral: adulterers, fornicators(shacking up), multiple partners.................. etc, etc ) in the body will cause death and loss of salvation, even after justification by Mashiach. (For more on losing one's salvation see Take the OSAS Challenge). Neither is there purgatory where sins can be removed after death ( For more see Puragatory Heresy ).

18-Yehoshua The Son Made Like Us In Every Way, Not Eloheem (pw God)

From the above it is clear that it was "essential" that Yehoshua be made like us as the Updated KJV puts it. He was of the seed of Abraham and He was made as we were in all things (Greek- pas) made in every way the same with free will to succumb to temptation or to resist it. He chose the latter. If He were Eloheem (pw God) Satan would not have wasted his time trying to tempt Him, now would he? Yahuah Eloheem cannot be tempted to sin. Yehoshua had to overcome Satan by not sinning. He chose to resist sin because He loves the Father. He thus became our perfect atonement. Some have taught that Mashiach was made righteous by nature rather than choice. This suggests He was an automaton who could not sin. This is utterly false and a lie since we have already been told here in Heb 2:16 that He was made with ournature, like us in every way with the same weaknesses, free will, etc. Mashiach was certainly born righteous (free of sin) just as Adam before he sinned. When Mashiach entered this sinful world He had to remain righteous by learning to remain obedient - Heb 5:8 as discussed in point 8 above. He had to purify himself (Jn 17:19) of this world's temptations by resisting them. Adam did not stay righteous, while Mashiach, on the other hand, obviously did. Mashiach did this both by choice and by nature since He chose to follow the nature of His Father just as we ought to.

19-Yehoshua Has One Father Eloheem As Do His Followers, He is NOT That Eloheem

Stated right after being raised to life by His Father:

Stated after Yehoshua's ascension into shamayim ( pw heaven) he repeats four times my Eloheem . This means it is a sure witness under Torah. Yehoshua in shamayim is not Eloheem.

Rev 3:12  Him that overcometh will I make a pillar in the haykal (pw temple) of my Eloheem (pw God), and he shall go no more out: and I will write upon him the name of my Eloheem (pw God), and the name of the city of my Eloheem (pw God), which is new Jerusalem, which cometh down out of shamayim (pw heaven) from my Eloheem (pw God): and I will write upon him my new name.

So the haykal is named after Yahuah  (not Yehoshua), the name upon the believers first written is Yahuah and the name of the city

20-Yehoshua Has the Fear of (From) Yahuah his Father As Prophesied

Isa 11:1  And there shall come forth a rod out of the stem of Jesse, and a Branch shall grow out of his roots: 

Isa 11:2  And the spirit of Yahuah (pw the LORD) shall rest upon him, the spirit of wisdom and understanding, the spirit of counsel and might, the spirit of knowledge and of the fear of Yahuah (pw the LORD);

Yehoshua has the full fear of Yahuah since Yehoshua fully and perfectly fulfils the whole duty of a man which is to obey his Eloheem's commandments. He is not Eloheem.

Ecc 12:13  Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter: Fear Eloheem (pw God), and keep his commandments: for this is the whole duty of man.

21-Yehoshua Uses "I Am" To Confirm Sonship Not Sovereignty

Mar 14;61 ...Again the high priest asked him, and said unto him, Art thou the Mashiach (pw Christ), the Son of the Blessed?
Mar 14:62  And Yehoshua(pw Jesus) said, I am: and ye shall see the Son of man sitting on the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven. 

We see the priest going: oh blasphemy! This is just like the false teachers of the "Jesus-is-God heresy" who also  falsely accuse Yehoshua of saying he said he is Eloheem / I AM when he is saying nothing of the sort! He is saying  I AM THE SON OF YAHUAH confirming the Sonship as was prophesied for the Mashiach (pw Messiah).  Yehoshua is seated on the right hand of Yahuah Eloheem so how can he be Eloheem himself? We shall further discuss the" I  AM" argument in another section.

22- Yehoshua Is One In Agreement With Eloheem And Is Not Eloheem Who Is One

Oneness is by unity of the Spirit and Word (Torah) which makes it possible for every believer to be one with Yahuah too, in agreement.

23- Yahuah Alone Is The Rock

Christians try to use a badly translated verse again to make out Yehoshua is the Rock when we have been told over and over again that Yahuah is the Spiritual Rock. They use

The translation should be "...and that Rock was anointed"

Yahuah is the Spiritual Rock who annointed the literal rock to miraculously provide water. The literal rock obviously did not follow them but the provision from the Spiritual Rock followed them.Thus in a sense the supply of water folllowed them on their journey.

That literal anointed rock that Yahuah split became a foreshadow of another altar as hinted at by Apostle Shaul a few verses later

 Despising the miracles of the literal anointed rock provided became a Torah transgression. Breaking covenant (oath) despises the altar and everything upon it.

Despising  Eloheem the Spiritual Rock becomes an example of warning for those who despise the Spiritual Lamb (spiritual  living Water) provided by Yahuah and wilfully  transgress the Torah of Eloheem as did Yasherel in the wilderness. They despised the altar , the literal anointed rock that Yahuah provided and which purified the water. Yahuah is the Spiritual Rock alone who provided his Son as an anointed offering to purify us upon an altar (stauros/ stake/tree). The emphasis is thus on the provision of an anointed thing or person PROVIDED BY YAHUAH AND ANOINTED BY YAHUAH to do his miraculous work.

The verse that the whole Catholic church twists to justify popery and man worship actually exposes the truth. It reveals again that  Yehoshua builds his congregation upon the only solid Rock who is Yahuah.

Mat 16:18  And I say also unto thee, That thou art Kephah (pw Peter), and upon this rock I will build my congregation (pw church - from Greco-Roman Circe deity); and the gates of the grave (pw hell) shall not prevail against it.

Kephah's name means "the Rock is Yah". The congregation is built upon Yahuah by his Son Yehoshua.

Yehoshua who was begotten and formed, by his Father the Rock, has not forgotten the fact that he  is not himself the Rock. It is only pagan Christianity that teaches such a lie.

If we say that Eloheem (the Spiritual Rock) is a literal rock  then we blaspheme and commit idolatry. If we say the literal rock is Yehoshua then we blaspheme again. If we say "Peter" (Kephah) is the  Rock we blaspheme some more.  Finally, If we say the literal Son (Spiritual Lamb), anointed by Yahuah, is Eloheem (Spiritual Rock) we blaspheme against Yahuah himself.

24-Yahuah Alone Is The Creator, Not Yehoshua

Who created all things? Did God (Yahuah)? Isaiah 44:24 says 

Isa 44:24 Thus saith Yahuah (pw the LORD), thy redeemer, and he that formed thee from the womb, I am Yahuah (pw the LORD) that maketh all things; that stretcheth forth the shamayim (pw heaven)s ALONE; that spreadeth abroad the earth BY MYSELF;" 

 Some will then ask: If Yahuah Eloheem is the only creator of all things by himself, then why does Colosians state this:

Col 1:15-17 Who is the image of the invisible Eloheem (pw God), the firstborn of every creature: "For by him were all things created, that are in shamayim (pw heaven), and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him: And he is before all things, and by him all things consist. 

They will try to make the "him" in "for by him were all things created" be referring to Yehoshua when it does not. The "him" here  is referring back to the invisible Eloheem, not the firstborn. Simple logic and context would tell us that the first born cannot have created everything since he had to first be created and born. Something that is born is not self existent.

Isa 44:24 Thus saith Yahuah-the self existent one (pw theLord), thy redeemer, and he that formed thee from the womb, I am Yahuah-the self existent one (pw theLord) that maketh all things; that stretcheth forth the shamayim (pw heaven)s ALONE; that spreadeth abroad the earth BY MYSELF;

 This further proves Yehoshua is not Eloheem since He is created in His image, as was Adam, and thus so are we. Hence, Mashiach / Anointed One is the last Adam made (created by Eloheem) with a quickening spirit (1 Cor 15:45 )

This is why the translators at least got that part right when they placed a colon in the sentence since the “: For by him” refers to the invisible Yahuah that was referred to in the sentence. The image is always created, just as Adam was created in the image OF Yahuah. The image is not the original self-existent Yahuah. An image is always a later consequence of the original substance thought, idea, etc. that proceeds from the original. So, Yehoshua proceeds as the image out of Yahuah's self-existence.

The eternal cannot die – Yehoshua, as man, died and was resurrected by the eternal Father. If Yehoshua, the man, were able to raise Himself then He would never have died in the first place.

1 Cor 6:14 And Yahuah hath both raised up the Master (Yehoshua), and will also raise up us by his OWN power.

“For by HIM" refers to the invisible Eloheem, not the image (Yehoshua). As Eve was created FOR ADAM, Yehoshua was begotten FOR Yahuah, and then Yahuah gave away his begotten Son because He so loved the world. You can't give yourself away but then say you gave your son, that would simply be a lie. Yahuah is not a liar. The image of Yahuah is not Yahuah.

25- Yehoshua Is The Only MAN To have Ascended To Shamayim (pw heaven)

27- Yahuah  Alone Is The Invisible One To This Day

Yehoshua said two seemingly contradictory things:

He said:

Jn 14:9 “He that hath seen me hath seen the Father” 

Seen what? the express image of His person (as stated in Hebrews) - the works and words of Torah carried out by Yehoshua in the flesh, his likeness in character, not Yahuah Himself, eg. His face etc.

Further:

Jn 15:23 He that hateth me hateth my Father also.

Jn 15:24 If I had not done among them the works which none other MAN did, they had not had sin: but now have they both seen and hated both me and my Father.

Yehoshua also stated, what is erroneously seen as contradictory:

1 Jn 4:20 If a man say, I love Yahuah, and hateth his brother, he is a liar: for he that loveth not his brother whom he hath seen, how can he love Yahuah whom he hath NOT SEEN?

In this verse Yehoshua is stating He is not Yahuah himself physically or in any other way.

So, Yehoshua is categorically NOT the invisible Father since no MAN has seen Yahuah to this day. This plainly shows Yehoshua is not Yahuah as He is standing right before their eyes speaking this verse.

Further:

Heb 10:12 But this MAN (Yehoshua), after he had offered one offering (pw sacrifice) for sins for ever, sat down on the right hand of Yahuah; [the still unseen , invisible, but  future visible YAHUAH].

28- Yehoshua and Yahuah Are Separate Entities That Are Both Needed

Whoever says were are saved by "Christ Alone" is a liar and implies that A) Yahuhah the Father does not exist or B) That the Son and the Father are one and  the same. We have already disproven that and we are told here again that we need to acknowledge BOTH and have BOTH.

1Jn 2:22  Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father AND the Son.
1Jn 2:23  Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father: (but) he that acknowledgeth the Son hath the Father also.
1Jn 2:24  Let that therefore abide in you, which ye have heard from the beginning. If that which ye have heard from the beginning shall remain in you, ye also shall continue in the Son, AND in the Father.

The Son had to be anointed by his Father and raised to life by His Father. A Father cannot be called a Father unless he has a Son and a Son cannot be called a Son unless he has a Father who has begotten him. Chirstianity denies the Son being begotten by a Father and claims he existed from eternity or is self existent.

Note there is not mention of a god  the spirit that is to be acknowledged since Yahuah is Spirit himself and Yehoshua is the one who is flesh that is anointed by that Spirit.

Chapter 4

History of the Trinity

This chapter contains some text from a printed tract of a "church" sect. In some places we have left the pagan names and words as they are. We do not uphold to the teachings of so-called "church fathers","denominations" or the misleading term "Christianity". We merely use the historical references to show men's philosophy through history and how it opposes the true scriptures.

From 100 AD to 400 AD so-called church-fathers of Alexandria in Egypt Clement, Irenaeus, Alexander, Origen, Arius, Athanasius and Cyril were causing confusion over the so-called Divinity of the Mashiach (pw Messiah).
They wanted to know whether He was fully Divine, or was He human? 

Well, it is important to note that this word “divine” itself is a pagan idea in the first place.
Divine/Divinity, Deity, Theos are all related words. The Greek words "dios" and "Theos," and the Latin word "deus" all refer to pagan gods: Greek "Dieus/Zeus, Teutonic-Germanic "Ziu," Roman "Diovis/Jovis/ Jupiter/Zeus were all names for Sun-god deities that "shine, have brightness."

So denying the Trinity is said to deny the Deity or Divinity of Mashiach (pw Messiah). Well, that would be a good start since Eloheem (pw God) is not a pagan god. He is not  a Deity or Divinity either. 
 
It is well known from the writings on the walls of the pyramids that the Egyptians had many gods, and were familiar with worshipping various trinities.  A Trinity is a group of three gods. For example, they worshipped Amun, Maut and Khonso, another was Osiris, Isis and Horus, and also Neph, Sate and Amouke, to name a few of the better known trinities.  Different trinities were being revered in different cities, while worshipers exercised a peaceful toleration toward those who revered any others.  This same tolerance or compromise was later shown with Constantine in Rome and his establishment of the false religion called Christianity. It is interesting to note, however, that in all these Egyptian trinities, the third god of the trio always emanated from the first two as though it were their offspring.

It was about AD 180 that Irenaeus proposed the first exposition of a “Christian Trinity”. This is nearly two centuries after the birth of Yehoshua the First Beggotten Son of Yahuha! This whole matter seems to have arisen from the baptism formula recorded in Matthew 28:19 "Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit".  Irenaeus also taught that those Christians who wished to be baptized must have a triple immersion in running water.  This was intended to conform to the three elements, the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit. Two leading clergymen, Alexander and Athanasius, quickly picked up on Irenaeus's  theory of a triune god. They both believed that Eloheem (pw God) and Jesus were equal, and they started to teach the earliest  concept of the Christian Trinity. They started to preach that Jesus was fully “divine” and the same substance with the Father.  They used the Greek words Homo Ousious (of the same substance) to describe the Father and the Son to make Irenaeus's idea more credible. So we assume that they had made their god a sun god like so many pagan triune gods since their obsession was with “divinity” and thus their Jesus was made of the same substance, ie. a sun-god too.

In the meanwhile Arius, a priest in Alexandria argued that Eloheem (pw God) is spirit (Jn 4:24) a non-material personal being, and his Son “Jesus” flesh and blood. He used the term Heter Ousious (of a different substance).  He said if Eloheem (pw God) had created the Son, the Son could not be eternal with the Father.  He argued that “Jesus” was created a superior Being to redeem the human race.  He reasoned that if the Father bore a Son, there must have been a time when the Son did not exist, so the Son could not be eternal with the Father. He therefore placed the Son in a position below that of the Father.  Arius also taught that the Father and Son were both superior to the “Holy” Spirit, which was Eloheem's (pw God) power.  He was convinced that the Father must rank above the Son and the Son was above the “Holy” Spirit.  He said that Eloheem (pw God) was the creator, and that the Son of Eloheem (pw God) was an intermediate Being, above all the rest of creation.

As the contention raged on, Arius could not alter the views of his opponents, so he called upon some of his fellow clergymen at Constantinople and elsewhere for support, causing the dispute to spread.  The contention caused waves of strife to arise between bishops, the clergy and various “church” groups, causing Alexandria to become divided over this issue.  The arguments continued unabated well into the 4th century, and by the 5th century these conflicts disrupted all commercial and industrial activity in Alexandria.

In the meanwhile the Edict of Milan in AD 313 brought an end to all persecution of those who claimed to follow Jesus in the Roman Empire.  Constantine the Great then invented Christianity as the state religion, and concerned himself with the affairs of this early Christian Church which was nothing like the doctrine of the apostles, Mashiach (pw Messiah) or Yahuah. 

This was simply a political manoeuvre in order to unify its false doctrines and thereby ensure unity within the Empire. Constantine was greatly concerned over the quarrelling by the “church” leaders with regards to the nature of Jesus.  He then took the initiative in AD 325, by convoking a Church Council in Nicaea, in present day Turkey.  The Meeting was commissioned to resolve the disagreement over the nature of Jesus and several other disputes that were prevalent at that time.  The main dispute about the so-called “divinity” of Jesus was again based on some ambiguous Renewed Everlasting Covenant (pw New Testament) passages.  

The meeting was very tempestuous as they debated and finally adopted the heretic resolution that Yehoshua (pw Jesus)  was indeed fully divine and of the same substance as the Father.  The meeting then endorsed their decision by using the key words Homo Ousious (of one substance) to describe the relationship of Yehoshua (pw Jesus)  to Eloheem (pw God) the Father.  From then onwards, Yehoshua (pw Jesus)  was to be known as "God the Son".  The Holy Spirit was then declared a God of equal standing with the Father and the Son.  The upshot of this meeting was that the Council had introduced a new doctrine into their Christian Church known as the Trinity.  This is the term used to express the belief that within the one God, there are three “divine” persons - the Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost (or Holy Spirit).  The Meeting then formulated the Nicene Creed, which was to be recited in all “churches” to demonstrate that Jesus was indeed "Very God".

At this time I cannot help but repeat what I had, as you may recall, stated at the begining in point 10:

1 Cor 15:24 "Then cometh the end, when he shall have delivered up the rule and reign (pw -kingdom) to Eloheem (pw God), indeed (*even) the Father; when he shall have put down all rule and all authority and power.  25 For he (Yehoshua) must reign, till he hath put all enemies under his feet.  26 The last enemy that shall be destroyed is death.  27 For he (Yahuah) hath put all things under his feet. But when he (Yahuah) saith all things are put under him (Yehoshua), it is manifest that he (Yahuah) is excepted which did put all things under him (Yehoshua).  28 And when all things shall be subdued unto him (Yehoshua), then shall the Son also himself be subject unto him (Yahuah) that put all things under him, that Eloheem [Yahuah](God) may be all in all." 

KJV has "even" the Father as though he is inclusive of others when it should be rendered "indeed", ie. exclusively the very Father alone. This is confirmed by the use of "excepted" in verse 26 further conveying the exclusivity of the Father from the Son. Yahuah is sovereign over all, including the son.

So, to put it another way, 1 Cor 15:24 is plainly exposing the lie of Yehoshua (pw Jesus)  indeed being “the very God” for it is saying that the fact that the Son is subject to the Father at the end of his appointed authority shows that he is NOT indeed the very God. It is the Father who is indeed the very all-in-all Eloheem, in other words, Sovereign Potentate (pw Godhead), and NOT Yehoshua. Appointed power is never above its sovereign master (pw Godhead).

Matt 10:24 The disciple is not above his master, nor the servant above his master.

In 1 Cor 15:24 the Mashiach (pw Messiah) is neither above nor equal in position but under the sovereign Eloheem. Scriptures refer to him being equal in other ways, eg. by kinship, etc. but not in sovereignty and certainly not of the same substance since Yahuah is not substance but Spirit. He creates substance!! He created the begotten Son whose substance (flesh) was filled with his Spirit [ie. ANOINTED = Mashiach (pw Messiah]. (Covered in more detail later).

Back to the history of the Trinity : Arius still maintained that there was only one God and that Jesus was the Son of God.  He claimed that by exalting the Son to equality with the Father they were destroying the great truth of the unity of Eloheem (pw God). He told the meeting that he rejected the Nicene Creed and everything that this meeting had endorsed. In reply, the meeting then rejected Arius, and declared his "One God" teaching as "Arian heresy" because he would not accept that Mashiach (pw Messiah) is of the same substance as Eloheem (pw God).

After this, Arianism quickly disappeared from within the Roman Empire. However, his followers remained active outside the Empire, particularly through the preaching of Bishop Ulfilas who converted many Germanic tribes to “Christianity” in northern Europe. 

A second Council Meeting was held at Constantinople fifty years later, in AD 381 to ratify the doctrine of the Trinity.  It approved the wording Homo Ousious (of one substance), and then affirmed that the “Holy” Spirit was a person.  After a few amendments were made the Nicene Creed was adopted, all of which were first propounded at Nicaea in AD 325. Conservative churchmen, however, hesitated to use this non-Biblical term Homo Ousious.

The introduction of the Trinity created much discord within this “Church” which raged on for many years, causing another Council to be held at Ephesus in AD 431. This meeting was to resolve some unfinished business, and to make further amendments to the "Christian Trinity” which had been promulgated at the Nicaea and Constantinople Meetings. At this meeting the Bishop of Alexandria came forward and introduced the idea that the Virgin Mary should be called the "Mother of God".  He used the word Theotokos, "Birthgiver of God" to pacify the people concerning this new doctrine of the Trinity.  He also proposed that Mary should be worshipped as the "Mother of God".  Nestorius, the Bishop of Constantinople on the other hand, asserted that the so-called “Divine” nature did indeed dwell in Jesus but He was not fully Eloheem (pw God), nor could he accept that the Virgin Mary is the Mother of Eloheem (pw God).  The Meeting then condemned Nestorius as a heretic for not accepting the Trinity.

It is ironic that this meeting should have taken place in Ephesus where they were pursuing the old pagan ideas of Isis and Cybele, the great mother goddesses, and Diana, the virgin goddess of the Ephesians whom the Apostle Paul denounced while on his missionary journey when he arrived at Ephesus, as we read in Acts 19:26-29, 35.

It took over 200 years, and no less than five Councils to hammer out, refine, and finalise the doctrine of the Trinity.  Many proposals and counter proposals were put forward and debated at these meetings.  Every minutest detail and every possibility of Mashiach's (pw Messiah's) relationship to the Father were argued and debated over and over again.  Many of the clergymen at that time sincerely believed that within the one Eloheem (pw God), there are three “Divine” Persons - the Father, the Son and the "Holy Ghost" or "Holy Spirit". Whilst one can be sincerely wrong, error can also be wilfully chosen by not taking the time to seek the truth in the scriptures and following the vain teachings of men.

The advent of the Trinity which evolved from these Council Meetings appears to be a concept drawn from the Mythologies of ancient Egypt and Babylon. It did not form part of the Apostles' original teachings as recorded in the Renewed Everlasting Covenant (pw New Testament), but was a product of many factors which were forming in this thing called “Church”, particularly in Egypt during the 3rd and 4th centuries.  By that time everyone had lost sight of the simple teachings of Yehoshua and the Apostles; and theology had taken its place. It is interesting to note that the word "theology" is not in scripture and is related to the invented Roman Vulgate word "theos" from which we get the pagan word Divine or god from Hinduism's sun gods / Divas, etc. It has nothing to do with Yahuah the Almighty in shamayim. He is not a sun-god or a sky god and neither is his Son.

The word "deity" derives from the Latin deus ("god"), which is related through a common Indo-European origin to Sanskrit deva ("god"), devi ("goddess"), divya ("transcendental", "spiritual"). The root is related to words for "sky", such as Latin dies ("day"), and the Sanskrit div, divus, diu ("sky", "day", "shine"). Also related are "divine" and "divinity," from the Latin "divinus," from "divus."

[Deity - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.htm]

Constantine however felt satisfied that for the first time his “Church” had a recognized set of "Christian" doctrines which are still adhered to today through the pagan Roman Catholic church and its Protestant “children” 

As the decisions of these Councils were intended for universal acceptance throughout the Roman Empire, those who would not subscribe to them were declared heretics. Ultimately a law was passed in AD 719 making the worship of the Trinity compulsory in all “churches”.

Difficulty With A So-Called "God the Spirit"

Shortly after this, however, it was discovered that the Western and Eastern sections of the Church were not unanimous in accepting the Trinity as it stood.  They disagreed on how the “Holy” Spirit is derived. The Greek Orthodox Church used the original text of the Nicene Creed which stated that the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father.  They base their belief on Jn 15:26

"But when the Comforter is come, whom I will send unto you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, which proceedeth from the Father, he shall testify of me."

The Church in Rome, in the meanwhile, inserted the filioque Clause (Latin for, and from the Son) into the Nicene Creed as they felt that the Holy Spirit proceeded from both the Father and the Son together, so as to conform to the Egyptian trinities.  This view was rejected by the Eastern Church as they believe that the Father alone produced both the Son and the "Holy Spirit". This dispute remains a serious obstacle to the reunification of the two pagan “Churches” to this day.  The Roman Catholic and the Greek Orthodox Churches each claim that their Trinity is the right one. These two "Christian Churches” have been divided over the Trinity for nearly a thousand years.

The Apostle Paul warned of an imminent departure by the congregations*, from the simple teachings of Yehoshua.

( *ekklesia , not "church"- a pagan Roman Vulgate word invention from the Circe / Kirkeh godess) 

Acts 20:28-31 Take heed brethren unto yourselves and to all the flock for I know this that after my departing shall grievous wolves enter in among you not sparing the flock.  Also of your own selves shall men arise speaking perverse things to draw away disciples after them.  Therefore watch and remember, that by the space of three years I ceased not to warn everyone night and day with tears .

Another stern warning

1 Cor 8:5-7 "For though there be that are called mighty ones, [Eloheem, which are not – in other words idols] (pw -gods), whether in shamayim or on Earth.  But to us there is but ONE Mighty One [Eloheem], the Father, of whom are all things (ie.created), and we in Him; AND one Yehoshua Mashiach, by whom are all things and we by him (ie. born again in the Spirit).  Howbeit there is not in every man this knowledge.

Shaul makes no mention of a "God the spirit" either here, but in Hebrews, says that the Father Eloheem is the source of the spirits.


These are the seven spirits Yehoshua was fully annointed with, as prophesied. Thus he was the Annointed One (pw Christ).

The Ruach (breath) of Yahuah was made to rest upon his Son, it came out of the Father, it is not a third pagan god to be prayed to as popularised by the Benny Hinn cult book "Good Morning Holy Spirit". It is not a person, it is only personified. Wisdom in Proverbs has been personified as a woman but nobody added "god the wisdom", so why "god the spirit"? The blood of Abel also cries out but it is not a god, it is merely personified as it bears direct witness of Cain and all the prophets murdered. The set apart Ruach is not a person!

The spirit of Yahuah consists of seven attributes:

These spirits / attributes / powers / thoughts are OF Eloheem, ie. they belong to and proceed from Him, have been given to the Lamb (Yehoshua) who has sent them forth as the comforter into all the earth from the Father to all who believe. 
The spirit is merely the attributes of Yahuah's power and core character itself, and so, when it is despised it is as if one is directly despising or grieving Yahuah after receiving the revelation of his thoughts, wisdom, etc. (turning from the light). It is rejecting the fullness of the knowledge, power, might, understanding and fear of Yahuah revealed through his spirit, that one is then turning away from, and there can be no excuse for that. It is what Satan did.

At this point it is crucial now to note that blasphemy against the set apart spirit (pw holy spirit) is not forgiven, yet blasphemy against the Son of Man, Yehoshua, is forgiven. Why would this be if He is of the same substance and is the "very God" or Almighty One?

Benny Hinn Charismaniacal Trinity

A Trinity idea of only three is somewhat lacking if one truly DEIFIES SPIRITS like a true pagan and loves to make a corrupted polytheism of the One TRUE Eloheem Yahuah. That pagan should rather go all the way to gehenna / lake of fire  (pw hell) in an express train and do his worst and invent a god the father, god the son, god the wisdom, god the fear, god the understanding, god the knowledge, god the counsel, god the spirit, etc. But perhaps that would have obviously been too pagan back then and they had to be more subtle. Perhaps this will be the next pantheon of pagan gods they will invent in the future as they paganise the scriptures further.

In fact, the very pagan and Catholic pentecostal charismaniac Benny Hinn went so far as to invent a greater number within his Trinity at some stage. "As Hinn's popularity increased due to his television program and the runaway sales of Good Morning, Holy Spirit, his teachings came under close scrutiny by several apologetics ministries. The Christian Research Institute became especially alarmed by Hinn's references to the Godhead that seemed at best unorthodox and at worst heretical. On both his television program and in his book Hinn asserted that all three persons of the so-called Triune Godhead have their own independent bodies, souls, and spirits, as well as wills (10/13/90, TBN)"

ref: www.rapidnet.com/~jbeard/bdm/exposes/hinn/general.htm

This is an example of what rubbish is shown on Trinity Broadcasting Network. Ironically this heretic broadcaster of the Trinity doctrine also boasts of its love for the pope as a man of God, as does Hinn.
Trinity Broadcasting Network also clearly admitted years ago that Mashiach (pw Christ/Messiah) himself does not say he is Eloheem (pw God) anywhere, yet they continue with the lie of the Catholic church since they are her agents.


Paul Crouch is admitting that Yehoshua did not ever say he is Eloheem. They thus wilfully obey the Pope's lies. If the late Paul Crouch were corrected and if Kenneth Copeland was correcting him then why did they still continue serving the pope, and still do in the case of Copeland with his recent call to join with the Vatican?

Do not forget, as well, that Benny Hinn promoted praying to the Ruach Hakodesh with his terrible book Good Morning Holy Spirit. We are simply called pray to Yahuah the Father (who is Spirit) in the name of Yehoshua. There is no god the spirit to be prayed to, especially a Torahless spirit, as in the case of Benny Hinn!

The Catholic church has done its worst in any case, they created enough Saints to be prayed to every day of the year (365). In setting them up as sky deities to be prayed to they are indeed deified gods. Including Mary, of course. They thus pray to the dead and make themselves the masters of necromancy which is an abomination and punishable by death under Yahuah's coming judgement. And let's not forget their god, "Saint" Nicholas, or Saint Nick, who encourages and rewards those who "nick" / steal stuff. He, the "saint" of thieves, who is worshipped by the world is none other than SANTA (SATAN). He certainly is the robbing demon, deceiving children with pagan worship and idolatry and turning them away from Yehoshua, robbing them of their reward of salvation. Martin Luther and the Protestants (daughters of the harlot church) merely offered soft porn, as it were, in the form of another idol for their pagan festival, Christmas. For Satan worshipers Yahuah's sovereignty must be undermined at all costs.  For more see "Saving Christmas?"

Paul's prophecy of what would happen after his departure was a warning of the debacle that would divide the believers very early on after his departure. These early so-called "church fathers" (fathers of lies) in the 3rd and 4th centuries had already denounced much of the Torah that Mashiach (pw Messiah) taught and that the disciples, apostles and believers had followed in the first century. Since they rejected the light it is no wonder that they wandered into the deeper darkness of Trinity heresy and then into idolatry of a Mashiach (pw Messiah) who is a god, and then on to the abomination of Mary as the Mother of God. More darkness would follow as they began to create their own doctrines. One could be tempted to blame it on the scriptures themselves as if they are written in such a way that there may have been apparent contradictions, but there are no contradictions in the scriptures.  Eloheem is not the author of confusion. They really simply wanted a replacement religion, one that would replace the Torah. They chose darkness with the invention of Torah-less Christianity and its Trinity which blasphemes the sovereignty of Yahuah.

---- 00O00 ----

Chapter 5

The Church's Greatest Deception - 1 Timothy 3:16

The Roman Catholic Church and its daughter the Protestant, Christian conglomerate had to create a supposed doctrinal support for their lying doctrines:

It seems their supposed success was achieved once again by their use of their own corrupted tranlsations that they had time to conjure up while they witheld them from the masses, the laity.They had plenty of time to tweak and corrupt the Hebrew and /or Greek into pagan Latin. Their "greatest" work would probably be 1 Timothy 3:16 as seen today in  the KJV still being used as doctrinal support across the trinitarian spectrum of deceivers.

 1 Tim 3:16 "...God was mainifest in the flesh..."

The half asleep and Biblically illiterate would not realise this to be a direct contradiction to Yahuah (pw God) himself as already shown in Chapter 2 The Two Witnesses:

The foolish, like so many of us at one time or another, accepted their lie. But now by the kindess of Yahuah many of us who love the truth are being shown that very truth and the lies of Babylon are being exposed once and for all! The horrendous corruption of 1 Timothy 3:16 is still evident in most modern KJV versions. In the copy I have on hand, a Ninth Impression 1992 based on the 1962 edition of the American Bible Society I find the following

Very clearly the publication indicates an asterisk next to "God". This inidcates an "alternative reading and rendering" which is supplied at the back. The alternate reading provided or suggested woud then be:

1Tim 3:16 And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: He who was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory.

Already we see the papal walls of Rome crumbling, "Eloheem" (pw God) is not even there in the alternate rendering. No such corrupted version of 1 Tim 3:16 existed in any manuscript, neither did any  reference to it exist until after the creation of the Trinity doctrine as set out in the chapter" History of the Trinity". The conclusion is clear - corruption of the truth was necessary to support a corrupt religion.

At this point it becomes paramount to further take note of what the subject in the sentence is. The subject is "the mystery of godliness". The subject is not "God" himself here. "godliness" is the pagan translation's useless attempt at replacing the Greek "eusebeia" which means piety, ie. being morally set apart to Yahuah (pw holiness). Thus, the subject is referring to an attitude, action, spirit or behaviour that is toward Eloheem, and not referring to Eloheem Himself. The mystery then is NOT about, how is it possible for Jesus to be God? That is never the question here since every true disciple knows Numbers 23:19 as above prohibits any such question, but rather, how is it possible for a man to behave totally set apart and pious in obedience to Yahuah? This is what is being declared. It made no sense for the translator to have made any error here unless it was intentional.

The declaration that "he", someone, in the flesh was shown to us, justified in the spirit, seen of malakhim (pw angels), preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world and received up into splendor (pw glory), this is the answer to the mystery, and there is NO CONTROVERSY, NO CONTRADICTION. Did you hear that? He who was shown to us as being fully obedient and morally pure does not contradict Numbers 23:19, he is not Eloheem. He is a man and remains a man, he remains the son of Eloheem - it is Yehoshua. The mystery that a man sent from above could be perfect and morally pure unto Yahuah and re-enter into shamayim (pw heaven) is the mystery that is no longer a mystery or a question, it has been seen and declared without CONTROVERSY, without CONTRADICTION. So, we see that the heretical church tries to make the mystery here all about a mysterious Trinity when it is not. They make out that their mysterious Trinity is so mysterious that it cannot be explained to this day. How convenient. They cannot explain their own contradiction either. Apostle Paul says there is no contrdiction or controversy since he is not talking about God being manifest in the flesh but piety or righteousness being manifest by the man Yehoshua in the flesh.

The further stupidity of stating "God" was seen by malakhim (pw angels) as some new revelation would be even more laughable. That Yahuah would need justifying by his own spirit is a double joke, and that He would be received up in splendor (pw glory) a triple great mystery since by whom would He be received by and given honor by? In this way the question rather than being answered by the scriptures is instead turned into some typical agnostic (secret knowledge) mystery by the Catholic Church.

Rome wants to contradict the true Eloheem and thus they inserted "God" instead of "he who" "was manifest in the flesh". Forgery was the order of the day.



Note: O  C  which means "who"  (Greek O C changed to Θ‾C which means theos "God". Line above with darker ink supports evidence of a modern forgery (ie. after the invention of Trinity doctrine and not before)


The same forgery was attempted in the Codex Sinaiticus (??)

I would call this a truly perfect example of what is today called the Mandela Effect, the name for the phenomenon where a fact is distorted by false information (in this case by forgery) which then seems to continue as a fact or truth regardless of the information having been corrected or changed. This type of phenomenon received its name when Nelson Mandela was reported to have died at an earlier time in his life and many continued to believe he was dead despite later reports of his activities. This has indeed happened to the world of Christianity who is living under the Mandela Effect of the Catholic Church.

The corruption of 1 Tim 3:16 has been exposed and corrected by numerous translations yet denominations around the world still declare Jesus is God manifest in the flesh and use 1 Tim 3:16 in its corrupted form. So what about you? Are you still under the Mandela Effect of Rome? Another example would be if I were to ask you to insert the missing word in the sentence - "We are saved / justified by ______ alone." Nine out of ten times the answer would undoubtedly be incorrect based upon another corrupted translation made around 500 years ago by Martin Luther! Although most translations do not render it this way at all the heretical slogan has stuck and continues to be used by the false church system just like the "God in the flesh" fable as if it were true scripture - another Mandela Effect. For the correct missing word see our aritcle Faith Alone?

Now, if we investigate 1 Tim 3:16 further, some texts even have "who" or" which" in place of "God". We agree most strongly with "which", since, as we stated previously, it is the mystery of set apartness (pw godliness), that is the subject, not "God" or a person that is being referred to, so "which" fits grammatically.

The following list is from http://www.TrinityTruth.org where 25 translations are shown with the more correct translations (we do not neccessarily endorse any of these 'bibles" in part or whole). They show how, despite the numerous correct translations, the lie or error continues to live on with gusto.

1Timothy 3:16

(ASV) “And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness; He who was manifested in the flesh, Justified in the spirit, Seen of angels, Preached among the nations, Believed on in the world, Received up in glory.”

(BBE) “And without argument, great is the secret of religion: He who was seen in the flesh, who was given God's approval in the spirit, was seen by the angels, of whom the good news was given among the nations, in whom the world had faith, who was taken up in glory.”

(CEV) “Here is the great mystery of our religion: Christ came as a human. The Spirit proved that he pleased God, and he was seen by angels. Christ was preached to the nations. People in this world put their faith in him, and he was taken up to glory.”

(CJB) “Great beyond all question is the formerly hidden truth underlying our faith: He was manifested physically and proved righteous spiritually, seen by angels and proclaimed among the nations, trusted throughout the world and raised up in glory to heaven.”

(CENT) “By common confession, great is the mystery of godliness: he was revealed in the flesh, was vindicated in the Spirit, seen by angels, preached among the nations, believed on in the world, taken up in glory.”

(ESV) “Great indeed, we confess, is the mystery of godliness: He was manifested in the flesh, vindicated by the Spirit, seen by angels, proclaimed among the nations, believed on in the world, taken up in glory.”

(GNB) “No one can deny how great is the secret of our religion: He appeared in human form, was shown to be right by the Spirit, and was seen by angels. He was preached among the nations, was believed in throughout the world, and was taken up to heaven.”

(HCSB) “And most certainly, the mystery of godliness is great: He was manifested in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen by angels, preached among the Gentiles, believed on in the world, taken up in glory.”

(LONT) “And, confessedly, great is the secret of godliness; -he who has manifested in the flesh, justified in the Spirit; seen of messengers, proclaimed to the Gentiles, believed on in the world, taken up in glory.”

(MSG) “This Christian life is a great mystery, far exceeding our understanding, but some things are clear enough: He appeared in a human body, was proved right by the invisible Spirit, was seen by angels. He was proclaimed among all kinds of peoples, believed in all over the world, taken up into heavenly glory.”

(MRC) “And as agreed by common consent great is the mystery of piety: He Who was manifested in the flesh, was justified in the Spirit, seen by angels, proclaimed among the nations, believed on in the world, taken up in glory.”

(NASB) “By common confession, great is the mystery of godliness: He who was revealed in the flesh, Was vindicated in the Spirit, Seen by angels, Proclaimed among the nations, Believed on in the world, Taken up in glory.”

(NCV) “Without doubt, the secret of our life of worship is great: He was shown to us in a human body, proved right in spirit, and seen by angels. He was preached to those who are not Jews, believed in by the world, and taken up in glory.”

(NET) “And we all agree, our religion contains amazing revelation: He was revealed in the flesh, vindicated by the Spirit, seen by angels, proclaimed among Gentiles, believed on in the world, taken up in glory.”

(NIRV) “There is no doubt that godliness is a great mystery. Jesus appeared in a body. The Holy Spirit proved that he was the Son of God. He was seen by angels. He was preached among the nations. People in the world believed in him. He was taken up to heaven in glory.”

(NIV) “Beyond all question, the mystery of godliness is great: He appeared in a body, was vindicated by the Spirit, was seen by angels, was preached among the nations, was believed on in the world, was taken up in glory.”

(NLT) “Without question, this is the great mystery of our faith: Christ appeared in the flesh and was shown to be righteous by the Spirit. He was seen by angels and was announced to the nations. He was believed on in the world and was taken up into heaven.”

(NLV) “It is important to know the secret of Godlike living, which is: Christ came to earth as a Man. He was pure in His Spirit. He was seen by angels. The nations heard about Him. Men everywhere put their trust in Him. He was taken up into heaven.”

(NRSV) “Without any doubt, the mystery of our religion is great: He was revealed in flesh, vindicated in spirit, seen by angels, proclaimed among Gentiles, believed in throughout the world, taken up in glory.”

(RSV) “Great indeed, we confess, is the mystery of our religion: He was manifested in the flesh, vindicated in the Spirit, seen by angels, preached among the nations, believed on in the world, taken up in glory.”

(RV) “And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness; He who was manifested in the flesh, justified in the spirit, seen of angels, preached among the nations, believed on in the world, received up in glory.”

(TCNT) “Yes, and confessedly wonderful are the deep truths of our religion; for-- 'He was revealed in our nature, pronounced righteous in spirit, seen by angels, proclaimed among the Gentiles, believed on in the world, taken up into glory.'”

(UPDV) “And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness; He who was manifested in the flesh, Justified in the spirit, Seen of angels, Preached among the nations, Believed on in the world, Received up in glory.”

(WmsNT) “Undoubtedly the mystery of our religion is a great wonder: "He was made visible in human form; He was vindicated by the Spirit; He was seen by angels; He was proclaimed among the heathen; He was trusted in throughout the world; He was taken up to glory.”

(WNT) “And, beyond controversy, great is the mystery of our religion - that Christ appeared in human form, and His claims justified by the Spirit, was seen by angels and proclaimed among Gentile nations, was believed on in the world, and received up again into glory.”

We also note the Trinitarian Albert Barnes' explanation below and highlight the fact that he remained a trinitarian all the same. This would mean that Mr Barnes also did not believe Eloheem (pw God) in Numbers 23:19, or simply ignored Him, rather hanging on to a Catholic fabrication - the Mandela Effect had developed into a lie that was now believed. If one tells a lie often enough it can be accepted as truth by the deceived and the teller of the lie will soon believe his own lie too. The Torah is clear that there must be two or more witnesses to establish a truth and Yahuah (through Num23;19 and many other places) is not a second witness to a false rendering of 1 Tim 3:16 but a witness who exposes its corruption by the Catholics of Constantine.

Albert Barnes' Notes on the Bible, (1798-1870)
“God - Probably there is no passage in the New Testament which has excited so much discussion among critics as this, and none in reference to which it is so difficult to determine the true reading. It is the only one, it is believed, in which the microscope has been employed to determine the lines of the letters used in a manuscript; and, after all that has been done to ascertain the exact truth in regard to it, still the question remains undecided. It is not the object of these notes to enter into the examination of questions of this nature. A full investigation may be found in Wetstein. The question which has excited so much controversy is, whether the original Greek word was Θεὸς Theos, “God,” or whether it was ὅςhos, “who,” or ὁho, “which.” The controversy has turned, to a considerable degree, on the reading in the “Codex Alexandrinus;” and a remark or two on the method in which the manuscripts in the New Testament were written, will show the true nature of the controversy.
Greek manuscripts were formerly written entirely in capital letters, and without breaks or intervals between the words, and without accents; see a full description of the methods of writing the New Testament, in an article by Prof. Stuart in Dr. Robinson's Biblotheca Sacra, No. 2, pp. 254ff The small, cursive Greek letters which are now used, were not commonly employed in transcribing the New Testament, if at all, until the ninth or tenth centuries. It was a common thing to abridge or contract words in the manuscript. Thus, πρ would be used for πατερpater, “father;” κς for κυριοςkurios, “Lord;” Θς for Θεος Theos, “God,” etc. The words thus contracted were designated by a faint line or dash over them. In this place, therefore, if the original uncials (capitals) were Θ¯C¯, standing for Θεὸς Theos, “God,” and the line in the Θ, and the faint line over it, were obliterated from any cause, it would easily be mistaken for OC - ὅςhos - “who.”
To ascertain which of these is the true reading, has been the great question; and it is with reference to this that the microscope has been resorted to in the examination of the Alexandrian manuscript. It is now generally admitted that the faint line “over” the word has been added by some later hand, though not improbably by one who found that the line was nearly obliterated, and who meant merely to restore it. Whether the letter O was originally written with a line within it, making the reading “God,” it is now said to be impossible to determine, in consequence of the manuscript at this place having become so much worn by frequent examination. The Vulgate and the Syriac read it: “who,” or “which.” The Vulgate is, “Great is the sacrament of piety which was manifested in the flesh.” The Syriac, “Great is the mystery of godliness, that he was manifested in the flesh.”

An easier understanding of how the "error" or rather corruption took place - watch this short video.

Chapter 6

The Mindless Mystery of the Trinity

So, after creating their greater confusion and deeper mystery, instead of solving it, the Roman Catholics then have further excuse that the Trinity is a mystery that cannot be understood by mere mortals and must therefore just be accepted by what they call faith. This, of course, is not the correct word - which in  Hebrew is emunah /moral fideltiy, conviction to obey the truth [not a lie]. Yahuah has not concealed any Trinity but rather made it clear who He is (spirit) and who the Son came as (flesh) throughout scripture, and the one is not the other as stated in Numbers 23:19 already! It is only false teachers who have concealed the truth with deception.

The so called Biblical doctrines are not to be accepted as such merely because they are labelled "Biblical" or "Christian". We do not accept doctrine by mindless so-called "faith", a pagan goddess inserted into the translation of the scriptures. We trust not in godesses which we simply carry around as amulets, but we have emunuh (pw faith), an active moral conviction which requires a conscious decision with reasoning and testing of every spirit.

1 Jn 4:1 Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of Eloheem (pw God): because many false prophets are gone out into the world.

2 Hereby know ye the Spirit of Eloheem (pw God): Every spirit that confesseth that Yehoshua (pw Jesus) Mashjak (pw Christ) is come in the flesh is of Eloheem (pw God):
3 And every spirit that confesseth not that Yehoshua (pw Jesus) Mashiach (pw Christ) is come in the flesh is not of Eloheem (pw God): and this is that spirit of anti-Mashiach (pw anti-Christ), whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world.
4 Ye are of Eloheem (pw God), little children, and have overcome them: because greater is he that is in you, than he that is in the world.

Yahuah does not create mindless mysteries or secrets for his true disciples
but reveals understandable truth which exposes bogus lies:

Amos 3:7 "Surely the Master Eloheem will do nothing, but he revealeth his secret unto his servants the prophets." 

Prov. 25:2 "It is a splendor of Eloheem to conceal a thing but the honor of kings is to search out a matter."

Isaiah 1:18  "Come now, and let us reason together, saith Yahuah ..."

Acts 17:11 "These were more noble than those in Thessalonica, in that they received the word with all readiness of mind, and searched the scriptures daily, whether those things were so"

Acts 18:4 "And he (Paul) reasoned* in the synagogue every sabbath, and persuaded the Yahudim (worshppers of Yah) (false modern word-Jews) and the Greeks.

* Strongs 1256 dialegomai dee-al-eg'-om-ahee middle voice from 1223 and 3004; to say thoroughly, i.e. discuss (in argument or exhortation):--dispute, preach (unto), reason (with), speak. see GREEK for 1223 see GREEK for 3004

Deut 13:3 "...for the Master your Eloheem proveth (tests) you, to know whether ye love the Master your Eloheem with all your heart and with all your soul* "

*Strongs 5315 nephesh neh'-fesh from 5314; properly, a breathing creature... accommodated or figurative sense (bodily or mental)..."

You must besides other things, apply all your mind to love Yahuah in order to make a morally convicted choice to serve and obey him correctly for who He is and what He commands. This is one of the reasons why a drunkard cannot enter shamayim ( pw heaven) He / she does not have or refuses to have their full mental faculties and reasoning to fully understand, serve and obey Yahuah.

It must not be forgotten that Sir Isaac Newton a man of almost obessesional study habits also studied the scriptures and believed in the Creator. Although he did not get all the scriptures right he did soon see through the lies of the Trinty doctrine by applying his mind and was one of the early people to question the corruption of 1 Tim 3:16 as discussed in the previous chapter.

The Egghead Godhead?

When one presses a trinitarian to explain the Trinity they may make an attempt at using a physical example of the Trinity and perhaps some of us settled for this explanation when we still followed the Trinity heresy. (Been there done that).
They say :the egg is one egg, right, (Godhead), but it has three parts, the shell, the yolk and the white. That is the Trinity they say - all different parts but the same egg. Wow, what a revelation! That sure cleared things up for us, after all, it was something to hold onto after being told that the Trinity is an unsolvable mystery and we are not to question "G-o-d". Sadly, when some of us found out the truth about the Trinity lie all that was left was egg on our own faces, or we could hear the Humpty Dumpty nursery rhyme playing in the background. This is simply a way out for the "egghead", the thoughtless, mindless "faith-based" pagan Trinity doctrine and not the emunah (moral conviction) based doctrine which includes a conscious seeking of the truth in the scriptures as they are written and not sermonized by Catholic philosophers.

Spurgeon made it clear but did not follow his own advice being a follower of the Church invention of "Jesus is God".

When these church philosphers cannot explain a Trinity physically they then try to do away with the physical realm as in the following discussion.

1+1+1=1... Really!?

Mr Morrison, a defender of trinitarianism has this to say:
Mr Morrison has no choice then but to deny the material flesh of Mashiach (pw Christ) coming into the material world in order for his “spiritual Trinity” heresy (1+1+1=1) to be able to work.

This is the anti Mashiach (pw antiChrist) spirit


The Creator Yahuah remains one regardless of the physical or the spiritual realm whether before he created (begot) Yehoshua or after. Yahuah is still Eloheem alone. He created the ordinances (laws) of physics and maths themselves and rules over them, and to say that these laws prevent a Trinity from making sense already shows from whence the Trinity orignates, the minds of worldly men! Yahuah has told us that he is ONE, if he meant three he would have said so. He is not mathematically challenged in the spiritual world, neither in the physical world.

Chapter 7

John 1 Must Harmonise with John 10 & 20

This Chapter probably best demonstrates the Christian hypocrisy when it comes to breaking the rules of apologetics, the golden rule being scriptural harmony which Christianity claims to stand by.

Here you will see how they break this rule all within one book the book of John. Most do not see it , it is not in plain sight and the reason is because they use smoke and mirrors by jumping around to other verses of other books or epistles in scripture when cornered and distract many from the normal reading of John, or of any book for that matter, which is  from beginning to end. I was impressed to find a YouTuber who challenges the interpretation taken by mainstream Christianity  demonstrating the proper application of scriptural harmony which we apply in this teaching. (The Hebrews 1 false interpretation by Christianity  is another example of apologetics being contravened and we cover that in Chapter  10, Hebrews 1 One Does Not Teach Us To Worship Yehoshua as Yahuah.

The basis of the Jesus-is-God deception relies heavily on the misconstruing of the well known first chapter of John.  What was the reason for John to write the book of John? Was it to make us believe Yehoshua is Eloheem or somebody else. Well, John tells us himself why he wrote the book of John as we will show and it does not support the Christian take on John 1 with reference to Eloheem, the Word and the Son.

We have added the correct meaning in brackets especially with reference to “Word” Greek “logos” and its matching Hebrew word  "*dabar".

“...was the Word ["dabar" reasoning ] , and the word was with Eloheem, and the Word [dabar, logos, reasoning, motive, thoughts, work etc ] was Eloheem.”

Naturally, therefore, the Word (logos) was present in the beginning as it was already there before the beginning of life or creation. It was self-existent since it was and is Eloheem. The use of past tense “was” in no way excludes the continuous existence of the Word which IS Yahuah since it is eternal backwards and forwards. The later referral to the Word becoming flesh in no way causes this Word to cease to exist as the sovereign Word Yahuah but rather points to it and confirms it as such. The word of Yahuah is what created life.

*Strongs Hebrew
559 'amar aw-mar' a primitive root; to say (used with great latitude):--answer, appoint, avouch, bid, boast self, call, certify, challenge, charge, + (at the, give) command(-ment), commune, consider, declare, demand, X desire, determine, X expressly, X indeed, X intend, name, X plainly, promise, publish, report, require, say, speak (against, of), X still, X suppose, talk, tell, term, X that is, X think, use (speech), utter, X verily, X yet.

It becomes clear very soon that this word that was "said" or "amar" by Yahuah is related to commandment, appointing, promise (covenant), intention, desire and thought. This is why "amar" is Yahuah's thoughts and intentions - the core of His intent is to create life and prevent it from perishing eternally. It is His very character, inseperable from His being.  

Yahuah refers to Word (logos) as the very thing that surpasses soul, spirit, bone and marrow and gets to the all important core of what makes a man or woman good or evil - it is the thoughts and intents of the heart.

We thus see how the all powerful word - centre of Yahuah's heart - His intent and thoughts, examine or reveal the word / logos - thought and intents of the core of every man's heart. We see how that when our thoughts and intents do not match up with Yahuah's it is evil and we speak many things, but not what Yahuah has spoken.

We see that Yahuah's "word" goes beyond mere words of men since they may say one thing and do another. They may flatter when they should warn or correct. Yahuah's word, instead, is able to penetrate the heart of man to see if there is life or death in him. Yahuah's intent or word was to create the light so men could find their way out of the darkness they had foolishly chosen.  So, as we continue with John Chapter 1 ( square brackets my insertions)

Jn 1:2 The same (His word, dabar logos) was in the beginning with Eloheem.  3 All things were made by him [Yahuah]; and without him [Yahuah] was not any thing made that was made.  4 In him [Yahuah] was life; and the life was the light of men. [as opposed to darkeness which is the death of men] 5 And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not.  6 There was a man sent from Yahuah, whose name was John.  7 The same came for a witness, to bear witness [report, dabar] of the Light [of Yahuah], that all men through him [Yahuah] might believe.  8 He [John] was not that Light [of Yahuah], but was sent to bear witness of that Light [of Yahuah].  9 That was the true Light [of Yahuah], which lighteth every man that cometh into the world. 10 He [Yahuah] was in the world, and the world was made by him [Yahuah], and the world knew him [Yahuah] not.  11 He [Yahuah] came unto his own, and his own received him [Yahuah] not.  12 But as many as received him [Yahuah], to them gave he [Yahuah] power to become the sons of Eloheem, even to them that believe on his name [Yahuah]:  13 Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of Eloheem. 

These three verses refer to Eloheem Yahuah entirely. Many make the mistake of context here, thinking this is referring to the Messianic age, which it is not. They thus think the "he" who made the world and came into the world is the Mashiach (pw Christ), when it is not.  It refers to Yahuah Eloheem when He Himself was in the world . His feet were seen upon the sapphire foundation at Sinai, He himself who passed over ("Yahuah's passover, who passed over the houses of the children of Israel Ex 12:27"). Thus when he was in the world with his own people the Hebrews with whom he made a covenant in Sinai. But they did not know him ( they did not learn his ways, his Word, logos, "dabar", commands his heart, his intent. He  had promised the power to be the sons of Eloheem by his own Word (intent). He dwelt amongst them in the tabernacle but they still did not know him - they did not learn his ways but went after their own ways. He had given them at that time too the power to become the sons of Eloheem (pw God), but they failed.  

Hosea 1:10 Yet the number of the children of Israel shall be as the sand of the sea, which cannot be measured nor numbered; and it shall come to pass, that in the place where it was said unto them, Ye are not my people, there it shall be said unto them, Ye are the sons of the living Eloheem.

  Heb 3:9  When your fathers tempted me, proved me, and saw my works forty years.

  Heb 3:10  Wherefore I was grieved with that generation, and said, They do alway err in their heart; and they have not known my ways. 

After this the context in Jn 1:14 then only becomes Messianic. Yahuah has sent men to bear witness of the true light of Yahuah - He has used Yochanan (John) and then the first begotten Son of Eloheem, Yehoshua in the flesh so that we can also become the Sons of Eloheem. 

Jn  1:14 And the Word [of Yahuah] was made ¹ flesh ² [in Yehoshua], and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his [Yehoshua's] splendor, the splendor as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of favour ³, (pw grace) and truth."

1) 1096 ginomai ghin'-om-ahee a prolongation and middle voice form of a primary verb; to cause to be ("gen"-erate), i.e. (reflexively) to become (come into being), used with great latitude (literal, figurative, intensive, etc.):--arise, be assembled, be(-come, -fall, -have self), be brought (to pass), (be) come (to pass), continue, be divided, draw, be ended, fall, be finished, follow, be found, be fulfilled, + Eloheem (pw God) forbid, grow, happen, have, be kept, be made, be married, be ordained to be, partake, pass, be performed, be published, require, seem, be showed, X soon as it was, sound, be taken, be turned, use, wax, will, would, be wrought.

2) 4561 sarx sarx probably from the base of 4563; flesh (as stripped of the skin), i.e. (strictly) the meat of an animal (as food), or (by extension) the body (as opposed to the soul (or spirit), or as the symbol of what is external, or as the means of kindred), or (by implication) human nature (with its frailties (physically or morally) and passions), or (specially), a human being (as such):--carnal(-ly, + -ly minded), flesh(-ly). see GREEK for 4563

Now, this is where the deception comes in - the scripture clearly says "the word was made flesh" it does not say Eloheem (God) was made flesh. It is Yahuah's word / logos, his thoughts and intents, work, commandments, oracles, as already established, it is this that has been fleshed out in the form of the witness in Yehoshua who only speaks and does the thoughts and intents of his Father out of the abundance of his heart of flesh, upon which the word ( logos, commands) are written. So, the word of Yahuah was made flesh upon the heart of his Son and this word then dwelt among us. It was spoken by the fleshly tongue and lips of Yehoshua. Emmanuel - El (Eloheem) is with us by thought and intent (logos) to give us eternal life. Yehoshua became the vessel of the word (logos) and spoke it and carried it out by the spirit of Yahuah. Even unto death so that Yahuah could express the penalty of sin (without prejudice that it was His own son, for He is no respector of persons), upon Yehoshua who bore our sin. Thereafter Yahuah's splendor and word (promise) were expressed upon resurrection of His own innocent Son.

Now let's rewrite Jn 1:14 using the full and proper word meanings as in Strong's for "made flesh" (1,2) and "grace" (3) and you will see the truth come to light concerning Yehoshua's purpose.


3 is again confirmed here:


Clearly Yahuah is the true light, not Yehoshua, Yehoshua is the perfect reflection of it (image), and the true way TO the true light which gives life, and that is The All Mighty One, Eloheem Yahuah.  Yehoshua, on His return, will show us the great light of Yahuah, the Only Potentate, which none of us have yet seen.


We are then told why the Son of Yahuah was manifested:

So, Yehoshua was manifested not to promote a Trinity doctrine that he is Eloheem (pw God) but to show that he is the Son of Yahuah in the flesh, a greater witness of the light than John. Yehoshua is the forerunner of the Word (logos, promise, intent) of Yahuah, that we also might become the sons of Yahuah and fulfill that Word (logos) and destroy the works (especially words of temptation) of the devil. If Yehoshua is not the Son but rather Eloheem himself then he is not our forerunner as sons of Eloheem, and He then has not begun to destroy the works of the devil but put on a charade. That is not the case.

Next we have the clear revelation of what John was really saying in Chapter 1. Let's revise: 

Jn 1:1 In the beginning was the word, and the word was with Eloheem, and the word was Eloheem.  2 The same was in the beginning with Eloheem.  3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.  4 In him was life; and the life was the light of men.

 John now echoes this same thought and then describes the "Word" with an additional expression -"Word of life".

1 Jn 1:1-3 That which was from the beginning, which we have heard [dabar-Word], which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked upon, and our hands have handled, of the Word of life; 2 (For the life was manifested, and we have seen it, and bear witness, and shew unto you that eternal life, which was with the Father, and was manifested unto us;) 3 That which we have seen and heard declare we unto you, that ye also may have fellowship with us: and truly our fellowship is with the Father, and with his Son Mashiach (pw Christ) Yehoshua.

John now shows that from the beginning it is evident that Yahuah Eloheem is the source of life which we can in part witness in this physical world around us that we can see and touch and that it was created by His word (logos, intent) from the beginning. It is an example of Yahuah's emunah (pw faith) in action through his word.

He is the source of life but that life at the beginning was eternal life since Yahuah is the Word of life eternal and is not Eloheem of the dead. Adam and Eve did not comprehend the light, they did not appreciate the state of eternal life until they sinned and received death - separation from Yahuah and his llight. Man has been in that state ever since. Since death and darknesss came man then did not comprehend the light nor the possibility of eternal life either, even though creation, the very beginning of life bears witness of the Word of life - Yahuah. This physical world however is corrupted by sin and dying around us and thus does not fully reveal the promise of eternal life very well as a physical proof to the unbeliever who relies on what he sees alone.

1 Jn 1:4 And these things write we unto you, that your joy may be full. 5 This then is the message which we have heard of him, and declare unto you, that Eloheem is light, and in him is no darkness at all. 6 If we say that we have fellowship with him [Eloheem], and walk in darkness, we lie, and do not the truth: 7 But if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship one with another, and the blood of Mashiach (pw Christ) Yehoshua his Son cleanseth us from all sin.

This, however, was changed when the disciples and or apostles witnessed Yehoshua resurrected from the dead. They physcially felt where the nails were in his hands and ate and drank with him following his death. This was the eternal life of the Father manifested in the flesh of his Son, this was the good news passed to us. This is the Word of life made flesh, ie. Yehoshua's dead flesh risen to life by the word of life - Yahuah.

So, in the beginning was the word of life, the Torah, the light that brings eternal life as it did for Mashiach (pw Christ), and we must walk in it now that Mashiach (pw Christ) has fulfilled the promise of eternal life in his flesh.

1 Tim 3:16 And without controversy great is the mystery of Yahuah-likeness (pagan word-godliness): Yahuah (the word of life) was manifestly declared (explicitly announced, asserted, proclaimed, avowed) in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of malakhim (pw angels) , preached unto the heathens (pagan word Gentiles), believed on in the world, received up into splendor.

So, eternal life - the word of life (logos, intent), promise of Yahuah was fully realised and witnessed in the raising of Mashiach's (pw Christ's) flesh from death. through his Son being Yahuah-like and obeying the Word of Life. 

I Jn 5:20 And we know that the Son of Eloheem is come, and hath given us an understanding (dabar Torah), that we may know him that is true (YAHUAH), and we are in him that is true, even in his Son Yehoshua Mashiach. This is the true Eloheem (YAHUAH), and eternal life (word of life, word, dabar, logos)

Yehoshua the son has manifestly declared, giving us an understanding of the true Eloheem, Word of Life, who gives eternal life which we have witnessed in his Son, who, in the flesh (visibly) proclaimed his Father's word.

Jn 5:25 Verily, verily, I say unto you, The hour is coming, and now is, when the dead shall hear the voice of the Son of Eloheem: and they that hear shall live. 26 For as the Father hath life in himself; so hath he given to the Son to have life in himself (given immortality after the Father raised him) 27 And hath given him authority to execute judgment also, because he is the Son of man.

1 Jn 1:7 But if we walk in the light (word of life), as he (Eloheem) is in the light, we have fellowship one with another, and the blood of Yehoshua Mashiach his Son cleanseth us from all sin. 8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us. 9 If we confess our sins, he is trustworthy (pw faithful) and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness. 10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word (of life) is not in us. 1 My little children, these things write I unto you, that ye sin not (DO NOT TRANSGRESS THE Torah-Word of Life). And if any man sin, we have an advocate with the Father, Mashiach Yehoshua the righteous:

Jn 5:2 And shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life (Word of Life) ; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation.

So, Yehoshua was with Yahuah in the very beginning but at that stage He was not yet begotten, ie. born of Mary in the flesh in the form of the Son of Eloheem (pw God). "Word" can be translated as "Logos" so you could say the idea / thought of Yehoshua the Son was with Yahuah at the very beginning as a plan for our salvation. The Son was hidden in the bosom (bay) of Yahuah like a ship until Yahuah was ready to send him forth by his Ruach (wind, breath).

We see this clear distinction of origin and action in:

1Cor 8:5-7 "For though there be that are called gods* , whether in shamayim (pw heaven) or in Earth. But to us there is but ONE Eloheem, (All Mighty ONE- pw God), the Father, of whom are all things (the source - Word of Life), and we in Him; AND one Yehoshua Mashiach (from the source of life - the Father), by whom are all things and we by him. Howbeit there is not in every man this knowledge."

*(eloheem - PLURAL OF "eloha" mighty ones 1) men appointed as judges by Yahuah eg. Yehoshua in shamayim (pw heaven) or men on earth (Psalm 82)  or 2) imagined mighty ones ie. idols, including Trinity idols - god the father, god the son, god the Holi ghost, or idols / deities in general: eg. J-Zeus (hail Zeus/ Jesus) ,  Mary Mother of god, Hope, Grace (Charis), Faith (Fides), Mercy, Charity, Destiny, papa Pope , Easter, (Eostre), Santa (Satan), Church (Circe/ Kirkeh) etc.  For more see Sunday Worship Terms).

If Paul were a trinitarian he may have written utter nonsense similar to this: 

But to us there is but one Eloheem (God), the Father AND One Eloheem (pw God) Yehoshua who is Eloheem (pw God).

But Paul does not. He says ONE Yehoshua Mashiach (pw Christ) and denounces the idea of plural mighty ones when referring to Eloheem (God). There is not the slightest inclination to include earthly or "heavenly gods" within THE SOVEREIGNTY (pw GODHEAD) of Eloheem THE ALMIGHTY, not even Yehoshua the  man appointed eloha (judge) who sits on his right hand.   

Here we also see "of whom" ascribed to Eloheem (pw God) the Father and "by whom" ascribed to the Son.

"of whom" Greek "ek" denotes origin of all things that exist by Eloheem and that includes the Son since that is why he is the Son OF Eloheem begotten and created. Over and over again you will see heretics do the unthinkable and exchange the preposition "of" with "is" ie. the Son of Eloheem (pw God) is changed to the Son is Eloheem (pw God). One cannot do that without committing the damnable sin of adding to scripture. 

Paul places the "by whom" description on the shoulders of the Son since "by" (Greek dia) is the preposition denoting the channel of an act. As we saw before Mashiach (pw Christ) is the causer (not author).This is why Yehoshua is the WAY or channel by His action of offering (pw sacrifice), love and obedience to the Father. The Father is His, and our, origin to whom we wish to be restored to. Yehoshua was fully restored from death (under our sin) to the Father's eternal life.

Jn  20: 27 "Then saith he to Thomas, Reach hither thy finger, and behold my hands; and reach hither thy hand, and thrust it into my side: and be not without emunah (pw faithless), but believing.   28 And Thomas answered and said unto him, My Master (pw Lord) and my Eloheem (pw God)." 

We should not have to go further than  "My Master AND my Eloheem" but for those who are doubting like Thomas we shall have to.

Regarding Jn  20:28, the question is raised concerning Thomas’ double usage of the definite article, most literally translated: “the lord of me and the god [THEOS] of me.” Did Thomas use the definite article twice to speak of two persons, first the son to whom he was directly speaking as “the lord of me” and then did he turn his attention to the Father in shamayim (pw heaven) in saying “the God of me”? If Thomas meant his whole expression to refer to only one person, only one definite article would have been needed: “the Master (pw Lord) and God of me”.

But if Thomas was referring to Yehoshua when he said “the THEOS of me”, was he thinking that Yehoshua was Yahuah, the only Most High of the universe, standing there before him? If Thomas did indeed refer to Yehoshua as “the THEOS of me”, we find no such custom all through the Renewed Everlasting Covenant (pw New Testament) of referring to Yehoshua as “my Eloheem (pw God)”, nor “our Eloheem (pw God)”. The scripture writers continuously distinguish the Father in shamayim (pw heaven) as “Eloheem (pw God)”, and Yehoshua as the Son of Eloheem (pw God), the one, made Master (pw Lord) and Mashiach (pw Christ), by Eloheem (pw God). If such a claim or doctrine as "Jesus is God” ("Yehoshua is Yahuah") is so all-important and a truth as many today seem to assume, we should expect such to be clearly stated many times throughout the scriptures, but, actually, what we find is just the opposite. So, if Thomas refers to Yehoshua as his Eloheem (pw God) in Jn 20:28, we have an exception to the general rule, and should seek to determine in what sense Thomas might have thought of Yehoshua as his Eloheem (pw God), in harmony with the general distinction that is made throughout the rest of the Renewed Everlasting Covenant (pw New Testament). Thus, in harmony with the Hebraic tradition of applying the same words that are translated as “Eloheem (pw god)” to others as rulers, princes, mighty ones, etc. we could say Thomas was really applying one of these options for the word now translated by Roman Vulgate translators as THEOS in adressing Yehoshua . Theos or God could be rendered as mighty ruler or mighty prince. In fact, the word majesty,  is used to describe Yehoshua's spiritual reign  but Yahuah is referred to as Majesty on High in contrast to Yehoshua. Yehoshua sits next to Yahuah upon his throne as you could expect an appointed Prince would do beside His King in keeping with the order of authority.

Now, let's put the verse above into context:

Jn 20:28 And Thomas answered and said unto him, My Lord (Master) and my God (Eloheem).  29 Yehoshua (pw Jesus)  saith unto him, Thomas, because thou hast seen me, thou hast believed: baruch'd (pw blessed) are they that have not seen, and yet have believed.   30 ¶And many other signs truly did Yehoshua (pw Jesus)  in the presence of his disciples, which are not written in this book:  31 But these are written, that ye might believe that Yehoshua (pw Jesus)  is the Mashiach (pw Christ), the Son of Eloheem (pw God); and that believing ye might have life through his name.

This would have been the perfect opportunity for John to say he was Eloheem (pw God), but he does not, instead he concludes that these things are written that "you might believe he is the Son of Eloheem (pw God)." One would expect the apostle to say something like:

Yahuchanon (John, meaning Yah's chesed, favour) is a worshipper of Yahuah, a Yahudi (pw Jew) AND a worshipper of His son Yehoshua, he is not a trinitarian Catholic, so he does not write lies.

The use of "My Master and My Eloheem" rather tie in with


Yahuah is ONE, The Almighty One, Eloheem, who excludes plural gods. It is to this ONE Eloheem that Thomas praises, after adressing his Master Yehoshua, separating them as two individuals with the use of "AND". Thomas separates Yehoshua from the sovereignty of Eloheem, just as Paul described.

Separating Personification from Deification

Do we need to  worry about Jn 1:1 and the Christian claim that because the Word became flesh it means Yehoshua is Eloheem. Well, if we were to take that logic with the Logos / Word / Dabar then we would have to apply the same rule for Wisdom as similarly personified  and described in scripture.

Using  personifaction alone we could add a fourth GOD to the pagan pantheon of the Christian Trinity and the deity would have to be a woman made flesh and crying in the streets. You can choose what female deity she might be. Perhaps they will choose Mary or have already done that seeing Christianity's Catholic roots bow to her , necromance her , and then eventually centuries later began to  call her THE MOTHER OF GOD.

Of course we cannot use the personification of Wisdom to deify Wisdom itself. Most Protestant Christians have not been so bold to do so either. So,  why have Christians been so bold in deifying Yehoshua simply because the Word is personified in Jn 1:1 as "he".

If John's alleged aim of Jn 1:1 was to convince us that  Yehoshua is Eloheem then why does Yehoshua not use such an argument  as bona fide evidence to agree with the  false accusation that the Jews made against him at the feast of dedication, that he makes himself Eloheem!  No, he did not since he debunked that false accusation and the " Word made flesh" does not provide one shred of evidence to support any argument that he is Eloheem. This happens in the  very same book of John and again does not lend support for the claim that John is writing all this to convince us that Yehoshua is Eloheem.

No, He ignored such a false interpretation and blasphemy when debunking the Jews. See  Chapter 2,  Witness 2- The Son
Thank goodness not all of us are seduced by Babylon the Mother of Harlots the Roman Catholic church. Neither was Sir Isaac Newton since he actually studied the scriptures!

Chapter 8

Our Saviour And Our Saviour - But Only One Eloheem.

Eloheem is our saviour who appointed his Son as the means to our salvation. Simply because Yehoshua is called the Saviour of the World does not mean we call him Eloheem (pw God). Yahuah is the ultimate Eloheem of SALVATION , the self-existent Saviour and there is no Saviour besides him. This may seem like a contradiction at first but we will see how this works in scripture.

The  translation uses saviour for Hebrew "yasha" but "the one who brings or has salvation" is probably the more correct all encompassing word here.

[*Strong's Hebrew*]
3467 yasha` yaw-shah' a primitive root; properly, to be open, wide or free, i.e. (by implication) to be safe; causatively, to free or succor:--X at all, avenging, defend, deliver(-er), help, preserve, rescue, be safe, bring (having) salvation, save(-iour), get victory.

Yahuah is the source of salvation itself and his servants are the intruments.

The translators would have been well advised that this translation using "no saviour beside me" would be more contradictory since the prophet Nehemiah himself refers to the many saviours that Yahuah has given. But nonetheless none were ever considered  "gods" or "divine" to be worshiped as Yahuah Eloheem the Creator!
 

Without Eloheem there is no sent and appointed saviour, eg. Moses, and no saviour Son Yehoshua either. It has always been Eloheem who equipped and sent saviours to his people and it is Eloheem who saved his very own Son, the sent saviour of the world,  from death to life. Thus Eloheem is ultimate SALVATION to all who accept him

So, who do we expect and look for? Two saviours. "Eloheem our saviour in all things" (vs 10) AND our sent saviour Son Yehoshua (vs 12). Again "and" in verse 13 is Greek "kai" as used by Thomas. So, it is not one-and-the-same-saviour but two different saviours. One is Eloheem and the other the Son of man, period! Yahuah is Saviour of all things which Yehoshua is not.

Note (vs 10) that the doctrine must be "put in the proper order" (kosmeo) where Eloheem the great (megas) Saviour is given pre-eminence "of all things" including over his appointed Son, and not that the Son is a self-existent saviour who saves himself. This appointed saviour teaches us Yah-likeness by example, that is, Torah obedience to Eloheem his Father.

So, the  "Saviour in all things", Yahuah Eloheem, results in true salvation, which is by righteous living in this world and is the result of the truly sent saviour Yehoshua honoring Eloheem, who redeemed us from our past Torah transgressions to make us acceptable to serve Eloheem. A false saviour "Jesus" who is fabled to save on his own and becomes an Eloheem (Saviour man-God) imposter, on the other hand, results in wholesale lawless (Torahless) living unto destruction in this present age, as we see in the harlot "church" institution which deceives the whole world (2 Jn 1:7, Rev 12:9). It is the headquarters of the out of order saviour idol "J-esus" through this trinitarian heresy. This is the age of the false goddess "Grace" of Babylon and not the result of Yahuah's "chesed", unmerited favour. It is devoid of a real working response by the followers, devoid of thanksgiving, there is no moral conviction to Torah obedience. It is all vanity, an impotent "Jesus" saviour god idol who promotes freedom from Torah and a hatred for Eloheem's law, like so many false saviour idols before, eg. Horus, Serapis, etc., with no power to save men from their lusts.

Yehoshua came to preach obedience to the Word – that is what  ultimately saves us following redemption by his blood. That is why He is the causer and finisher of our emunah (pw faith) (steadfast moral conviction to obey). I do not speak heresy or blasphemy here since Paul agrees:

Noah was a saviour of his household by faith - he also became the condemner of the world and HEIR OF RIGHTEOUSNESS

Heb 11:7 By moral conviction (pw faith) Noah, being warned of Yahuah of things not seen as yet, moved with fear, prepared an ark to the saving of his house; by the which he condemned the world, and became heir of the righteousness which is by emunah (steadfast moral conviction to obey)(pw faith).

And the converse is true - it is wrong doctrine that also sends men to Gehenna (pw hell), it is called damnable heresy. Changing doctrine is what caused the original sin in Eden. Correct doctrine is what restores what happened in Eden and this is what the honor of Yehoshua is.

There is only one Saviour of ALL THINGS and that is Yahuah who provides saviours and who bought us with the sent saviour of the World Yehoshua, the last Adam, the only saviour that was to  save the whole world from sin for those who repent.

So we see that it is Yahuah's Word that saves men or it is the corruption of it that causes their destruction, despite what Yehoshua did on the execution stake. Indeed, Yehoshua came to save the world by his death and OBEDIENCE TO THE WORD OF THE SAVIOUR OF ALL THINGS. It is Yahuah who saved Yehoshua from death by raising his trustworthy Son, without which no salvation would exist!

So when we DO and TEACH the WORD, as Yehoshua, the WORD made flesh, did and taught, we save others, and so, indirectly, we are saviours by the favour and authority of Yahuah. In fact, as Paul says (1 Tim 4:16), we become the saviour of others and ourselves.  By being obedient , Yehoshua saved himself and those who are in turn obedient. Yahuah the SAVIOUR OF ALL THINGS saves those who repent and continue in obedience. This is in no way blasphemy since it is what scripture teaches. This is the great commission after all.

Chapter 9

Majesty Versus Majesty on High

Yehoshua is described as follows :

Hebrews 1:3 Who being the brightness of his (Yahuah's) splendor (pw glory), and the express image of his (Yahuah's) person (character, Yah-likeness, Michael - who is like El), and upholding all things by the word of His (Yahuah's) power, when He (Yehoshua) had by Himself purged our sins, sat down on the right hand of the Majesty on high (Yahuah);

To put into context the misplaced position and authority of Yehoshua, one need only look at modern praise and worship lyrics  sung in many "churches" . Here is one that you may be familiar with from some decades back :

Majesty, worship His Majesty
Unto Jesus, be all glory,
Power and praise
Majesty, Kingdom authority
Flow from His throne,
Unto his own, His anthem raise.

So exalt, lift up on high
The Name of Jesus
Magnify, come glorify,
Christ Jesus the King
Majesty, worship His Majesty
Jesus who died, now glorified,
King of all Kings.

Note : Yehoshua is being called Majesty, capital "M" as would be referred to Yahuah Eloheem (pw God), but he is not the Majesty on High although he is majestic (having authority from the Father).

This seemingly innocent song usurps the throne of Yahuah the Almighty (All Mighty) with a false Jesus, who, as the song says, must receive ALL power, ALL glory, and ALL Praise.  All Praise and All Splendour (pw Glory) and All Power is given to Yahuah through his Son's obedient  accomplishments.

1Ch 29:10  Wherefore David blessed the LORD before all the congregation: and David said, Blessed be thou, LORD God of Israel our father, for ever and ever.
1Ch 29:11  Thine, O LORD, is the greatness, and the power, and the glory, and the victory, and the majesty: for all that is in the heaven and in the earth is thine; thine is the kingdom, O LORD, and thou art exalted as head above all.

 This is not to say that Yehoshua should not receive any praise as he too is praiseworthy. A son praiseworthy son should receive praise from his father. Yehoshua, however does not receive ALL of it since he returns the authority back to his Father

1 Cor 15:24-28 Then cometh the end, when he [Yehoshua] shall have delivered up the kingdom to Eloheem, even the Father; when he shall have put down all rule and all authority and power.
For he [Yehoshua] must reign, till he hath put all enemies under his feet.
The last enemy that shall be destroyed is death.
For he [Eloheem] hath put all things under his [Yehoshua's] feet. But when he saith all things are put under him, it is manifest that he [Eloheem] is excepted [excluded], which did put all things under him [Yehoshua].
And when all things shall be subdued unto him [Yehoshua], then shall the Son also himself be subject unto him that put all things under him, that Eloheem may be all in all.

Yahuah is above all and receives all power due to him having been magnified by the Son while in his temporary delegated position placed upon his shoulders, as prophesied in Isaiah 9:6, so that the Father may be ALL in ALL, the Almighty ONE, Only Potentate.

Revelations clearly makes the distinction as to who is receiving the splendor (pw glory) and worship :

Rev 14:7 "Saying with a loud voice, Fear Eloheem (pw God), and give splendor (pw glory) to him; for the hour of his judgment is come: and worship him that made shamayim (pw heaven), and earth, and the sea, and the fountains of waters."  

Rev 4:6 "And before the throne there was a sea of glass like unto crystal: and in the midst of the throne, and round about the throne, were four beasts full of eyes before and behind.  7 And the first beast was like a lion, and the second beast like a calf, and the third beast had a face as a man, and the fourth beast was like a flying eagle.  8 And the four beasts had each of them six wings about him; and they were full of eyes within: and they rest not day and night, saying, kodesh (pw Holy), kodesh, kodesh, Master (pw Lord) Eloheem (pw God) Almighty, which was, and is, and is to come.  9 And when those beasts give splendor (pw glory) and honor and thanks to him that sat on the throne, who liveth for ever and ever,  10 The four and twenty elders fall down before him that sat on the throne, and worship him that liveth for ever and ever, and cast their crowns before the throne, saying,  11 Thou art worthy, O Supreme Master (pw Lord), to receive splendor and honor and power: for thou hast created all things, and for thy pleasure they are and were created."

This is clearly Yahuah, the Creator of shamayim (pw heaven) and earth and also creator of Yehoshua, His Son, who is begotten. Yahuah is sitting on His throne, since the Lamb (Yehoshua) is the one who takes the book out of Yahuah's right hand and is worthy to open it, as follows:

Rev 5:1 "And I saw in the right hand of him that sat on the throne a book written within and on the backside, sealed with seven seals.  2 And I saw a strong malakh (pw angel)  proclaiming with a loud voice, Who is worthy to open the book, and to loose the seals thereof?  3 And no man in shamayim (pw heaven), nor in earth, neither under the earth, was able to open the book, neither to look thereon.  4 And I wept much, because no man was found worthy to open and to read the book, neither to look thereon.  5 And one of the elders saith unto me, Weep not: behold, the Lion of the tribe of Judah, the Root of David, hath prevailed to open the book, and to loose the seven seals thereof.  6 And I beheld, and, lo, in the midst of the throne and of the four beasts, and in the midst of the elders, stood a Lamb as it had been slain, having seven horns and seven eyes, which are the seven Spirits of Eloheem (pw God) sent forth into all the earth.  7 And he came and took the book out of the right hand of Him [Eloheem] that sat upon the throne.  8 And when he had taken the book, the four beasts and four and twenty elders fell down before the Lamb, having every one of them harps, and golden vials full of odours, which are the prayers of saints.  9 And they sung a new song, saying, Thou art worthy to take the book, and to open the seals thereof: for thou wast slain, and hast redeemed us to Eloheem (pw God) by thy blood out of every kindred, and tongue, and people, and nation;  10 And hast made us unto our Eloheem (pw God) kings and priests: and we shall reign on the earth."

From the above you should be able to see the distinction between Yahuah and Yehoshua.

Chapter 10

Hebrews 1 One Does Not Teach Us To Worship Yehoshua as Yahuah

This section will include a lot of arguements with verses, so, pay careful attention.

Heb 1, like Jn 1, has been popularly used to support "Jesus is God" and that he is the Creator himself who must be worshipped as such. This of course is a ridiculous abomination and contradicts the entire Everlasting Convenant (EC) (pw OT). It is not a Hebrew Idea  and hence the aptly named book of Hebrews does not teach it either.

Nowhere in the entire Hebrew translation of the EC is such a command given or intimated.  As you will see once again, translation is key to the misguidance and deception. We will study Hebrews 1 verse by verse and use the actual cross references most likely used by Shaul (Paul) from the Hebrew Tanakh, Everlasting Covenant (pw Old Testament). Contrary to Trinitarians, we will use the first rule in apologetics, yes,   scriptural harmony against other verses. We will then summarise with the alternate correct translation of Hebrews 1 at the end.

Here Shaul makes the clear declaration that it is Yahuah Eloheem (pw God) who has used men to speak to us in the past. This statement then immediately prepares us for the acceptance of yet another prophet who he speaks BY, namely the Son of man from shamayim, the very Son of Yahuah, but not Yahuah himself. Yehoshua is another mouthpiece, the ulitmate one.

Heb 1:2 Hath in these last days spoken unto us by his Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things, by [for] whom also he made the worlds; 

It is clear that the Son of man, as established in the beginning of this book, is the Son of Yahuah who is not Eloheem but the word made flesh, in other words, the speaker / mouthpiece of Yahuah who has now been used to speak to us when He was sent by the Father from shamayim (pw heaven). He also has been appointed over all things as a majestic / royal heir ( a son to the Majesty on High - Eloheem). Now we get "by whom also he made the worlds" . This is where many get fooled. The Greek dia for "by" again may mean a number of things. 

So it is clear that it should read 

"FOR whom also he made (poieo) the worlds."

Here it is clear that the worlds were made by the Father specifically so that they could be given to the Son who is clearly stated as "heir". The heir receives an inheritance, and what He inherits, whilst being appointed over the worlds, are us, His children (His riches Rev 5:12, not silver and gold) who are obedient Sons of Yahuah, as Shaul quotes later in chapter 2.

Our argument is further strengthened by the fact that "made" (poieo) herde is probably not intended. "Ginomai" seems to be used more, so when referring to "made", as used in the following verse 4 of Heb 1, referring to how the Son has been "made" (ginomai) better than the malakhim (pw angels).  "poieo", unlike "ginomai", includes the very specific meaning: "give"

4160 poieo poy-eh'-o apparently a prolonged form of an obsolete primary; to make or do (in a very wide application, more or less direct):--abide, + agree, appoint, X avenge, + band together, be, bear, + bewray, bring (forth), cast out, cause, commit, + content, continue, deal, + without any delay, (would) do(-ing), execute, exercise, fulfil, gain, give, have, hold, X journeying, keep, + lay wait, + lighten the ship, make, X mean, + none of these things move me, observe, ordain, perform, provide, + have purged, purpose, put, + raising up, X secure, shew, X shoot out, spend, take, tarry, + transgress the law, work, yield. Compare 4238. see GREEK for 4238 

1096 ginomai ghin'-om-ahee a prolongation and middle voice form of a primary verb; to cause to be ("gen"-erate), i.e. (reflexively) to become (come into being), used with great latitude (literal, figurative, intensive, etc.):--arise, be assembled, be(-come, -fall, -have self), be brought (to pass), (be) come (to pass), continue, be divided, draw, be ended, fall, be finished, follow, be found, be fulfilled, + God forbid, grow, happen, have, be kept, be made, be married, be ordained to be, partake, pass, be performed, be published, require, seem, be showed, X soon as it was, sound, be taken, be turned, use, wax, will, would, be wrought.

Thus we firmly believe it should be 

"for whom also he gave (poieo) the worlds.

Next:

Heb 1:3 Who being the brightness of his (Eloheem's) honor (pw glory), and the express image of his person (Eloheem's nature), and upholding (Greek phero)  all things by the word of his (Eloheem's) power, when he had by himself purged our sins, sat down on the right hand of the Majesty on high;

Here again we see that the Son is subject as a spokesperson / mouthpiece expressing the image (representation) of the nature of Eloheem by word and action. Yehoshua (pw Jesus) is by the trinitarians made to appear as some sovereign god who is the upholder of all things in this sentence, but it is Eloheem (pw God) who is sovereign. The word used here is "phero", the sense is toward the response of the servant who upholds what is given to him rather than the originator of the upholding power. The Torah given by the Father is what is upheld. In fact, it is magnified and made honorable by the Son as prophesied (Is 42:19-21). He observed all things given to him under the authority of Yah's Torah.

Yehoshua does not "uphold" all things in the sense that he is the Master of the universe and holds the world together that he allegedly created himself. No! Neither is he the source of  how or what that upholding should be, but more accurately, as the definition implies, "endures" those things which have been appointed to him or "bears" or "observes", indeed, lays all things (what more did he lay down of his own accord than his own life given to him). The "all things", all the sin, in the same verse, from which he has purged us. He endured the punishment on the torture stake by himself / alone [Mark 15:34 My Eloheem, My Eloheem why hast thou forsaken me] by his own offering of his own body, but by the command (word)  (Greek rhema) of Eloheem's power. This should already set the alarm ringing in your head. That Yehoshua offered himself separately under the command of his Father and endured it HIMSELF by Eloheem's power which sustained him even while Yahuah Eloheem forsook him. And of course the obvious two Majesties again show the Majestic Son as seperate, not the same, as he sits next to his Father, the pre-eminent Majesty on High.

The Son is begotten so we already know He has been made by the Father, but the "made" here reminds us that he is the begotten son of Eloheem and not created in the same way as his fellow malakim (servants) (pw angels). Hence the name he has received bears the Father Yahuah's name - Yeh-oshua - Yah(uah) saves. By inheritance of Yahuah's name and authority this Servant has thus inherited the high service above his fellows, even unto salvation as commanded by Yahuah. (Jesus, on the other hand, is not a more excellent name and bears no name of the Father Yahuah, neither does it bear (uphold) salvation - instead it is a syncretic name for pagans to feel at ease with Babylonian idolatry and pagan festivals and days of J-Zeus, J-Esus, Hey Zeus, etc. Salvation "soteria" is nowhere in the pagan name Jesus either.)

Shaul (Paul) is more than likely quoting from

It is very obvious that Yehoshua has a beginning. He was begotten on a specific "DAY", but when was this day? First off, there is a perception that Yehoshua existed before the creation of the world.

If we take this to mean that Yehoshua literally existed and had a relationship with Eloheem before the world began, we would need to test that, if that is in harmony with the rest of scripture. For instance:

1Jn 4:19  We love him, because he first loved us.

This clearly shows that Yahuah's love has always been pre-existent to our existence or our knowledge or any relationship with him. In fact, the very giving of the Son himself by Yahuah is a declaration of his love preceding us:

Jn 3:16  For Eloheem so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.

That  is why we can say we know he loved us before the world began or at least before we existed. Yehoshua can say the same, knowing His own role prophesied in the scriptures by the Father and that he would be called a beloved Son. Yehoshua studied the scriptures and learnt of his Father's love and plan for fallen man and his own part in redeeming man. Yahuah obviously loved him as his preconcevied idea and foreordained chosen one ("last Adam" 1 Cor 15:45). This plan of Yahuah's redemption was conceived from the foundation of the world since Yahuah, being all knowing, knew that one man, Adam, would bring Torah transgression into the world.

Rom 5:19  For as by one man's disobedience many were made Torah transgressors (sinners), so by the obedience of one shall many be made righteous.

So, we have to be very careful when choosing the time for the beginning of Yeshoshua's existence, especially when standing against the Jesus-is-God heresy which tries to make Yehoshua self-existent and or eternal from the beginning. This next verse demonstrates what happens when we take the time of the events of Yehoshua to be literally taking place versus the time these events were instead planned.

Rev 13:8 ...the lamb who was slaughtered before the creation of the world.

If we were to interpret literally that Yehoshua was slain at the creation of the world then it would mean his body was offered up twice, and we know that is false.

Heb 7:27  ...for this he did once, when he offered up himself.

So, we know Yehoshua was loved before He was made, rather than loved and made before the world was made.

"you loved me before the world was made."

a time before the foundation of the worlds (Jn 17:24). Yahuah's reason to create the world was founded upon the Son (last Adam) he planned to bring into the world which would save men who repent so they could live in a new earth and shamayim (pw heaven) with the Father and Son. So, we see that this world really was created as a means to reach the new earth, but both worlds were created for the Son to rule for a time appointed by the Father. (More on this later). This is affimed in verse 5 with the words "will be" and "shall be":

Heb 1:5 For unto which of the malakim (pw angels) said he at any time, Thou art my Son, this day (Greek - semeron) have I begotten thee? And again, I will be to him a Father, and he shall be to me a Son?

This means there has to be a specific day on which the begetting of the Son takes place, together with the declaration actually being made, "you are my son and I am your Father" as opposed to a prophecy of such: 

Heb 1:5 ...I will be to him a Father, and he shall be to me a Son

The Father does not say "I AM" a FATHER-SON without beginning or end! Yehoshua the Son is not eternal backwards, not self-existent since He has a beginning, a day when He shall be a Son and be called a Son.

Yehoshua was truly physically non-existent  prior to being begotten. How can we be so certain of that?

Jn 8:42 If Yahuah is your Father (as indeed He can be), ye would love me: for I proceeded forth and came from Yahuah; neither came I of myself, but he sent me.

Yehoshua is saying he came forth from the  Father as a man comes forth by an earthly father in the sense that he has no decision in the matter of his very existence by being born.

Yehoshua is confirming that his existence can be attributed to being born by the Father. He has a beginning to his own existence which is obviously beyondhis own involvement or knowledge.

Jn 7:28 Ye both know me, and ye know whence I am (exist): and I am NOT come of myself, but he that SENT me is true.

Many, however, even Baptists, for example, try to force the idea that the Son is eternal, using:

Firstly, of course, the argument is moot, since the verse says the Son has received life in himself. It is something that he did not have at the time before the receiving. Secondly, they conveniently leave out the previous two verses which show that "life in himself" is not referring to self-existence at all but to the resurrected everlasting life that we all as believers will have given to us, that life which was lost to Adam and Eve due to Torah transgression (pw sin). Mashiach (pw Christ) was the first to receive this everlasting life from HIs Father as the Son of man and last Adam. Yehoshua is decribed as our forerunner since we are promised the same everlasting life he received:

The verses then reiterate that Yehoshua is the Son of Eloheem, not Eloheem, even after this concept of "life in himself", and then further reiterate again that Yehoshua is the Son of Man so that no trinitarian has any excuse to persist with stupidity, since we already established at the beginning that Eloheem  is not the Son of Man!

Back to Hebrews 1

Apostle Shaul is quoting from Psalms which he and his hearers are very familiar with since these are read in the congregation on the Sabbath and so the backdrop is Psalm 103 no doubt:

Psa 103:1  A Psalm of David. baw'rak (pw bless) Yahuah (pw LORD), O my soul: and all that is within me, baw'rak (pw bless) his qodesh (pw holy) name.

2  Baw'rak (pw bless) Yahuah (pw LORD), O my soul, and forget not all his benefits:

Here it becomes clear as to what Shaul is paraphrasing from. Here we have the first possible evidence as in the Hebrew text of malakim (pw angels) giving worship, yet here again they are worshipping Yahuah Eloheem concerning his healing, redemption, forgiveness and Torah. It mentions that Yahuah has prepared the kingdom and throne. The throne for who? Himself? No, Yahuah has existed for eternity. It is for Mashiach (pw Christ) to sit at his right hand and from there to rule over his appointed kingdom. Thus Mashiach (pw Christ) is brought (introduced) into the world (his kingdom) to rule over it until his second coming. The JPS translates verse 20 as:


Yehoshua fulfilled the word of Yahuah , his Father's Torah and does not abolish it. He was thus like a malak but a little lower, being flesh which is likely why Apostle Shaul makes mention of such similarity in Hebrews as far as the fulfilling of the Word [Torah] goes.


Note Yehoshua is set over the works of the Creator Yahuah (works of thy hands). Yehoshua is not that Creator. Secondly Yehoshua is not a malak but is indeed included in the host as a minister of Yahuah which is included among those who worship Yahuah.

Ps 103: 21  Baw'rak (pw bless) ye Yahuah (pw LORD), all ye his hosts; ye ministers of his, that do his pleasure.

Gal 2:17  But if, while we seek to be justified by the Anointed One / Mashiach (pw Christ), we ourselves also are found  Torah transgressors, is therefore Mashiach (pw Christ) the minister of Torah transgression (pw sin)? Eloheem (pw God) forbid.

Mat 20:28  Even as the Son of man (whom Yahuah is not) came not to be ministered unto, but to minister, and to give his life a ransom for many.

Yehoshua is a minister of righteousness and not idolatry (Torah transgression). He, like the malakim, does not accept worship that elevates him to being Eloheem or that declares he is Eloheem. Yehoshua worships Eloheem himself. He hearkens unto the voice of his Father's word as does any Son of Eloheem. This does not mean that Yehoshua does not receive praise and honor as a trustworthy Son. This tribute is made to Yehoshua by the malakim, and us as believers.  Denying the Trinity does not deny honoring the Son but the Son and Father are dishonored when the Son is placed at the status of Eloheem. He thus then erroneously and blasphemously receives idolatrous praise by those who equate him with the Father Creator. For more on worship look out for our upcoming article - Is The Worship of Yehoshua Idolatry? An Answer to Jews.

Jn 8:47  He that is of Eloheem heareth Eloheem's words: ye therefore hear them not, because ye are not of Eloheem

Here the Word made flesh, the voice of Yahuah, is introduced, and what more could we expect since Shaul's teaching began with how Yahuah has spoken in time past 

The phrase, "voice of his word" (qowl dabar) in Ps 103:20 is unique and nowhere else appears in the scriptures, as far as I can see! The Word made flesh, Yehoshua, who delivers the word (Torah) from his lips.
Consider how Shaul highlights later that Yasherel did not want to hear Yahuah's voice
And still on the theme, that Mashiach (pw Christ) "speaks" better things than Abel. Blood that condemned is replaced by his own blood that redeems in the Renewed Covenant for those that hear Yahuah's commandments (Torah) from shamayim (pw heaven), now  spoken through the Son to them, and those who do them.



The "renewing youth like an eagle", Ps 103 vs 5, suggests the connection to the renewing of Yahuah's everlasting covenant with Abraham, and strength to overcome Torah transgression and the world again.

That Yahuah must be baw'rak'd (pw blessed) is commanded to his malakhim (pw angels), which is actually also the alternate translation of men, messengers or ambassadors of Yahuah (2 Cor 5:20 we are ambassadors for Mashiach). Mashiach (pw Christ) is such an ambassador himself, but as Shaul has already indicated, higher now than the malakim of shamayim, the hosts of shamayim. The "ye ministers of his" Psa 103:21 ties in exactly with Shaul in his very next verse


However, Psalm 104 is the direct reference for this quotation made by Shaul and is really just a continuation from Psalm 103. There is no new heading for a new Psalm in this Psalm itself, except in some modern translations (eg. E-Sword KJV).

It is obvious now how Psalm 103 flows into Psalm 104

Psa 104:1  Bless Yahuah (pw the LORD), O my soul. O Yahuah (pw LORD) my Eloheem (pw God), thou art very great; thou art clothed with honour and majesty.
Psa 104:2  Who coverest thyself with light as with a garment: who stretchest out the shamayim (pw heavens) like a curtain:
Psa 104:3  Who layeth the beams of his chambers in the waters: who maketh the clouds his chariot: who walketh upon the wings of the wind:
Psa 104:4  Who maketh his malakim (pw angels) spirits; his ministers a flaming fire:
Psa 104:5  Who laid the foundations of the earth, that it should not be removed for ever.

Remember again that we were told that Yehoshua had been slain from the foundation of the world and we said that that did not mean he exists from the foundation of the world or even before that. Ps 104 reminds us of that fact that everything that runs the earth and all its future has been preplanned and foredained by Yahuah including his Son which would be brought into the world in the future.

Both Psalms 103 and 104  begin and end with the idea of Baw'rak Yahuah oh my soul. Essentially praising Yahuah (who is not Yehoshua)

Psa 104:35  Let the Torah transgressor (pw sinner) be consumed out of the earth, and let the wicked be no more. Bless thou Yahuah (pw LORD), O my soul. Praise ye Yahuah (pw the LORD).

We have no doubt that Psalm 103 and 104 is where Shaul is quoting from in Heb 1:6. However, we still did not see any reference to worshiping Yehoshua but instead to Baw'rak or praise Yahuah. If Psalm 104 is anything to go by, Shaul is confirming that Yahuah gives life to all, including his Son, by his spirit.

Is Shaul saying the malakim (pw angels) must really worship the Son in this particular quote? Let's look again at what the translation claims Shaul had said.

Even in the claimed Greek Septuagint reference there is no such mention that Yehoshua is receiving worship. Moses's Song would be saying that all the mighty ones of Eloheem must worship him, Eloheem, himself. There is no intimation for them to worship somebody else. In fact, it has just warned them against that very thing a few verses prior

Would it not be sweet for Satan and his devils to insert or add such an idea into scripture when Yahuah warns against it? Do we now  create the worship of a new mighty one called "Jesus" / J-Zeus / J-Esus, whom they knew not, who replaces Yahuah and assumes equal worship as if he were Eloheem himself?  Is this not the very man of Lawlessness we were warned about by Shaul himself? Why would he be promoting such false worship of Yehoshua as if he were this man of lawlessness.

2Th 2:4  Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called Eloheem(pw God), or that is worshipped; so that he as Eloheem (pw God) sitteth in the temple of Eloheem (pw God), shewing himself that he is Eloheem.

So, then, what was the purpose of Shaul's lesson to the Messianic Hebrews here? He was preaching from Psalms to confirm Mashiach's (pw Christ's) proper position and rank as High Priest, his beginning, his being created (begotten), his position first lower and then later made higher than malakim (pw angels),  the honor that should be given to him as a worthy created Son, but never, never to worship him as Eloheem the Creator. Quite the contrary since Jews  were connected to angel worship and superstitious practises which scripture denounces. Why would Shaul be creating confusion and telling them to do that?  Is Shaul saying something else? It is simply a corrupted translation which gets more diabolical, as you will see later.


So, we have the point  in time where Yehoshua is brought into the world. Obviously it is a momentous occasion since Yahuah has Created a solution for mankind, having created the last Adam, who is Yehoshua. He is now bringing him into this world. Yahuah is praised for His mighty plan and work for us. There can be no doubt as to where we should go for this reference Shaul is quoting from.


So, the host of shamayim, the malakim (pw angels) worship Eloheem and Eloheem alone. Hence Heb 1:6 is stating the same. They are worshiping Yahuah as Yahuah Eloheem and not worshiping Yehoshua as Yahuah Eloheem.
 
It is simple to see that Yahuah Eloheem is saying prophetically that they should fully worship Him himself, and not the first begotten. So, no matter where this quote is from, that Shaul uses, it has been twisted to contradict how the prophetic worship by the malakim (pw angels) would occur when his Son would indeed be brought into the world. The focus of worship is on Yahuah Eloheem in the highest for bringing His Son into the world.

So, Apostle Shaul is addressing, in Hebrews 1, not the question of worship but honor when it comes to our sent saviour, Yehoshua. He is putting Yehoshua in his rightful position to be correctly honoured. Would Yahuah not know that his Son is to be rightfully honored once he is identified as the one brought into the world? Of course and that can be derived from the prophetic connection of Yehoshua to David's annointing seen in Psalm 2.

 The  Masoretic  Text JPS Tanakh for verse 12 is rendered in this way

Psa 2:12  Do homage/ be in purity, lest He (Yahuah) be angry, and ye perish in the way, when suddenly His (Yahuah's) wrath is kindled. Happy are all they that take refuge in Him (Yahuah).

The KJV has rendered it as:

The debate is with regards to the word being Hebrew or Aramaic in the original. Since there is no Aramaic in the whole of Psalms it is considered not to be suddenly in this isolated verse either and hence the translation is not considered to mean "Son".

Neither of these versions are really important at this stage as we are not primarliy arguing whether the Mashiach / Anointed One is to be worshipped as Eloheem or not .

If "Kiss the Son" were there  it  would not take away from the fact  that  he is the Son of Eloheem which we already accept, of course. If "Kiss the Son"   is not there we still have not lost anything since Yahuah has already stated his pre-eminence in setting up his Son who will be King, not Eloheem.

However we are trying to prove that paying homage to Yehoshua is lawful  under Torah and not idolatry even if Yehoshua is an appointed melek (ruler) and Son.

One could pay homage to a royal ruler (melek/ (king) as with Yehoshua the Appointed Ruler and Son about which this Psalm is  about . It is not about worshipping him as Eloheem. If the homage however  is being directed to Yahuah it is being wisefully advised following the instruction to obey the melek / ruler that Yahuah has appointed. It goes without saying that if one does not pay homage to the Prince (Yehoshua) one is indirectly not paying homage to the King (Yahuah) on his throne. 

Of course royal blood is not involved in the case of Yahuah and Yehoshua but the Spirit, although Yehoshua is indeed of the line of David.

In the photograph we see kissing going on or homage being made.

So, v11 states, serve Yahuah with fear. This is the beginning of wisdom and it is not the beginning of foolish Trinitarian heresy where Mashiach (pw Christ) is being served with fear and trembling above Yahuah, it is ALMIGHTY YAHUAH who receives that. This is clearly the first commandment level of worship to Yahuah the Creator of everyone and everything - with all your heart, mind and soul, etc.

Apostle Shaul has the habit of quoting Psalms. Psalms specifically is the place where we hear the repeated phrase Praise Yahuah O my Soul eg:

Psa 146:1  Praise ye Yahuah (pw the LORD). Praise Yahuah (pw LORD), O my soul.

 or, Bawruk (pw Bless) Yahuah O my Soul, and when we hear that we immediatlely connect to this first and greatest commandment.

Deu 11:13  And it shall come to pass, if ye shall hearken diligently unto my commandments which I command you this day, to love Yahuah (pw the LORD) your Eloheem (pw God), and to serve him with all your heart and with all your soul...

"soul" here in Deuteronomy is "nephesh" and includes our whole being, heart, mind body, soul, breath.

H5315 Strong's Hebrew Concordance
נֶפֶשׁ
nephesh
neh'-fesh
From H5314; properly a breathing creature, that is, animal or (abstractly) vitality; used very widely in a literal, accommodated or figurative sense (bodily or mental): - any, appetite, beast, body, breath, creature, X dead (-ly), desire, X [dis-] contented, X fish, ghost, + greedy, he, heart (-y), (hath, X jeopardy of) life (X in jeopardy), lust, man, me, mind, mortality, one, own, person, pleasure, (her-, him-, my-, thy-) self, them (your) -selves, + slay, soul, + tablet, they, thing, (X she) will, X would have it.

Yehoshua is not confused as to who he worships. Why are so many Trinitarians confused then? Why are they hanging on to such deception?


* silly translation for Catholic idol worshipers renders it as "what we worship" as though Yahuah is an object or graven image

Yehoshua affirms worshiping Eloheem is the first command that he himself keeps.

Mar 12:30  And thou shalt love Yahuah thy Eloheem with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind, and with all thy strength: this is the first commandment.

But the Trinitarian will then say but Jesus is God / Yehoshua is Eloheem to which Yehoshua replies, No!

Jn 20:17...I ascend unto my Father, and your Father; and to my Eloheem (pw God), and your Eloheem (pw God).

He says this right after being resurrected to life by his Father. This is his very first post-resurrection doctrine that he utters, not a I-am-God-worship-me doctrine.

Jn  20:17  Yehoshua (pw Jesus) saith unto her, Touch me not; for I am not yet ascended to my Father: but go to my brethren, and say unto them, I ascend unto my Father, and your Father; and to my Eloheem, and your Eloheem.

So, Thomas of the brethren hearing this and seeing Yehoshua alive then declares Yehoshua as his Master and aknowledges his Master's  Eloheem in having done this work in raising the Son. He thus affirms Eloheem as his Eloheem too in context of the shared Father and Eloheem of Yehoshua along with his brethren.

Now, Apostle Shaul calls worship reasonable / expected service specifically to Eloheem not Yehoshua. Eloheem is the one who receives ultimate worship from our whole being. Yehoshua indeed gave up his whole being, even to death, in service and worship to Yahuah.

Rom 12:1  I beseech you therefore, brethren, by the compassion (pw mercies) of Eloheem, that ye present your bodies a living offering (pw sacrifice), set apart (pw holy), acceptable unto Eloheem, which is your reasonable service*.

Strong's Greek Concordance:
*G2999
λατρεία
latreia
lat-ri'-ah
From G3000; ministration of God, that is, worship: - (divine) service.

 Then, juxtaposed against that mighty backdrop of pre-eminince of worship is the command in verse 12, to kiss the Son lest he be angry.

Ps 2:12 Kiss the Son, lest he be angry, and ye perish from the way, when his wrath is kindled but a little. Baruch'd (pw blessed) are all they that put their trust (confidence) in him.

Yet, with this simple command comes a threat to you if it be ignored: Mashiach's (pw Christ's) wrath and your death.
So, Mashiach (pw Christ) is mentioned, and so is the attitude and warning pointed towards him who betrays the Mashiach (pw Christ) as did Judas, with a kiss of falsehood or mockery rather than accceptance and tender affection. It was the opposite of the qodesh kiss with which the brethren are to greet each other. Such custom was seen in the student / disciple kissing their teacher in respect. We believe it could closely be compared with the verbal expression of the term Amein (pw Amen), an expression or affirmation of firmness in support.

Interestingly a translation for kiss is the idea of fastening up (suggesting -an expression or affirmation of firmness in support).

An irony is that" fastening up" could also mean "to arrest" which is what the kiss of betrayal produced with Judas, the arrest of Yehoshua.

Now, some conclusions that should be clear from Ps 2 11,12:


Shaul knows the difference between honoring men and worshiping Yahuah Eloheem who is preeminent, but it seems the Christian world does not.

The children of Yasherel knew the difference of rightful honour to a worthy man and that that was not equated with worship of Eloheem. Hence Shaul uses Moses, who was worthy of honour, to demonstrate he is not speaking of worship of Eloheem when he refers to our saviour who, like Moses,  also receives honour. But this honour toward Yehoshua is clearly greater than toward Moses but it still never enters the realm of worshiping either of them as Eloheem the Creator!

On the contrary we are reminded that they are both appointed and created by Yahuah and both have been placed over a house (living congregation of believers) whom Yahuah has indirectly built through his created servants (Moses and then Yehoshua).
 
Let us look at Hebrews 3:

Heb 3:1-6 For this man (Yehoshua) was counted worthy of more splendor (pw glory) than Moses, inasmuch as he who hath builded the house hath more honor than the house. Who was trustworthy (pw faithful) to him that appointed him, as also Moses was trustworthy in all his house.

For every house is builded by some man; but he that built all things is Eloheem (pw God). And Moses verily was trsutworthy in all his house, as a servant, for a witness (pw testimony) of those things which were to be spoken after; But the Anointed One (pw Christ) as a son over his own house; whose house are we, if we hold fast the confidence and the rejoicing of the expectation (pw hope) firm unto the end.

Consider the servant Moses who was given splendor (pw glory) in his "house" (congregation of believers), however the greater splendor is given to the builder of the house. Yehoshua is the buider of the living stones, we his congregation. But finally the greatest splendor is given to Eloheem the creator of ALL THINGS, us, Moses AND HIS SON. Shaul cannot make it any clearer that the highest honor is given to Eloheem and Yehoshua does not replace or take that from him.
 
Apostle Shaul dispels any fears and false allusions that Yehoshua is being worshiped as Eloheem.  Apostle Shaul is teaching us, in the same way as Psalms 2, to kiss the son, a sign of honoring, and affirmation of his rightful appointment by Yahuah and in honoring his trustworthiness.

Geting back to Hebrews 1


The first question is, who are the ministers? Yehoshua is among these ministers but he is THE Minister of all, the very High Priest ministeriing in the House (pw Temple) of Yahuah in shamayim (pw heaven). The question is, who is his source? And the rhetorical question is answered - Yahuah, the Creator of the first begotten/ born Son of course. Ministers of Yahuah are not "gods" to be worshipped but rather servants of Yahuah  just as Shaul referred to Moses.

The word here is not "unto" as if David is addressing the Son here, he is adressing Eloheem. Shaul is quoting directly from Psalm 45:6 He is saying "pertaining to the Son".

G4314 Strong's Greek Concordance
 pros pros a strengthened form of 4253; a preposition of direction; forward to, i.e. toward (with the genitive case, the side of, i.e. pertaining to; with the dative case, by the side of, i.e. near to; usually with the accusative case, the place, time, occasion, or respect, which is the destination of the relation, i.e. whither or for which it is predicated):--about, according to , against, among, at, because of, before, between, (where-)by, for, X at thy house, in, for intent, nigh unto, of, which pertain to, that, to (the end that), X together, to (you) -ward, unto, with(-in). In the comparative case, it denotes essentially the same applications, namely, motion towards, accession to, or nearness at. see GREEK for 4253

The words "he saith" are not even there in the original and have been added, further corrupting the scripture.

It should be


Trinitarians are in big trouble if they insist Yehoshua is being addressed as Eloheem. Let us first look at the whole Psalm for context. In its literal sense it is a wedding song for an earthly ruler who his getting married to his virgin.

Psa 45:1  To the chief Musician upon Shoshannim, for the sons of Korah, Maschil, A Song of loves. My heart is inditing a good matter: I speak of the things which I have made touching the ruler (pw king): my tongue is the pen of a ready writer.

But we will see that it is also a spiritual prophecy about two kings and a bride:

Psa 45:2  Thou art fairer than the children of men: chesed (pw grace) is poured into thy lips: therefore Eloheem (pw God) hath blessed thee for ever.

The spiritual Bride is being adressed here. She is fairer than the chidlren of men (born in the flesh) since she has been redeemed (born again in the Spirit), she has received chesed/ kindness/ favour from Yahuah.

Next we see the mighty ruler who is to receive his bride and willing to fight the good fight of moral conviction founded upon righteousnes, truth and meekness and who learns obedience:

Psa 45:3  Gird thy sword upon thy thigh, O most mighty, with thy splendour (pw glory) and thy majesty.
Psa 45:4  And in thy majesty ride prosperously because of truth and meekness and righteousness; and thy right hand shall teach thee terrible things.
Psa 45:5  Thine arrows are sharp in the heart of the rulers's (pw king's) enemies; whereby the people fall under thee.

He carries the sword of truth and has been appointed with majesty, a king of kings. But now it switches to another ruler (king) and that is the one in shamayim (pw heaven) who is Eloheem.

Psa 45:6  Thy throne, O Eloheem, is for ever and ever: the sceptre of thy kingdom is a right sceptre.

We know Yehoshua's kingdom is not for ever it is handed back to Yahuah [1 Cor 15-20]. So, we will stop here and ask if it is plausible to think that because this is a prophecy "pertaining to the Son" that right here the Son is being addressed as Eloheem? That would of course be preposterous. It would mean that in reality this literal soon-to-be-married ruler (king) must be addressed as Eloheem too! If that were so this Psalm would have been tossed out for idolatry. But it is not. It is putting into perspecttive that there are two rulers (kings). One earthly ruler who has been appointed by Eloheem and he is the other ruler Supreme in shamayim. The earthly ruler is subordinate to the ruler in shamayim. Hence the secular saying "God save the king".

Yehoshua is indeed our appointed and anointed earthly ruler (king), but the first to ascend to shamayim (pw heaven). He is indeed, prophetically coming as the Lion of Yehuda in his second coming. In his first coming he came as a righteous meek servant ruler riding upon an ass. But one thing is for sure, he is not Eloheem the Supreme Ruler. Yehoshua, the prophesied earthly ruler, needed saving by his Father, the Supreme Ruler, when he lay dead three days and three nights in the tomb. Eloheem raised him back to life. It is Yahuah who annoints his appointed rulers, such as ruler David and ruler Yehoshua.

Yahuah alone appoints rulers, judges, magistrates and saviors. Eloheem is being addressed in the context of being the Supreme Ruler with the Sceptre of his Kingdom in his hand. That sceptre is metaphorically an earthly king, being identified prophetically as the Son who now reigns on the right hand of his Father. The secular analogy would be a king (Eloheem) with a prince (Yehoshua) as his sceptre. The prince has the power of the king delegated to him as long as he is one with the king (loyal / righteous) and within his time of reign. Then in this next verse the Son or subordinate ruler is specifically addressed. So, this is now what actually pertains to the Son and his Father who has annointed him.

Psa 45:7-10 Thou lovest righteousness, and hatest wickedness: therefore Eloheem (pw God), thy Eloheem (pw God) [Jn20:17], hath anointed thee with the oil of gladness above thy fellows.
All thy garments smell of myrrh, and aloes, and cassia, out of the ivory palaces, whereby they have made thee glad.
Kings' daughters were among thy honourable women: upon thy right hand did stand the queen in gold of Ophir.
Hearken, O daughter, and consider, and incline thine ear; forget also thine own people, and thy father's house;

Now we get to the bit about the bride worshiping the ruler and master:

Psa 45:11  So shall the king greatly desire thy beauty: for he is thy Master (pw Lord); and worship thou him.

So, we have now moved from that worship that involves worshiping Yahuah as Creator and supreme ruler on his throne to worshiping his Son, the appointed Ruler, Master and prophetic Bridegroom of his Bride. This is, metaphorically, the body of Yehoshua, the assembly of true covenant believers. Hence there is no idolatry here again. If there were, all of Yasherel would have protested against this song and tossed it out of Psalms. But no, it is here. If worship toward a king was good enough then it certainly should be good enough for the Anointed One, Yehoshua, Son of Eloheem.  It is about honouring the appointed ruler, kissing the Son.

The virgin theme, as well, is very clear here as with the ten virgins parable given by Yehoshua about us being like the five wise virgins being ready for his return. This is rightful honour, reverence, respect and dedication not idolatry, just as a worker should honour his boss, a wife her husband, a child their parent as long as they in turn honor Yahuah.

Psa 45:12  And the daughter of Tyre shall be there with a gift; even the rich among the people shall intreat thy favour. 

Now it is clear that there are two rulers (kings) in this Wedding song which most people miss. There is the king who is the father of the bride and the king who receives the bride which me marries.

Psa 45:13  The king's daughter is all glorious within (internal spiritual virtue): her clothing is of wrought gold (refined in tribulation).

Psa 45:14 She shall be brought unto the king in raiment of needlework: the virgins her companions that follow her shall be brought unto thee.

Yahuah is indeed the Ruler (king) Father of the Bride and he hands his Spiritual Bride to his Son who is the Spiritual Bridegroom and Ruler (Prince). His Father's kingdom has been placed upon his shoulders to govern for a time. [1 Cor 15:25-28].

Psa 45:15  With gladness and rejoicing shall they be brought: they shall enter into the king's palace.
Psa 45:16  Instead of thy fathers shall be thy children, whom thou mayest make princes in all the earth.
Psa 45:17  I will make thy name to be remembered in all generations: therefore shall the people praise thee for ever and ever.

Now the Son is indeed the very sceptre of righteousness that is in the hand of Yahuah (on the right hand of the Majesty on high). The Son shows that the righteous Kingdom of Yahuah is so Sovereign that Eloheem even would forsake his own Son because of our Torah transgression (pw sin), that his Son took upon himself. But Eloheem, equally, so hated iniquity that He would raise his Son, as promised, to overcome Torah transgression and death - this is the true sceptre of righteousness: It is Shiloh the Mashiach / Anointed One (pw Christ) prophesied already in Genesis that woulld  gather his people to Eloheem's throne.


So, Shaul confirms that David prophesies about Yehoshua, that he indeed fulfills the definition of the prophesied Sceptre of Righteousness in the hand of Yahuah since Mashiach / the Anointed One (pw Christ) too has loved righteousness, fully preaching (pleroo) the law (Torah) [Mat 5:17-20] whilst also offering his body as atonement for us to keep his Torah in the future ("establish the Torah" as Shaul says [Rom 3:31]. Yehoshua hated iniquity so much that he overcame it with good, giving his own body as atonement.


Thus, as the sceptre of righteousness, he has been appointed as judge by his Father. It is unequivocally evident that the writer of this Psalm is not a Trinitarian, he prophesies that the annointed and appointed Prince Yehoshua has an Eloheem, just as an earthly ruler like himself is under Eloheem - He does not become Eloheem. He is not called Eloheem. The verse is not addressing Yehoshua here as "God" and then saying He has a "God", that is ridiculous. The original verse from Psalms 45:7 does not have "even" added, it is simply


Getting back to Hebrews 1


Confusion is made possible here by the use of "Lord" in Heb 1:10 which falsely translates it from the OT text which is supposed to be the pagan "LORD" and that does not mean Master but rather Yahuah the name of the One True Eloheem alone.
There is only one Eloheem with the name of Yahuah. That is the shema. The pagan translation is:


But the true translation is:


In other words,  hear oh Yasherel that our Eloheem whom we call Yahuah is the only one with that name since he is our only Eloheem.

And there is only one Master, Yehoshua by which we can be saved. One is Father and one is Son. Neither are the same and neither can exchange names. Yahuah (pw LORD) ALONE is being addressed by name here not Yehoshua the Master (pw Lord).

Continuing here with the idea of hands, Yahuah is the Sovereign who upholds the sceptre (Yehoshua) in his hand. We recall earlier how we said Yahuah is the upholder of all things by the power of his word, while Yehoshua endures / bears (phero) this appointed responsibility given to him.

Recapping from verse 3


It was by the word of Eloheem's power and spirit that Yehoshua upheld his Word (sign of Yona) and whereby Yahuah raised his Son to life on the third day. Yehoshua, however,  bears all things appointed to him. Yahuah is the Creator of all things. The very foundation he created is an extension of his upholding power, which literally and physically upholds us upon the earth. In addition he upholds us as living animated beings by his very breath alone (spirit).

Act 17:28  For in him we live, and move, and have our being...

Yehoshua was not living, not moving and not having his being but dead for three days and three nights. Yahuah cannot die, he is not a man neither the Son of man. He cannot escape his own Spirit by which he is defined.  But Yahuah the Creator gave Yehoshua his being again by returning the spirit to Yehoshua after he gave it up on the stake. Yehoshua was also forsaken by Yahuah because he had taken on all our transgression upon his flesh else he would have been incinerated or cremated by the pure righteous presence of Yahuah.

However, we willl have trinitarian Christians telling us that "Jesus  / J-Zesus is the Creator who allegedly upholds all things . They say he must be worshipped as Eloheem which is  blasphemy. They simply cash in on ambiguous or mistranslated verses. They break the apologetic first rule which is scriptural harmony with the first and second witness of Yahauh and Yehoshua, as discussed in the first part of this book.

Yehoshua is Eloheem or the Honorable Servant of Eloheem?

Yehoshua is over and over again described as the servant of Yahuah, not Yahuah himself. This is in line with what was prophesied concerning Yehoshua, his servant, whom Yahuah sent and anointed.

So what does this mean ?

Some beleive it is saying only Yahuah has honour and because he says he does not give it to anyone then it means that because Yehoshua has been given honor he can then only be Eloheem himself.

But what it is saying is that Yahuah gives honor to his elect servant (Yehoshua) whom he annoints to such an extent that it exceeds any one else he has given honour to, even that of Moses. We have covered this in our Hebrews 1 discussion earlier.

Heb 3:1-6 For this man (Yehoshua) was counted worthy of more splendor (pw glory) than Moses, inasmuch as he who hath builded the house hath more honor than the house. Who was trustworthy (pw faithful) to him that appointed him, as also Moses was trustworthy in all his house.

Apostle Shaul clearly understands that Yahuah has indeed given honour to his servants but none so great as Yehoshua. But this all still does not make Yehoshua, neither Moses become Yahuah, else Yahuah would have said so here when he describes Yehoshua his coming servant. He instead reminds us of not committing idolatry, elevating an object to a place of power it does not possess.

The idea is that elevating Yehoshua to a place of power he does not posess namely that he is the Creator and breath of man, is likewise an object idolatry. Yahuah has categorically attached his name in this prophecy to his power as Creator of life alone which is is stated 

Yehoshua in no way contradicts Yahuah who says "my honor (pw glory) will I not give to another" since Yehoshua bears witness of the Father - he does not bear false witness of Him and  honors the Father, not himself. 

Jn 5:31 If I bear witness of myself, my witness is not true.

He fulfills (carries out) the Torah and preaches it fully (Mat 5:17-20).

Jn 14:13 And whatsoever ye shall ask in my name, that will I do, THAT the Father may be honoured (pw glorified) in the Son.

The Father is honoured in what the Righteous Son does, just as a child brings honor to the parent (or shame if he does not obey). Again this given honour, as great as it is, it can never exceed the preeminence of the Creator Yahuah who is One.

1 Cor 15:24-28 Then cometh the end, when he [Yehoshua] shall have delivered up the kingdom to Eloheem, even the Father; when he shall have put down all rule and all authority and power.
For he [Yehoshua] must reign, till he hath put all enemies under his feet.
The last enemy that shall be destroyed is death.
For he [Eloheem] hath put all things under his [Yehoshua's] feet. But when he saith all things are put under him, it is manifest that he [Eloheem] is excepted [excluded], which did put all things under him [Yehoshua].
And when all things shall be subdued unto him [Yehoshua], then shall the Son also himself be subject unto him that put all things under him, that Eloheem may be all in all.

Jn 8:42 If Yahuah is your Father (as indeed He can be), ye would love me: for I proceeded forth and came from Yahuah; neither came I of myself, but he sent me. 43 Why do ye not understand my speech? even because ye cannot hear my word (Torah). 44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, HE SPEAKETH OF HIS OWN (speaking of his own Honour - pw GLORY): for he is a liar, and the father of it.

LORD, Lord - Its All Greek To Me.

In the Everlasting Covenant (pw Old testament) of KJV and others, the translators replaced the word, Master, with, Lord. They also replaced Yahuah (Yahuah) with LORD. This creates enough deception and confusion already. Yahuah corrupted to "LORD" was done over 7000 times in the "OT". Then the translators had a field day in promoting the Trinity doctrine even further when it came to the REC (pw New Testament) translated from the Greek.

Here they go further to ignorantly (or deceptively) translate "Lord" meaning  Master (Hebrew Strong's H113 אָדֹן    אָדוֹן  'âdôn    'âdôn), which could refer to Yahuah or the Son. One is totally confused.

They then corrupt Yahuah / Yehoshua  into "Lord" as well. This then is even worse than the Everlasting Covenant (OT), having not even a distinction between "LORD" in uppercase and "Lord"
capitalised, which would at least clearly distinguish it as referring to Yahuah, Yehoshua or Master.

Were it not for quotes by Yehoshua and the apostles themselves quoting from the Everlasting Covenant (OT) we would not be able to pick up on their shenanigans, but they are clearly exposed. However, many still fall prey to their trickery, sadly even sisters of the harlot "church", Baptists, for example, who use such verses as proof of their Trinity heresy that "Jesus is God", or as they put it, where "Jesus is recognized as God"

We see that as we continue all the way to the end, nothing has changed. It is still referring to Yahuah Eloheem who is being spoken of here as the Creator:


It is Eloheem who tells Mashiach (pw Christ) to sit at his right hand, thus it is Yahuah who is the Creator spoken of here.

The original verse Shaul is quoting from is from Psalm 102, a prayer, which begins as
 

It is unmistakenly an address to Yahuah, Yahuah Eloheem, where the pagan translators exchange Yahuah with L-O-R-D not Lord which would mean Master.

Jumping down to verse 12:

still referring to Yahuah, not Yehoshua. When we get to verse 25 we finally have the rest of Shaul's matching quote:


It is obvious that Shaul thus quoted from verse 12 here and then verse 25, as one would do when shortening a quote using "...", but in Hebrew text elipsis is not used. Shaul clearly did this to make sure we know who is being adressed so that there is no mistake that it is Yahuah (pw LORD). But of course the trinitarians then try to hide Shaul's clear presentation and they translate it with the deceptive "Lord" which enables trinitarians to say, oh, look, Jesus our Lord is Creator. Total deception, total Catholic rubbish.

Finally, our conclusion of Hebrews 1 with corrected translation as well as explanations in brackets:

Thus Yehoshua, the sceptre in the hand of Yahuah is raised up by the Father.

Chapter 11

The Declaration "Jesus is Lord" Proves He is God?

Many will  insist that the Bible teaches us to confess that Jesus is God, allegedly proving he indeed is using this verse:

They will equate the word Lord to mean God , saying  Lord is kurios koo'-ree-os from kuros (supremacy); supreme in authority, i.e. (as noun) controller; by implication, Master (as a respectful title):-- God, Lord, master. But we have already explained the difference between the pagan translation of "Lord" Master versus" LORD" meaning YHUHיהוה  Yahuah.

Hence we confess that Yehoshua is Master , the Master appointed by Yahuah.

We need to read the context of this verse

Php 2:9  Wherefore Eloheem (pw God) also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name:
Php 2:10  That at the name of Yehoshua (pw Jesus) every knee should bow, of things in shamayim (pw heaven), and things in earth, and things under the earth;
Php 2:11  And that every tongue should confess that Yehoshua the Anointed  One (pw Jesus Christ) is Master (pw Lord), to the honour (pw glory) of Eloheem (pw God) the Father.

We see that Yahuah Eloheem has given the Son a name of authority. This name is Yehoshua (not Jesus) which means Yahuah has saved. His very name shows the power His Father had over his Son's  dead body when he gave up his Spirit to the Father and lay as dead flesh for three days. His Father alone saved him. Hence his very name and authority proves he is not Eloheem but instead the receiver of this highest authority and saving power which is from Eloheem the Creator and giver of life alone.

It further shows we do not bow and confess Yehoshua is Master to honour him as Eloheem but rather we bow and confess he is Master to honour Eloheem who has given him authority, "...of things in shamayim (pw heaven), and things in earth, and things under the earth;". This authority, as we have repeatedly shown, is temporary and is returned back to Yahuah Eloheem who is Supreme and Eternal. (1 Cor 15:25)

Yehoshua, yes, is supreme appointed Master in authority over shamayim (pw heaven) and earth - that is why the malakhim (pw angels)  must obey Him - He is the head too over the assembly (pw church-circus) the body of believers, in no way does this detract, or take away from Yahuah's honor (pw glory). It still brings honor to Yahuah. Kipha (pw Peter) also made it clear that the same title of respect is applied to the husband or should be (but today's standard has been corrupted by feminism and pagan thinking).

1 Pet 3:6 Even as Sara obeyed Abraham, calling him Master (pw lord kurios): whose daughters ye are, as long as ye do well, and are not afraid with any amazement. 7 Likewise, ye husbands, dwell with them according to knowledge, giving HONOUR unto the wife, as unto the weaker vessel.

Note: the one in subjection has honor (pw glory) GIVEN by commandment of Yahuah and the woman gives honor to the husband above her. The same applies to chidren honouring parents. The honor (pw glory) is mentioned and so is the clear and precise order of Sovereignty to Yahuah who is above all - Majesty on High.

Reflect upon the following for at least a week and try to apply the Trinity doctrine to it - the light of this scripture will expose the Trinity doctrine for what it is – disorder, dishonour and plain confusion.

1 Cor 11:3 But I would have you know, that the HEAD of EVERY MAN is Mashiach / Anointed One; and the HEAD of the woman is the man; and the HEAD of Mashiach / Anointed One is Yahuah. 4 Every man praying or prophesying, having his head covered, dishonoureth his head. 5 But every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with her head uncovered dishonoureth her head: for that is even all one as if she were shaven. 6 For if the woman be not covered, let her also be shorn: but if it be a shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her be covered. 7 For a man indeed ought not to cover his head, forasmuch as HE IS THE IMAGE AND HONOUR (pw glory) OF Yahuah: but the WOMAN IS THE HONOUR (pw glory) OF THE MAN. 8 For the man is not of the woman; but the woman of the man. 9 Neither was the man created for the woman; but the woman for the man. 10 For this cause ought the woman to have power on her head because of the malakhim (pw angels). 11 Nevertheless neither is the man without the woman, neither the woman without the man, in Yahuah. 12 For as the woman is of the man, even so is the man also by the woman; but all things of Yahuah.

The honor (pw glory) is not diminished in any way by the rightly placed functions of each (male, female, Yehoshua or Yahuah) but it all flows up to Yahuah, thus ending with vs 12 “but all things of Yahuah”. Yahuah has purposed the function and order and hierarchy for HIS ultimate honor (pw glory).

However, if this order is corrupted by Satan then Yahuah is blasphemed. Placing Yehoshua as the Supreme Head, ie. Yahuah Eloheem, then removes him as man and mediator between man and Yahuah. And then this falsely created void allows for Catholic female deities or mediatrixes to be invented like Mary (or Shakti, Isis, Queen of Heaven (Mother of God) etc) as to fill this Satanic void. Hence we have our main image.

Paul is not a trinitarian but a true Yahudi - worshipper of Yah (pw Jew, misleading-contraction of Judaite) as in the Shama.

1 Tim 2: 5 For there IS one Yahuah (shama), and one mediator between Yahuah and men, the MAN Yehoshua Hamashiach

Chapter 12

Does Bowing To Yehoshua Make Him God?

Many would argue saying, "Why would God allow us to bow before Yehoshua if he wasn't God?  

"for I am Eloheem (pw God), and there is none else."

Well, again we are bowing to him as lawfully appointed Master not as Eloheem. Bowing to someone, to pay tribute or give honour does not mean one is bowing to them as if they are Yahuah the Creator, or as if they replace the Creator except when it comes to the Catholic Church and Christianity's blasphemous Trinity and Jesus-is-God heresy.

In the context of Joseph being a man and having his parents bowing to the earth to him would seem like idolatry but in hindsight it obviously was not since it came to pass to him when he became an appointed ruler in Egypt with great authority and would save them from drought. Nobody ever says Joseph must be Eloheem the Creator because he was bowed to. He became simply an appointed Master with power , authority and salvation.

At the end of the day we bow our knees to the Father Yahuah who is Creator and Father and Creator of Yehoshua

Eph 3:14 For this cause I bow my knees unto the Father OF our Master Yehoshua Mashiach / Anointed One, 15 Of whom the whole family in shamayim (pw heaven) and earth is named, 16 That he would grant you, according to the riches of his honor (pw glory), to be strengthened with might by his Spirit in the inner man;

However, the wicked will face the appointed Magistrate (judge, mighty one, eloha , pw god)  Yehoshua, who has been appointed by the Majesty on High. They will bow for a different reason:

Acts 17:31 Because he (Yahuah )hath appointed a day (which he as Omniscient One Alone knows which Yehoshua does not know ie is not the Omniscient One), in the which he (Yahuah) will judge the world in righteousness BY that MAN (Yehoshua) whom he hath ordained (appointed, decreed, limited to) whereof he hath given assurance unto all men, in that HE (Yahuah) hath raised him(Yehoshua) from the dead. (Yehoshua did not raise himself since he was man - a dead man, period!)

In the same way some are forced to call the Magistrate “My Lord” (respectfully Master), because he is acting under the Majesty of England let's say - so it is with Yehoshua. The emphasis is the name /authority, not Yehoshua himself, - the name is the authority with which Yehoshua operates from Yahuah's throne. If the Magistrate is appointed by the Majesty of the country the person addresses him because he bears the appointed authority of the Majesty on his throne. It does not make the Magistrate the Majesty on High. When the appointed Magistrate, Yehoshua, puts the full penalty of Yahuah's law (curse of the law-wages of sin and death) upon the shoulders of the wicked, they will certainly bow whether they like it or not. Every knee will bow, not in worship here, but by the pure weight of kabod (pw glory) and judgement, whether willing or not, since He has been appointed Magistrate.

True worship requires obedience by free will, that is the basis of true worship - these people do not obey thus they are punished. Crying to the rocks "fall on us" (a rock on you should make you bend your knees). Yahuah is the Rock and Mashiach / Anointed One is the appointed Magistrate to bring that judgement to crush the rebellious.

Jn 6:16 And said to the mountains and rocks, Fall on us, and hide us from the face of him that sitteth on the throne, and from the wrath of the Lamb: 17 For the great day of his wrath is come; and who shall be able to STAND?

Yehoshua is indeed Master (pw lord, lard, baali etc) in the same way the world addresses a Magistrate as with the pagan title "My Lord" in some countries - a respectful title similar to Sir or Mister, Doctor, Your Honour etc. Yes, some think they are Eloheem (pw God) as soon as they get a title but these are carnal men. Yehoshua is not sinful flesh but full of Yahuah's spirit - He did not have a Eloheem (pw God) complex. He knows he is the Son of Yahuah with the appointment of authority.

Jn 14:28 for my Father is greater than I.

Yahuah would certainly allow us to bow to the Master since He has so decreed it from the foundation of the world. He did not say there is none other than me to which you must not bow, He said, do not bow to graven images, do not make your own images of what has been created by Yahuah and worship them as though they are All Mighty Yahuah the Creator. Do not make representations of what Yahuah has created and bow to those things as if they are Sovereign powers. These are man-made images of what Yahuah has made. Mashiach / Anointed One has also been created by Yahuah himself, however as an image of Yahuah himself. Mashiach / Anointed One is not an idol but the pure representation of the image of Yahuah by word and deed- a living representation, not a man-made statue etc. This is why we were commanded not to make false images and bow to them since they blaspheme the Father's own created image he had prepared for us - his own Son, as prophesied, to which we may bow down, recognising him as the Sovereign's Son with appointed power and authority.

We continue to not bow to images or icons of Yehoshua, but to the Son, as commanded, when He returns, in recognition of his apointed authority by his Father.

Chapter 13

Trinity - A New Revelation?

The book of Revelations was written much later and is the last words of scripture. This book is often titled "the Revelation of Jesus" and it is no wonder that the trinitarians try to create an idea as if Yehoshua (pw Jesus) is being revealed to John finally in his fullness as Eloheem (pw God) after allegedly being a secret or mystery prior to that. I have indeed heard such an idea being taught. This far-fetched idea would make all the apostles liars and in the dark as far as true witnesses then. They had to witness Mashiach / the Anointed One (pw Christ) first-hand and they declared him as the Son of Eloheem and never Eloheem. Mashiach (pw Christ) as the light (true witness) to Paul also then would not be the blinding light of truth, if this were the case, that knocked him to the ground, but, instead, some dark or obscure light.

But the light was not hid under a bed, it was openly revealed:

Secondly, this idea of no prior revelation would not make sense since that argument defeats itself since these same trinitarians will still try to use scriptures prior to the book of Revelations claiming that they are "clear" evidence of such a known revelation that "Jesus is God", eg. Thomas "my Lord and my God" ealier discussed. The Father himself, however, already revealed (gave revelation) to Simon Peter by his pure breath (pw holy spirit) for example:
It is more than ironic then that the Vatican would create a fake Peter Pope (Papa, Father ) imposter who stands for the very opposite, that "Jesus is God". But the true revelation to the real Apostle Simon Peter in Mat 16:15 precedes John's revelation. The revelation is the same and the source is the same: that Yehoshua is the Son of Eloheem and that his Father, Yahuah in shamayim is the one who has thus declared it. So, any different revelation only means a different father, and that revelation is the so-called later Trinity revelation from the fake Papa Pope, so-called father on earth. Yes, they present a corrupted revelation revealed by flesh and blood, a doctrine of the fleshly puffed up swollen heads of theological (g-o-d following) church (Circe goddess) fathers.

So, if a Trinity was supposedly not revealed prior to the book of Revelations then a trinitarian cannot use those prior scriptures to prove any trinty before a supposed later revelation to John, otherwise such scriptures surely would have clearly revealed a Trinity to those who were direct eyewitness of the Mashiach (pw Christ) - the very Apostles themselves. No such thing happened. He was revealed by the Father himself as the SON OF THE LIVING Eloheem! The trinitarian cannot have his cake and eat it.

Seeing Dimly Or Just being Dull Of Hearing?

When Paul says


then they may be quick to believe it supports that idea that Paul and his fellows were seeing "Jesus" dimly and not yet as Eloheem (pw God), as though later revelation was needed to see that Yehoshua (pw Jesus) is Eloheem (pw God). This, however, is not true. It merely refers to knowing Yahuah face to face, ie. His visible form. It does not refer to not knowing his character, his name and who He is, perhaps a Jesus or some silly masquerade idea. Paul's statement is echoed by John and there it is clear that we do already know Him. It is the world that did not know Him.


We shall know His form and appearance as we know our own. Note also that this happens after resurrection. This revelation then does not happen with the book of revelations and neither does it happen upon this earth. So, again, this is the revelation of Yahuah's appearance and not the fabled later revelation that "Jesus is God".

Chapter 14

How Many Alpha and Omegas (Aleph & Tau) Are There?

Who is the Alpha and Omega, Beginning and End, First and Last? Let's have a look.
We see the use of "Alpha and Omega, begining and end" four  times, and all only in Revelations. There may have been confusion for many of us at one time or another as to who the Alpha and Omega is, and this title is often incorrectly used as proof of Yehoshua and Eloheem being one and the same. Again there may be a temptation to believe this is a later revelation revealed to John. We shall cover the four references.


*More likely, Day of Yahuah (pw LORD not pw Lord), the day (period) of Yahuah's judgement at the end, ie. Judgement Day. It is a vision of that day. It is not a Sunday or Sabbath day that Yahuchanon is referring to.

In this very first reference Yahuchanon (corrupted name: John) tells us who the Alpha and Omega is here. It is the Son of man. So there is no mistake that this is Yehoshua and not Eloheem Yahuah. This is Revelation 101!

Now in this verse we see this word Almighty*. In the renewed Everlasting Covenant  (NT) scriptures it is only present in Revelations (8 times) besides once in  2 Corinthians. 

[*StrongsGreek*]
3841 pantokrator pan-tok-rat'-ore from 3956 and 2904; the all-ruling, i.e. God (as absolute and universal sovereign):--Almighty, Omnipotent. see GREEK for 3956 see GREEK for 2904

It is clear that this is the All Mighty One, Eloheem,  "pantokrator" This would perhaps be a better word for that troublesome Roman Vulgate invention "theotes" - Godhead or would at least make a clearer definition of Yahuah as the Sovereign, Absolute, Omnipotent, All Ruling One. 

So, now we have two Alpha and Omegas, but is this possible? The trinitarians immediately would declare: 

Of course since they are one and the same. They thus try to make us believe 2=1. What about 3=1?  Their other so-called "god" the "holi ghost" is missing at this stage once again!

Whilst two parties may share a similar or same description, it in no way follows that they are one and the same.  Considering further that Alpha and Omega on its own does not necessarily define sovereignty or eternity backwards and forwards it merely defines a starting point and an end in the dimension of time. The Almighty, however, does not have a starting point but he chooses to do whatever he likes and appoints a starting point or an end point according to His own will here on Earth. The Almighty is eternal backwards and forwards but when He created time he was obviously there at its beginning, thus from creation's point of view He was its beginning and he is its end when the Earth and shamayim are destroyed and replaced. We shall see this context soon in this section. However, He is not bound by time or the events of creation, neither its destruction, since he supersedes those dimensions. It is clear that this descriptive name, Alpha and Omega, in Rev 1:8 is for Yahuah this time but obtains seperate ownership from that applied to Yehoshua in Rev 1:10 by the additional use this time of  "who was, who is and which is to come, the Almighty". This clearly distinguishes him from the other Alpha and Omega who is Yehoshua,  who was merely first and last from his time of being begotten forwards, including when he became the last Adam ("the first begotten of the dead "- see Rev 1:5, 1 Cor 15:45), resurrected and then made eternal by Yahuah at his ascension.

3) Rev 21:6 And he said unto me, It is done. I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end. I will give unto him that is athirst of the fountain of the water of life freely.

In this third instance we may be tempted to assume this is now the Mashiach (pw Christ) who we are accustomed to know as the "water of life". However, the source of that life is Yahuah and it does not take more than a verse later to see who is talking, it is the very source of that water:

Rev 21:7 "He that overcometh shall inherit all things; and I will be his Eloheem (God), and he shall be my son."

Immediately after Eloheem we see "son" is mentioned. He thus reminds us that he is the Father, the source here, he is the beginning of the Son and the beginning of us who shall be Sons of Eloheem, by inheritance through his first begotten Son who is our beginning, the Alpha [our forerunner of emunah (pw faith)]. 

So the picture is becoming clearer again as to why the Alpha and Omega names are being used back and forth for the Son and the Father, but each time with a clearer understanding of their context, their action, their function, their rank. This is what Hebrew names are all about. The name has purpose and meaning. It is not a transliteration without scriptural meaning  (like the awful meaningless transliteration J-E-S-U-S which DOES NOT mean saviour as theologians have tried to force. If it were so "soter" would be part of the name since "soter" means saviour - II Peter 3:18 "our Master (pw Lord) and Saviour (soter) Jesus (no soter) Mashiach  (pw Christ)." The true Hebrew meanings on the other hand explain the seperate rank and function of the Son and the Father while maintaining unity of purpose and thus they share the name Alpha and Omega.

Let us go back in the passage for even more context.

Here it becomes obvious again that Eloheem HIMSELF will dwell with his people, something that has not happened before since his Son has told us no man has seen or even heard Eloheem, save the first begotten Son of Eloheem. This then further qualifies the Father as another beginning for us in the new shamayim (pw heaven) and the new earth created for us, and a new beginning, being with us, dwelling with him for the FIRST (ALPHA) TIME ever.

This then brings us to the name Immanuel - El is with us. Here Eloheem is truly Immanuel, here the consummation, goal, full realisation of that name is made by the Son who was given that name as a memorial to his function to make this happen for Yahuah's honor (pw glory). We see descriptive names given throughout scripture to various people in the scriptures which prophetically point to a future event or describe something that Yahuah is highlighting at the time. For more on Immanuel see Chapter 25

 Now that we have established shamayim (pw heaven) as a keyword relating to Alpha and Omega for Eloheem, here, let's see the final verse:

Here we know that it is Mashiach Yehoshua speaking since he refers to "His" commandments and not "my" commandments thus making it clear that he keeps the Father's commandments (Torah) as we are commanded to (Jn 15:10). A couple of verses later reveals it is, indeed, Yehoshua.

Rev 22:16 "I Yehoshua (pw Jesus) have sent mine malakh (pw angel) to declare (pw testify) unto you these things in the assemblies (pw churches)  I am the root and the offspring of David, and the bright and morning star. 

He mentions his fleshly end, last Adam (Omega) again as offspring of David but also reminds us that he is David's root (Alpha) in the flesh. We know that the foundation (idea / conception) of his flesh being slain was already from the foundation (idea / conception) of the world, the beginning of our or creation's time (alpha-omega period of the current earth and shamayim (pw heaven).

So, to summarise the order  1) Yahuah Alpha and Omega at Revelations 1:8, then  (2) Yehoshua Alpha and Omega, (3) Yahuah and  (4) Yehoshua Alpha and Omega at the end of Revelations (22:13).

So we see that Mashiach / the Anointed One (pw Christ) Yehoshua, the Son, is the Alpha and Omega beginning and end of the things of this earth, as appointed by his Father. Yahuah, too, is the beginning BUT of ALL creation including his own Son as well as the end of the earth when he makes a new earth. Thus the rank of the Son and purpose was and is to do his Father's will on earth, ie. be the Alpha and Omega upon Earth, to be the "causer" of Immanuel (Eloheem with us) so that Yahuah the Alpha and Omega can be the true Immanuel, Eloheem with us, in the new earth and new shamayim, the all in all  (see 1 Cor 15:28 again). "All in all" here would be Yahuah Eloheem fully supreme and fully seen.

Mashiach prays that he himself may be Alpha and Omega (the beginning and end of the goal or will of Yahuah) on earth as appointed, and that Yahuah be Alpha and Omega, starter and finisher of his overarching will in shamayim, and that their two purposes will be one and the same in unity. In this way the descriptive Alpha and Omega is shared by both the roles of the Father and the Son.

Conclusion

Yahuah, as well as Yehoshua, are the Alpha and Omega, Aleph and Tau , the first and last letter of the Hebrew alphabet. Hence we see them both described throughout Psalms 119, the longest Psalm, broken up into 21 segments corresponding to the Hebrew Alphabets, Aleph to Tau.

"Psalm 119 is a singularly complex alphabetic acrostic in that every line in an entire stanza begins with the same letter. So not just one verse, but eight verses start with the letter aleph—the next eight with beth, and so on, all the way through the Hebrew alphabet."

In this Psalm, the love for Yahuah's Torah is the central theme, and the KJV heads Psalm 119 as  "Your WORD is a lamp to my feet".

An example in the KJV

Psa 119:1  ALEPH. Blessed are the undefiled in the way, who walk in the law (Torah)  of Yahuah (pw the LORD).

and ends with the last verse under TAU

Psa 119:176  I have gone astray like a lost sheep; seek thy servant; for I do not forget thy commandments (Torah)

Thus we can safely say that the Aleph and Tau represent the fullness of the Torah to guide us.  Yahuah is that Torah  from the beginning, eternal. (Jn 1:1) And then the Word made flesh preached from beginning to end by Yehoshua in the flesh, and to be fulfilled by him on earth.
 
Although Mashiach (pw Christ) and Yahuah are not described specifically as Aleph and Tau within Psalm 119,  they are in Revelations.

Both are the beginnings of different things: Yahuah is the source, beginning of the Word making up Torah and creation. Mashiach (pw Christ) is the beginning of the ultimate witness or declaration of the Word, for which he was willing to die for- the causer (beginner) and ender (consummater) of our emunah (pw faith) as we respond to the Word of life. Two beginnings: Yahuah began life in his Son, His Son's life began to conquer death.

Alpha and Omega being used interchangeably between the Son Yehoshua (Son of Man) and the Father Yahuah can only be falsely used by Trinitarians to mean they are one-and-the-same holders of that name (Jesus=God fallacy). This would be as ridiculous as saying the two Simons in the scriptures are the same merely because they hold the same name whilst ignoring the different context and character of each.

Secondly, these names, Aleph and Tau, are descriptive titles only and not names in any case. They represent domains, two different domains. More importantly Yahuah has not said that the Alpha and Omega is an exclusive title for himself. He has said that his real name YAHUAH is exclusive and cannot be given to another. So, Trinitarians do the opposite always to what Yahuah commands. They make a title exclusive, that is not, so that they can break the Torah, and try to give the exclusive name YAHUAH to Yehoshua his son which is blasphemy.

Mashiach (pw Christ) the created Alpha and Omega points to (shows) his eternal Father the Alpha and Omega of creation to which Yahuah gave a beginning and an end:

Of course the Trinitarians twist this verse and say the Potentate is "Jesus" and he is going to show us he is God himself which of course is ridiculous since it is referring to Eloheem whom no man hath seen. Man has already seen Yehoshua so please give me a break with all the madness. Yehoshua is going to show us when he returns his Father Yahuah Eloheem whom no man hath seen.

Chapter 15

Yahuah and Yehoshua: Equal or Same?

Philippians 2:5 "Let this mind be in you, which was also in Mashiach (pw Christ) Yehoshua (pw Jesus) :  6 Who, being in the form of Eloheem (pw God), thought it not robbery to be equal with Eloheem (pw God):  7 But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men:  8 And being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the torture stake (Greek stauros)( pw cross).  9 Wherefore Eloheem (pw God) also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name:  10 That at the name of Yehoshua (pw Jesus)  every knee should bow, of things in shamayim (pw heaven), and things in earth, and things under the earth;  11 And that every tongue should confess that Yehoshua (pw Jesus)  Mashiach (pw Christ) is Master (pw Lord), to the splendor (pw glory) of Eloheem (pw God) the Father."

So, what does "being in the form of Eloheem (pw God)" really mean? To answer that we must ask what does "god/ God" mean. It has several meanings

G2316 Strong's Greek Concordance
θεός
theos
theh'-os
Of uncertain affinity; a deity, especially (with G3588) the supreme Divinity; figuratively a magistrate; by Hebraism very: - X exceeding, God, god [-ly, -ward].
Total KJV occurrences: 1343

It can obviously refer to Eloheem the supreme Creator (in other words not Yehoshua the Son) or it can refer to someone who has the form of Yah-likeness (pw godliness) in character or it can mean a magistrate (eloha/  pw god) appointed  by Yahuah. The former obviously can only apply to Eloheem whilst the two latter can apply to any man.

So, it means that Yehoshua has a form of Yah-likeness (pw godliness) or was in the form of a magistrate / judge appointed by Eloheem.  Both of these are  true in the case of Yehoshua. His character is of Eloheem obeying and teaching Torah. Secondly his appointment is to be a Righteous Judge (magistrate)

Jn 5:22 ... committed all judgment unto the Son:

which is the very argument he uses in Jn 10 against the false accusation that he is making himself to be Eloheem simply declaring to be the Son (who judges).

Hence he does not think it robbery to be equal with Eloheem in authority while he applies the given authority of the Torah from his Father. A policeman does not think it robbery to apply the law that he has been given authority to apply. etc....

Yehoshua then lowered Himself from an appointed place of authority to become a servant for us. Similarly a policeman has authority given to him which is equal to his law enforcement agency, but that does not mean he cannot lower himself to be a servant who may give up  his life to save some one.

Now, the name Michael has the Hebrew meaning: "who is like Eloheem (pw God)" We see that  Sethur in the Old Covenant was the Son of Michael. So, was this a blasphemy? A mere mortal with a name,  "who is like El(oheem)". How can it be? Let's say your name were Michael, perhaps it is - well, would that, in the strictest sense, be a kind of blasphemy? Perhaps if you were not behaving as Eloheem. That would be using that name in vain since you did not live up to it. That would be robbery, misrepresentation, abuse of power or fraud, in the Hebrew sense, when it comes to a name. 

The straightforward answer then is, that this is not blasphemy or robbery to be equal with Eloheem when it comes to Mashiach himself since He lived up to the name of his Father. In so doing He has come as an example for us all to be Michael, like El (pw God) IN CHARACTER. What does that badly translated word “godly” or “godliness” mean? The whole of Christianity reads it but IGNORES IT. They insist that their pagan word "god" means the Almighty of the scriptures but reject it as being the very nature of Eloheem when it is written "godliness" by their own corrupted translators. There is no replacement for it. 

Paul uses this word and it can only mean to be Yahuah-like. Is it robbery of Eloheem's very throne and sovereign power, or is it his goal and will for us, to be like him in nature, righteous? It is of course the latter since Satan rejects the latter in favour of trying to gain the former. To be equal with Eloheem is not to obtain his position which consists of his sovereignty, omniscience, self-existence, omnipotence, no it is to  have his character of righteousness. As you will remember Satan tempted Yehoshua not with offering him the power to have the righteous character of Eloheem (pw God), no, but offered him the position to rule over an earthly reign ( pw kingdom) at the expense of unrighteous worship of Satan himself. 

Apostle Paul defines the mystery of Yah-likeness ( pw "godliness"). 

1 Tim 3:16 And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness (Yah-likeness): which was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of malakhim (pw angels) , preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into honor (pw glory).

So "godliness" / piety, being morally set apart from the ways of the world  - pure humility as manifest in Yehoshua who was humble enough to obey the Father unto pureness (pw holiness). This is why we do not see it robbery to be like the Father in purity and be obedient to Him. This is not SELF-RIGHTEOUSNESS but HIS righteousness that we follow by the power of his spirit. It was the Father too who was humble and stooped down to us by giving His Son so that we may repent and have our Torah transgressions (pw sins) washed away by his Son's offering (pw sacrifice).  So, Mashiach showed equal humility when he stooped down to us and died for us so that we could be in equality to His Father's baruch'd (pw blessed) nature, having our past Torah transgressions (pw sins) forgiven. The Son himself has told us to be equal to his Father as well, of course in nature again, not poisition in the following verse

Mat 5:48  Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in shamayim (pw heaven) is perfect. 

The word perfect here is telios which we cover elsewhere in this article. According to Strong's Greek it clearly refers to character: 

tel'-i-os
From G5056; complete (in various applications of labor, growth, mental and moral character, etc.); neuter (as noun, with G3588) completeness: - of full age, man, perfect.

The likeness or equality is not about having the same throne of Yahuah in shamayim (pw heaven) but about the work and nature that is similar or equal. Thus we too are encouraged to be Michael, like Yahuah in moral purity by obedience to Yahuah.

Do I speak blasphemy? No! Read again 

Phillipians 2:5 Let this mind be in you, which was also in Mashiach (pw Christ) Yehoshua (pw Jesus) : 6 Who, being in the form of Eloheem (pw God), thought it not robbery to be equal with Eloheem (pw God): 7 But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men: 8 And being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the stake (pw cross).

This nature has been the nature of Yahuah since he, in reality, stooped down to us by sending his Son as saviour when we did not deserve it, while we were Torah transgressors (pw sinners) at the time.

Read that again and read it until you get the truth in your heart and mind. Paul is saying Yehoshua did not think it robbery to be like Yahuah (michael), (pw god-like, godly), and HE IS TELLING YOU TO BE LIKE-MINDED. He is saying you must have this same attitude in your mind. He is not telling you to be a Trinitarian, or that Yehoshua is a Trinitarian, or for you to form a Trinity by being like-minded, ie. equal to Eloheem (pw God) in substance and sovereignty - that is insane. He wants us to be equal in character of righteousness in our work as servants  (laborers) of Yahuah under the authority of Torah.

Further on in Phillipians Apostle Shaul (Paul) reconnects the mind that must be in the disciples as it relates to "labor", a word listed in the definition of telios (perfect).

Php 4:2  I beseech Euodias, and beseech Syntyche, that they be of the same mind in the Master (pw Lord).
Php 4:3  And I intreat thee also, true yokefellow, help those women which laboured with me in the gospel, with Clement also, and with other my fellowlabourers, whose names are in the book of life.

From Philllipians 2:5 we can also clear up the equality of "form" versus "likeness". Yehoshua is "in the form of Eloheem" verse 6. "form" here is:

Greek: 3444 morphe mor-fay' perhaps from the base of 3313 (through the idea of adjustment of parts); shape; figuratively, nature:--form. see GREEK for 3313 

It is not equal substance or shape as Trinitarian heretics try to imply. That contradicts the statement by Yahuah himself that he is not a man or the son of man but is spirit. If "form" here meant shape or substance we would have difficulty understanding then how he has the "form" shape or substance of a man servant:

 verse 7 "and took upon him the form (3444) of a servant"

Does a servant have a particular shape or substance that we should be aware of? Should they be shaped like a broom and be made of a woody substance or something stupid like that? No, of course not, it refers to NATURE - CHARACTER - ATTITUDE and so does the "form of Eloheem" refer to equal or same nature - Yah-like!

Isos

Let us examine this word "equal" more closely to confirm its correct meaning.  

[*StrongsGreek*]
2470 isos ee'-sos probably from 1492 (through the idea of seeming); similar (in amount and kind):--+ agree, as much, equal, like. see GREEK for 1492

In this context the word's meaning is "agree" since the context is let this mind be in you. Paul is saying your mind should agree with Yahuah, be equal with him, and then react, become obedient to him as Mashiach agreed with him and became obedient even to death. It would also fit in with "like" since one can be like-minded and Yahuah-like in nature.  Also note the word equal must hold "through the idea of seeming" it appears as though Yehoshua is equal by having the character of Yahuah but he is not literally equal just as an earthly son and father seem to appear alike by character but are not literally the same. 

This word "isos" is seen only one other place in the New Testament. Here the Jews used it in Jn 5:18. However there they made the false conclusion and accusation that He was making himself "equal" with or to Eloheem (pw God) or "as much" Eloheem (pw God). "As much God" sounds almost identical as the phrase "indeed the very God", invented by the Trinity liars. Here Yehoshua responded to their allegation as he knew they accused him of being Eloheem the source of power and authority which he is not. He simply has been given authority and power. He promptly corrects them.


So the false religious system, then and now, propogates the same lie that Yehoshua (pw Jesus) claims to be Eloheem (pw God) when he clearly does not. One was a false accusation and the other now has become a false doctrine.

It is interesting how similar this Greek word "isos" sounds to Esus, the pagan Gallic god pictured on the left. In fact, in Latin "isos" would be spelt "esus". One would also see the striking closeness of Iesus( for Jesus) in Welsh and Greek Iesous (for Jesus). This would finally lead to further paganising the Mashiach's (pw Christ's) name to Jesus. Some have debunked this, saying that Esus is unconnected, being an Indo-European word while Jesus is a semitic word. This is of course not true since Jesus is not semitic at all but a transliteraion, not just one transliteration but several through Greek and Latin etc, from the true semitic word, Yehoshua.

This was only recently done so it was easy to manipulate it towards the same sound of a pre-existing pagan god. Esus can be spelt Hesus and Jesus and in Hispanic is still pronounced Hey Zeus today whilst Esus has a connection to Zeus as well.  A "J" merely inserted for no reason except a de-Affrication excuse gives J-esus.  Pagans would feel at home with a pagan god sounding similar, and perhaps there is a connection with the further similar sounding (isos) to make the incorrect connection to the meaning of "equal", equal to the Almighty Eloheem himself, the very same false accusation against the Son Yehoshua by the Pharisees. This would be the perfect step towards the preparation and acceptance of a Trinity heresy. Thus pagan transliteration made it easy to manipulate the name away from his only true and real name, Yehoshua, containing Yah (uah), and thus away from Yahuah, away from Yahuah-likeness and towards a new,  and equal Trinity "god" devoid of Torah.

High Standards = Robbery?

Why would it even be considered robbery by some if one is of a nature and character that agrees with Eloheem? Simply because Yah-likeness is so foreign to a corrupted, Torah-less world, impotent of Yah's spirit, who teaches "we cannot keep the law" even after the redepmtion and spirit of Yahuah is upon us! It therefore would appear as if the one who aimed towards the standards of Yahuah's nature would be seen as being so foreign, as if one were trying to be Eloheem (pw God) himself, when, in fact, Eloheem wants us to all be like him in character- that is why he gave us Torah. This was the very false accusation levelled against Mashiach (pw Christ) for being an obedient Son of Eloheem in the midst of a corrupt and Torahless Jerusalem.



The false religion pretends to have an appearance of religion but denies the power of the one true religion which is of Yahuah. This pure religion gives us the power to become the Sons of Eloheem (pw God) to be equal in agreement with his character, Torah.

Chapter 16

Trinity Stumbling Block - Chasing Thrones

It is Satan who wants to be "isos" in the context of equal, as much Eloheem (pw God) only in the sense of having his throne and sovereignty itself and even be above Eloheem. That is robbery.

Is 14:12 How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations! 13 For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into shamayim (pw heaven), I WILL EXALT MY THRONE ABOVE THE STARS OF Yahuah: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north: 14 I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High. 15 Yet thou shalt be brought down to gehenna, to the sides of the pit.

The Trinity gospel inverts the truth and places Yehoshua as one who wants to merely ascend to the throne and be equal, if not higher than the Almighty these days with the forsaking of Torah. The false Catholic Mary evidently represents that Satanic spirit. It is not about the throne of Yehoshua but the work and nature that is equal, and the same mind should be in us. Even the right-hand position on the throne next to the Father, he attributes it by giving splendor to Yahuah.

Let us look at a good example of chasing thrones.

Mat 20:20 ¶Then came to him the mother of Zebedee’s children with her sons, worshipping him, and desiring a certain thing of him. 21 And he said unto her, What wilt thou? She saith unto him, Grant that these my two sons may sit, the one on thy right hand, and the other on the left, in thy rule and reign (pw kingdom). 22 But Yehoshua (pw Jesus) answered and said, Ye know not what ye ask. Are ye able to drink of the cup that I shall drink of, and to be immersed (pw baptized) with the immersion (pw baptism) that I am immersed (pw baptized) with? They say unto him, We are able. 23 And he saith unto them, Ye shall drink indeed of my cup, and be baptized with the immersion (pw baptism) that I am immersed (pw baptized) with: but to sit on my right hand, and on my left, is not mine to give, but it shall be given to them for whom it is prepared of my Father. 24 And when the ten heard it, they were moved with indignation against the two brethren. 25 But Yehoshua (pw Jesus) called them unto him, and said, Ye know that the princes of the Gentiles exercise dominion over them, and they that are great exercise authority upon them. 26 But it shall not be so among you: but whosoever will be great among you, let him be your minister; 27 And whosoever will be chief among you, let him be your servant: 28 Even as the Son of man came not to be ministered unto, but to minister, and to give his life a ransom for many.

The two brothers were rebuked - they were thinking like trinitarians, they wanted to sit on either side of Yehoshua as though he were Eloheem (pw God) Almighty, almost as if they could complete a triad on a throne with him as demigods, after all, trinities were already popular amongst Hellinistic Jews. Yehoshua clearly rebuked them for thinking about thrones instead of servanthood, they were beginning to sound like the King of Tyre, Satanic. LORDING over is the heathen way - throne obsessed. This is the Papal way, trying to sieze power from the Father and making void his Torah with "church canons". The daughter Protestant churches (word founded upon pagan deity Circe) have also mostly followed suite. The Baptist church, for example, has over 2000 created laws, but like the Catholics it abolishes the seventh day sabbath and denies keeping Torah in general, which has only, more or less, 600 laws many not even applicable due to Yehoshua's redemption and the destruction of the haykal (pw temple). Since we, who are believers under Mashiach (pw Christ), have been put to death in the flesh on the stake and live in the spirit we too can aim to be Yahuah-like as servants to his Torah. 

Is it any wonder then that the pagan translators siezed upon another pagan idea by having the sons of Zebedee being surnamed "Sons of Thunder" as though being followers of the now paganised (J)Zeus, perhaps making them then sons of the god Zeus, the god of thunder. Would this not be a perfect image of a Trinity with (J)Zeus  seated in the middle upon a throne, rather than the true Yehoshua on the right hand of Yahuah his Father? The truth is, Yehoshua named the brothers "Boanerges" which means sons of commotion. You will see that whilst Strong's states it as exactly that, the translators still insist on translating it as "sons of thunder"!: 

Mark 3:17 And James the son of Zebedee, and John the brother of James; and he surnamed them Boanerges (strongs 993: sons of commotion), which is, The sons of thunder.

Yehoshua crushes any idea of gods on thrones by emphasising men as servants, using himself as the very example. Yehoshua does not have a god complex, contrary to popular pagan trinitarians who have attempted to portray Him as such. In the same way the Sons of Zebedee were slipping towards a type of trinitarian god complex before being rebuked by Yehoshua.They were forgetting and usurping the Father, just as pagan Christianismos does with its Torahless Jesus/(J)Zeus. Yehoshua emphatically leaves it to the Father to decide who if any will sit on either side of Him in ruling and reigning. Yehoshua is not Eloheem the Father and has no say in such a matter. He is the servant Son of Yahuah.

Chapter 17

The "I AM" Or "I am"?

Trinitarians love to turn mere words into pronouns and then make those pronouns to be names to prove that the pagan name "Jesus" , or even the real Mashiach (pw Christ) Yehoshua, somehow bears the name and position of the Sovereign Eloheem, and thus they claim he is Eloheem. Their favorite is:

"I am" in this case should be: "I exist" or  "I was".  We cannot make it a pronoun by adding capitals and making it into a name.

Strongs Concordance: am=1510 eimi i-mee' I exist (used only when emphatic):--am, have been, ie. it is I, was.

Yehoshua is merely stating that his foreshadow existed before Abraham which we will explain. Even if he did precede Abraham literally would that make him Eloheem. No?  The whole host of malakhim (pw angels) existed before Abraham too. This does not make them Eloheem.  It proves that Yehoshua's fleshly existence was a fore-odained plan from the foundation of the world unlike any other man on earth ever was or will be. He was Yahuah's first begotten Son. Yehoshua had existed in the mind (bosom) of Yahuah before the worlds. 

As we note, the son is still talking and praying to the Father as the Son, and as we keep showing, will always be subject to the Father Eloheem (Almighty), He is never Eloheem himself. 

1 Cor 15:28 And when all things shall be subdued unto him, then shall the Son also himself be subject unto him that put all things under him, that Eloheem (the Almighty) may be all in all.

Please note "I exist" in Jn 8 above and "It is I" in: 

Mat 14:27"But straightway Yehoshua (pw Jesus) spake unto them, saying, Be of good cheer; it is I; be not afraid."

are BOTH just two of the same words in each case ego(I) and eimi (I exist).

Mat 8:9  For I am (ego eimi) a man under authority, having soldiers under me: and I say to this man, Go, and he goeth; and to another, Come, and he cometh; and to my servant, Do this, and he doeth it.

Here the exact same use Greek : ego (I) and Greek: eimi (I exist) are used and obviously the centurion is not "I AM" either.

Now, let's be logical and obedient to the revelation by the pure Ruach (pure Breath of Yahuah - not the Holi Babylon Hindu Spirit) as recorded in

Matthew 14:33 "Then they that were in the ship came and worshipped him, saying, Of a truth thou art the Son of Eloheem (pw God)."

So this is what the Apostles realised of Mashiach (pw Christ) - He is the Son of Eloheem (pw God). This "Son of Eloheem (pw God)" principle is clearly given by the pure Ruach (pw Holy Spirit) and anything contrary is made up by flesh and blood (doctrines of men).

Mat 16:15 "He saith unto them, But whom say ye that I am?   16 And Peter answered and said, Thou art the Mashiach (pw Christ), the Son of the living Eloheem (pw God).  17 And Yehoshua (pw Jesus) answered and said unto him, baruch'd (pw blessed) art thou, Simon Bar–jona: for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in shamayim (pw heaven)."

Here again Mashiach (pw Christ) says, but whom say ye that "I am". Peter does not say, yes, you are I AM, does he? No, because it is preposterous - he says, in fact, Thou art the Mashiach (pw Christ), the Son of the living Eloheem (pw God). If "I am" was ever to be a pronoun "I AM" here would have been the best time to state it.

* KJV adds "he" here. So it should read "then shall you know that I exist (ego eimi) and do nothing of myself." Quite conveniently one would think if the "he" were NOT inserted then ego eimi should be again considered as one of those ridiculous pronouns where Yehoshua is speaking in code and saying "then shall you know that I AM". But it would not work and the lie would be exposed since the Son says right after that that he cannot do anything but only what is taught to him by his Father (who is  the I AM that I AM). Instead, he says then shall ye know that I exist and that I do nothing of myself;  I exist and do nothing of my self, in fact, attributing his very existence to that of the one-and-only I AM THAT I AM (self existent one) - his Father. In fact Yehoshua would not exist if he were not raised back to life by the Father Yahuah.

These" I AM" deceivers do not even try to insert such a thing here when it is blatantly opposed in the very same sentence by the Father's contrasting presence and superiority. The trick of their "I AMs" are only effective to the fast asleep in that context where the Father's supremacy is absent in the verse.

 A Methodist Minister recently used these verses as evidence for his lie:



He has clearly challenged them on their wicked Torahless conclusion which they have jumped to saying he said he is Eloheem which he DID NOT!

Finally Matthew begins with

So, how is it that Yehoshua can be the Son of Abraham but exist before Abraham? Yehoshua is simply stating that he is of the order of Melchizedek who preceded Abraham as a priestly King. He is highlighting the fact that his authority exceeds that of Abraham. Abraham paid tithes to Melchizedek not the other way around. He is simply stating he is representing the pure word of Yahuah as did Melchezidek which means King of Righteousness and his place in the order of things. Foreshadows are seen elsewhere as with Elijah and Yahuchanon (John) the second Elijah etc...

Chapter 18

Let Us Make Man In Our Image - Did The All-Powerful creator need help?

 Gen 1:26 "And Eloheem (pw God) said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness..."

The Hebrew for the Almighty here (pw God) is Eloheem which is plural for Eloah (singular). Yahuah Eloheem is in plural not because He is a three headed G-o-d but because Hebrew uses the plural when it wishes to express intensity and fullness. An example of this is seen for the word "wisdom" spelt, chokmah,  singular (eg. Ex 35:31), and wisdom plural spelt, chokmowth, (eg. Ps 49:3). Obviously wisdom is wisdom and the plural sense conveys intensity and fullness when in the plural.  Thus, for Eloheem, plural of Eloha, the Almighty is the Mightiest of the Mighties, ie. he is ALL mighty. It does not in this case mean plurality by number but plurality by power and position. This is further confirmed by scripture that the Master Eloheem (plural) remains ONE, ie. the great ALL Mighty ONE.

It is clear that there is only ONE self-existent ONE יהוה Yahuah from the beginning.  It is made clear early on in Genesis that Yahuah is the Most high el /  Most high Almighty / Supreme Almighty / elyown el. That he is the possessor of shamayim (pw heaven) and earth itself.

  Gen 14:19 ...baruch'd (pw blessed) be Abram of the most high el (elyown el), possessor of shamayim (pw heaven) and earth:

When it says

People are quick to think that Yahuah is speaking to another part of himself or to his Son and some Holi ghost god at this stage, as if he needed help with His creation and was not the All Powerful Eloheem. This thinking is very prominent again from the pagan Vatican (Minister of death) where Eloheem is blasphemed and not seen as Supreme and all powerful and needed help with his creation, thus a few extra gods should be thrown in, ah, yes, a Trinity should do the trick and a little evolution as well, or so they think as they try to undermine Yahuah's sovereignty. 

If that were so it would state who he is speaking to but it does not. The word "us" is simply not there, it is merely inserted. The word "said" has great latitude in meaning, not necessarily meaning a dialogue with one or more entities. It can again refer

to thought, desire, command, etc, it is the Hebrew word, amar:

Strong's Hebrew 559 'amar aw-mar' a primitive root; to say (used with great latitude):--answer, appoint, avouch, bid, boast self, call, certify, challenge, charge, + (at the, give) command(-ment), commune, consider, declare, demand, X desire, determine, X expressly, X indeed, X intend, name, X plainly, promise, publish, report, require, say, speak (against, of), X still, X suppose, talk, tell, term, X that is, X think, use (speech), utter, X verily, X yet.

Isaiah 45:5 "I am Yahuah (pw LORD), and there is none else, there is no Eloheem (PLURAL) (pw God) beside me: I girded thee, though thou hast not known me:  6 That they may know from the rising of the sun, and from the west, that there is none beside me. I am Yahuah (pw LORD), and there is none else.  7 I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I Yahuah (pw LORD) do all these things".

Yahuah is saying that He alone is Eloheem (ie. emphatic plural of Eloah - ALL Mighty One) and that there is no other Eloheem (ie. emphatic plural Eloah Mighty One). There may indeed be a mighty one (eloha), a god (created by man), singular upon the earth, and simply by their numbers they become plural. However, what Yahuah is saying is that their plurality by numbers can never be mightier than the emphatic plural Eloheem since he remains ONE and yet greater than any number of mighty ones.

Chapter 19

Own Blood of Eloheem, The Spirit or The Son?

Remembering that Eloheem is not a man (chapter 2), it follows that he does not bleed, thus, when some use the following verse to prove 'Jesus is God' they are digging themselves into a deeper hole by reducing Eloheem to a mortal man, as did the pagan translators with their Trinity bias here:


Oi vey ! How convenient for promoting the Jesus God who bleeds eternally and never dies with the transubstantiation and eucharist abomination . See



Yehoshua is Yahuah's own Son, thus his own kindred by Spirit but born of a woman in the flesh. Thus it should read:

Chapter 20

For unto us a child is born...The mighty God?

A verse that 's widely used as evidence that Yehoshua is Eloheem (pw God) Himself is the following as it appears in KJV:

Isaiah 9:6 For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty Eloheem (pw God), The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace.

Incorrect use of this verse has done much damage in keeping Judaisers in Judaism causing them to reject any idea of a Mashiach (pw Christ) being prophesied here because the perverse Christian version of this Mashiach (pw Christ) usurps Eloheem, making himself Eloheem. That is not the case!!

The question is, who is the "He" being referred to here? It is clear that the Father always receives splendor (pw glory) through the action of the Son, especially at the very end.

Satan (Santa) the father of lies, the father of pagan gods also known as 
Nick, the devil.

1 Cor 15:26 The last enemy that shall be destroyed is death. 27 For he (Father Eloheem (pw God)) hath put all things under his (Son's) feet. But when he saith all things are put under him (Son), it is manifest that he (Father Eloheem (pw God)) is excepted, which did put all things under him (Son). 28 And when all things shall be subdued unto him (Son), then shall the Son also himself be subject unto him (the Father) that put all things under him, that Eloheem (pw God) may be all in all.

Now, as in the above verse it is important, firstly, to make a distinction between the "He" and that it is the Father and Son who are differentiated between, not melded into one as those who quote Isaiah 9:6 would like to make you believe. So, from 1 Cor 15:26 the ultimate conclusion is that, the government upon the shoulders of the Son is handed back to the Father so that the Father may receive pre-eminence (be all in all) and be distinctly known as the Father. In other words, the reason for the Son coming and being given the government upon His shoulders was not to create a confusion of Son = God, but on the contrary, that Son = Son and Yahuah Eloheem working together  which = Yahuah Eloheem all in all. Now, take note, the word excepted! in Verse 27. It is shown that Eloheem (pw God) is excepted when putting everything under the Son. 

Full Definition of except : transitive verb : to take or leave out from a number or a whole : exclude

Merriam Webster

So, when it says, all things are put under the Son, it is clear that that EXCLUDES the Father who still reigns supreme. So, it also follows that Yehoshua is himself still subject TO the Father. In other words the Son of Eloheem rules to show how much He is not Eloheem by the very fact that He returns his rule to the Father when he has accomplished his Father's appointed purposes. 

Now, if we apply Isaiah 9:6 and ask, when was Yehoshua (pw Jesus) called any of these names whilst on earth? I believe we would find it difficult to answer. Yehoshua is certainly referred to as a Prince, which simply means, ruler or chief, etc. and he has been made ruler over all things by the Father as we have just stated. However, Yehoshua (pw Jesus) is not referred to as the Prince of Peace. In fact, he clearly said he did not come to earth to bring peace here.

Mat 10:34 Think not that I am come to send shalom (pw peace) on earth: I came not to send shalom (pw peace), but a sword.

The Son, I believe, is clearly telling us not to confuse the title, Prince of Peace, in Isaiah directly with himself. It would not be the first time prophecy has been confused, as with the prophecy of Jeremiah when the Jews expected Mashiach (pw Christ) to ride upon a horse but he came upon an ass.(two different prophecies). So, can we ascribe this title to him here? No. Yehoshua (pw Jesus) has been called the Prince of the kings of the earth (Rev 1:5), Prince of life (Acts 3:15) and Prince and Saviour (Acts 5:31), but never Prince or Ruler of Peace! What about Wonderful Counsellor?  Nowhere to be seen when referring to the Trinitarians' "Jesus", but we do hear Paul referring to Yahuah (pw God the Father) as the counsellor.

Rom 11:34 For who hath known the mind of the Master (pw Lord)? or who hath been his counsellor?

Proof that it is Master Eloheem and not Master Yehoshua here, since Paul knows his scriptures and quotes them from the Tanakh (pw Old Testament).

Isaiah 40:13 Who hath directed the Spirit of Yahuah (pw LORD) or being his counsellor hath taught him?

The pagan corrupted rendering of LORD in capitals always refers to the proper name יהוה meaning Yahuah, I am that I am, the self existent one. This can be distinguished from "Lord" lower case which simply refers to a title - Master. Of course the modern translation of the  everlasting covenant (pw New Testament) does not distinguish, making it appear as if the Master Yehoshua and the Master Yahuah are one and the same, which they are not! The translators did their best in hiding Yahuah the Father's name, trying to eradicate it. So, here Isaiah is clearly referring to Eloheem (pw God) the Father who taught (counselled, advised) the Son. Marcion would have some thinking that the Son counselled the Father, telling him his Torah is evil and to be done away with - Yah forbid!

Take note that no man can direct the Spirit of Yahuah as stated in the verse above. Yahuah is Spirit and Yehoshua is flesh. Therefore Yehoshua does not direct Yahuah but Yahuah directs Yehoshua through his Spirit. Once again Yehoshua is not Eloheem.

Jn 14:10 Believest thou not that I am in the Father, and the Father in me? the words that I speak unto you I speak not of myself (*not of my own authority or counsel): but the Father that dwelleth in me, he doeth the works.

*my own words

Back to  Isaiah as it appears in KJV: 

Isaiah 9:6 For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty Eloheem (pw God), The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace.

Now we shall see the best effort yet by the devious translators and how they have twisted this verse even to try to deceive the Hebrews into thinking that "Jesus is God", so much so that these Jews discount these Messianic verses altogether as referring to the Mashiach (pw Christ) because of this idolatrous idea, and rightly so. However, the Jews take advantage of such a glaring opportunity to simply deny the Son and try to make Son refer to Israel, which is ridiculous, and it will cost their souls as they continue to prefer their own idolatry of Judaism - following rabbis and men's flawed teachings, and deny the Son.

The first part is fine and straight foward 

For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given...

referring to the son being born and given to us, which is the Son of Yahuah, who was certainly given to us as an offering for redemption (pw sacrifice).

The second part refers to the authority placed by the Father upon his son's shoulders, a ruler (Prince) over all things EXCEPT Yahuah himself, as described above in 1 Cor 15:26.

At first we see

...and the government shall be upon his shoulder...

But then we come to the more deceptive third part 

... and his name shall be called Wonderful,  Counsellor, The mighty Eloheem (pw God), The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace.

This horrendous translation makes it appear as if this "Jesus" would in the future be called, amongst other things, the everlasting Father and mighty Eloheem. This blasphemy contradicts the sovereignty of Eloheem and everything we have just proven using the scriptures themselves, and when scripture appears to contradict itself it is usually one of several things: wrong understanding, wrong context, wrong translation, etc. In this case it is clearly wrong translation because of a Catholic Trinity bias and Marcion spirit. Isaiah was prophesying in the name of Yahuah, not in the name of the Catholic "church" who invented pagan "Jesus-is-God" doctrine much later. Now I shall prove to you what it should say.

Taking all the Hebrew words in the phrase using Strong's and comparing them to the KJV (top row):

and	his	name	shall	be	called
		08034  shem shame a primitive word (perhaps rather from 7760 through the idea of definite and conspicuous position; compare 8064);  an appellation, as a mark or memorial of individuality; by implication  honor, authority, character:--+ base, (in-)fame(-ous), named(-d), renown, report. see HEBREW for 07760 see HEBREW for 08064	hâyâh haw-yaw' A primitive root (compare H1933); to exist, that is, be or become, come to pass (always emphatic, and not a mere copula or auxiliary): - beacon, X altogether, be (-come, accomplished, committed, like), break, cause, come (to pass), continue, do, faint, fall, + follow, happen, X have, last, pertain, quit (one-) self, require, X use.		07121 qara' kaw-raw' a primitive root (rather identical with 7122 through the idea of accosting a person met); to call out to (i.e. properly, address by name, but used in a wide variety of applications):--bewray (self), that are bidden, call (for, forth, self, upon), cry (unto), (be) famous, guest, invite, mention, (give)  name, preach, (make) proclaim(- ation), pronounce, publish, read, renowned,  say. see HEBREW for 07122

Firstly it becomes clear that "and his" is not really there. Secondly translating "qara" as "called" throws all the Father's titles onto the inserted"his", ie. the Son, which is a lie. "qara" is used a number of times to denote proclaiming, publishing, preaching the name of Yahuah. The very fact that the Son is born of the Father, it follows that the son receives the authority that comes with the office of honor given by the Father and the Father receives the honor in return since the Son serves the Father with honor and proclaims his names Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty Eloheem (pw God), The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace by preaching his Word.

Examples of "qara":

Here we see the same word used for both "called" and "proclaimed" in the same verse.

Now thirdly in the table above we see that the "shall be" is central to the confusion. Here it would either imply that Yahuah Eloheem will be in the future called Wonderful Counsellor, The mighty Eloheem (pw God), The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace. or if you are Trinitarian, that this "Jesus" in the future will be called these things including Mighty God since he is of course this G-o-d in the eyes of the pagan trinitarian. But what if the correct translation were used having "shall be" replaced with the alternate "that is". Obviously these names of the eternal Father have been eternally existent and they are not something future, they have existed always.  He has always been the Mighty Eloheem (pw God) so there is no "shall be" it is simply ridiculous and like stating the obvious. Instead the correct translation "that is" refers to the names that are in existence already, the names of Yahuah eternal.

Thus Isaiah 9:6 is more likely stating the following:

For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government (of Yahuah) is* upon his (the son's) shoulder: and the name that is proclaimed and preached is Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty Eloheem, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace.

*I have replaced the first "shall be", which appears in the KJV but not in Hebrew, with "that is".You will notice how the tense now all makes sense.

The descriptive name has the title, "Everlasting Father". "Everlasting Father" cannot be given to the Son. So the Father's name is clearly being referred to here, not the Son. Specifically, He is an "Everlasting Father" in that his Son has been begotten and been given eternal life. If his Son had died the name "Everlasting Father" could not be true since an Eternal Father has an Eternal Son, and all the more since that Son has inherited us who believe on Him as sons who shall also be eternal. It is therefore the Eternal Father who is Wonderful Counsellor, The Mighty Eloheem, and that is only fully revealed in all its majesty when his Eternal Son has accomplished his appointed office. Note the title, Mighty Eloheem = The Mighty Mighty one = The ALL MIGHTY ONE,  or in Hebrew El Elyon and not little "gods", as some try to argue.

Eloheem Alone Is The Wonderful Counsellor Not Yehoshua

Many do not realise that Yehoshua clearly showed that he is not  the Wonderful Counsellor.  The Son receives Counsel from the Father, hence He himself said, why do you call me good Rabbi (teacher / master), there is only ONE good teacher, counsellor, that is the Father - he stated that categorically!!

 Luke 18:18 And a certain ruler asked him, saying, Good Master (didaskolas - teacher), what shall I do to inherit eternal life?  19 And Yehoshua (pw Jesus) said unto him, Why callest thou me good? none is good, save one, that is, Eloheem (pw God). 20 Thou knowest the commandments, Do not commit adultery...

The emphasis is not on good but on teacher. Obviously Mashiach (pw Christ) is good, he is the Good Shepherd, but the teaching and resulting goodness is not his own, the source is

FROM HIS FATHER, THE-ONE-AND-ONLY-GOOD SOURCE OF TEACHING.

Yehoshua was not his Father since he was born "according to the law". What law? The law of sin and death. Yehoshua was born inheriting fallen man's original Torah transgression reward in the flesh which he overcame.

So, anyone who claims that there is a 'Jesus' who brings his own new good news teaching called a New Testament or his own new good news Gospel / Godspell (from German Gott spell) is a liar and blasphemer . He brings the Father's everlasting teaching which is the commandments (Torah) of Yahuah. His Son refers to them as the good teaching of his Father.

"Thou knowest the commandments, Do not commit adultery...etc" He does not refer to a lawless Protestant, Catholic, Charismatic, Pentecostal, Trinity doctrine etc., a new replacement religion called Christianismos / Christianity? NO!

he refers to his Father's Torah PERIOD!!

Yahuah's Name is Put Upon His Apointed Ruler and Children

Here we see how Yahuah puts his name upon all the children of Eloheem by the priestly baruch (pw blessing). That name includes the name "THAT IS" (not "shall be") Wonderful Counsellor, The mighty Eloheem (pw God), The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace.  This in no way makes the children of Yshrel Eloheem themselves, it simply means they bear his authority over them and thus should proclaim His name in deed and word and be baruch'd. They are children or citizens of his government.  Yehoshua was given the headship over this government and thus Yahuah placed his name (authority) Wonderful Counsellor, The Mighty Eloheem (pw God), The Everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace upon Yehoshua's shoulders as well.

Now, what does Isaiah say further along, referring to the government itself?

Isaiah 9:7 Of the increase of his government and peace there shall be no end, upon the throne of David, and upon his kingdom, to order it, and to establish it with judgment and with justice from henceforth even for ever.

Now, as we have seen, the government ended for David but was revived through the line of David in Yehoshua (the root and offspring of David). But this government ends again as Yehoshua hands it over to Eloheem (pw God) (1 Cor 15:26). So who is the "his" in "his government" obviously the eternal Eloheem, the Father, whose rule does NOT end. The government obviously has increased and is increasing for the Father, since we, his believing sons, who Yehoshua has inherited, are ruled over with justice and shalom (pw peace) in the everlasting kingdom, for He, the Almighty, is the King of the saints and they serve Him.

Revelation 15:3 And they sing the song of Moses the servant of Eloheem (pw God), AND the song of the Lamb, saying, Great and marvellous are thy works, Master (pw Lord) Eloheem (pw God) Almighty; just and true are thy ways, thou King of saints.

We see that Eloheem AND the Lamb each have thrones in that kingdom, as will the 12 disciples as well.

Luke 22:30 That ye may eat and drink at my table in my kingdom, and sit on thrones judging the twelve tribes of Yshrel (pw Israel).

But there is a hierarchy, not a shared sovereign authority. The mere fact that the 12 disciples will be sitting on thrones does not make them demigods or idols, neither is Yehoshua made so, since Yahuah is Eloheem (pw God) Almighty on His throne. The point is, who is the King at the end of the day, but the Almighty? Nobody sits on HIS throne, period! There is none besides Him! While Mashiach (pw Christ) may sit beside him that does not replace the Father who still sits on the Almighty throne, there is none besides him ( ie. that replaces that very position and supreme power).

Rev 2:23 And there shall be no more curse: but the throne of Eloheem AND of the Lamb shall be in it; and his servants shall serve him*:

(*Him - being Eloheem (pw God), not "Jesus", nor both, otherwise it would state "them" plural in line with "and")

Revelation 22:1 And he shewed me a pure river of water of life, clear as crystal, proceeding out of the throne of Eloheem (pw God) AND of the Lamb.

 Now let's back up a bit in Isaiah 9 again, verse 6 

"For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given." 

So, it is immediately clear that Mashiach (pw Christ) is born of the flesh, but more importantly, when it says, a son is given, the Hebrew for son, "ben" directly translated means, a builder of the family name. So, what Isaiah is saying is that, son, refers to the Builder of the Name, but not that he is that person - he carries what it stands for. He upholds the family name of the Father - YAHUAH. The government is placed upon his son's shoulders. In other words, the Mashiach (pw Christ) came to build the name of Yahuah so that ultimately we will live to recognise, witness and enjoy the Almighty's full titles as Prince of Peace, Wonderful (,) Counsellor, Mighty God (Yahuah) and Everlasting Father. Yahuah's name will be magnified as prophesied since there will be no more war or tears.

Does Isaiah Prophesy Sonship Or Sovereignty of Yehoshua?

It is clear that it was a struggle for others as well in determining who is who in the prophecy of Isaiah at times. In Acts we see Philip having to clear the eunuch's confusion. The result is a test case for us as to who Isaiah reveals Yehoshua as. If we are to know who Yehoshua is revealed as, this would have to be it. Philip only had a brief encounter with the man and he would not have left the man with a half-baked revelation. He surely would have quoted the above verse we have just discussed in Isa 9:6  to claim this child is "mighty God".

Let us see what happens:

This was a struggle even with reference to a single "he" and so Isaiah 9:6 with two "he's" being referred to is understandably a struggle for some without the additional mistranslations thrown in by the Catholics. So what we see is remarkable. The eunuch immediately wants to be immersed and the requirement is that he believes Mashiach (pw Christ) to be the Son of Eloheem which he does. If Philip had really been a trinitarian do you not think he would have then not moved to Isaiah 9:6 and quoted it as a Catholic resulting in the eunuch rather saying I believe the Mashiach (pw Christ) is the Mighty God, Wonderful Counsellor, Everlasting Father??? Well, he does not, and why does he not do that?

Did Ireaneus not promote the twisted trinitarian 'baptism formula" which lead to a Trinity teaching. Was pure immersion in water not the root for a corruption towards a Trinity and "Jesus-is-God" fable?  So, why is it absent here in Acts??? Simply because the scriptures are not a fable but Catholicism is.

Mashiach (pw Christ) is the Son of Eloheem and that is what Isaiah preached, that is what Philip preached, that is what Mashiach (pw Christ) himself preached and that is what the eunuch then understood and believed, allowing him to be immersed. he did not need to believe in thd core teaching of Christianity to be immersed. He was not turned away by the Catholic clergy for denying the Trinity "Jesus-is-God" heresy. If Philip mentioned Isaiah 9:6 at all to the eunuch then  he obviously taught it correctly explaining the Son born and given to us by Yahuah, the Mashiach (pw Christ), Son of Eloheem, not Son = Eloheem.  

Romans 15:6 That ye may with one mind and one mouth give honor to (pw glorify) Eloheem (pw God), even the Father of our Master Yehoshua (pw Jesus) Mashiach (pw Christ).

Jn 17: 1 These words spake Yehoshua (pw Jesus), and lifted up his eyes to shamayim (pw heaven), and said, Father, the hour is come; honor (pw glorify) thy Son, that thy Son also may honor (pw glorify) thee: 2 As thou hast given him power over all flesh, that he should give eternal life to as many as thou hast given him. 3 And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true Eloheem (pw God), AND Yehoshua (pw Jesus) Mashiach (pw Christ), whom thou hast sent. 4 I have honoured (pw glorified) thee on the earth : I have finished the work which thou gavest me to do. 5 And now, O Father, honor ( pw glorify) thou me with thine own self with the honor (pw glory) which I had with thee before the world was. 6 I have manifested THY NAME unto the men which thou gavest me out of the world: thine they were, and thou gavest them me; and they have kept thy word. 7 Now they have known that all things whatsoever thou hast given me are of thee. 8 For I have given unto them the words which thou gavest me (*since you are the Wonderful Counsellor); and they have received them, and have known surely that I came out from thee, and they have believed that thou didst send me.

(*my own words)

Chapter 21

Yehoshua is One with The Father - Does that Make him God?

 In Jn 10:30 Yehoshua said

When reading this verse alone, and out of context, it would appear that Yehoshua is making a statement that He is Eloheem (pw God) but the truth is found in Jn 17:20-21 where Yehoshua prays for all His followers, even those who have not yet been born. 

"Neither pray I for these alone, but for them also which shall believe on me through their word; that they all may be one; as thou Father, art in me, and I in thee, that they also may be one in us; that the world may believe that thou hast sent me."  

Here Yehoshua prays that all His followers will be one with Him, just as He and His Father are one, that is, He wants everyone to be in unison, one mind with the All Mighty One, Eloheem. The unity of belief is that he is sent by the Father not that he is the Father.

See also

Jn 17:11  "And now I am no more in the world, but these are in the world, and I come to thee. Set apart (pw Holy) Father, keep through thine own name those whom thou hast given me, that they may be one, as we are."

If oneness were to mean equal substance then we all would be Eloheem, which we are not. We are only one in unity to Yahuah through obedience to his will (Torah). It is in oneness of state (unity), not substance, by the state that the spirit set our minds to obey through Yahuah's spirit of wisdom.

Scripture teaches clearly that Eloheem (pw God) is "one", He stands alone, and tolerates no equals or rivals.

Deut 6:44 "Hear, O Yshrel:  Yahuah (pw LORD) our Eloheem (pw God) is one Yahuah (pw LORD):  5 And thou shalt love Yahuah (pw LORD) thy Eloheem (pw God) with all thine heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy might."

Isaiah 43:10 "Ye are my witnesses, saith Yahuah (pw LORD), and my servant whom I have chosen: that ye may know and believe me, and understand that I am he: before me there was no Eloheem (pw God) formed, neither shall there be after me."

Isaiah 45:5 "I am Yahuah (pw LORD), and there is none else, there is no Eloheem (pw God) beside me: I girded thee, though thou hast not known me:  6 That they may know from the rising of the sun, and from the west, that there is none beside me. I am Yahuah (pw LORD), and there is none else.  7 I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I Yahuah (pw LORD) do all these things". 

Jn 14:28 28  "Ye have heard how I said unto you, I go away, and come again unto you. If ye loved me, ye would rejoice, because I said, I go unto the Father: for my Father is greater than I. " 

1 Timothy 2: 4 "Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth.  5 For there is one Eloheem (pw God), and one mediator between Eloheem (pw God) and men, the man Mashiach (pw Christ) Yehoshua (pw Jesus);"

Yehoshua is the perfect image of His Father in shamayim (pw heaven), and it is obvious that the Trinity is a man-made doctrine by the pagan institiution called "Church" at the Council of Nicaea in AD 325.  It has no place nor foundation in the scriptures, nor in the simple good message taught by Yehoshua and the Apostles.  The doctrine of the Trinity did not form part of the teachings of Yehoshua or the Apostles, as recorded in the REC. As we have seen, it is a product of many factors prevalent in Egypt between the third and fourth centuries in the fledgling "Christian Church".  The moment of truth :  Whom should we believe, Eloheem (pw God) or man?

They simply are not, have not and will not be ONE-and-the-SAME!! They are one in agreement but NOT the same, as we who are believers are one in agreement with the Son but not the same.

Jn 14:11 Believe me that I am in the Father, and the Father in me: Jn 14:23.....If a man love me, he will keep my words: and my Father will love him, and we will come unto him, and make our abode with him.

Jn 14:20 At that day ye shall know that I am in my Father, and ye in me, and I in you.

When Ezra Reads the Torah:

These are many different  men and women who are one in spirit, intent and unity hearing and understanding the Torah as does Yehoshua with his Father- they are thus one or single- minded.Or are we to believe that suddenly thousands of people, both men and women suddenly became one man? Who is this man? Have you met this man? I have not met this man and neither have I met the equally ridiculous invention of this man-God Jesus.

Chapter 22

Does Scripture Teach the Dual Nature of A Man-God Jesus?

Based on this  "are one-and-thus-are-the-same" reasoning we then arrive at the next destination of our journey to never never land in the Trinitarian wagon, the duality of a Christ Man-God. 

There simply is nothing specific to a Trinity idea when it comes to oneness and being in the Son who is in the Father and the Son who is in us if we simply keep the Father's commandments we are of one mind, bound to the will of the Father.

Yehoshua (pw Jesus) is not Eloheem (pw God) Almighty. "In us" is by the spirit - mind, thoughts and moral Torah obedient character, not substance or shape neither is it a dual nature of man-God since Eloheem cannot and will not ever be a man as we already proven by the declaration of Yahuah himself.

Furthermore if Yehoshua and Yahuah are one and the same then there would be no need for Yehoshua to state the following

He would simply say he does and says as he  wills. There would be no separation of wills if we are talking about one entity having a dual nature. On the contrary he submits his own SEPARATE will to the will of the Father.

Chapter 23

Does Yahuah Eloheem Only Have Power To Forgive Sins?

Some maintain that Yehoshua has to be God (Yahuah) to forgive sins, and this he did. They will quote:

Luke 5:20-22 And when he saw their faith, he said unto him, Man, thy sins are forgiven thee. And the scribes and the Pharisees began to reason, saying, Who is this which speaketh blasphemies? Who can forgive sins, but God alone?

Mat 9:2-3
And, behold, they brought to him a man sick of the palsy, lying on a bed: and Jesus seeing their faith said unto the sick of the palsy; Son, be of good cheer; thy sins be forgiven thee. And, behold, certain of the scribes said within themselves, This man blasphemeth.

Now, did not Yehoshua not pass on similar authority to forgive men their sins who directly offend us and who repent directly to us. Did He not say if we do not forgive men their sins then neither will your Father in shamayim (pw heaven) forgive you.

Psa 110:4 Yahuah (pw the LORD) hath sworn, and will not repent, Thou art a priest for ever after the order of Melchizedek.

Now, since Yehoshua is of the order of High Priest Melchizedek as well, He has the same authority which superscedes and precedes the Levitical Priesthood even.

But even the Levitical Priesthood could forgive men their sins by the authority given to them by Yahuah in the haykal (pw temple). Let's look:

Lev 4:35 And he shall take away all the fat thereof, as the fat of the lamb is taken away from the offering (pw sacrifice) of the peace offerings; and the priest shall burn them upon the altar, according to the offerings made by fire unto Yahuah: and the PRIEST SHALL MAKE AN ATONEMENT FOR HIS SIN THAT HE HATH COMMITTED, AND IT SHALL BE FORGIVEN HIM.

Remember, Yehoshua prayed the prayer: forgive us our tresspasses - He prayed this to our (including His) Father.

Remember, He prayed: forgive them for they know not what they do. All authority was in prayer to the Father for the forgiveness of other's sins.

The Pharisees did not know Yehoshua is of the order of Melchizedek, and so they were in blasphemy for not recognising the authority of the High Priest Yehoshua, who is Himself the living offering (pw sacrifice) of redemption for us. The Pharisees were always claiming blasphemy only because they did not accept the authority given to Yehoshua by Yahuah. They wanted to be the big authority in town and had forgotten to follow the Torah and the prophets.

Yehoshua knew he would  be the very offering (pw sacrifice) for redemption, so , he , indeed, could forgive sins since he would be the  one who is taking every one of those sins upon his own head.

Prophetically these people who came to Yehoshua to repent would have their sins forgiven through the work of Yahuah in raising his son to life.

Remember, that the man is head over the woman, so now let's apply Torah - see if you can apply this to what I said about Yehoshua being given authority over every man:

Num 30: 2 If a man vow a vow unto Yahuah, or swear an oath to bind his soul with a bond; he shall not break his word, he shall do according to all that proceedeth out of his mouth. 3 If a woman also vow a vow unto Yahuah, and bind herself by a bond, being in her father's house in her youth; 4 And her father hear her vow, and her bond wherewith she hath bound her soul, and her father shall hold his peace at her: then all her vows shall stand, and every bond wherewith she hath bound her soul shall stand. 5 But if her father disallow her in the day that he heareth; not any of her vows, or of her bonds wherewith she hath bound her soul, shall stand: and Yahuah shall forgive her, because her father disallowed her. 6 And if she had at all an husband, when she vowed, or uttered ought out of her lips, wherewith she bound her soul; 7 And her husband heard it, and held his peace at her in the day that he heard it: then her vows shall stand, and her bonds wherewith she bound her soul shall stand. 8 But if her husband disallowed her on the day that he heard it; then he shall make her vow which she vowed, and that which she uttered with her lips, wherewith she bound her soul, of none effect: and Yahuah SHALL FORGIVE HER. 9 But every vow of a widow, and of her that is divorced, wherewith they have bound their souls, shall stand against her. 10 And if she vowed in her husband's house, or bound her soul by a bond with an oath; 11 And her husband heard it, and held his peace at her, and disallowed her not: then all her vows shall stand, and every bond wherewith she bound her soul shall stand. 12 But if her husband hath utterly made them void on the day he heard them; then whatsoever proceeded out of her lips concerning her vows, or concerning the bond of her soul, shall not stand: her husband hath made them void; and Yahuah SHALL FORGIVE HER. 13 Every vow, and every binding oath to afflict the soul, her husband may establish it, or her husband may make it void. 14 But if her husband altogether hold his peace at her from day to day; then he establisheth all her vows, or all her bonds, which are upon her: he confirmeth them, because he held his peace at her in the day that he heard them. 15 But if he shall any ways make them void after that he hath heard them; THEN SHALL HE BEAR HER INQUITY

Yehoshua loosed the inquity from the broken vow (broken covenant through sin, between Yahuah and her, the bride, Yshrel (Israel) but still bore that iniquity upon Himself, as the Lamb, as the head man over every man, who had authority to say "your sins are forgiven". He made the broken covenant itself void, and renewed it by his death. (Rom 7-8)

This similar authority regarding covenant and the applied Torah has been extended to the men who recognise Mashiach / the Anointed One as their head.

Mat16:19 And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of shamayim (pw heaven): and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in shamayim (pw heaven): and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in shamayim (pw heaven).

There is no blasphemy in this either since it is authority given by the Father to us through the mediator, the Son of Yahuah.

This is the same language Paul uses :

Rom 3:31 Do we then make VOID the law through faith (steadfastness / moral conviction)? Yahuah forbid: yea, we ESTABLISH THE LAW.

In other words we make the Torah more binding by doing it through emunah/ moral conviction (pw faith) and thus justify and stand as witnesses for the coming inevitable judgment on those who do not repent and do not keep the Torah.

If Yahuah is King then his Son is Prince, sharing the throne for a time but not taking it over.

Chapter 24

Does Apostle Shaul Teach a Trinity Doctrine For Church Unity?

Paul, inspired by the Pure Spirit of Yahuah, declares that we who are true believers will all come in unity by one very specific requirement. Is it the so-called core teaching of Christianity that has been so violently enforced by the so-called church fathers. Is it the Trinity and Jesus-is -God heresy? He says:

Eph 4:13 Till we all come in the unity of the moral conviction  (Hebrew emunah, pw faith),

Does Shaul say,  "till we all come in the Tri-unity Faith"?
Does he say "till we all come in the Trinity Faith"?

No, he does not . Instead, right after that,  what does he say is the knowledge that we need for true biblical unity (as opposed to a church father unity / tri-unity / Trinity), he says,

...it is the knowledge of the SON OF Yahuah

So, unity among the  true assembly is by  each believer acknowledging or realising that Yehoshua the Anointed One / Messiah came in the flesh and is the Son of Yahuah.

He does not stop there, he says, as a play on words, that this is what perfects us to be like Yehoshua the Son of Eloheem, not Eloheem :

...unto a perfect MAN (as the Son of Yahuah is, not a perfect god), unto the measure of the stature and fullness of the Anointed One (Messiah).

It cannot be any clearer, Paul clearly states here what the Anointed One / Messiah Spirit of unity is, as opposed to what the anti-Anointed One (Messiah) Spirit is

2 Jn 1:7 For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Mashiach / Anointed One Yehoshua IS COME in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an anti_anointed One / anti-Messiah (pw anti-Christ).

Note: MANY deceivers - so the majority of so-called believers are deceived by such a Jesus Christ is Eloheem (pw God) Spirit, rather than he-is-flesh doctrine.

Note: also IS COME*, * not CAME, ie. present imperfect tense - erchomai

1 Jn 4:2 Hereby know ye the Spirit OF Yahuah: Every spirit that confesseth that Yehoshua Mashiach / Anointed One IS COME in the flesh is OF Yahuah:

Again, erchomai, present imperfect tense, since the Son remains the purified Mashiach / Anointed One in the flesh and returns as such.

Further:

2Jn 1:9 Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Messiah (pw Christ), hath not Eloheem (pw God). He that abideth in the doctrine of Messiah (pw Christ), he hath both the Father and the Son.
10 If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him Eloheem (pw God) speed: 11 For he that biddeth him Eloheem (pw God) speed is partaker of his evil deeds

If there is any doctrine works against the unity of the moral conviction (pw faith) it has been the Trinity and Jesus-is-God heresy. Jews cannot accept it and are divided against Christians which is the aim of Satan.

Chapter 25

Immanuel means the Jesus God is with Us?

Isaiah 7:14  Therefore Yahuah (pw LORD) himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel."

 Immanuel means Eloheem is with us. So let's look at prophecy fulfilled.

Behold, a virgin shall be with child, and shall bring forth a son, and they shall call His name Emmanuel, which being interpreted is, Eloheem (pw God) with us." (Matthew 1:23) 

Many will jump to conclusions saying this means Yehoshua is Eloheem. This is really foolish since Yahuah has said "I am with you" before when offering salvation through the word of  prophet Jeremiah.

Yahuah is truly with us if we obey. The people did not obey Jeremiah's word.  Despite this, it was still  for future believers, who obey, that Yahuah had not forsaken His people - that He would renew his everlasting covenant, and the action of Yehoshua is to indeed bring Yahuah to them again. This is called the Spirit of Reconciliation:

2 Cor 5:19 To wit, that Yahuah was in Mashiach / Anointed One (ie. as He now should be in us), reconciling the world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them; and hath committed unto us the word of reconciliation. 20 Now then we are ambassadors for the Anointed One (pw  Messiah), as though Yahuah did beseech you by us: we pray you in Mashiach / the Anointed One's (pw Christ's) stead, be ye reconciled to Yahuah (ie. so that Yahuah is with you or within you -Immanuel ).

Jeremiah warns the people not not to entertain the idolatrous ways of Egypt. He says Eloheem will be with them as long as they are not going in the way of Egypt. If we, today, go in the way of Egypt with her Trinity styled idols and demi-gods etc. then we will not have Immanuel, Eloheem with us. We are then indeed in Egypt / Spiritual Babylon and will also face the promised plagues of Egypt in the last days.

 Rev 18:4  And I heard another voice from shamayim (pw heaven), saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her Torah transgressions (pw sins), and that ye receive not of her plagues.

Do we actually see anybody directly calling Yehoshua Emmanuel in the scriptures? Well, not clearly in the Greek translation, but  I believe Paul made reference to Emmanuel but it is lost in the translation, however before we get there :

1 Jn 4:2 Hereby know ye the Spirit of Yahuah: Every spirit that confesseth that Yehoshua Mashiach / Anointed One is come in the flesh is of Yahuah:

Rom 8:29 For whom he did foreknow, he also did predetermine (pw predestinate) to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn AMONG MANY brethren. ( ie. he is one among many aosed to Yahuah who is One) 30 Moreover whom he did predetermine, them he also called: and whom he called, them he also justified: and whom he justified, THEM HE ALSO MADE HONOURABLE (pw glorified)-

their honor (pw glory) does not detract from Yahuah but points to Yahuah in the same way Yehoshua's honour does not subtract but adds to the honour to Yahuah.

Context is every thing and we see the context of Immanuel  here as Paul then says:

Rom 8:31 What shall we then say to these things? If Eloheem (pw God) be for us (Immanuel), who can be against us?

I believe Yehoshua's descriptive name is being declared here and is tied to Yahuah making us fellow honorable sons (conformed to his image) and thereby he is with us as family or kindred:

Eloheem for us

El for us / El with us

Emannuel.0

The answer to Romans 8:31 would be nobody can be against us if Eloheem is for / with is, if he has sent  Emmanuel, not even the king of Babylon can be against us for we will repent and  be delivered (by the blood of Yehoshua his servant)  from his kingdom and come out of Babylon (Egypt) for Yehoshua shall be called Emmanuel - the one who brings us to Emmanuel - he is the only Torah-founded way to the Father so that  he is with us / for us. We are not on the way to Torahless Rome  / Babylon / Egypt. We do not fear the Kings of Babylon since we have theof the Jews appointed b yYahuah who conquers death itself.

So, this conforming to the image of the Son of Yahuah is what gives us the authority to say Yahuah is with us ie. Emmanuel and not against us, since we are also given the power to become the Sons of Yahuah.

Note: if Yahuah is not for or with us then we do not get chastised as sons and we are bastards.

Heb 12:7 If ye endure chastening, Yahuah dealeth with you as with sons; for what son is he whom the father chasteneth not? 8 But if ye be without chastisement, whereof all are partakers, then are ye bastards, and not sons.

Yehoshua being the first begotten of the House of Yahuah is the eldest  Son who is thus given authority to chastise us as the Mediator for his Father.
Hence Yehoshua says to the assembly :

Rev 3:19 As many as I  love, I rebuke and chasten: be zealous therefore, and repent.

What chastisement did Yehoshua receive - the highest - for our Torah transgression (pw sins) - why? Because he was the Son who was bruised for our inquities. The Father cannot receive the chastisement - the Father gives the chastisement. If Yehoshua is The Father then He was self-flagellating Himself at the execution stake - a Catholic doctrine again, some sort of pagan penance. Self-abuse is condemned:

1 Cor 6:9 Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of Yahuah? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor ABUSERS OF THEMSELVES with mankind.

Lev 19:28 Ye shall not make any cuttings in your flesh for the dead, nor print any marks upon you: I am Yahuah.

Yes, sadly we have the Graeco-Roman translation to thank for their anti-Hebrew slant of scriptures again. If we look at some names in our Hebrew scriptures, since salvation is of (coming out from) the Yahudim (pw Jews), and not the Greeks or Romans etc, then we get a fuller understanding of Yahuah, Yahuah (Yah)has  given names that bear His own name. These names point TO Yahuah (Yah), it does not make the holder of that name Yahuah himself:

Joshua - Real Name is Yehoshua= “YAH is Salvation"
(this is the same name of Mashiach / Anointed One NOT JESUS)

Samuel- Real Name is ShamAHuel= “Listen to YAH your Eloah”

Isaiah- Real Name is YeshaYAHU= “Salvation is YAH”

Jeremiah- Real Name is YirmeYAHU= “The Resurrection/Rising is YAH”

Ezekiel- Real Name is YAHchezqel= “YAH is a Righteous Eloah”

Daniel- Real Name is DaniYAHel “The decision is YAH's our Eloah”

Hosea- Real Name is HosheAH= “The Deliverer is YAH”

Joel- Real Name is YAHel= “YAH is Eloah”

Amos- Real Name is AHmoce= “YAH’s Burden”

Obadiah- Real Name is ObadYAHU= “The Servant of YAH”

Jonah- Real Name is YonAH= “YAH provides Warmth”

Micah- Real Name is MiykahYAHU= “Who is like YAH”

Nahum- Real Name is NachUm= “Comfort comes from YAH”

Habakkuk- Real Name is ChabaqUq= “Embrace YAH”

Zephaniah- Real Name is TsphanYAHU= “The Secret is YAH”

Haggai- Real Name is ChaggaYAH= “The Celebration is YAH”

Zechariah- Real Name is ZacharYAHU= “YAH Remembers”

Malachi- Real Name is MalakiYAH= “Messenger of YAH”

Job- Real Name is YAHshub= “YAH Will Return”

Ezra- Real Name is EzrAH= “Our Help is YAH”

Nehemiah- Real Name is NechemYAH= “Consoled by YAH”

Matthew- Real Name is MatithYAHU= “The gift is YAH”

Mark- Real Name is MarkU= “Man of YAH”

Luke- Real Name is LukAH= “The Light is YAH”

John- Real Name is YAHUchanon= “YAH is Favour”

Timothy- Timotheos= “Dear to ELOAH”

James- Real Name is YAHcob= “YAH rises up”

Peter- Real Name is KephAH= “The Rock is YAH”

Jude- Real Name is YAHUdAH= “YAH’s Worshipers and Followers”

Chapter 26

Identifying and Responding To The-Jesus-is-God Heretic

Firstly Identify This Heretic: Test Every Spirit

1Jn 4:1  Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of Eloheem: because many false prophets are gone out into the world.

The Marcion spirit makes two eloha (pw gods) - an evil god of the Everlasting Covenant (pw Old Testament), and a good god of a so-called New Testament.

Yahuah would have to be the evil god for these Torah (law) haters and Jesus would have to be the good god who abolishes Yahuah's so-called evil Torah (law). The only way to do that is to make this Gr“Jesus” god and make the other Eloheem (pw God) (Yahuah) mere Jewish history. Yahuah is not history since his Son came to magnify HIS-Story of salvation starting with the everlasting covenant in the Tanakh (erroneously called Old Testament).

Let us test every spirit - there is only one true spirit of unity in the assembly of Yehoshua with Yahuah over all, there is not a tri-unity. As we saw in Chapter 24 Apostle Shaul identified which doctrine brings true unity versus division. So that is our first acid test. Then John confirms Apostle Shaul and says:

1 Jn 4:2 Hereby know ye the Spirit OF Yahuah: Every spirit that confesseth that Yehoshua Mashiach / Anointed One IS COME in the flesh is OF Yahuah:

Again, erchomai, present imperfect tense, since the Son remains the purified Anointed One / Messiah in the flesh, Son of Eloheem, and returns as such. (See Chapter 3 Fact 19)

Respond Correctly To The Heretic Because His Deeds Are Evil

2Jn 1:9 Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of the Anointed One /  Messiah (pw Christ), hath not Eloheem (pw God). He that abideth in the doctrine of the Anointed One/  Messiah (pw Christ), he hath both the Father and the Son.
10 If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him Eloheem (pw God) speed: 11 For he that biddeth him Eloheem (pw God) speed is partaker of his evil deeds

Yehoshua did not preach a doctrine saying he is Eloheem. As we saw in Chapter 2, he debunked such a false accusation made aginst him by some Jews at the Feast of Dedication. So the Jesus-is-God Heretic does not abide in the doctrine of the Anointed One but of false accusers (their Father is Satan). When you show the Heretic the doctrine of Yehoshua himself rejecting the false accusation made against him that he is making himself Eloheem and the Heretic refuses to accept that doctrine of Yehoshua then you know his deeds are evil.

Ironically Jehovah witnesses are denied entry  into homes usually by mainstream Christians mainly based on the fact that Jehovah Witnesses do not accept Jesus is God. Of course Jehovah witnesses are wrong about many other things, such as rejecting the Torah, which  mainstream Christianity also rejects. However it is an interesting  point that mainstream Christians treat others as heretics rather than themselves  in order to follow Rome's Jesus-is-God heresy twisting Shaul's words as if he preached against the keeping of Torah which is a pure lie.

Trinitarians Grouped With False Accusers and Torah Haters

The reader may ask where is the Trinitarian mentioned here?  It is in the last verse.

2Ti 3:5  Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away.

Christianity is indeed a form of godliness (religion), a mere sect and its core invention is the Trinity and Jesus-is-God heresy. Its other core teaching is the despising of those who are good.

2Ti 3:3  ...despisers of those that are good, 

 It hates those who preach and keep the Torah. In fact it teaches that nobody can be good. And to prove my case it is identified here among the false accusers

2Ti 3:3 ...false accusers...

As we have proven in Chapter 2 The Two Witnesses - Yehoshua the whole Christian heresy is a continuation of the false accusation made aginst Yehoshua by some Jews. That is its core foundation - a lie.

And finally the Trinitarian is clearly defined as "...denying the power thereof ". TheTrinitarian indeed denies the power of Eloheem and redirects this Sovereign power to their  invented man God Jesus, who they now say is Creator of the earth andabolisher of the Law (Torah).
A trinity believer has a form of religion (godliness) but denies that the power comes from Yahuah Eloheem the Creator by his Spirit  and instead  sets up an idol called Jesus. An idol  by definition has no power, so , they deny the of Eloheem.

It is then easy to see why again we are commanded to turn away from such an evil religion and those who follow it.

2Tim 3:5 ...from such turn away.

It is listed amongst blasphemers  and those who are not set apart to righteousness (pw unholy) (v2)

A True Witness By Simon Kipha (Peter) - Not a Jehovah's Witness or a Trinitarian, But a Yahudi-Worshiper of Yahuah

Mark 8: Whom do men say that I the Son of man am? 14 And they said, Some say that thou art John the Baptist: some, Elias; and others, Jeremias, or one of the prophets. 15 He saith unto them, But whom say ye that I am?

And Simon Kipha (pw Peter) answered and said, as thou sayest thou art the I Am.

NO!!! Kipha does not say such a thing!   

Kipha answers

"Thou art the Anointed One (pw Messiah),

THE SON OF

the living Eloheem."

And Yehoshua continues:

Barcuh'd (pw blessed) art thou, Simon Bar Jonah: for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but MY FATHER which is in shamayim (pw heaven).

ie. Yahuah in shamayim has revealed his SON on earth to Kipha - it is NOT Yahuah on earth revealing himself as Yehoshua in shamayim, or Yahuah on earth saying he is Yehoshua on earth while being in shamayim.

I pray that Yehoshua will be manifest to you correctly. How is Yehoshua manifested in the correct way to any believer?

In the same way He was revealed to Kipha as shown above. Yehoshua says it's when those believers accept his Torah (law, commandments). Those who do not do his law and commandments, they will have another kind of manifestation - that of devils and man-made "church" system Trinity theology, turning Yehoshua into a blasphemous Godhead or HeadGod, some swollen-headed god who usurps Yahuah and his law.

Here is the key to knowing the Son as the Son of Yahuah:

Jn 14:21 HE THAT HATH MY COMMANDMENTS, AND KEEPETH THEM, he it is that loveth me: and he that loveth me shall be loved of my Father, and I will love him,
and will MANIFEST myself to him.

I pray for the true manifestation of the Son of Yahuah as you follow His commandments and love His Father who gave us Torah (Gen-Rev) by the splendor (pw glory) he placed upon His people Yasherel, including the Jew (Yahudi), his own Son Yehoshua.

Yehoshua even knows who He worships (serves, obeys) as a Jew - He has no identity crisis. He knows the Shema, as a Yahuah-fearing Yahudi. He is not a pagan Samaritan like Simon Magus who had no idea what even the spirit of Yahuah was about.

Yehoshua speaking to the Samaritan woman

Jn 4:22 Ye worship ye know not what (idols-false gods): we know WHO* we worship: for salvation is of the Yahudim (Hebrew for worshipper of Yahuah) (pagan translation has the term "Jews" - misleading)

*[pagan influence in KJV chooses "what" here instead of who - Yahuah is not a “what” but a who, or else the sense is that the woman worships a what (object-idol, or doctrine) rather than the living Eloha himself.]

Yahuah is Spirit and must be worshipped in truth, not as a man-god or a god-man or three-headed god, or shape-shifting eggshell-albumen-yolk (Jesus-God-Spirit) or Eloheem (pw God) the ventriloquist with a Jesus puppet on Catholic strings, or a God who cannot decide if He is all-knowing or not, or a God who cannot add up (1+1+1=1)?, or a God who cannot decide if he is omnipresent or squeezed into the body of a man and into the restriction of time, or a God who talks to himself, flaggelates himself, puts himself to death, punishes himself, and raises himself up, forsakes himself, talks in riddles, pats himself on the back, says he is the Father when he really means he is the Son, says he is self-existent yet must be born. Says he consists of everything yet must receive something, says he is greater all-in-all yet subjects himself to himself, says he is to be worshipped but worships himself. Really???

Let's be true - Yahuah is not the Eloheem of confusion.

Jn 4:23 But the hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshipers shall worship the Father in SPIRIT and in truth: for the Father seeketh such to worship him. 24 Yahuah IS Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth.

Yehoshua worships His Father, Yahuah with us - He, Himself, is not Yahuah.

Jn 15:1 I am the true vine, and my Father is the husbandman (farmer)

..........and we are the branches let's bear splendid fruit to the splendor of the Father.

Chapter 27

Attributes for All Sons of Yahuah

Many attributes that Yehoshua has been GIVEN by authority FROM Yahuah have been used to make the claim that He is, in fact, Yahuah himself, however, many of these attributes have been promised to us who are obedient believers as well, and that certainly does not give us the right to claim that we are Yahuah Eloheem. So, why should the authority of pagans be taken serious who make such a false claim for the Anointed Man Yehoshua being God and turn him into an idol?

Instead it is evident that we, by the power and love (Hebrew- chesed: (kindness, covenant loyalty, trustworthiness) of Yahuah, can be Yahuah-like (falsely called godly), or in His image, or of His nature (express image of his person (character), as Yehoshua indeed is.

11 Peter 3:11 Seeing then that all these things shall be dissolved, what manner of persons ought ye to be in all morally and ceremonially pure conversation (pw holy) and Yahuah-LIKENESS (pw godliness),

11 Peter 1:6-7 6 And to knowledge temperance; and to temperance patience; and to patience Yahuah-LIKENESS; 7 And to Yahuah-LIKENESS brotherly kindness; and to brotherly kindness love (pw charity)

11 Peter 1:3 According as his from above (pw divine) power hath given unto us all things that pertain unto life and Yahuah-LIKENESS, through the knowledge of him that hath called us to honor (pw glory) and virtue:

Titus 2:12 Teaching us that, denying UN-Yahuah-LIKENESS and worldly lusts, we should live soberly, righteously, and Yahuah-LIKE, in this present world;

Titus 1:1 Paul, a servant of Yahuah, and an apostle of Yehoshua the Anointed One / Messiah, according to the emunah / moral conviction (pw faith) of Yahuah's elect, and the acknowledging of the truth which is after Yahuah-LIKENESS

1 Tim 2:2 For kings, and for all that are in authority; that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all Yahuah-LIKENESS and honesty. 3 For this is good and acceptable in the sight of  Eloheem (Yahuah pw God) our Saviour.

Romans 11:26 And so all Yasherel (pw Israel) shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away UN-Yahuah-LIKENESS from Jacob: (ie. change his name to YasherEl - Eloheem makes straight , not Yisrael  (Eloheem makes crooked)

1 Tim 6: 3 If any man teach otherwise, and consent not to wholesome words, even the words of our Master Yehoshua /Anointed One / Messiah, and to the doctrine which is according to Yahuah-LIKENESS;

The doctrine of Jesus is God i s not according to Yahuah-likeness. If we say Yehoshua the Son is Eloheem because he has these atttributes then by default we should also be Eloheem and not like Eloheem. The LIKENESS falls away and we are not the image of  Eloheem, reflecting his character, but then Eloheem himself.

 Many of these attributes that Yehoshua received from his Father are promised for us true believers too:

Purified soul (1 Peter 1:22)

Perfected love (1:Jn 4:12 Hebrews 10;14)

Man - image of Yahuah (1 Cor 11:7)

 Body made honorable (pw glorified) (Phi 3:21)

Son/s of Yahuah (Jn 1:12)

Born of the Spirit (Jn 3:8)

Born and begotten of Yahuah (1 Jn 5:18)

Filled with the Spirit (Eph 5:18)

Eph 3:19 "And to know the love of the Anointed One / Messiah,

which passeth knowledge, that ye might be filled with

ALL THE FULNESS OF Yahuah."

So, Eloheem  (pw GOD ) MUST FULLY DWELL WITHIN YOUR BODY , ie you can and must be fully Anointed by His SPIRIT 

 THAT DOES NOT MAKE YOU = Eloheem (pw GOD) 

and neither did it make Yehoshua = Eloheem

THUS

 Yehoshua is not Eloheem but he is perfectly 

LIKE him in character,

 Yehoshua is Yahuah-like as we are aiming 

to be through Yahuah's Ruach (Spirit)

Well, let's, for a moment, pretend that this were the be-all-and-end-all for salvation to just say something and claim to believe something (without any evidence of that belief by obedience. For more see Faith Alone?).

Let's pretend salvation is restricted to this alone as "Christianity" often teaches. Then that same "Christian" who claims to believe salvation is earned by this verse becomes a  liar when he says Yehoshua IS Eloheem. He does not believe what he is required to believe here namely that Eloheem raised Yehoshua from DEATH but instead confesses with his mouth that  Yehoshua is Eloheem (Jesus is God) and therefore immortal, could not and did not die or need to be raised by another to life, that being Eloheem. Thus we see how belief in the Son of Eloheem being reliant on  Eloheem's eternal power is paramount for true salvation. We see how the "Christian" immediately condemns himself here since his confession and belief at the start contradicts the confession and belief required by scripture:

-- 00((O))00 --

Further Teaching Which I Recommend -

You Will Find it Extremely Helpful in also

explaining why the use of "G-O-D" in bad translations versus

"Eloheem" also causes problems

it is a 2 Part Video Format........