Dawkins-The Devil Delusion

Dawkins -The Devil Delusion

The Devil Delusion

[pw = pagan word]
This article first published D23/M12/Y20

Updated D15/M7/Y22

Happy Dawkins

Dawkins Is Indeed Religious

Richard Dawkins, Evolutionary Biologist, Author of The God Delusion and Atheist (or 6.9 Agnostic as he calls himself)  is indeed a worshiper

of a pagan religion. While he makes allegations about the Bible being a myth he contradicts himself by accepting the historicity of Yahushua ( pw Jesus). He also tries to state a fact  that the Hebrews were just polytheists before the ten commandments which is difficult to claim (whether true or false) if you are saying the Bible is a myth since then there would be no Hebrews, idols or ten commandments in the first place.

So what is Dawkins' real religion?  We shall expose the root of Dawkins' dogma.

On the surface we submit that Dawkins worships Greek mythology.

Dawkins' 1976 book The Selfish Gene reveals the religion he serves. But first  let's look at the word "gene" for starters.

Gene etymology:

1911, from German Gen, coined 1905 by Danish scientist Wilhelm Ludvig Johannsen (1857-1927), from Greek genea "generation, race" (from PIE root *gene- "give birth, beget"). De Vries had earlier called them pangenes. Gene pool is attested from 1946.

The German "gen" is of course from Greek "genos"---->  (protogenos)

The Protogenoi in Greek Mythology, are immortals who were the first beings to come into existence.

According to their mythology the first, and main deity / protogenos was Khaos, also spelled Chaos. The Hindu equivalent is of course Khali.

Charles Darwin developed a theory of inheritance he termed pangenesis, from Greek pan ("all, whole") and genesis ("birth") / genos ("origin"). Remember De Vries had earlier called genes pangenes.

Pan is of course another pagan deity which results in Pantheism another pagan doctrine which identifies a god with the universe, or regards the universe as a manifestation of a god, the worship or tolerance of many gods (polytheism). Many agnostics fall into this category.

So from protogenos mythology we have first born from which gene was coined. Then they coined the buzzword protogene.

Merriam Webster


1: a dominant gene or factor

2[International Scientific Vocabulary, from New Latin protogenes primeval, firstborn, from Greek prōtogenēs, from prōt- prot- + -genēs born] : a hypothetical mutable primary unit that is capable of reduplication, is held to have differentiated from nonliving matter, and is regarded as a precursor of living beings

Thus we have the beginning of all life attributed to protogenes or protogenoi the Greek mythological gods. This is what the so-called scientific world is stating and follows while claiming to be irreligious. This is why these Evolutionists refer to Mother Earth, a purely pagan Babylonian New Age religion connected to the Catholic Church who does not worship Yahuah either but worships the same "Mother Earth" and took on a pagan "Mother of God" goddess Isis, aka Venus, aka Nana, aka Sophia, aka Quan Ying - all Babylonian cult re-inventions etc etc who they simply named Mary. ( a corruption of the real mother of Yahushua:  Miriam who was not a Catholic or a "god")

Note How this Gaming Page spells it out (my comments in brackets):

"Birth of the Protogenoi

Ouranos casting his children into Tartarus

"Initially, all the matter in the cosmos drifted around in a gloomy, SOUPY MIST (sound familiar??) called Chaos, the first of the Protogenoi. Eventually, SOME OF ITS MATTER COLLECTED TO FORM THE EARTH (sound familiar), which developed a personality that called herself Gaea. After a period of time (LONG LONG TIME -EVOLUTION???), the sky appeared: a great dome above the earth that became Ouranos. He married Gaea and had several children together, whom he hated and she loved. Gaea alone gave birth to the mountains, Ourae."

ref: https://riordan.fandom.com/wiki/Protogenos#:~:text=Protogenosalso known  as  the primordial gods are, so therefore they cannot truly be killed.

So we can see where Evolutionists borrowed their primordial soup idea. "primordial" again is just another word for protogenoi ie primordial deities (highlighted in illustration)which again are the myths of the first gods and goddesses.

primordial gods

"born from the void of Chaos. Hesiod's first (after Chaos) are Gaia, Tartarus, Eros, Erebus, Hemera and Nyx. The primordial deities Gaia and Uranus give birth to the Titans, and the Cyclopes..."    

Pagan blah blah blah ad nauseum.

Now to prove that Dawkins obeys or serves the" protogenoi" or "primordial deities" myth we shall examine what he says in his book The Selfish Gene. According to this summary on his book under the heading:

"Humans Often “Disobey” Genes" Dawkins is said to suggest:

"Humans are far complex and have built civilizations that often “disobey” genes.

Contraceptives and the use of porn instead of copulation are such an example.

Also, many elements of culture do not always seem to have a direct connection with natural selection."

It is clear that Dawkins' religion is that he must obey the gene or genos or primordial deity within and to do otherwise seems to be some type of disobedience. He is of course admitting (or contradicting himself ) that man has a moral choice here and is not really controlled by his genes or primordial deities /pagan goddesses such as "Destiny" or "Gaia.

"Is it science or is it religion? Not even the promoters of Gaia agree completely. Gaia is the New Age darling of spiritual feminists, neo-pagans, political environmentalists, and animal-rights activists. Yet in the past three years, more than 100 scientific and technical articles have been Written on Gaia theory. Gaia, the Greek earth goddess, has scientists hotly debating the reality of her existence. "
ref  www.christianitytoday.com/ct/1993/january-11/is-earth-alive.html

This is clearly a quasi- religion that contradicts itself and which Dawkins follows and preaches. But then again is it quasi?

Please take a look at this webpage article from the inverse.com/science website promoting the humanizing of pigs we will return to it at the end of this article and reveal what you may have missed in the image:

dash of the devil

The Real Religion of Dawkins

Perhaps there is a more solid religion here. We hear what religion he is really following, one that he very loudly preaches in the disguise of science, it is the religion of Satan which is hidden (occultic), as in most cases, and further hidden behind pagan deities and idols.

Dawkins says:

"Let us understand what our own selfish genes are up to, because we may then at least have the chance to upset their designs, something that no other species has ever aspired to do."

Why would Dawkins be claiming to "aspire" to anything if we are just evolved primordial soup. Dawkins is admitting that man is not an animal or plant which the bible clearly tells us. Man was made in the image of Yahuah the Creator from the beginning.

Whilst his comment was in the context of behavioral chRIchard dawkinsange  following from the previous comment:

"...but we can force ourselves to eat less when we see it’s not actually helping our organism anymore."

one cannot but think that Dawkins is really fighting against the Creator who created him, He is on the Crusade with Satan to upset the genes ("upset their designs") of man.

This is what the evil malakim (fallen angels) did when they corrupted the seed of man and figuratively or spritually speaking tares (weeds) began popping up. 

The Parable of the Weeds (Tares)
Mat 13:24  Another parable put he (Yahushua pw Jesus) forth unto them, saying, The rule and reign of shamayim (pw kingdom of heaven) is likened unto a man which sowed good seed in his field:
Mat 13:25  But while men slept, his enemy came and sowed tares among the wheat, and went his way.
Mat 13:26  But when the blade was sprung up, and brought forth fruit, then appeared the tares also.
Mat 13:27  So the servants of the householder came and said unto him, Sir, didst not thou sow good seed in thy field? from whence then hath it tares?
Mat 13:28  He said unto them, An enemy hath done this. The servants said unto him, Wilt thou then that we go and gather them up?
Mat 13:29  But he said, Nay; lest while ye gather up the tares, ye root up also the wheat with them.
Mat 13:30  Let both grow together until the harvest: and in the time of harvest I will say to the reapers, Gather ye together first the tares, and bind them in bundles to burn them: but gather the wheat into my barn.  

Gen 6:13  And Elohim (pw God) said unto Noah, The end of all flesh is come before me; for the earth is filled with violence through them; and, behold, I will destroy them with the earth.

Is this far-fetched? No, Dawkins does not even think it is taboo to eat "human" flesh created in a lab. How far has he gone into the dark world of Satan? He certainly wants to be a tare and his aspiration seems to be becoming a cannibal which again is linked to the satanic religion of Catholcism and its transubstantiation (Transubstantiation - How Low Can You Go?)

Dawkins' Real Crusade

Will he too promote the injecting of pig gelatin and aborted "human" fetus DNA / RNA (chimera) into people through vaccines to upset their design? The creation of chimeras which are being injected in to mankind has been going on now for years under the name of science.

Dawkins has become so selfish that he wants to override what Yahuah has designed this is why he wants to remove religion from science (only one religion specifically and in reality, the religion of the Bible). While science is meant to be objective and theories are never absolute Dawkins has broken that rule by saying that whoever does not believe in Evolution is stupid. With such subjectivity it is easy for Dawkins to remove religion (namely Torah) from science which tests the morals and ethics of it. When it come to Dawkins' own religion which is Satanism he wants no moral opposition.


We know that much of secular modern science would love to upset the genes somehow to achieve some kind of immortality by some other way than by the redeemer Yahushua (pw Jesus). This is of course impossible but Satan will sell this lie to tempt man to try to gain immortality in this world and thus lose his soul and eternal life in the world to come.

Mar 8:36  For what does it profit a man to gain the whole world and forfeit his soul?
Mar 8:37  For what can a man give in return for his soul?
Mar 8:38  For whoever is ashamed of me and of my words in this adulterous and torahless ( pw sinful) generation, of him will the Son of Man also be ashamed when he comes in the splendor of his Father with the kodesh (pw holy) malakim (pw angels).”

At first I thought I had come to this conclusion perhaps over presumptiously or I was being over critical of Dawkins and decided to further investigate. It happened when looking for an image of The Selfish Gene Book Cover that I came across the startling discovery of what the book really was supposed to be called:

In the foreword to the book's 30th-anniversary edition, Dawkins said he "can readily see that [the book's title] might give an inadequate impression of its contents" and in retrospect thinks he should have taken Tom Maschler's advice and called the book The Immortal Gene.

ref https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Selfish_Gene

So when Dawkins says he wants to upset the genes he really means the design of the Creator's creation. Dawkins does not want to have to change his moral behavior, to repent, he does not want a savior to change his heart and redeem him he wants to change things for his OWN SELFISH gain. He is deluded and does not see he is working for Satan where science must have a seared conscience to the Creator and thus will destroy many. This is the working of the unethical "science" seen in the Nazi horror labs.

Rom 1:30  Backbiters, haters of Elohim, despiteful, proud, boasters, INVENTORS OF EVIL (DEPRAVED) THINGS, disobedient to parents.

Dawkins - Good Egotist, Bad Humanist

Dawkins wants to be a selfish human(ist) as the summary on his book says:

"Dawkins does present a view of very selfish human beings though."

This incidentally goes against the failed theory of humanism which says men do not need morals from the Bible and are intrinsically "good". We see where that has gotten the world now with plagues due to eating things at Wuhan forbidden as food in the Bible.

"He says human beings are selfish with a semblance of altruism."

He further adds:

"The more selfish we can be while at the same time appearing the most altruist, the more benefits we can reap from the people around while we are actually doing our own interests...That any other being around us, especially if of the same specie, can be an enemy in the struggle for survival and passing on of the genes."

Let's hear that again:

"The more selfish we can be while at the same time APPEARING the most altruist, the more benefits we can reap from the people around while we are actually doing our own interests.

Is Dawkins Really An Anti-Religionist?

This is pure demonic language from the pit of Satan. No wonder Dawkins does not attack Anton Levay, Albert Pike, Aleister Crowley or Hitler quite so much. Dawkins is mainly anti-religionist when it comes to opposing Yahuah and his WORD, that is his main objective. He is admitting that his own mantra is to get from you as much profit even if it means ACTING (appearing) to be concerned about your so called misguided religion. This is his indemnity clause right here. He thinks because if you are still stupid to follow him then he can say but I told you so and you agreed with this doctrine yourself.

Is Dawkins An Actor or A Dictator?

Hitler Fake ReligionIs Dawkins a paid actor like his ex-wife (known for her role in Dr WHO), is Dawkins a shill? His ex-wife said:

"at home he is very different from his public image as an angry anti-religionist"

Another word for "Actor" in his context would be "hypocrite" and we know how Yahushua exposed hypocrites.

Darwin Swastika

Dawkins' religion is of self, survival of the fittest, the forerunning religion to Nazism (disguised by Hitler's label  "Positive Christianity"). Oh and Dawkins did say:

"It is always more difficult to fight against faith than against knowledge."

Which is exactly what Hitler said in Mein Kampf  - Hitler was both an actor and a dictator.

"It is always more difficult to fight successfully against Faith than against knowledge."

ref: https://sites.google.com/site/nnempire18/quoteables/schadenfreudeshah-dn-froi-duhnoun)

Hitler's "Christianity" was of course Torahless- see  Do You Really Want to be Called a Christian?

This is all Satanic dogma being recycled over and over again in a new jacket and that is why Dawkins hates the Bible because Yahushua opposes and exposes his Satanic dogma. Yahushua was not interested in Greek "protogenoi" or a "selfish gene". Yahushua worshiped and obeyed his Father Yahuah and laid down his own life to save us and that destroys Dawkins' theory of natural selection which will never give him eternal life.

Dawkins - A Disciple of Babylon

Yes Dawkins' religion is the age-old religion of Satan where the self is elevated and to an unprecedented level in the last days.

2Pe 3:3  Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days SCOFFERS, walking after their OWN LUSTS,

2Ti 3:1  This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come.

2Ti 3:2  For men shall be lovers of their own selves (SELFISH), covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, morally unpure,

2Ti 3:3  Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, DESPISERS OF THOSE THAT ARE GOOD.

2Ti 3:4  Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of Elohim;

2Ti 3:5  Having a form of godliness (religion/piety eg Dawkins humanism), but denying (contradicting) the power thereof: from such turn away.

Come out of this "Evolutionist Torahless Church" of Richard Dawkins which is the Roman Catholic Church dogma. Remember Dawkins' fellow atheist (and actress) Julia Sweeney recounts how her Catholic "Father" Tom told her the Bible is myth as well. Catholicism is against Yahuah and his Torah. The Vatican mocks the power of Yahuah by saying he could not create everything in six days as Yahuah declares. Yahuah is the liar and the Pope is true- NOT!!!

Catholicism is here only to try and destroy people's belief in Yahuah and hand them over to serve Satan.

Rev 18:4  Then I heard another voice from shamayim (pw heaven) saying, “Come out of her, my people, lest you take part in her torah transgressions (pw sins), lest you share in her plagues;

Rev 18:5  for her torah transgressions (pw sins) are heaped high as shamayim (pw heaven), and Elohim (pw God) has remembered her iniquities (torahlessness).

Rev 18:6  Pay her back as she herself has paid back others, and repay her double for her deeds; mix a double portion for her in the cup she mixed.

Rev 18:7  As she glorified herself and lived in luxury, so give her a like measure of torment and mourning, since in her heart she says, ‘I sit as a queen, I am no widow, and mourning I shall never see.’

Rev 18:8  For this reason her plagues will come in a single day, death and mourning and famine, and she will be burned up with fire; for mighty is Yah'uah (pw the LORD)  Elohim (pw God) who has judged her.”

Do not be fooled Dawkins is not an atheist - he keeps the Roman Catholic pagan invention and icon  - Christ Mass (See Saving Christmas) which he enjoys. He reminisces about Santa (SATAN) Clause and even attended Christ Mass Carols at King's College- he is most likely a Jesuit.

 "he does celebrate Christmas - and enjoys singing traditional Christmas carols each festive season."... told singer Jarvis Cocker that he happily wishes everyone a Merry Christmas - and used to have a tree when his daughter was younger...'I am perfectly happy on Christmas day to say Merry Christmas to everybody,' Dawkins said. 'I might sing Christmas carols - once I was privileged to be invited to Kings College, Cambridge, for their Christmas carols and loved it.

'My very first Christmas, maybe my second Christmas, there was a man called Sam who apparently dressed up as Father Christmas,' he said. 'All the children loved it, all completely fooled by Father Christmas being there.

'Eventually he said: 'Ho ho ho, it's time for me to go,' back to Greenland or wherever he comes from, so he left. Then I, the youngest of all of them, said: 'Sam's gone' and completely gave the game away to all the other children.'

'We are not kill joys, we are not scrooges,' he said. 'We give each other presents and when my daughter was a bit younger we would have a tree.

(ref https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1100842/Why-I-celebrate-Christmas-worlds-famous-atheist.html)

When Dawkins says "they are not scrooges." he is of course succumbing to peer group pressure which is seen in all false religion. One is more worried about pleasing people than obeying Yahuah which is why Yahushua rebuked the Pharisees.


After Dawkins declares  'I actually love most of the genuine Christmas carols."

My next question would be given the Immortal / Selfish Gene relgion / cult he follows which would be Dawkins' favorite Carol. My guess is the one that goes like this:

Hark now hear the angels ( pw angelos) sing

A king was born today

And man will live for evermore

Because of Christmas Day.

No, man shall not live for evermore because of Christ Mass day. Man does not have an "Immortal Gene" because of Christ Mass day. He has been cursed to die because of torah transgression ( pw sin). Pagan Christ Mass (Mithra 25 December ) of the Vatican is nowhere in the bible, only in Catholic dogma. Man is offered eternal life if and when he repents and accepts Yahushua as redeemer and obeys His Father Yahuah's Torah.  The Catholic Church believes it has immortality by some other way through a Eucharist / Transubstantiation cult  - the alchemy abomination involving playing with cell tissue and blood (gene alchemy??).

NO MAN has ever gone to shamayim (pw heaven) except Yahushua who was raised to life by his Father.

Joh 3:13  And no man hath ascended up to shamayim (pw heaven), but he that came down from shamayim , even the Son of man which is in shamayim.

The righteous (living and dead) will only be resurrected (receive immortality) at the last trumpet at the end and the wicked will be resurrected 1000 years later to be judged and destroyed (body and soul- ashes) , not spend  time in a place called "hell" enjoying smoking cigars with Hitler for eternity. The Bible is not a Hollywood Christ Mass Carol with which Dawkins can console himself with.

Dawkins Cryptically Reveals Who He Worships

In this video clip Dawkins answers the question posed to him by a person from the audience "What if you are wrong" with reference to who he worships ( or does not worship- however we have shown that to be untrue).  Dawkins answers the question with another question. He refers to other pagan gods which one could have worshiped and claims it is only time and geography  that "accidentlally" determines who you believe in. So he puts it all down to culture as if Yahuah's message has not been spread around the world as prophesied and where pagan culture is replaced by His Torah.

He refers to Central Africa, among other areas, and says if you were living there you would have maybe been worshiping the "Great Juju at the top of the mountain". He refers to others as well, the Viking's Woden and Thor ( who Dawkins still pays respect to indirectly since he follow the pagan calendar of the pope which bases the name "Wednesday" on this "Woden" and Thursday on Thor. So although Dawkins' time and place in history has changed Dawkins still chooses to follow the wrong religion and its calendar. See Whose Calendar Do You Follow? and Torahless Pope - Prophesied By Daniel

What is startling is that Dawkins uses a clever tactic in hiding who he worships at the end with his question:

"...and you can ask me the question, what if I'm wrong,  and what if your're wrong about the Great Juju at the bottom of the sea"

So, to some it would seem that Dawkins is mocking all religion with this "Juju" which in French might mean plaything (joujou) however it is not and it refers to an evil spirit worshiped in Africa to which he referred to, which is used for white or black magic. A monkey head is often used. However if one were not sharp one would have missed the fact that this Juju reference went from the top of the mountain to the bottom of the sea now, a different Juju or evil spirit. So who is this? Well, Dawkins is making it clearer so there is no mistake who this is.

Let the scriptures reveal it to us.

First we see Yahuah rebuking the Spirit of Pride - Self Achievement, Self Creation (Evolution), Similar to the Immortal / Selfish Gene of Humanism in Pharoah taught by the dragon in the rivers:

Eze 29:3  Speak, and say, Thus saith Yahuah Elohim; Behold, I am against thee, Pharaoh king of Egypt, the great dragon that lieth in the midst of his rivers, which hath said, My river is mine own, and I have made it for myself.

Isa 27:1  In that day Yahuah with his sore and great and strong sword shall punish leviathan the piercing serpent, even leviathan that crooked serpent; and he shall slay the dragon that is in the sea.

So, the waters of the river (typologically - people, nations) is where the spirit of the dragon's false doctrine largely resides at first (Egypt) and flows to the sea  where it is deeper (reaches more people nations, cultures globally). So, we see this dragon comes out the sea and scripture reveals it is the lying serpent from the Garden of Eden it is none other than the crooked serpent Satan who teaches the doctrines of Pharoah (Spiritual Egypt / Babylon). It is the doctrines of Baal which Catholicism and Freemasonry follow.


Devil's Chaplain"In A Devil's Chaplain, Richard Dawkins helps us to understand the worldview and thinking behind the theory of evolution. As he applies to be the devil's chaplain, it appears that Richard Dawkins is superbly qualified for the job"
ref The Devil's Chaplain_ Richard Dawkins on Christianity - The Christian Post

Yes Dawkins serves Satan but then we knew that already since you either serve your Father Yahuah and keep his commandments or you are a child of Satan.

Joh 8:43  Why do you not understand what I [Yahushua (pw Jesus)] say? It is because you cannot bear to hear my word [Torah].
Joh 8:44  You are of your father the devil, and your will is to do your father's desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks out of his own character, for he is a liar and the father of lies.
Joh 8:45  But because I tell the truth, you do not believe me.


Now those of you who do not know the etymology of "chaplain" I will explain. It is another Sunday worship term not in the bible. It is invented by the Satanic Catholic Church.

"Middle English chapelein, from Anglo-French, from Medieval Latin cappellanus, from cappella"  Meriam Webster related to "Chapel.  It is ultimately derived from the Late Latin word cappa, meaning "cloak." How did we get from a garment to a building? The answer to this question has to do with a shrine created to hold the sacred [another pagan word see sacred] cloak of St. Martin of Tours. In Medieval Latin, this shrine was called "cappella" (from a diminutive of cappa meaning "short cloak or cape") in reference to the relic it contained. Later, the meaning of "cappella" broadened to include any building that housed a sacred relic [another pagan practice] and eventually to a place of worship. Old French picked up the term as "chapele," which in turn passed into English as "chapel" in the 13th century.

The oldest Masonic Lodge existing is called St Mary's Chapel and is not a place of worship. Even Masons know the real meaning of "chapel". The Cistene chapel houses pagan relics of idolatry.  The church in general has become a cloak to secret societies.

"Most of the churches in Rome have special Chapels of Relics that house religious and sacred relics belonging to the Catholic Church... a relic can be anything ranging from body parts of saints, remains of the [so-called] idol - True Cross [see cross] or even just a piece of cloth that has been rubbed against the tomb of a saint. Most relics are openly displayed in Rome and people can visit and see them with little restrictions...Rome has made these relics to attract many viewers who pay a small fee to see them." (Vatican.com)

It is clear that Dawkins is into the occult - hiding under the cappa cloak of the Satanic Catholic Church, acting as their "chaplain". This is why Dawkins so enjoyed being in the King's College Chapel listening to Christ Mass carols.


At first one may think that Dawkins is attacking religion in general, the belief of a generic "god". But this is not true. As we have shown Dawkins serves the Devil. After all Satanism is a religion too.  While he may make attacks on Islam and other religions do not be fooled. There is one and only one religion that he is after and that is the true one which he tries to destroy.

The reality is that Dawkins' key enemy is the Creator who created organic life on earth in six days as he stated in Genesis. Dawkins' Evolution lie is primarliy after the one thing that makes the Almighty exlcusive in that he specifies the order of creation and the time taken. Evolution really only opposes this one and only living Elohim (pw God) Yahuah who writes his name יהוה  and excludes himself from all other religions and idols and further marks his people as those who keep the sabbath remembering and commemortating that he rested on the seventh day after creation. It is this religion primarily that Dawkins hates and that is because he serves Satan who hates the creator and his creation.

Dawkins loves the Catholic icon feast day Christ Mass / Chistmas. Celebrating such a thing is a religious act. This may seem a contradiction in what we are saying but we have shown that the Catholic church serves satan and Christ Mass is a satanic ritual. The Catholic church also does not accept the 6 days of creation and rejects the sabbath ( 7th day of rest) substituting it with SUNday worship. This is why Dawkins even claiming to be an atheist, has such a love for the Catholic Church's pagan Christmas which is nowhere commanded in scripture let alone the satanic ritual of the Eucharist  (Transubstantiation - How Low Can You Go? ).


 "Like Darwin, Dawkins argues that evolution is a blind process, demonstrating no concern for suffering "as an inherent consequence of natural selection."
ref The Devil's Chaplain_ Richard Dawkins on Christianity - The Christian Post

Notice how Dawkins focuses on the present world of suffering as an excuse to accuse the Creator of not existing. He shifts blame from Satan and man's choice to follow Satan and rather blames the Creator Yahuah as if He "sinned" and corrupted Creation.  He does not focus on the suffering that he and his fellow "scientists" are themselves bringing on the world by turning Yahuah's Torah upside down.

Neither does Dawkins focus on Yahuah's Son who came to offer us redemption through repentance and to remove us from death itself and the suffering of this corrupted world which is dying because of Torah transgression. Dawkins is Satan's messenger distracting you from the cause (Torah transgression) and the solution (redemption). This is the ultimate goal of that great deceiver Satan. Satan always wants to appear as the shining light and falsely accuses the Creator and those that follow him.

While Dawkins makes a big ado about so-called suffering so much so as to dedicate his lifetime to a Crusade against the Creator, when it comes to Satanic pedophilia he downplays this suffering as not being a big deal. Dawkins is definitely maligning the Righteous Creator while promoting the evil acts of the devil. He is indeed the promoter of suffering himself and should stop blaming the Creator. He has indeed upset even child protection agencies. 

Richard Dawkins, one of the world’s best-known and outspoken atheists, has provoked outrage among child protection agencies and experts after suggesting that recent child abuse scandals have been overblown.  In an interview in The Times magazine on Saturday (Sept. 7), Dawkins, 72, he said he was unable to condemn what he called “the mild pedophilia” he experienced at an English school when he was a child in the 1950s.

ref https://www.huffpost.com/entry/richard-dawkins-pedophilia_n_3895514

Richard Dawkins defends "mild pedophilia," says it does not cause "lasting harm"

The biologist and author described the sexual abuse that occurred among his former classmates as "mild touching up"


SEPTEMBER 10, 2013 11:47PM (UTC)

"In a recent interview with the Times magazine, Richard Dawkins attempted to defend what he called "mild pedophilia,"

which, he says, he personally experienced
as a young child and does not believe causes "lasting harm."

Dawkins went on to say that one of his former school masters "pulled me on his knee and put his hand inside my shorts,"

and that to condemn this "mild touching up"  as sexual abuse today would somehow be unfair.

"I am very conscious that you can't condemn people of an earlier era by the standards of ours. Just as we don't look back at the

18th and 19th centuries and  condemn people for racism in the same way as we would condemn a modern person for racism,

I look back a few decades to my childhood and see things like caning, like mild pedophilia, and can't find it in me to condemn

it by the same standards as I or anyone would today," he said.

Plus, he added, though his other classmates also experienced abuse at the hands of this teacher, "I don't think he did any of us lasting harm."

Child welfare experts responded to Dawkins' remarks with outrage -- and concern over their effect on survivors of abuse.

As noted by the Religion News Service, Peter Watt, director of child protection at the National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children,

called Dawkins'  defense of sexual assault "a terrible slight" to victims of such abuse.

"Mr. Dawkins seems to think that because a crime was committed a long time ago we should judge it in a different way," Watt continued.

"But we know that  the victims of sexual abuse suffer the same effects whether it was 50 years ago or yesterday."

Ref  https://www.salon.com/2013/09/10/richard_dawkins_defends_mild_pedophilia_says_it_does_not_cause_lasting_harm/

DAWKINS YOU ARE ON THE WRONG SIDEPentagram seen in Dawkins book cover

What does the bible say ?:

Luke 17:2 It would be better for him if a millstone were hung around his neck and he were cast into the sea than that he should cause one of these little ones to transgress torah.

1 Corinthians 6:18
Flee from sexual immorality. Every other sin a person commits is outside the body, but the sexually immoral person sins against his own body.

Ephesians 5:5
For you may be sure of this, that everyone who is sexually immoral or impure, or who is covetous (that is, an idolater), has no inheritance in the rulership (pw kingdom) of Mashiach (pw Christ) and Elohim (pw God).

But of course perverted Dawkins said people should give those  who follow the "Old Testament" aka Torah a wide birth and then I suppose pedophiles a narrow birth (??).

It is Satan who is destroyed on the Day Of Yahuah - the day of Judgment. So, Mr Dawkins we cannot be wrong, it is you who is on the wrong side, on the side of that great evil spirit of Juju / Satan or as the Freemasons call and serve - Jahbulon ( with the centre part "bul" being Bel or Baal of Babylon), it is you who is indeed wrong. We who serve Yahuah will see justice and truth and this message has gone out INTO THE WORLD so there is no excuse to say Muslims, Africans or anyone cannot hear this WORD of truth from the bible which exposes the Great Juju who is metaphorically at the bottom of the sea that you worshiip Mr Dawkins, who is none other than Satan (Lucifer  - who the pope also literally sings to at his pagan festival Easter [Ishtar]).

Is it any wonder that the satanic Pentagram is hidden in true occultic fashion on the cover of Dawkins First Edition of the "Greatest Show On Earth"? Through this book Dawkins is still promoting the lies about a so-called evolutionary  "tree of life" which was long disproven and which Darwin himself did not believe. Darwin referred to a thicket on a bank not a tree of life.

Dawkins' Lies and Disinformation:

 “we find ourselves perched on one tiny twig in the midst of a blossoming and flourishing TREE OF LIFE and it is no accident, but the direct consequence of evolution by non-random selection.”

Modern Science:

"But modern genetics has revealed that representing evolutionary history as A TREE IS MISLEADING, with scientists saying a more realistic way to represent the origins and inter-relatedness of species would be an impenetrable thicket. Darwin himself also wrote about evolution and ecosystems as a "tangled bank".
"We have no evidence at all that the tree of life is a reality,"
Eric Bapteste, an evolutionary biologist at the Pierre and Marie Curie University in Paris, told New Scientist magazine."

ref https://www.theguardian.com/science/2009/jan/21/charles-darwin-evolution-species-tree-life


"upsetting the genes" right now is being done with genetic modification (eg GMO foods, GM mosquitoes, lab grown human meat for human consumption (much to Dawkin's delight as per his social media. And of course now by injecting or planning to inject genetic chimeras ("human" fetus cell lines, pig, crab blood etc. etc. ) via vaccines into people. This is how they aim to destroy the world.  They indeed have the selfish gene and think the gene is indeed immortal. But Yahuah has said what he will do to these selfish ones who destroy the earth, His very creation:

Rev 11:18  And the nations were angry, and thy wrath is come, and the time of the dead, that they should be judged, and that thou shouldest give reward unto thy servants the prophets, and to the saints, and them that fear thy name [YAHUAH], small and great; and shouldest destroy them which destroy the earth.


We said we would come back to the image we presented earlier. Perhaps you saw the thumbs up in the image but take a look again. This is an occultic  /hidden ( satanic) message.  It is not a thumbs up it is the horned hand /devil's horns sign.

destroy minds reap sould
"The most likely early instigator of the devil horns' popularity in heavy metal, the occult-driven '60s and '70s rock act Coven, seemed bent on using the devil horns for the devil's purpose.

It might seem silly now, but if you take Coven's 1969 debut Witchcraft Destroys Minds and Reaps Souls at face value, the Chicago-based doom rockers' primary aim was indeed to spread the word of Satan. Of particular note is that the Mercury Records album's opening song is called "Black Sabbath," and that — here we go — some of the band members are blatantly holding up the devil horns on the back cover. With the 'evil' prayers during 'Coven in Charing Cross,'" AllMusic's Joe Viglione writes of Witchcraft's music itself, "Coven get a bit heavy-handed; the group goes over the top trying to push the black magic stuff. 'Pact With the Devil' is written 'Pack With the Devil' on the label, and the 13-plus minute 'Satanic Mass' is more of a curiosity piece than [a] musical adventure.""    
destroys minds reaps souls

ref  loudwire.com/where-did-metal-devil-horns-hand-come-from/

The Album Mantra as you can see is "Destroys Minds Reaps Souls" This is indeed Witchracft which the bible says is defined as rebellion against Yahuah ( and his Torah). This is the same religion Dawkins follows that wants to upset the genes, destroy Yahuah's creation through transhumanism for instance and wants to destroy minds by opposing the Torah and thus reap souls for satan ie. lose eternal life and end up in the lake of fire where body and soul will be destroyed.

Flag Counter